Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 5月, 2010 4 次提交
  3. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h

percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  5. 23 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 16 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 03 3月, 2010 4 次提交
    • M
      regulator: Provide optional dummy regulator for consumers · 34abbd68
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      In order to ease transitions with drivers are boards start using regulators
provide an option to cause all regulator_get() calls to succeed, with a
dummy always on regulator being supplied where one has not been configured.
A warning is printed whenever the dummy regulator is used to aid system
development.

This regulator does not implement any regulator operations but will allow
simple consumers which only do enable() and disable() calls to run. It
is kept separate from the fixed voltage regulator to avoid Kconfig
confusion on the part of users when it is extended to allow boards to
explicitly use the dummy regulator to simplify cases where the majority
of supplies are from fixed regulators without software control.

This option is currently only effective for systems which do not specify
full constriants. If required an override could also be provided to allow
these systems to use the dummy regulator, though it is likely that
unconfigured supplies on such systems will lead to error due to
regulators being powered down more aggressively when not in use.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      34abbd68
    • M
      regulator: Assume regulators are enabled if they don't report anything · 9a7f6a4c
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      If a regulator driver does not provide a way to query if the driver is
enabled then assume that it is enabled.  This is very likely to reflect
the actual state is more useful for callers than reporting an error.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      9a7f6a4c
    • M
      regulator: Allow regulators to specify the time taken to ramp on enable · 31aae2be
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      Regulators may sometimes take longer to enable than the control operation
used to do so, either because the regulator has ramp rate control used to
limit inrush current or because the control operation is very fast (GPIO
being the most common example of this).  In order to ensure that consumers
do not rely on the regulator before it is enabled provide an enable_time()
operation and have the core delay for that time before returning to the
caller.

This is implemented as a function since the ramp rate may be specified in
voltage per unit time and therefore the time depend on the configuration.
In future it would be desirable to allow the bulk operations to run the
delays for multiple enables in parallel but this is not currently supported.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      31aae2be
    • M
      regulator: Add notifier event on regulator disable · 84b68263
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      The intended use case is for drivers which disable regulators to save
power but need to do some work to restore the hardware state when
restarting.  If the supplies are not actually disabled due to board
limits or sharing with other active devices this notifier allows the
driver to avoid unneeded reinitialisation, particularly when used with
runtime PM.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      84b68263
  11. 12 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 17 12月, 2009 8 次提交
  15. 16 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 22 9月, 2009 10 次提交
  19. 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 29 4月, 2009 4 次提交
  23. 31 3月, 2009 4 次提交
    • M
      regulator: Support disabling of unused regulators by machines · ca725561
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      At present it is not possible for machine constraints to disable
regulators which have been left on when the system starts, for example
as a result of fixed default configurations in hardware. This means that
power may be wasted by these regulators if they are not in use.

Provide intial support for this with a late_initcall which will disable
any unused regulators if the machine has enabled this feature by calling
regulator_has_full_constraints(). If this has not been called then print
a warning to encourage users to fully specify their constraints so that
we can change this to be the default behaviour in future.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      ca725561
    • M
      regulator: Don't increment use_count for boot_on regulators · 50f07596
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      Don't set use_count for regulators that are enabled at boot since this
stops the supply being disabled by well-behaved consumers which do
balanced enables and disabled. Any consumers which don't do disables
which are not matched by enables are unable to share regulators - shared
regulators are the common case so the API should facilitate them.

Consumers that want to disable regulators that are enabled when they
start have two options:

 - Do a regulator_enable() prior to the disable to bring the use count
   in sync with the hardware state; this will ensure that if the
   regulator was enabled by another driver then this consumer will play
   nicely with it.
 - Use regulator_force_disable(); this explicitly bypasses any checks
   done by the core and documents the inability of the driver to share
   the supply.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      50f07596
    • D
      regulator: refcount fixes · cd94b505
      由 David Brownell 提交于 
      Fix some refcounting issues in the regulator framework, supporting
regulator_disable() for regulators that were enabled at boot time
via machine constraints:

 - Update those regulators' usecounts after enabling, so they
   can cleanly be disabled at that level.

 - Remove the problematic per-consumer usecount, so there's
   only one level of enable/disable.

Buggy consumers could notice different bug symptoms.  The main
example would be refcounting bugs; also, any (out-of-tree) users
of the experimental regulator_set_optimum_mode() stuff which
don't call it when they're done using a regulator.

This is a net minor codeshrink.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      cd94b505
    • M
      regulator: Don't warn if we failed to get a regulator · 1dc60343
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      The consumer can print a message if required, some consumers may have
optional regulators and wish to downgrade the logging for them or ignore
their absence.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      1dc60343