- 30 5月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The tree modification log together with the current state of the tree gives a consistent, old version of the tree. btrfs_search_old_slot is used to search through this old version and return old (dummy!) extent buffers. Naturally, this function cannot do any tree modifications. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Record all relevant modifications to block pointers in the tree mod log so that we can rewind them later on for backref walking. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
When running functions that can make changes to the internal trees (e.g. btrfs_search_slot), we check if somebody may be interested in the block we're currently modifying. If so, we record our modification to be able to rewind it later on. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
The tree mod log will log modifications made fs-tree nodes. Most modifications are done by autobalance of the tree. Such changes are recorded as long as a block entry exists. When released, the log is cleaned. With the tree modification log, it's possible to reconstruct a consistent old state of the tree. This is required to do backref walking on a busy file system. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 26 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Three callers of btrfs_free_tree_block or btrfs_alloc_tree_block passed parameter for_cow = 1. In fact, these two functions should never mark their tree modification operations as for_cow, because they can change the number of blocks referenced by a tree. Hence, we remove the extra for_cow parameter from these functions and make them pass a zero down. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 06 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
verify_parent_transid needs to lock the extent range to make sure no IO is underway, and so it can safely clear the uptodate bits if our checks fail. But, a few callers are using it with spinlocks held. Most of the time, the generation numbers are going to match, and we don't want to switch to a blocking lock just for the error case. This adds an atomic flag to verify_parent_transid, and changes it to return EAGAIN if it needs to block to properly verifiy things. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
add_root_to_dirty_list happens once at the very beginning of the transaction, but it is still racey. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
btrfs_search_slot sometimes needs write locks on high levels of the tree. It remembers the highest level that needs a write lock and will use that for all future searches through the tree in a given call. But, very often we'll just cow the top level or the level below and we won't really need write locks on the root again after that. This patch changes things to adjust the write lock requirement as it unlocks levels. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This cuts down on the CPU time used by map_private_extent_buffer Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Because btrfs cow's we can end up with extent buffers that are no longer necessary just sitting around in memory. So instead of evicting these pages, we could end up evicting things we actually care about. Thus we have free_extent_buffer_stale for use when we are freeing tree blocks. This will make it so that the ref for the eb being in the radix tree is dropped as soon as possible and then is freed when the refcount hits 0 instead of waiting to be released by releasepage. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
balace_level() seems to deal with missing tree nodes by BUG_ON(). Instead, we can easily just set the file system readonly and bubble -EROFS back up the stack. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
__btrfs_cow_block(), the only caller of update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() any error return. Instead, we can go read-only fs as update_ref_for_cow() manipulates disk data in a way which doesn't look like it's easily rolled back. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() after it's call to btrfs_lookup_extent_info() if no existing references are found. Since refs are computed directly from disk, this should be treated as a corruption instead of a logic error. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The only caller of update_ref_for_cow() is __btrfs_cow_block() which was originally ignoring any return values. update_ref_for_cow() however doesn't look like a candidate to become a void function - there are a few places where errors can occur. So instead I changed update_ref_for_cow() to bubble all errors up (instead of BUG_ON). __btrfs_cow_block() was then updated to catch and BUG_ON() any errors from update_ref_for_cow(). The end effect is that we have no change in behavior, but about 8 different places where a BUG_ON(ret) was removed. Obviously a future patch will have to address the BUG_ON() in __btrfs_cow_block(). Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 15 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit. But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions: 1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction, and this may change the src root when processing the following pending snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions; 2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache, which lead to corruptions. This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be consistent. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 21 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Otherwise we can execced the array bound of path->slots[]. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Before the reader/writer locks, btrfs_next_leaf needed to keep the path blocking to avoid making lockdep upset. Now that btrfs_next_leaf only takes read locks, this isn't required. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant lock contention, especially in the root node. This commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer lock. The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking. Atomics count the number of blocking readers or writers at any given time. It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs to decide when it should continue spinning. In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster. In write heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention on the root node lock. We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping to access the memory. The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use of this kmap cache would make it even more complex. This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers, and rips out all of the related code. