Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 10月, 2008 10 次提交
  3. 05 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 04 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      nfsd: common grace period control · af558e33
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      Rewrite grace period code to unify management of grace period across
lockd and nfsd.  The current code has lockd and nfsd cooperate to
compute a grace period which is satisfactory to them both, and then
individually enforce it.  This creates a slight race condition, since
the enforcement is not coordinated.  It's also more complicated than
necessary.

Here instead we have lockd and nfsd each inform common code when they
enter the grace period, and when they're ready to leave the grace
period, and allow normal locking only after both of them are ready to
leave.

We also expect the locks_start_grace()/locks_end_grace() interface here
to be simpler to build on for future cluster/high-availability work,
which may require (for example) putting individual filesystems into
grace, or enforcing grace periods across multiple cluster nodes.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      af558e33
  7. 30 9月, 2008 12 次提交
  9. 02 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 09 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      [NFSD] uninline nfsd4_op_name() · f1c7f79b
      由 Adrian Bunk 提交于 
      There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason why nfsd4_op_name() is
marked as "inline":

It's only used in a dprintk(), and as long as it has only one caller
non-ancient gcc versions anyway inline it automatically.

This patch fixes the following compile error with gcc 3.4:

  ...
    CC      fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.o
  nfs4proc.c: In function `nfsd4_proc_compound':
  nfs4proc.c:854: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
  nfs4proc.c:897: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
  make[3]: *** [fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.o] Error 1
Reported-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
[ Also made it "const char *"  - Linus]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f1c7f79b
  13. 31 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      fs/nfsd/export.c: Adjust error handling code involving auth_domain_put · 53e6d8d1
      由 Julia Lawall 提交于 
      Once clp is assigned, it never becomes NULL, so we can make a label for it
in the error handling code.  Because the call to path_lookup follows the
call to auth_domain_find, its error handling code should jump to this new
label.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@r@
expression x,E;
statement S;
position p1,p2,p3;
@@

(
if ((x = auth_domain_find@p1(...)) == NULL || ...) S
|
x = auth_domain_find@p1(...)
... when != x
if (x == NULL || ...) S
)
<...
if@p3 (...) { ... when != auth_domain_put(x)
                  when != if (x) { ... auth_domain_put(x); ...}
    return@p2 ...;
}
...>
(
return x;
|
return 0;
|
x = E
|
E = x
|
auth_domain_put(x)
)

@exists@
position r.p1,r.p2,r.p3;
expression x;
int ret != 0;
statement S;
@@

* x = auth_domain_find@p1(...)
  <...
* if@p3 (...)
  S
  ...>
* return@p2 \(NULL\|ret\);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      53e6d8d1
  15. 27 7月, 2008 3 次提交
  17. 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 19 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  21. 16 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 10 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • O
      rpc: bring back cl_chatty · b6b6152c
      由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于 
      The cl_chatty flag alows us to control whether a given rpc client leaves

	"server X not responding, timed out"

messages in the syslog.  Such messages make sense for ordinary nfs
clients (where an unresponsive server means applications on the
mountpoint are probably hanging), but not for the callback client (which
can fail more commonly, with the only result just of disabling some
optimizations).

Previously cl_chatty was removed, do to lack of users; reinstate it, and
use it for the nfsd's callback client.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      b6b6152c
  25. 08 7月, 2008 2 次提交
    • B
      nfsd: take file and mnt write in nfs4_upgrade_open · e518f056
      由 Benny Halevy 提交于 
      testing with newpynfs revealed this warning:
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: writeable file with no mnt_want_write()
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: WARNING: at /usr0/export/dev/bhalevy/git/linux-pnfs-bh-nfs41/include/linux/fs.h:855 drop_file_write_access+0x6b/0x7e()
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: Modules linked in: nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: Call Trace:
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadc88:  [<6002f471>] warn_on_slowpath+0x54/0x8e
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadcc8:  [<601b790d>] printk+0xa0/0x793
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadd38:  [<601b6205>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1db/0x1ea
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadd68:  [<7107d4d5>] nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op+0x2a6/0x31c [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadda8:  [<60078dc9>] drop_file_write_access+0x6b/0x7e
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaaddc8:  [<710804e4>] nfsd4_open_downgrade+0x114/0x1de [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaade08:  [<71076215>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x1ba/0x2dc [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaade48:  [<71068221>] nfsd_dispatch+0xe5/0x1c2 [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaade88:  [<71312f81>] svc_process+0x3fd/0x714 [sunrpc]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadea8:  [<60039a81>] kernel_sigprocmask+0xf3/0x100
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadee8:  [<7106874b>] nfsd+0x182/0x29b [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadf48:  [<60021cc9>] run_kernel_thread+0x41/0x4a
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadf58:  [<710685c9>] nfsd+0x0/0x29b [nfsd]
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadf98:  [<60021cb0>] run_kernel_thread+0x28/0x4a
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: 6eaadfc8:  [<60013829>] new_thread_handler+0x72/0x9c
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel:
Jul  3 07:32:50 buml kernel: ---[ end trace 2426dd7cb2fba3bf ]---

Bruce Fields suggested this (Thanks!):
maybe we need to be doing a mnt_want_write on open_upgrade and mnt_put_write on downgrade?

This patch adds a call to mnt_want_write and file_take_write (which is
doing the actual work).

The counter-calls mnt_drop_write a file_release_write are now being properly
called by drop_file_write_access in the exact path printed by the warning
above.
Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
      e518f056
    • J
      nfsd: document open share bit tracking · 4f83aa30
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      It's not immediately obvious from the code why we're doing this.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
      4f83aa30
  27. 05 7月, 2008 1 次提交