Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 8月, 2012 5 次提交
    • O
      uprobes: Change uprobe_mmap() to ignore the errors but check fatal_signal_pending() · 5e5be71a
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Once install_breakpoint() fails uprobe_mmap() "ignores" all other
uprobes and returns the error.

It was never really needed to to stop after the first error, and
in fact it was always wrong at least in -ENOTSUPP case.

Change uprobe_mmap() to ignore the errors and always return 0.
This is not what we want in the long term, but until we teach
the callers to handle the failure it would be better to remove
the pointless complications. And this doesn't look too bad, the
only "reasonable" error is ENOMEM but in this case the caller
should be oom-killed in the likely case or the system has more
serious problems.

However it makes sense to stop if fatal_signal_pending() == T.
In particular this helps if the task was oom-killed.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      5e5be71a
    • O
      uprobes: Kill dup_mmap()->uprobe_mmap(), simplify uprobe_mmap/munmap · f1a45d02
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      1. Kill dup_mmap()->uprobe_mmap(), it was only needed to calculate
   new_mm->uprobes_state.count removed by the previous patch.

   If the forking process has a pending uprobe (int3) in vma, it will
   be copied by copy_page_range(), note that it checks vma->anon_vma
   so "Don't copy ptes" is not possible after install_breakpoint()
   which does anon_vma_prepare().

2. Remove is_swbp_at_addr() and "int count" in uprobe_mmap(). Again,
   this was needed for uprobes_state.count.

   As a side effect this fixes the bug pointed out by Srikar,
   this code lacked the necessary put_uprobe().

3. uprobe_munmap() becomes a nop after the previous patch. Remove the
   meaningless code but do not remove the helper, we will need it.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      f1a45d02
    • O
      uprobes: Kill uprobes_state->count · 647c42df
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      uprobes_state->count is only needed to avoid the slow path in
uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(). It is also checked in uprobe_munmap()
but ironically its only goal to decrement this counter. However,
it is very broken. Just some examples:

- uprobe_mmap() can race with uprobe_unregister() and wrongly
  increment the counter if it hits the non-uprobe "int3". Note
  that install_breakpoint() checks ->consumers first and returns
  -EEXIST if it is NULL.

  "atomic_sub() if error" in uprobe_mmap() looks obviously wrong
  too.

- uprobe_munmap() can race with uprobe_register() and wrongly
  decrement the counter by the same reason.

- Suppose an appication tries to increase the mmapped area via
  sys_mremap(). vma_adjust() does uprobe_munmap(whole_vma) first,
  this can nullify the counter temporarily and race with another
  thread which can hit the bp, the application will be killed by
  SIGTRAP.

- Suppose an application mmaps 2 consecutive areas in the same file
  and one (or both) of these areas has uprobes. In the likely case
  mmap_region()->vma_merge() suceeds. Like above, this leads to
  uprobe_munmap/uprobe_mmap from vma_merge()->vma_adjust() but then
  mmap_region() does another uprobe_mmap(resulting_vma) and doubles
  the counter.

This patch only removes this counter and fixes the compile errors,
then we will try to cleanup the changed code and add something else
instead.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      647c42df
    • S
      uprobes: Remove check for uprobe variable in handle_swbp() · 8bd87445
      由 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 提交于 
      by the time we get here (after we pass cleanup_ret) uprobe is always is
set. If it is NULL we leave very early in the code.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      8bd87445
    • S
      uprobes: Remove redundant lock_page/unlock_page · 61e1d394
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Since read_opcode() reads from the referenced page and doesnt modify
the page contents nor the page attributes, there is no need to lock
the page.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      61e1d394
  3. 30 7月, 2012 12 次提交
  5. 16 6月, 2012 15 次提交
  7. 08 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 06 6月, 2012 7 次提交
    • O
      uprobes: Kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id · 778b032d
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Kill the no longer needed uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id code.

It doesn't really work anyway. synchronize_srcu() can only
synchronize with the code "inside" the
srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock section, while
uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() does srcu_read_lock() _after_ we
already hit the breakpoint.

I guess this probably works "in practice". synchronize_srcu() is
slow and it implies synchronize_sched(), and the probed task
enters the non- preemptible section at the start of exception
handler. Still this is not right at least in theory, and
task->uprobe_srcu_id blows task_struct.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529193008.GG8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      778b032d
    • O
      uprobes: Teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu · 56bb4cf6
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Currently handle_swbp() assumes that it can't race with
unregister, so it roughly does:

	if (find_uprobe(vaddr))
		process_uprobe();
	else
		send_sig(SIGTRAP);

This relies on the not-really-working uprobes_srcu code we are
going to remove, see the next patch.

