1. 13 7月, 2006 1 次提交
    • X
      [TCP] tcp_highspeed: Fix AI updates. · 6150c22e
      Xiaoliang (David) Wei 提交于
      I think there is still a problem with the AIMD parameter update in
      HighSpeed TCP code.
      
      Line 125~138 of the code (net/ipv4/tcp_highspeed.c):
      
      	/* Update AIMD parameters */
      	if (tp->snd_cwnd > hstcp_aimd_vals[ca->ai].cwnd) {
      		while (tp->snd_cwnd > hstcp_aimd_vals[ca->ai].cwnd &&
      		       ca->ai < HSTCP_AIMD_MAX - 1)
      			ca->ai++;
      	} else if (tp->snd_cwnd < hstcp_aimd_vals[ca->ai].cwnd) {
      		while (tp->snd_cwnd > hstcp_aimd_vals[ca->ai].cwnd &&
      		       ca->ai > 0)
      			ca->ai--;
      
      In fact, the second part (decreasing ca->ai) never decreases since the
      while loop's inequality is in the reverse direction. This leads to
      unfairness with multiple flows (once a flow happens to enjoy a higher
      ca->ai, it keeps enjoying that even its cwnd decreases)
      
      Here is a tentative fix (I also added a comment, trying to keep the
      change clear):
      Acked-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6150c22e
  2. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 18 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 03 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 06 5月, 2006 1 次提交
    • J
      [TCP]: Fix snd_cwnd adjustments in tcp_highspeed.c · 5528e568
      John Heffner 提交于
      Xiaoliang (David) Wei wrote:
      > Hi gurus,
      > 
      >    I am reading the code of tcp_highspeed.c in the kernel and have a
      > question on the hstcp_cong_avoid function, specifically the following
      > AI part (line 136~143 in net/ipv4/tcp_highspeed.c ):
      > 
      >                /* Do additive increase */
      >                if (tp->snd_cwnd < tp->snd_cwnd_clamp) {
      >                        tp->snd_cwnd_cnt += ca->ai;
      >                        if (tp->snd_cwnd_cnt >= tp->snd_cwnd) {
      >                                tp->snd_cwnd++;
      >                                tp->snd_cwnd_cnt -= tp->snd_cwnd;
      >                        }
      >                }
      > 
      >    In this part, when (tp->snd_cwnd_cnt == tp->snd_cwnd),
      > snd_cwnd_cnt will be -1... snd_cwnd_cnt is defined as u16, will this
      > small chance of getting -1 becomes a problem?
      > Shall we change it by reversing the order of the cwnd++ and cwnd_cnt -= 
      > cwnd?
      
      Absolutely correct.  Thanks.
      Signed-off-by: NJohn Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5528e568
  6. 13 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 18 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  8. 11 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  9. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
    • A
      [ICSK]: Move TCP congestion avoidance members to icsk · 6687e988
      Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
      This changeset basically moves tcp_sk()->{ca_ops,ca_state,etc} to inet_csk(),
      minimal renaming/moving done in this changeset to ease review.
      
      Most of it is just changes of struct tcp_sock * to struct sock * parameters.
      
      With this we move to a state closer to two interesting goals:
      
      1. Generalisation of net/ipv4/tcp_diag.c, becoming inet_diag.c, being used
         for any INET transport protocol that has struct inet_hashinfo and are
         derived from struct inet_connection_sock. Keeps the userspace API, that will
         just not display DCCP sockets, while newer versions of tools can support
         DCCP.
      
      2. INET generic transport pluggable Congestion Avoidance infrastructure, using
         the current TCP CA infrastructure with DCCP.
      Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6687e988
  10. 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交