- 01 9月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The trick free_stateid is using is a little cheesy, and we'll have more uses for this field later. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Wow, I wonder how long that typo's been there. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the number of slots. Reported-by: NRick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't need this any more. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2011 13 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
When called with OPEN_STATE, preprocess_seqid_op only returns an open stateid, hence only an open owner. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We've got some lock-specific code here in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op which is only used by nfsd4_lock(). Move it to the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note that the special handling for the lock stateid case is already done by nfs4_check_openmode() (as of 02921914 "nfsd4: fix openmode checking on IO using lock stateid") so we no longer need these two cases in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This flag doesn't really buy us anything. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Share some common code, stop doing silly things like initializing a list head immediately before adding it to a list, etc. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
These appear to be generic (for both open and lock owners), but they're actually just for open owners. This has confused me more than once. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
For all the usual reasons. (Type safety, readability.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The server is returning nfserr_resource for both permanent errors and for errors (like allocation failures) that might be resolved by retrying later. Save nfserr_resource for the former and use delay/jukebox for the latter. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于
Even if we fail to write a recovery record, we should still mark the client as having acquired its first state. Otherwise we leave 4.1 clients with indefinite ERR_GRACE returns. However, an inability to write stable storage records may cause failures of reboot recovery, and the problem should still be brought to the server administrator's attention. So, make sure the error is logged. These errors shouldn't normally be triggered on a corectly functioning server--this isn't a case where a misconfigured client could spam the logs. Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move around some of this code, simplify a bit. Reviewed-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Acked-by: NJim Rees <rees@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
A client that wants to execute a file must be able to read it. Read opens over nfs are therefore implicitly allowed for executable files even when those files are not readable. NFSv2/v3 get this right by using a passed-in NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE on read requests, but NFSv4 has gotten this wrong ever since dc730e17 "nfsd4: fix owner-override on open", when we realized that the file owner shouldn't override permissions on non-reclaim NFSv4 opens. So we can't use NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE to tell nfsd_permission to allow reads of executable files. So, do the same thing we do whenever we encounter another weird NFS permission nit: define yet another NFSD_MAY_* flag. The industry's future standardization on 128-bit processors will be motivated primarily by the need for integers with enough bits for all the NFSD_MAY_* flags. Reported-by: NLeonardo Borda <leonardoborda@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Userspace shouldn't have a use for these constants. Nothing here is used outside fs/nfsd. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which map nfserr_symlink to other errors. In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred over less specific errors where possible. The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink error was introduced with v4. I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass. Delete these unnecessary exceptions. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Zero means "I don't care what kind of file this is". And that's probably what we want--acls are also settable at least on directories, and if the filesystem doesn't want them on other objects, leave it to it to complain. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Add some more comments, simplify logic, do & S_IFMT just once, name "type" more helpfully. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We allow the fh_verify caller to specify that any object *except* those of a given type is allowed, by passing a negative type. But only one caller actually uses it. Open-code that check in the one caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
A slightly unconventional approach to make the code more compact I could live with, but let's give the poor reader *some* chance. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Without this, an attempt to open a device special file without first stat'ing it will fail. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The set of errors here does *not* agree with the set of errors specified in the rfc! While we're there, turn this macros into a function, for the usual reasons, and move it to the one place where it's actually used. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernd Schubert 提交于
Fan Yong <yong.fan@whamcloud.com> noticed setting FMODE_32bithash wouldn't work with nfsd v4, as nfsd4_readdir() checks for 32 bit cookies. However, according to RFC 3530 cookies have a 64 bit type and cookies are also defined as u64 in 'struct nfsd4_readdir'. So remove the test for >32-bit values. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NBernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Casey Bodley 提交于
CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR is used in response to a broken lease; allowing it to break the lease and return EAGAIN leaves the client unable to make progress in returning the delegation nfs4_get_vfs_file() now takes struct nfsd4_open for access to the claim type, and calls nfsd_open() with NFSD_MAY_NOT_BREAK_LEASE when claim type is CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR Signed-off-by: NCasey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Both the filesystem and the lock manager can associate operations with a lock. Confusingly, one of them (fl_release_private) actually has the same name in both operation structures. It would save some confusion to give the lock-manager ops different names. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
just rewind it to the beginning before vfs_readdir() and be done with that... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
It's sort of ridiculous that we've never had a working reply cache for NFSv4. On the other hand, we may still not: our current reply cache is likely not very good, especially in the TCP case (which is the only case that matters for v4). What we really need here is some serious testing. Anyway, here's a start. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This simplifies cleanup a bit. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2011 9 次提交
-
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
Before nfs41 client's RECLAIM_COMPLETE done, nfs server should deny any new locks or opens. rfc5661: " Whenever a client establishes a new client ID and before it does the first non-reclaim operation that obtains a lock, it MUST send a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to FALSE, even if there are no locks to reclaim. If non-reclaim locking operations are done before the RECLAIM_COMPLETE, an NFS4ERR_GRACE error will be returned. " Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
Check in SEQUENCE that the request doesn't exceed maxreq_sz for the given session. Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Mi Jinlong 提交于
According to RFC5661, 18.36.3, "if the client selects a value for ca_maxresponsesize such that a replier on a channel could never send a response,the server SHOULD return NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL in the CREATE_SESSION reply." So, error out when the client sets a maxreq_sz less than the minimum possible SEQUENCE request size, or sets a maxresp_sz less than the minimum possible SEQUENCE reply size. Signed-off-by: NMi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Stateid's hold a read reference for a read open, a write reference for a write open, and an additional one of each for each read+write open. The latter wasn't getting put on a downgrade, so something like: open RW open R downgrade to R was resulting in a file leak. Also fix an imbalance in an error path. Regression from 7d947842 "nfsd4: fix downgrade/lock logic". Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Without this, for example, open read open read+write close will result in a struct file leak. Regression from 7d947842 "nfsd4: fix downgrade/lock logic". Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
This operation is used by the client to check the validity of a list of stateids. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
This operation is used by the client to tell the server to free a stateid. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
As promised in feature-removal-schedule.txt it is time to remove the nfsctl system call. Userspace has perferred to not use this call throughout 2.6 and it has been excluded in the default configuration since 2.6.36 (9 months ago). So this patch removes all the code that was being compiled out. There are still references to sys_nfsctl in various arch systemcall tables and related code. These should be cleaned out too, probably in the next merge window. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
DESTROY_CLIENTID MAY be preceded with a SEQUENCE operation as long as the client ID derived from the session ID of SEQUENCE is not the same as the client ID to be destroyed. If the client IDs are the same, then the server MUST return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY. (that's not implemented yet) If DESTROY_CLIENTID is not prefixed by SEQUENCE, it MUST be the only operation in the COMPOUND request (otherwise, the server MUST return NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP). This fixes the error return; before, we returned NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION; after this patch, we return NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP. Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <benny@tonian.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-