1. 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      ARM: OMAP2+: wakeupgen: AM43x adaptation · 6246cd06
      Afzal Mohammed 提交于
      AM43x has 224 interrupts and 7 banks, make it as maximum values. Keep
      default values as earlier, if am43x is detected, update interrupts and
      banks accordingly.
      
      Also AM43x has only one cpu, ensure that clearing bitmask at wakeupgen
      is done only for the single existing cpu, existing code assumes that
      there are two cpu's.
      
      If bitmask is cleared in wakeupgen for the nonexistent second cpu,
      an imprecise abort happens as soon as Kernel switches to user space.
      It was rootcaused by Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NAfzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      6246cd06
  2. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users · 8bd26e3a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
      rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
      and all __CPUINIT from assembly code.  It also had two ".previous"
      section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
      (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8bd26e3a
  3. 02 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 13 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      irqchip: Move ARM gic.h to include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h · 520f7bd7
      Rob Herring 提交于
      Now that we have GIC moved to drivers/irqchip and all GIC DT init for
      platforms using irqchip_init, move gic.h and update the remaining
      includes.
      Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
      Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
      Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
      Cc: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
      Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>
      Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
      Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
      Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      520f7bd7
  5. 21 9月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 13 9月, 2012 4 次提交
    • P
      ARM: OMAP4: wakeupgen: remove duplicate AUXCOREBOOT* read/write · 3c5dc4a7
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      The wakeupgen context-save code reads and stores the AUXCOREBOOT0 and
      AUXCOREBOOT1 register contents twice.  This seems like a waste of
      time, so, remove the duplicates.
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      3c5dc4a7
    • S
      ARM: OMAP4: wakeupgen: Fix the typo in AUXCOREBOOT register save · ecc335fc
      Santosh Shilimkar 提交于
      The wakeupgen context-save code reads AUXCOREBOOT0 register
      instead of AUXCOREBOOT1 register contents while saving AUXCOREBOOT1.
      
      Fix the same.
      Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      ecc335fc
    • T
      ARM: OMAP: Split plat/hardware.h, use local soc.h for omap2+ · dbc04161
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      As the plat and mach includes need to disappear for single zImage work,
      we need to remove plat/hardware.h.
      
      Do this by splitting plat/hardware.h into omap1 and omap2+ specific files.
      
      The old plat/hardware.h already has omap1 only defines, so it gets moved
      to mach/hardware.h for omap1. For omap2+, we use the local soc.h
      that for now just includes the related SoC headers to keep this patch more
      readable.
      
      Note that the local soc.h still includes plat/cpu.h that can be dealt
      with in later patches. Let's also include plat/serial.h from common.h for
      all the board-*.c files. This allows making the include files local later
      on without patching these files again.
      
      Note that only minimal changes are done in this patch for the
      drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c driver to keep things compiling. Further
      patches are needed to eventually remove cpu_is_omap usage in the drivers.
      
      Also only minimal changes are done to sound/soc/omap/* to remove the
      unneeded includes and to define OMAP44XX_MCPDM_L3_BASE locally so there's
      no need to include omap44xx.h.
      
      While at it, also sort some of the includes in the standard way.
      
      Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
      Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
      Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
      Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NWim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
      Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      dbc04161
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Prepare for irqs.h removal · 7d7e1eba
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      As the interrupts should only be defined in the platform_data, and
      eventually coming from device tree, there's no need to define them
      in header files.
      
      Let's remove the hardcoded references to irqs.h and fix up the includes
      so we don't rely on headers included in irqs.h. Note that we're
      defining OMAP_INTC_START as 0 to the interrupts. This will be needed
      when we enable SPARSE_IRQ. For some drivers we need to add
      #include <plat/cpu.h> for now until these drivers are fixed to
      remove cpu_is_omapxxxx() usage.
      
      While at it, sort som of the includes the standard way, and add
      the trailing commas where they are missing in the related data
      structures.
      
      Note that for drivers/staging/tidspbridge we just define things
      locally.
      
      Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      7d7e1eba
  7. 05 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP4: Fix array size for irq_target_cpu · e534e871
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      If NR_IRQS is less than MAX_IRQS, we end up writing past the
      irq_target_cpu array in omap_wakeupgen_init():
      
      /* Associate all the IRQs to boot CPU like GIC init does. */
      for (i = 0; i < max_irqs; i++)
      	irq_target_cpu[i] = boot_cpu;
      
      This can happen if SPARSE_IRQ is enabled as by default NR_IRQS is
      set to 16. Without this patch we're overwriting other data during
      the boot.
      
      Looks like a similar fix was posted by Benoit Cousson earlier
      as "ARM: OMAP2+: wakeupgen: Fix wrong array size for irq_target_cpu"
      but was lost.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      e534e871
  8. 09 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 13 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      ARM: OMAP2+: declare file-local functions as static · 8c3d4534
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Several function declarations used only in the files in which they're
      declared should include the static keyword, but don't:
      
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c:248:6: warning: symbol 'cmdline_find_option' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:259:6: warning: symbol 'irq_sar_clear' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:878:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_vibra_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:882:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_audio_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:201:29: warning: symbol 'omap_panda_wlan_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:393:24: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:403:12: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:464:6: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c:434:6: warning: symbol 'omap_init_hsmmc' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:12: warning: symbol 'hwspinlocks_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:58:12: warning: symbol 'omap1_dm_timer_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/fpga.c:90:6: warning: symbol 'innovator_fpga_IRQ_demux' was not declared. Should it be static?
      
      Mark all of these as static.
      
      Thanks to Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for pointing out a typo in the
      original patch description.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Govindraj R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
      Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Cc: David Anders <x0132446@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      8c3d4534
  10. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 09 12月, 2011 3 次提交