Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 10月, 2008 24 次提交
  3. 15 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 13 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      Automatic MODULE_ALIAS() for DMI match tables. · d945b697
      由 David Woodhouse 提交于 
      This makes modpost handle MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, xxxx).

I had to change the string pointers in the match table to char arrays,
and picked a size of 79 bytes almost at random -- do we need to make it
bigger than that? I was a bit concerned about the 'bloat' this
introduces into the match tables, but they should all be __initdata so
it shouldn't matter too much.

(Actually, modpost does go through the relocations and look at most of
them; it wouldn't be impossible to make it handle string pointers -- but
doesn't seem to be worth the effort, since they're __initdata).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      d945b697
  7. 12 10月, 2008 3 次提交
  9. 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 07 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      Marker depmod fix core kernel list · 87f3b6b6
      由 Mathieu Desnoyers 提交于 
      * Theodore Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu) wrote:
>
> I've been playing with adding some markers into ext4 to see if they
> could be useful in solving some problems along with Systemtap.  It
> appears, though, that as of 2.6.27-rc8, markers defined in code which is
> compiled directly into the kernel (i.e., not as modules) don't show up
> in Module.markers:
>
> kvm_trace_entryexit arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel  %u %p %u %u %u %u %u %u
> kvm_trace_handler arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel  %u %p %u %u %u %u %u %u
> kvm_trace_entryexit arch/x86/kvm/kvm-amd  %u %p %u %u %u %u %u %u
> kvm_trace_handler arch/x86/kvm/kvm-amd  %u %p %u %u %u %u %u %u
>
> (Note the lack of any of the kernel_sched_* markers, and the markers I
> added for ext4_* and jbd2_* are missing as wel.)
>
> Systemtap apparently depends on in-kernel trace_mark being recorded in
> Module.markers, and apparently it's been claimed that it used to be
> there.  Is this a bug in systemtap, or in how Module.markers is getting
> built?   And is there a file that contains the equivalent information
> for markers located in non-modules code?

I think the problem comes from "markers: fix duplicate modpost entry"
(commit d35cb360)

Especially :

  -   add_marker(mod, marker, fmt);
  +   if (!mod->skip)
  +     add_marker(mod, marker, fmt);
    }
    return;
   fail:

Here is a fix that should take care if this problem.

Thanks for the bug report!
Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Tested-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
CC: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
CC: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
CC: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com>
CC: Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@np.css.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      87f3b6b6
  13. 29 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 23 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 05 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 27 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      selinux: add support for installing a dummy policy (v2) · 93c06cbb
      由 Serge E. Hallyn 提交于 
      In August 2006 I posted a patch generating a minimal SELinux policy.  This
week, David P. Quigley posted an updated version of that as a patch against
the kernel.  It also had nice logic for auto-installing the policy.

Following is David's original patch intro (preserved especially
bc it has stats on the generated policies):

se interested in the changes there were only two significant
changes. The first is that the iteration through the list of classes
used NULL as a sentinel value. The problem with this is that the
class_to_string array actually has NULL entries in its table as place
holders for the user space object classes.

The second change was that it would seem at some point the initial sids
table was NULL terminated. This is no longer the case so that iteration
has to be done on array length instead of looking for NULL.

Some statistics on the policy that it generates:

The policy consists of 523 lines which contain no blank lines. Of those
523 lines 453 of them are class, permission, and initial sid
definitions. These lines are usually little to no concern to the policy
developer since they will not be adding object classes or permissions.
Of the remaining 70 lines there is one type, one role, and one user
statement. The remaining lines are broken into three portions. The first
group are TE allow rules which make up 29 of the remaining lines, the
second is assignment of labels to the initial sids which consist of 27
lines, and file system labeling statements which are the remaining 11.

In addition to the policy.conf generated there is a single file_contexts
file containing two lines which labels the entire system with base_t.

This policy generates a policy.23 binary that is 7920 bytes.

(then a few versions later...):

The new policy is 587 lines (stripped of blank lines) with 476 of those
lines being the boilerplate that I mentioned last time. The remaining
111 lines have the 3 lines for type, user, and role, 70 lines for the
allow rules (one for each object class including user space object
classes), 27 lines to assign types to the initial sids, and 11 lines for
file system labeling. The policy binary is 9194 bytes.

Changelog:

	Aug 26: Added Documentation/SELinux.txt
	Aug 26: Incorporated a set of comments by Stephen Smalley:
		1. auto-setup SELINUXTYPE=dummy
		2. don't auto-install if selinux is enabled with
			non-dummy policy
		3. don't re-compute policy version
		4. /sbin/setfiles not /usr/sbin/setfiles
	Aug 22: As per JMorris comments, made sure make distclean
		cleans up the mdp directory.
		Removed a check for file_contexts which is now
		created in the same file as the check, making it
		superfluous.
Signed-off-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Quigley <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      93c06cbb
  23. 22 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 06 8月, 2008 1 次提交