- 26 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yang Dongsheng 提交于
We need to fill inode when we found a node for it in delayed_nodes_tree. But we did not fill the ->last_trans currently, it will cause the test of xfstest/generic/311 fail. Scenario of the 311 is shown as below: Problem: (1). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT) (2). pwrite(test_fd, buf, 4096, 0) (3). close(test_fd) (4). drop_all_caches() <-------- "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" (5). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT) (6). fsync(test_fd); <-------- we did not get the correct log entry for the file Reason: When we re-open this file in (5), we would find a node in delayed_nodes_tree and fill the inode we are lookup with the information. But the ->last_trans is not filled, then the fsync() will check the ->last_trans and found it's 0 then say this inode is already in our tree which is commited, not recording the extents for it. Fix: This patch fill the ->last_trans properly and set the runtime_flags if needed in this situation. Then we can get the log entries we expected after (6) and generic/311 passed. Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
do_blockdev_direct_IO() increments and decrements the inode ->i_dio_count for each IO operation. It does this to protect against truncate of a file. Block devices don't need this sort of protection. For a capable multiqueue setup, this atomic int is the only shared state between applications accessing the device for O_DIRECT, and it presents a scaling wall for that. In my testing, as much as 30% of system time is spent incrementing and decrementing this value. A mixed read/write workload improved from ~2.5M IOPS to ~9.6M IOPS, with better latencies too. Before: clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 33], 5.00th=[ 34], 10.00th=[ 34], 20.00th=[ 34], | 30.00th=[ 34], 40.00th=[ 34], 50.00th=[ 35], 60.00th=[ 35], | 70.00th=[ 35], 80.00th=[ 35], 90.00th=[ 37], 95.00th=[ 80], | 99.00th=[ 98], 99.50th=[ 151], 99.90th=[ 155], 99.95th=[ 155], | 99.99th=[ 165] After: clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 95], 5.00th=[ 108], 10.00th=[ 129], 20.00th=[ 149], | 30.00th=[ 155], 40.00th=[ 161], 50.00th=[ 167], 60.00th=[ 171], | 70.00th=[ 177], 80.00th=[ 185], 90.00th=[ 201], 95.00th=[ 270], | 99.00th=[ 390], 99.50th=[ 398], 99.90th=[ 418], 99.95th=[ 422], | 99.99th=[ 438] In other setups, Robert Elliott reported seeing good performance improvements: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/557 The more applications accessing the device, the worse it gets. Add a new direct-io flags, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT, which tells do_blockdev_direct_IO() that it need not worry about incrementing or decrementing the inode i_dio_count for this caller. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) <elliott@hp.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 4月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
There are two problems in qgroup: a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K, qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup is not available to user. b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it, it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup. The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to write and release it in transaction committed. In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account when the data is written in commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
Currently, for pre_alloc or delay_alloc, the bytes will be accounted in space_info by the three guys. space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used. But on the other hand, in qgroup, there are only two counters to account the bytes, qgroup->reserved and qgroup->excl. And qg->reserved accounts bytes in space_info->bytes_may_use and qg->excl accounts bytes in space_info->used. So the bytes in space_info->reserved is not accounted in qgroup. If so, there is a window we can exceed the quota limit when bytes is in space_info->reserved. Example: # btrfs quota enable /mnt # btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt # for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done # sync # btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 20987904 20987904 0 10485760 --- --- qg->excl is 20987904 larger than max_excl 10485760. This patch introduce a new counter named may_use to qgroup, then there are three counters in qgroup to account bytes in space_info as below. space_info->bytes_may_use --- space_info->reserved --- space_info->used. qgroup->may_use --- qgroup->reserved --- qgroup->excl With this patch applied: # btrfs quota enable /mnt # btrfs qgroup limit -e 10M /mnt # for((i=0;i<20;i++));do fallocate -l 1M /mnt/data$i; done fallocate: /mnt/data9: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data10: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data11: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data12: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data13: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data14: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data15: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data16: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data17: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data18: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded fallocate: /mnt/data19: fallocate failed: Disk quota exceeded # sync # btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 9453568 9453568 0 10485760 --- --- Reported-by: NCyril SCETBON <cyril.scetbon@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Steps to reproduce: while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/btrfs_dir/file count=[fs_size * 75%] rm /btrfs_dir/file sync done And we'll see dd failed because btrfs return NO_SPACE. Reason: Normally, btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() in end to free fs space for next write, but sometimes it hadn't done work on time, because btrfs-cleaner thread get delayed-iputs from list before, but do iput() after next write. This is log: [ 2569.050776] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() begin [ 2569.084280] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() [ 2569.085418] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() done btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() [ 2569.087554] comm=sync func=btrfs_commit_transaction() end [ 2569.191081] comm=dd begin [ 2569.790112] comm=dd func=__btrfs_buffered_write() ret=-28 [ 2569.847479] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 0 + 32677888 = 32677888 [ 2569.849530] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 32677888 + 23834624 = 56512512 ... [ 2569.903893] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=add_pinned_bytes() 943976448 + 21762048 = 965738496 [ 2569.908270] comm=btrfs-cleaner func=btrfs_evict_inode() end Fix: Make btrfs_commit_transaction() wait current running btrfs-cleaner's delayed-iputs() done in end. Test: Use script similar to above(more complex), before patch: 7 failed in 100 * 20 loop. after patch: 0 failed in 100 * 20 loop. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Now that no one is using rw, remove it completely. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The rw parameter to direct_IO is redundant with iov_iter->type, and treated slightly differently just about everywhere it's used: some users do rw & WRITE, and others do rw == WRITE where they should be doing a bitwise check. Simplify this with the new iov_iter_rw() helper, which always returns either READ or WRITE. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Most filesystems call through to these at some point, so we'll start here. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 4月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
btrfs_evict_inode() needs to be more careful about stealing from the global_rsv. We dont' want to end up aborting commit with ENOSPC just because the evict_inode code was too greedy. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When truncate starts, it allocates some space in the block reserves so that we'll have enough to update metadata along the way. For very large files, we can easily go through all of that space as we loop through the extents. This changes truncate to refill the space reservation as it progresses through the file. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order to delete the corresponding crcs. This adds accounting so that we keep track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build up too much delayed crc work. This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global reserves. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we are deleting large files with large extents, we are building up a huge set of delayed refs for processing. Truncate isn't checking often enough to see if we need to back off and process those, or let a commit proceed. The end result is long stalls after the rm, and very long commit times. During the commits, other processes back up waiting to start new transactions and we get into trouble. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guenter Roeck 提交于
Building alpha:allmodconfig fails with fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function 'check_direct_IO': fs/btrfs/inode.c:8050:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iov_iter_alignment' due to a missing include file. Fixes: 3737c63e1fb0 ("fs: move struct kiocb to fs.h") Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
struct kiocb now is a generic I/O container, so move it to fs.h. Also do a #include diet for aio.h while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are keeping track of how many extents we need to reserve properly based on the amount we want to write, but we were still incrementing outstanding_extents if we wrote less than what we requested. This isn't quite right since we will be limited to our max extent size. So instead lets do something horrible! Keep track of how many outstanding_extents we reserved, and decrement each time we allocate an extent. If we use our entire reserve make sure to jack up outstanding_extents on the inode so the accounting works out properly. Thanks, Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I introduced a regression wrt outstanding_extents accounting. These are tricky areas that aren't easily covered by xfstests as we could change MAX_EXTENT_SIZE at any time. So add sanity tests to cover the various conditions that are tricky in order to make sure we don't introduce regressions in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
My fix Btrfs: fix merge delalloc logic only fixed half of the problems, it didn't fix the case where we have two large extents on either side and then join them together with a new small extent. We need to instead keep track of how many extents we have accounted for with each side of the new extent, and then see how many extents we need for the new large extent. If they match then we know we need to keep our reservation, otherwise we need to drop our reservation. This shows up with a case like this [BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE+4K][4K HOLE][BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE+4K] Previously the logic would have said that the number extents required for the new size (3) is larger than the number of extents required for the largest side (2) therefore we need to keep our reservation. But this isn't the case, since both sides require a reservation of 2 which leads to 4 for the whole range currently reserved, but we only need 3, so we need to drop one of the reservations. The same problem existed for splits, we'd think we only need 3 extents when creating the hole but in reality we need 4. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
My patch to properly count outstanding extents wrt MAX_EXTENT_SIZE introduced a regression when re-dirtying already dirty areas. We have logic in split to make sure we are taking the largest space into account but didn't have it for merge, so it was sometimes making us think we were turning a tiny extent into a huge extent, when in reality we already had a huge extent and needed to use the other side in our logic. This fixes the regression that was reported by a user on list. Thanks, Reported-by: NMarkus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert kmalloc(nr * size, ..) to kmalloc_array that does additional overflow checks, the zeroing variant is kcalloc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 03 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
