1. 20 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 14 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 14 5月, 2010 4 次提交
  4. 06 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 28 4月, 2010 2 次提交
  6. 15 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 04 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      net: convert multicast list to list_head · 22bedad3
      Jiri Pirko 提交于
      Converts the list and the core manipulating with it to be the same as uc_list.
      
      +uses two functions for adding/removing mc address (normal and "global"
       variant) instead of a function parameter.
      +removes dev_mcast.c completely.
      +exposes netdev_hw_addr_list_* macros along with __hw_addr_* functions for
       manipulation with lists on a sandbox (used in bonding and 80211 drivers)
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      22bedad3
  8. 27 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 25 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 23 2月, 2010 3 次提交
  11. 04 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  12. 26 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 23 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      e1000/e1000e: don't use small hardware rx buffers · 9926146b
      Jesse Brandeburg 提交于
      When testing the "e1000: enhance frame fragment detection" (and e1000e)
      patches we found some bugs with reducing the MTU size.  The 1024 byte
      descriptor used with the 1000 mtu test also (re) introduced the
      (originally) reported bug, and causes us to need the e1000_clean_tx_irq
      "enhance frame fragment detection" fix.
      
      So what has occured here is that 2.6.32 is only vulnerable for mtu <
      1500 due to the jumbo specific routines in both e1000 and e1000e.
      So, 2.6.32 needs the 2kB buffer len fix for those smaller MTUs, but
      is not vulnerable to the original issue reported.  It has been pointed
      out that this vulnerability needs to be patched in older kernels that
      don't have the e1000 jumbo routine.  Without the jumbo routines, we
      need the "enhance frame fragment detection" fix the e1000, old
      e1000e is only vulnerable for < 1500 mtu, and needs a similar
      fix.  We split the patches up to provide easy backport paths.
      
      There is only a slight bit of extra code when this fix and the
      original "enhance frame fragment detection" fixes are applied, so
      please apply both, even though it is a bit of overkill.
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9926146b
  14. 21 1月, 2010 2 次提交
  15. 08 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 03 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 19 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 14 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  20. 08 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 27 9月, 2009 11 次提交