- 23 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Bligh 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Bligh <mbligh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
-
- 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交于
for_each_cpu() actually iterates across all possible CPUs. We've had mistakes in the past where people were using for_each_cpu() where they should have been iterating across only online or present CPUs. This is inefficient and possibly buggy. We're renaming for_each_cpu() to for_each_possible_cpu() to avoid this in the future. This patch replaces for_each_cpu with for_each_possible_cpu under /net Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: N"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 06 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
percpu_data blindly allocates bootmem memory to store NR_CPUS instances of cpudata, instead of allocating memory only for possible cpus. As a preparation for changing that, we need to convert various 0 -> NR_CPUS loops to use for_each_cpu(). (The above only applies to users of asm-generic/percpu.h. powerpc has gone it alone and is presently only allocating memory for present CPUs, so it's currently corrupting memory). Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Acked-by: NWilliam Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 04 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
To help in reducing the number of include dependencies, several files were touched as they were getting needed headers indirectly for stuff they use. Thanks also to Alan Menegotto for pointing out that net/dccp/proto.c had linux/dccp.h include twice. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
the patch below marks various variables const in net/; the goal is to move them to the .rodata section so that they can't false-share cachelines with things that get written to, as well as potentially helping gcc a bit with optimisations. (these were found using a gcc patch to warn about such variables) Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Hawkes 提交于
In 'net' change the explicit use of for-loops and NR_CPUS into the general for_each_cpu() or for_each_online_cpu() constructs, as appropriate. This widens the scope of potential future optimizations of the general constructs, as well as takes advantage of the existing optimizations of first_cpu() and next_cpu(), which is advantageous when the true CPU count is much smaller than NR_CPUS. Signed-off-by: NJohn Hawkes <hawkes@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Of this type, mostly: CHECK net/ipv6/netfilter.c net/ipv6/netfilter.c:96:12: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_init' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv6/netfilter.c:101:6: warning: symbol 'ipv6_netfilter_fini' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
That groups all of the tables and variables associated to the TCP timewait schedulling/recycling/killing code, that now can be isolated from the TCP specific code and used by other transport protocols, such as DCCP. Next changeset will move this code to net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-