With this patch we rely on the result of
is_swbp_at_addr(bp_vaddr) if find_uprobe() fails.

If is_swbp == 1, then we hit the normal int3, we should send
SIGTRAP.

If is_swbp == 0, we raced with uprobe_unregister(), we simply
restart this insn again.

The "difficult" case is is_swbp == -EFAULT, when we can't read
this memory. In this case I think we should restart too, and
this is more correct compared to the current code which sends
SIGTRAP.

Ignoring ENOMEM/etc from get_user_pages(), this can only happen
if another thread unmaps this memory before find_active_uprobe()
takes mmap_sem. It would be better to pretend it was unmapped
before this insn was executed, restart, and get SIGSEGV.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192947.GF8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      56bb4cf6
    • O
      uprobes: Change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing · 77fc4af1
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing.
This is a bit unfortunate but hopefully not too bad, this is the
slow path anyway.

This is needed to ensure that find_active_uprobe() can not race
with uprobe_register() which adds the new bp at the same
bp_vaddr, after find_uprobe() fails and before
is_swbp_at_addr_fast() checks the memory.

IOW, this is needed to ensure that if find_active_uprobe()
returns NULL but is_swbp == true, we can safely assume that it
was the "normal" int3 and we should send SIGTRAP.

There is another reason for this change. We are going to replace
uprobes_state->count with MMF_ flags set by register/unregister
and cleared by find_active_uprobe(), and set/clear shouldn't
race with each other.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192928.GE8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      77fc4af1
    • O
      uprobes: Teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info · d790d346
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      A separate patch to simplify the review, and for the
documentation.

The patch adds another "int *is_swbp" argument to
find_active_uprobe(), so far its only caller doesn't use this
info.

With this patch find_active_uprobe() additionally does:

	- if find_vma() + ->vm_start check fails, *is_swbp = -EFAULT

	- otherwise, if valid_vma() + find_uprobe() fails, it holds
	  the result of is_swbp_at_addr(), can be negative too. The
	  latter is only possible if we raced with another thread
	  which did munmap/etc after we hit this bp.

IOW. If find_active_uprobe(&is_swbp) returns NULL, the caller
can look at is_swbp to figure out whether the current insn is bp
or not, or detect the race with another thread if it is
negative.

Note: I think that performance-wise this change is fine. This
adds is_swbp_at_addr(), but only if we raced with
uprobe_unregister() or if we hit the "normal" int3 but this mm
has uprobes as well. And even in this case the slow
read_opcode() path is very unlikely, this insn recently
triggered do_int3(), __copy_from_user_inatomic() shouldn't fail
in the likely case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192914.GD8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d790d346
    • O
      uprobes: Introduce find_active_uprobe() helper · 3a9ea052
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      No functional changes. Move the "find uprobe" code from
handle_swbp() to the new helper, find_active_uprobe().

Note: with or without this change, the find-active-uprobe logic
is not exactly right. We can race with another thread which
unmaps the memory with the valid uprobe before we take
mm->mmap_sem. We can't find this uprobe simply because
find_vma() fails. In this case we wrongly assume that this trap
was not caused by uprobe and send the erroneous SIGTRAP. See the
next changes.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192857.GC8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      3a9ea052
    • O
      uprobes: Change read_opcode() to use FOLL_FORCE · a3d7bb47
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      set_orig_insn()->read_opcode() should not fail if the probed
task did mprotect() after uprobe_register(), change it to use
FOLL_FORCE. Without FOLL_WRITE this doesn't have any "side"
effect but allows to read the !VM_READ memory.

There is another reason for this change, we are going to use
is_swbp_at_addr() from handle_swbp() which can race with another
thread doing mprotect().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192759.GB8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      a3d7bb47
    • O
      uprobes: Optimize is_swbp_at_addr() for current->mm · c00b2750
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Change is_swbp_at_addr() to try to avoid the costly
read_opcode() if mm == current->mm, __copy_from_user_inatomic()
should succeed in the likely case.

Currently this optimization is not important, but we are going
to add more is_swbp_at_addr(current->mm) callers.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120529192744.GA8057@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c00b2750