- 25 8月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
rpc_unlink() and rpc_rmdir() will dput the dentry reference for you. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> (cherry picked from a05a57effa71a1f67ccbfc52335c10c8b85f3f6a commit)
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signe-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> (cherry picked from 88bf6d811b01a4be7fd507d18bf5f1c527989089 commit)
-
- 22 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Panagiotis Issaris 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPanagiotis Issaris <takis@issaris.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sesterhenn 提交于
Hi, the coverity checker spotted that cred is always NULL when we jump to out_err ( there is just one case, when we fail to allocate the memory for cred ) This is Coverity ID #79 Signed-off-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If not, we cannot guarantee that idmap->idmap_dentry, gss_auth->dentry and clnt->cl_dentry are valid dentries. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This fixes a bug whereby if two processes try to look up the same auth_gss credential, they may end up creating two creds, and triggering two upcalls because the upcall is performed before the credential is added to the credcache. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we look up a new cred in the auth_gss downcall so that we can stuff the credcache, we do not want that lookup to queue up an upcall in order to initialise it. To do an upcall here not only redundant, but since we are already holding the inode->i_mutex, it will trigger a lock recursion. This patch allows rpcauth cache searches to indicate that they can cope with uninitialised credentials. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
gss_create_upcall() should not error just because rpc.gssd closed the pipe on its end. Instead, it should requeue the pending requests and then retry. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Not only are the qop parameters that are passed around throughout the gssapi unused by any currently implemented mechanism, but there appears to be some doubt as to whether they will ever be used. Let's just kill them off for now. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Add the code to the client side to handle privacy. This is dead code until we actually add privacy support to krb5. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Various xdr encode routines use au_rslack to guess where the reply argument will end up, so we can set up the xdr_buf to recieve data into the right place for zero copy. Currently we calculate the au_rslack estimate when we check the verifier. Normally this only depends on the verifier size. In the integrity case we add a few bytes to allow for a length and sequence number. It's a bit simpler to calculate only the verifier size when we check the verifier, and delay the full calculation till we unwrap. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2005 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This reverts 17f4e6febca160a9f9dd4bdece9784577a2f4524 commit.
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently rpc_mkdir/rpc_rmdir and rpc_mkpipe/mk_unlink have an API that's a little unfortunate. They take a path relative to the rpc_pipefs root and thus need to perform a full lookup. If you look at debugfs or usbfs they always store the dentry for directories they created and thus can pass in a dentry + single pathname component pair into their equivalents of the above functions. And in fact rpc_pipefs actually stores a dentry for all but one component so this change not only simplifies the core rpc_pipe code but also the callers. Unfortuntately this code path is only used by the NFS4 idmapper and AUTH_GSSAPI for which I don't have a test enviroment. Could someone give it a spin? It's the last bit needed before we can rework the lookup_hash API Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Add a generic mechanism for skipping over transport-specific headers when constructing an RPC request. This removes another "xprt->stream" dependency. Test-plan: Write-intensive workload on a single mount point (try both UDP and TCP). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean-up: get rid of unnecessary socket.h and in.h includes in the generic parts of the RPC client. Test-plan: Compile kernel with CONFIG_NFS enabled. Version: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:06:23 -0400 Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Currently we return -ENOMEM for every single failure to create a new auth. This is actually accurate for auth_null and auth_unix, but for auth_gss it's a bit confusing. Allow rpcauth_create (and the ->create methods) to return errors. With this patch, the user may sometimes see an EINVAL instead. Whee. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We shouldn't be silently falling back from krb5p to krb5i. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-