- 04 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The code used to ignore GSO completely, passing either way too small or zero pkts_acked when GSO skb or part of it got ACKed. In addition, there is no need to calculate the value in the loop but simple arithmetics after the loop is sufficient. There is no need to handle SYN case specially because congestion control modules are not yet initialized when FLAG_SYN_ACKED is set. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 5月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
State could become inconsistent in two cases: 1) Userspace disabled FRTO by tuning sysctl when one of the TCP flows was in the middle of FRTO algorithm (and then RTO is again triggered) 2) SACK reneging occurs during FRTO algorithm A simple solution is just to abort the previous FRTO when such obscure condition occurs... Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The conservative spurious RTO response did not queue CWR even though the sending rate was lowered. Whenever reduction happens regardless of reason, CWR should be sent (forgetting to send it is not very fatal though). A better approach would be to queue CWR when one of the sending rate reducing responses (rate-halving one or this conservative response) is used already at RTO. Doing that would allow CWR to be sent along with the two new data segments that are sent during FRTO. However, it's a bit "racy" because userland could tune the response sysctl to a more aggressive one in between. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 4月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This is a corner case where less than MSS sized new data thingie is awaiting in the send queue. For F-RTO to work correctly, a new data segment must be sent at certain point or F-RTO cannot be used at all. RFC4138 allows overriding of Nagle at that point. Implementation uses frto_counter states 2 and 3 to distinguish when Nagle override is needed. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
No new data is needed until the first ACK comes, so no need to check for application limitedness until then. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 35 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Do some simple changes to make congestion control API faster/cleaner. * use ktime_t rather than timeval * merge rtt sampling into existing ack callback this means one indirect call versus two per ack. * use flags bits to store options/settings Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This is (mostly) automated change using magic: sed -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e '/struct sock \*sk/ N' -e 's|struct sock \*sk,[\n\t ]*struct tcp_sock \*tp\([^{]*\n{\n\)| struct sock \*sk\1\tstruct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);\n|g' -e 's|struct sock \*sk, struct tcp_sock \*tp| struct sock \*sk|g' -e 's|sk, tp\([^-]\)|sk\1|g' Fixed four unused variable (tp) warnings that were introduced. In addition, manually added newlines after local variables and tweaked function arguments positioning. $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1) ... $ codiff -fV built-in.o.old built-in.o.new net/ipv4/route.c: rt_cache_flush | +14 1 function changed, 14 bytes added net/ipv4/tcp.c: tcp_setsockopt | -5 tcp_sendpage | -25 tcp_sendmsg | -16 3 functions changed, 46 bytes removed net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: tcp_try_undo_recovery | +3 tcp_try_undo_dsack | +2 tcp_mark_head_lost | -12 tcp_ack | -15 tcp_event_data_recv | -32 tcp_rcv_state_process | -10 tcp_rcv_established | +1 7 functions changed, 6 bytes added, 69 bytes removed, diff: -63 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c: update_send_head | -9 tcp_transmit_skb | +19 tcp_cwnd_validate | +1 tcp_write_wakeup | -17 __tcp_push_pending_frames | -25 tcp_push_one | -8 tcp_send_fin | -4 7 functions changed, 20 bytes added, 63 bytes removed, diff: -43 built-in.o.new: 18 functions changed, 40 bytes added, 178 bytes removed, diff: -138 Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
When a transmitted packet is looped back directly, CHECKSUM_PARTIAL maps to the semantics of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. Therefore we should treat it as such in the stack. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the transport header, it is still legal to touch skb->h.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the cases where the transport header is being set to a offset from skb->data. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the cases where the network header is being set to a offset from skb->data. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the network header, it is still legal to touch skb->nh.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the mac header, it is still legal to touch skb->mac.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. This one also converts some more cases to skb_reset_mac_header() that my regex missed as it had no spaces before nor after '=', ugh. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
That is equal to skb->head before skb_reserve, to help in the layer header changes. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Add whitespace around keywords. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This allows the write queue implementation to be changed, for example, to one which allows fast interval searching. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 James Morris 提交于
