- 29 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 malahal@us.ibm.com 提交于
Now the rq->deadline can't be zero if the request is in the timeout_list, so there is no need to have next_set. There is no need to access a request's deadline field if blk_rq_timed_out is called on it. Signed-off-by: NMalahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Stern 提交于
This patch (as1159b) changes the timeout routines in the block core to use round_jiffies_up(). There's no point in rounding the timer deadline down, since if it expires too early we will have to restart it. The patch also removes some unnecessary tests when a request is removed from the queue's timer list. Signed-off-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We cannot abort a request if we raced with the timeout handler already, or with the IO completion. So make blk_abort_request() mark the request as complete, and only continue if we succeeded. Found and suggested by Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Only works for the generic request timer handling. Allows one to sporadically ignore request completions, thus exercising the timeout handling. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Mike Anderson 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Right now SCSI and others do their own command timeout handling. Move those bits to the block layer. Instead of having a timer per command, we try to be a bit more clever and simply have one per-queue. This avoids the overhead of having to tear down and setup a timer for each command, so it will result in a lot less timer fiddling. Signed-off-by: NMike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-