A block-local variable stores error code but btrfs_get_blocks_direct may not return it in the end as there's a ret defined in the function scope. CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.6+ Fixes: d187663e ("Btrfs: lock extents as we map them in DIO") Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
On our gluster boxes we stream large tar balls of backups onto our fses. With 160gb of ram this means we get really large contiguous ranges of dirty data, but the way our ENOSPC stuff works is that as long as it's contiguous we only hold metadata reservation for one extent. The problem is we limit our extents to 128mb, so we'll end up with at least 800 extents so our enospc accounting is quite a bit lower than what we need. To keep track of this make sure we increase outstanding_extents for every multiple of the max extent size so we can be sure to have enough reserved metadata space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We do this to get the space accounting, but this is just needless churn on the io_tree, so just drop setting/clearing delalloc and just drop the reserved data space when we have a successfull allocation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have this weird dance where we always inc outstanding_extents when we do a O_DIRECT write, even if we allocate the entire range. To get around this we also drop the metadata space if we successfully write. This is an unnecessary dance, we only need to jack up outstanding_extents if we don't satisfy the entire range request in get_blocks_direct, otherwise we are good using our original reservation. So drop the unconditional inc and the drop of the metadata space that we have for the unconditional inc. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 chandan r 提交于
This patch adds a new member to the 'struct btrfs_inode' structure to hold the file creation time. Signed-off-by: Nchandan <chandanrmail@gmail.com> [refreshed, removed btrfs_inode_otime] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
They just opencode taking address of the timespec member. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
So we can check raid56 with: (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) instead of long: (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)) Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Currently there's a 4B hole in the structure between refs and state and there are only 16 bits used so we can make it unsigned. This will get a better packing and may save some stack space for local variables. The size of extent_state gets reduced by 8B and there are usually a lot of slab objects. struct extent_state { u64 start; /* 0 8 */ u64 end; /* 8 8 */ struct rb_node rb_node; /* 16 24 */ wait_queue_head_t wq; /* 40 24 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ atomic_t refs; /* 64 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ long unsigned int state; /* 72 8 */ u64 private; /* 80 8 */ /* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 7 */ /* sum members: 84, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ }; Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The errors are worth noting and might get missed with INFO level. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Several messages that point to some internal problem, level INFO is wrong here. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Now that we never use the backing_dev_info pointer in struct address_space we can simply remove it and save 4 to 8 bytes in every inode. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Reviewed-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
If the found_key is NULL, then btrfs_find_item becomes a verbose wrapper for simple btrfs_search_slot. After we've removed all such callers, passing a NULL key is not valid anymore. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 03 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
In btrfs_mkdir(), if it fails to create dir, we should clean up existed items, setting inode's link properly to make sure it could be cleaned up properly. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If right after starting the snapshot creation ioctl we perform a write against a file followed by a truncate, with both operations increasing the file's size, we can get a snapshot tree that reflects a state of the source subvolume's tree where the file truncation happened but the write operation didn't. This leaves a gap between 2 file extent items of the inode, which makes btrfs' fsck complain about it. For example, if we perform the following file operations: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdd $ mount /dev/vdd /mnt $ xfs_io -f \ -c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 32K 0 32K" \ -c "fsync" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 32770 16K 32770" \ -c "truncate 90123" \ /mnt/foobar and the snapshot creation ioctl was just called before the second write, we often can get the following inode items in the snapshot's btree: item 120 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 7987 itemsize 160 inode generation 146 transid 7 size 90123 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 flags 0x0 item 121 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 7967 itemsize 20 inode ref index 282 namelen 10 name: foobar item 122 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 7914 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1104855040 nr 32768 extent data offset 0 nr 32768 ram 32768 extent compression 0 item 123 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 53248) itemoff 7861 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 extent data offset 0 nr 40960 ram 40960 extent compression 0 There's a file range, corresponding to the interval [32K; ALIGN(16K + 32770, 4096)[ for which there's no file extent item covering it. This is because the file write and file truncate operations happened