Where appropriate, convert references to xtime.tv_sec to the get_seconds() helper function. Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Undoing ssthresh is disabled in fastretrans_alert whenever FLAG_ECE is set by clearing prior_ssthresh. The clearing does not protect FRTO because FRTO operates before fastretrans_alert. Moving the clearing of prior_ssthresh earlier seems to be a suboptimal solution to the FRTO case because then FLAG_ECE will cause a second ssthresh reduction in try_to_open (the first occurred when FRTO was entered). So instead, FRTO falls back immediately to the rate halving response, which switches TCP to CA_CWR state preventing the latter reduction of ssthresh. If the first ECE arrived before the ACK after which FRTO is able to decide RTO as spurious, prior_ssthresh is already cleared. Thus no undoing for ssthresh occurs. Besides, FLAG_ECE should be set also in the following ACKs resulting in rate halving response that sees TCP is already in CA_CWR, which again prevents an extra ssthresh reduction on that round-trip. If the first ECE arrived before RTO, ssthresh has already been adapted and prior_ssthresh remains cleared on entry because TCP is in CA_CWR (the same applies also to a case where FRTO is entered more than once and ECE comes in the middle). High_seq must not be touched after tcp_enter_cwr because CWR round-trip calculation depends on it. I believe that after this patch, FRTO should be ECN-safe and even able to take advantage of synergy benefits. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
A local variable for icsk was created but this change was missing. Spotted by Jarek Poplawski. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
New sysctl tcp_frto_response is added to select amongst these responses: - Rate halving based; reuses CA_CWR state (default) - Very conservative; used to be the only one available (=1) - Undo cwr; undoes ssthresh and cwnd reductions (=2) The response with rate halving requires a new parameter to tcp_enter_cwr because FRTO has already reduced ssthresh and doing a second reduction there has to be prevented. In addition, to keep things nice on 80 cols screen, a local variable was added. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The reordering detection must work also when FRTO has not been used at all which was the original intention of mine, just the expression of the idea was flawed. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Implements the SACK-enhanced FRTO given in RFC4138 using the variant given in Appendix B. RFC4138, Appendix B: "This means that in order to declare timeout spurious, the TCP sender must receive an acknowledgment for non-retransmitted segment between SND.UNA and RecoveryPoint in algorithm step 3. RecoveryPoint is defined in conservative SACK-recovery algorithm [RFC3517]" The basic version of the FRTO algorithm can still be used also when SACK is enabled. To enabled SACK-enhanced version, tcp_frto sysctl is set to 2. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
To be honest, I'm not too sure how the reord stuff works in the first place but this seems necessary. When FRTO has been active, the one and only retransmission could be unnecessary but the state and sending order might not be what the sacktag code expects it to be (to work correctly). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
TCP without FRTO would be in Loss state with small cwnd. FRTO, however, leaves cwnd (typically) to a larger value which causes ssthresh to become too large in case RTO is triggered again compared to what conventional recovery would do. Because consecutive RTOs result in only a single ssthresh reduction, RTO+cumulative ACK+RTO pattern is required to trigger this event. A large comment is included for congestion control module writers trying to figure out what CA_EVENT_FRTO handler should do because there exists a remote possibility of incompatibility between FRTO and module defined ssthresh functions. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Previously RETRANS bits were cleared on the entry to FRTO. We postpone that into tcp_enter_frto_loss, which is really the place were the clearing should be done anyway. This allows simplification of the logic from a clearing loop to the head skb clearing only. Besides, the other changes made in the previous patches to tcp_use_frto made it impossible for the non-SACKed FRTO to be entered if other than the head has been rexmitted. With SACK-enhanced FRTO (and Appendix B), however, there can be a number retransmissions in flight when RTO expires (same thing could happen before this patchset also with non-SACK FRTO). To not introduce any jumpiness into the packet counting during FRTO, instead of clearing RETRANS bits from skbs during entry, do it later on. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
