1. 24 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 23 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 07 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 14 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 14 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 08 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 17 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: clean up how the journal device name is printed · 05496769
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Calculate the journal device name once and stash it away in the
      journal_s structure.  This avoids needing to call bdevname()
      everywhere and reduces stack usage by not needing to allocate an
      on-stack buffer.  In addition, we eliminate the '/' that can appear in
      device names (e.g. "cciss/c0d0p9" --- see kernel bugzilla #11321) that
      can cause problems when creating proc directory names, and include the
      inode number to support ocfs2 which creates multiple journals with
      different inode numbers.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      05496769
  9. 14 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 08 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: Avoid printk floods in the face of directory corruption · 9d9f1775
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      Note: some people thinks this represents a security bug, since it
      might make the system go away while it is printing a large number of
      console messages, especially if a serial console is involved.  Hence,
      it has been assigned CVE-2008-3528, but it requires that the attacker
      either has physical access to your machine to insert a USB disk with a
      corrupted filesystem image (at which point why not just hit the power
      button), or is otherwise able to convince the system administrator to
      mount an arbitrary filesystem image (at which point why not just
      include a setuid shell or world-writable hard disk device file or some
      such).  Me, I think they're just being silly. --tytso
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg>
      9d9f1775
  12. 14 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  13. 09 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  14. 09 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 09 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 09 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks · a30d542a
      Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
      With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before
      we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure
      (ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This would mean
      silent data loss (We do a printk stating data will be lost). This patch
      updates the DIO and fallocate code path to do block reservation before
      block allocation. This is needed to make sure parallel DIO and fallocate
      request doesn't take block out of delayed reserve space.
      
      When free blocks count go below a threshold we switch to a slow patch
      which looks at other CPU's accumulated percpu counter values.
      Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a30d542a
  18. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 09 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  20. 10 10月, 2008 7 次提交
  21. 09 10月, 2008 6 次提交