1. 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
  3. 21 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 07 12月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 10 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  6. 08 11月, 2007 4 次提交
  7. 11 10月, 2007 7 次提交
  8. 27 9月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 26 9月, 2007 1 次提交
  10. 17 9月, 2007 2 次提交
  11. 31 8月, 2007 1 次提交
    • W
      SCTP: Fix to encode PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause correctly · 00f1c2df
      Wei Yongjun 提交于
      PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause in ABORT is bad encode when make abort
      chunk. When SCTP encode ABORT chunk with PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause,
      it just add the error messages to PROTOCOL VIOLATION error cause, the
      rest four bytes(struct sctp_paramhdr) is just add to the chunk, not
      change the length of error cause. This cause the ABORT chunk to be a bad
      format. The chunk is like this:
      
      ABORT chunk
        Chunk type: ABORT (6)
        Chunk flags: 0x00
        Chunk length: 72 (*1)
        Protocol violation cause
          Cause code: Protocol violation (0x000d)
          Cause length: 62 (*2)
          Cause information: 5468652063756D756C61746976652074736E2061636B2062...
          Cause padding: 0000
      [Needless] 00030010
      Chunk Length(*1) = 72 but Cause length(*2) only 62, not include the
      extend 4 bytes.
      ((72 - sizeof(chunk_hdr)) = 68) != (62 +3) / 4 * 4
      Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      00f1c2df
  12. 14 6月, 2007 2 次提交
  13. 05 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • V
      [SCTP]: Set assoc_id correctly during INIT collision. · 07d93967
      Vlad Yasevich 提交于
      During the INIT/COOKIE-ACK collision cases, it's possible to get
      into a situation where the association id is not yet set at the time
      of the user event generation.  As a result, user events have an
      association id set to 0 which will confuse applications.
      
      This happens if we hit case B of duplicate cookie processing.
      In the particular example found and provided by Oscar Isaula
      <Oscar.Isaula@motorola.com>, flow looks like this:
      A				B
      ---- INIT------->  (lost)
      	    <---------INIT------
      ---- INIT-ACK--->
      	    <------ Cookie ECHO
      
      When the Cookie Echo is received, we end up trying to update the
      association that was created on A as a result of the (lost) INIT,
      but that association doesn't have the ID set yet.
      Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      07d93967
  14. 26 4月, 2007 3 次提交
  15. 20 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  16. 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 14 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  18. 03 12月, 2006 5 次提交