This interpretation comes from RFC4138: "If the sender implements some loss recovery algorithm other than Reno or NewReno [FHG04], the F-RTO algorithm SHOULD NOT be entered when earlier fast recovery is underway." I think the RFC means to say (especially in the light of Appendix B) that ...recovery is underway (not just fast recovery) or was underway when it was interrupted by an earlier (F-)RTO that hasn't yet been resolved (snd_una has not advanced enough). Thus, my interpretation is that whenever TCP has ever retransmitted other than head, basic version cannot be used because then the order assumptions which are used as FRTO basis do not hold. NewReno has only the head segment retransmitted at a time. Therefore, walk up to the segment that has not been SACKed, if that segment is not retransmitted nor anything before it, we know for sure, that nothing after the non-SACKed segment should be either. This assumption is valid because TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS does not leave holes but each non-SACKed segment is rexmitted in-order. Check for retrans_out > 1 avoids more expensive walk through the skb list, as we can know the result beforehand: F-RTO will not be allowed. SACKed skb can turn into non-SACked only in the extremely rare case of SACK reneging, in this case we might fail to detect retransmissions if there were them for any other than head. To get rid of that feature, whole rexmit queue would have to be walked (always) or FRTO should be prevented when SACK reneging happens. Of course RTO should still trigger after reneging which makes this issue even less likely to show up. And as long as the response is as conservative as it's now, nothing bad happens even then. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
FRTO controls cwnd when it still processes the ACK input or it has just reverted back to conventional RTO recovery; the normal rules apply when FRTO has reverted to standard congestion control. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Because TCP is not in Loss state during FRTO recovery, fast recovery could be triggered by accident. Non-SACK FRTO is more robust than not yet included SACK-enhanced version (that can receiver high number of duplicate ACKs with SACK blocks during FRTO), at least with unidirectional transfers, but under extraordinary patterns fast recovery can be incorrectly triggered, e.g., Data loss+ACK losses => cumulative ACK with enough SACK blocks to meet sacked_out >= dupthresh condition). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Since purpose is to reduce CWND, we prevent immediate growth. This is not a major issue nor is "the correct way" specified anywhere. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
The FRTO detection did not care how ACK pattern affects to cwnd calculation of the conventional recovery. This caused incorrect setting of cwnd when the fallback becames necessary. The knowledge tcp_process_frto() has about the incoming ACK is now passed on to tcp_enter_frto_loss() in allowed_segments parameter that gives the number of segments that must be added to packets-in-flight while calculating the new cwnd. Instead of snd_una we use FLAG_DATA_ACKED in duplicate ACK detection because RFC4138 states (in Section 2.2): If the first acknowledgment after the RTO retransmission does not acknowledge all of the data that was retransmitted in step 1, the TCP sender reverts to the conventional RTO recovery. Otherwise, a malicious receiver acknowledging partial segments could cause the sender to declare the timeout spurious in a case where data was lost. If the next ACK after RTO is duplicate, we do not retransmit anything, which is equal to what conservative conventional recovery does in such case. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Handles RFC4138 shortcoming (in step 2); it should also have case c) which ignores ACKs that are not duplicates nor advance window (opposite dir data, winupdate). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Retransmission counter assumptions are to be changed. Forcing reason to do this exist: Using sysctl in check would be racy as soon as FRTO starts to ignore some ACKs (doing that in the following patches). Userspace may disable it at any moment giving nice oops if timing is right. frto_counter would be inaccessible from userspace, but with SACK enhanced FRTO retrans_out can include other than head, and possibly leaving it non-zero after spurious RTO, boom again. Luckily, solution seems rather simple: never go directly to Open state but use Disorder instead. This does not really change much, since TCP could anyway change its state to Disorder during FRTO using path tcp_fastretrans_alert -> tcp_try_to_open (e.g., when a SACK block makes ACK dubious). Besides, Disorder seems to be the state where TCP should be if not recovering (in Recovery or Loss state) while having some retransmissions in-flight (see tcp_try_to_open), which is exactly what happens with FRTO. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
In case a latency spike causes more than one RTO, the later should not cause the already reduced ssthresh to propagate into the prior_ssthresh since FRTO declares all such RTOs spurious at once or none of them. In treating of ssthresh, we mimic what tcp_enter_loss() does. The previous state (in frto_counter) must be available until we have checked it in tcp_enter_frto(), and also ACK information flag in process_frto(). Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
Moved comments out from the body of process_frto() to the head (preferred way; see Documentation/CodingStyle). Bonus: it's much easier to read in this compacted form. FRTO algorithm and implementation is described in greater detail. For interested reader, more information is available in RFC4138. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
In addition, removed inline. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
FRTO spurious RTO detection algorithm (RFC4138) does not include response to a detected spurious RTO but can use different response algorithms. Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-