- 28 1月, 2008 36 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This is trivial, in that they're both effectively the same for the base relocations anyways. SH-5 doesn't need the unaligned bits, and has a few extra relocations, which are never hit on non-SH5 parts. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 25 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kay Sievers 提交于
All kobjects require a dynamically allocated name now. We no longer need to keep track if the name is statically assigned, we can just unconditionally free() all kobject names on cleanup. Signed-off-by: NKay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
There is no need for kobject_unregister() anymore, thanks to Kay's kobject cleanup changes, so replace all instances of it with kobject_put(). Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
Stop using kobject_register, as this way we can control the sending of the uevent properly, after everything is properly initialized. Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 07 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
The ST40 stuff in-tree hasn't built for some time, and hasn't been updated for over 3 years. ST maintains their own out-of-tree changes and rebases occasionally, and that's ultimately where all of the ST40 users go anyways. In order for the ST40 code to be brought up to date most of the stuff removed in this changeset would have to be rewritten anyways, so there's very little benefit in keeping the remnants around either. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-