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Arne's scrub stuff exposed a problem with mapping the extent buffer in reada_for_search. He searches the commit root with multiple threads and with skip_locking set, so we can race and overwrite node->map_token since node isn't locked. So fix this so that we only map the extent buffer if we don't already have a map_token and skip_locking isn't set. Without this patch scrub would panic almost immediately, with the patch it doesn't panic anymore. Thanks, Reported-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Arne's scrub stuff exposed a problem with mapping the extent buffer in reada_for_search. He searches the commit root with multiple threads and with skip_locking set, so we can race and overwrite node->map_token since node isn't locked. So fix this so that we only map the extent buffer if we don't already have a map_token and skip_locking isn't set. Without this patch scrub would panic almost immediately, with the patch it doesn't panic anymore. Thanks, Reported-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Currently, btrfs_truncate_item and btrfs_extend_item returns only 0. So, the check by BUG_ON in the caller is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Our readahead is sort of sloppy, and really isn't always needed. For example if ls is doing a stating ls (which is the default) it's going to stat in non-disk order, so if say you have a directory with a stupid amount of files, readahead is going to do nothing but waste time in the case of doing the stat. Taking the unconditional readahead out made my test go from 57 minutes to 36 minutes. This means that everywhere we do loop through the tree we want to make sure we do set path->reada properly, so I went through and found all of the places where we loop through the path and set reada to 1. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have a bit of debugging in btrfs_search_slot to make sure the level of the cow block is the same as the original block we were cow'ing. I don't think I've ever seen this tripped, so kill it. This saves us 2 kmap's per level in our search. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
parameter tree root it's not used since commit 5f39d397 ("Btrfs: Create extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 28 3月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch is checking return value of read_tree_block(), and if it is NULL, error processing. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return. (but, most callers still use BUG_ON()) Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly helpful for debugging, e.g dd-7822 [000] 2121.641088: btrfs_inode_request: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 4, ino = 256, blocks = 8, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 8, logged_trans = 0 dd-7822 [000] 2121.641100: btrfs_inode_new: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 8, ino = 257, blocks = 0, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 0, logged_trans = 0 btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935420: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29368320 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29388800 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935473: btrfs_cow_block: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29364224 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29392896 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.972221: btrfs_transaction_commit: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), gen = 8 flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824210: btrfs_chunk_alloc: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), offset = 1103101952, size = 1073741824, num_stripes = 1, sub_stripes = 0, type = DATA flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824241: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29388800 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29396992 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824255: btrfs_cow_block: root = 4(DEV_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29372416 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29401088 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [000] 2155.824329: btrfs_cow_block: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 20971520 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 20975616 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898019: btrfs_cow_block: root = 5(FS_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29384704 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29405184 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898043: btrfs_cow_block: root = 7(CSUM_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29376512 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29409280 (cow_level = 0) Here is what I have added: 1) ordere_extent: btrfs_ordered_extent_add btrfs_ordered_extent_remove btrfs_ordered_extent_start btrfs_ordered_extent_put These provide critical information to understand how ordered_extents are updated. 2) extent_map: btrfs_get_extent extent_map is used in both read and write cases, and it is useful for tracking how btrfs specific IO is running. 3) writepage: __extent_writepage btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook Pages are cirtical resourses and produce a lot of corner cases during writeback, so it is valuable to know how page is written to disk. 4) inode: btrfs_inode_new btrfs_inode_request btrfs_inode_evict These can show where and when a inode is created, when a inode is evicted. 5) sync: btrfs_sync_file btrfs_sync_fs These show sync arguments. 6) transaction: btrfs_transaction_commit In transaction based filesystem, it will be useful to know the generation and who does commit. 7) back reference and cow: btrfs_delayed_tree_ref btrfs_delayed_data_ref btrfs_delayed_ref_head btrfs_cow_block Btrfs natively supports back references, these tracepoints are helpful on understanding btrfs's COW mechanism. 8) chunk: btrfs_chunk_alloc btrfs_chunk_free Chunk is a link between physical offset and logical offset, and stands for space infomation in btrfs, and these are helpful on tracing space things. 9) reserved_extent: btrfs_reserved_extent_alloc btrfs_reserved_extent_free These can show how btrfs uses its space. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The pointer to the extent buffer for the root of each tree is protected by a spinlock so that we can safely read the pointer and take a reference on the extent buffer. But now that the extent buffers are freed via RCU, we can safely use rcu_read_lock instead. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently if we have corrupted items things will blow up in spectacular ways. So as we read in blocks and they are leaves, check the entire leaf to make sure all of the items are correct and point to valid parts in the leaf for the item data the are responsible for. If the item is corrupt we will kick back EIO and not read any of the copies since they are likely to not be correct either. This will catch generic corruptions, it will be up to the individual callers of btrfs_search_slot to make sure their items are right. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Should check if functions returns NULL or not. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
Hi, In fs/btrfs/inode.c::fixup_tree_root_location() we have this code: ... if (!path) { err = -ENOMEM; goto out; } ... out: btrfs_free_path(path); return err; btrfs_free_path() passes its argument on to other functions and some of them end up dereferencing the pointer. In the code above that pointer is clearly NULL, so btrfs_free_path() will eventually cause a NULL dereference. There are many ways to cut this cake (fix the bug). The one I chose was to make btrfs_free_path() deal gracefully with NULL pointers. If you disagree, feel free to come up with an alternative patch. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
These are all the cases where a variable is set, but not read which are not bugs as far as I can see, but simply leftovers. Still needs more review. Found by gcc 4.6's new warnings Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-