both right after the snapshot creation ioctl called btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(), which means we didn't start and wait for the ordered extent that matches the write and, in btrfs_setsize(), we were able to call btrfs_cont_expand() before being able to commit the current transaction in the snapshot creation ioctl. So this made it possibe to insert the hole file extent item in the source subvolume (which represents the region added by the truncate) right before the transaction commit from the snapshot creation ioctl. Btrfs' fsck tool complains about such cases with a message like the following: "root 331 inode 257 errors 100, file extent discount" >From a user perspective, the expectation when a snapshot is created while those file operations are being performed is that the snapshot will have a file that either: 1) is empty 2) only the first write was captured 3) only the 2 writes were captured 4) both writes and the truncation were captured But never capture a state where only the first write and the truncation were captured (since the second write was performed before the truncation). A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When doing a fsync with a fast path we have a time window where we can miss the fact that writeback of some file data failed, and therefore we endup returning success (0) from fsync when we should return an error. The steps that lead to this are the following: 1) We start all ordered extents by calling filemap_fdatawrite_range(); 2) We do some other work like locking the inode's i_mutex, start a transaction, start a log transaction, etc; 3) We enter btrfs_log_inode(), acquire the inode's log_mutex and collect all the ordered extents from inode's ordered tree into a list; 4) But by the time we do ordered extent collection, some ordered extents we started at step 1) might have already completed with an error, and therefore we didn't found them in the ordered tree and had no idea they finished with an error. This makes our fsync return success (0) to userspace, but has no bad effects on the log like for example insertion of file extent items into the log that point to unwritten extents, because the invalid extent maps were removed before the ordered extent completed (in inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io). So after collecting the ordered extents just check if the inode's i_mapping has any error flags set (AS_EIO or AS_ENOSPC) and leave with an error if it does. Whenever writeback fails for a page of an ordered extent, we call mapping_set_error (done in extent_io.c:end_extent_writepage, called by extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_writepage) that sets one of those error flags in the inode's i_mapping flags. This change also has the side effect of fixing the issue where for fast fsyncs we never checked/cleared the error flags from the inode's i_mapping flags, which means that a full fsync performed after a fast fsync could get such errors that belonged to the fast fsync - because the full fsync calls btrfs_wait_ordered_range() which calls filemap_fdatawait_range(), and the later checks for and clears those flags, while for fast fsyncs we never call filemap_fdatawait_range() or anything else that checks for and clears the error flags from the inode's i_mapping. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If cow_file_range_inline() failed, when called from compress_file_range(), we were tagging the locked page for writeback, end its writeback and unlock it, but not marking it with an error nor setting AS_EIO in inode's mapping flags. This made it impossible for a caller of filemap_fdatawrite_range (writepages) or filemap_fdatawait_range() to know that an error happened. And the return value of compress_file_range() is useless because it's returned to a workqueue task and not to the task calling filemap_fdatawrite_range (writepages). This change applies on top of the previous patchset starting at the patch titled: "[1/5] Btrfs: set page and mapping error on compressed write failure" Which changed extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() to use SetPageError and mapping_set_error(). Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
To avoid duplicating this double filemap_fdatawrite_range() call for inodes with async extents (compressed writes) so often. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
For compressed writes, after doing the first filemap_fdatawrite_range() we don't get the pages tagged for writeback immediately. Instead we create a workqueue task, which is run by other kthread, and keep the pages locked. That other kthread compresses data, creates the respective ordered extent/s, tags the pages for writeback and unlocks them. Therefore we need a second call to filemap_fdatawrite_range() if we have compressed writes, as this second call will wait for the pages to become unlocked, then see they became tagged for writeback and finally wait for the writeback to finish. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Its return value is useless, its single caller ignores it and can't do anything with it anyway, since it's a workqueue task and not the task calling filemap_fdatawrite_range (writepages) nor filemap_fdatawait_range(). Failure is communicated to such functions via start and end of writeback with the respective pages tagged with an error and AS_EIO flag set in the inode's imapping. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Shilong Wang 提交于
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb # mount -t btrfs /dev/sdb /mnt -o compress=lzo # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data bs=$((33*4096)) count=1 after previous steps, inode will be detected as bad compression ratio, and NOCOMPRESS flag will be set for that inode. Reason is that compress have a max limit pages every time(128K), if a 132k write in, it will be splitted into two write(128k+4k), this bug is a leftover for commit 68bb462d(Btrfs: don't compress for a small write) Fix this problem by checking every time before compression, if it is a small write(<=blocksize), we bail out and fall into nocompression directly. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-