- 15 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emil Tantilov 提交于
Following patch fixes warnings reported by `make namespacecheck` Reported by Stephen Hemminger CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Signed-off-by: NEmil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com> Tested-by: NStephen Ko <stephen.s.ko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Emil Tantilov 提交于
Remove functions that are declared, but not used in the driver. This patch fixes warnings reported by `make namespacecheck` Reported by Stephen Hemminger CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Signed-off-by: NEmil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com> Tested-by: NStephen Ko <stephen.s.ko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shannon Nelson 提交于
Signed-off-by: NShannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter P Waskiewicz Jr 提交于
82599 supports using either link flow control or priority flow control when in DCB mode. The dcbnl interface already supports sending down configurations through rtnetlink that can enable LFC when DCB is enabled, so the driver should take advantage of this. 82598 does not support using LFC when DCB is enabled, so explicitly disable it when we're in DCB mode. This means we always run in PFC mode when DCB is enabled. Signed-off-by: NPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 PJ Waskiewicz 提交于
When changing DCB parameters, ixgbe needs to have the MAC reset. The way the flow control code is setup today, PFC will be disabled on a reset. This patch adds a new flow control type for PFC, and then has the netlink layer take care of toggling which type of flow control to enable. Signed-off-by: NPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter P Waskiewicz Jr 提交于
The flow control handling is overly complicated and difficult to maintain. This patch cleans up the flow control handling and makes it much more explicit. It also adds 1G flow control autonegotiation, for 1G copper links, 1G KX links, and 1G fiber links. Signed-off-by: NPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter P Waskiewicz Jr 提交于
New year, new copyright date ranges. Also bump the driver version number to reflect many of the recent changes. Signed-off-by: NPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Eder 提交于
Fix this sparse warnings: drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:180:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_get_copper_link_capabilities_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:245:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_setup_fc_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:729:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_set_vmdq_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:773:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_set_vfta_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:897:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_read_analog_reg8_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:919:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_write_analog_reg8_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:940:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_read_i2c_eeprom_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c:1000:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_get_supported_physical_layer_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_dcb_82598.c:100:5: warning: symbol 'ixgbe_dcb_config_packet_buffers_82598' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NHannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Duyck 提交于
This adds support for Data Center Bridging (DCB) features in the ixgbe driver and adds an rtnetlink interface for configuring DCB to the kernel. The DCB feature support included are Priority Grouping (PG) - which allows bandwidth guarantees to be allocated to groups to traffic based on the 802.1q priority, and Priority Based Flow Control (PFC) - which introduces a new MAC control PAUSE frame which works at granularity of the 802.1p priority instead of the link (IEEE 802.3x). Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-