- 17 11月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Arend van Spriel 提交于
Testing revealed the IF ADD event contains the interface index of the new interface. This would result in a NULL pointer access when handling the event. Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Arend van Spriel 提交于
The brcmf_add_if() function had a struct device as parameter to accomodate the bus specific code to use this function. The driver has been reworked so the bus specific code does not need this function. Better replace the parameter with a more specific driver object, ie. struct brcmf_pub. Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Arend van Spriel 提交于
Handling of firmware event has been reworked into a seperate code file. The change is needed as firmware event can be received in interrupt context. Decoupling of the event handling has been lowered to allow event processing to sleep. Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-