If the NULL test on pr is needed, then the dereference should be after the
NULL test.

A simplified version of the semantic match that detects this problem is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/):

// <smpl>
@match exists@
expression x, E;
identifier fld;
@@

* x->fld
  ... when != \(x = E\|&x\)
* x == NULL
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Remove open-coded zalloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var_node().
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ",
however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they
should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own.

Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there.

This does not change any actual console output,
asside from a whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

This failure is very common on many platforms.  Handling it in the ACPI
processor driver is enough, and we don't need a warning message unless
CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is set.

Based on a patch from Zhang Rui.

Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389Signed-off-by: NFrans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Acked-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If the BIOS reports an invalid throttling state (which seems to be
fairly common after system boot), a reset is done to state T0.
Because of a check in acpi_processor_get_throttling_ptc(), the reset
never actually gets executed, which results in the error reoccurring
on every access of for example /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling.

Add a 'force' option to acpi_processor_set_throttling() to ensure
the reset really takes effect.

Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13389

This patch, together with the next one, fixes a regression introduced in
2.6.30, listed on the regression list. They have been available for 2.5
months now in bugzilla, but have not been picked up, despite various
reminders and without any reason given.

Google shows that numerous people are hitting this issue. The issue is in
itself relatively minor, but the bug in the code is clear.

The patches have been in all my kernels and today testing has shown that
throttling works correctly with the patches applied when the system
overheats (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c14).
Signed-off-by: NFrans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Acked-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now whether the ACPI processor proc I/F is registered depends on the
CONFIG_PROC. It had better depend on the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS.
When the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is unset in kernel configuration, the
ACPI processor proc I/F won't be registered.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Commit 4973b22a ("ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's
invalid") introduced a new warning which prints a spurious newline.

The ACPI_WARNING macro that is used already takes care of adding a
newline, after adding ACPI_CA_VERSION to the message. Remove the newline
to avoid the message getting split into two lines.
Signed-off-by: NFrans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

If the BIOS hands us an invalid throttling state,
write a valid state.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NJames Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce module parameter processor.ignore_tpc.

Some laptops are shipped with buggy _TPC,
this module parameter is used to to disable the buggy support.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NJames Ettle <theholyettlz@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NJan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Reported-by: NRoel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Impact: Reduce memory usage, use new API.

This is part of an effort to reduce structure sizes for machines
configured with large NR_CPUS.  cpumask_t gets replaced by
cpumask_var_t, which is either struct cpumask[1] (small NR_CPUS) or
struct cpumask * (large NR_CPUS).

(Changes to powernow-k* by <travis>.)
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place,
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h.
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

ACPI_DB_ERROR and ACPI_DB_WARN were removed from ACPICA core.
So replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX ...)
and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN, ...) with printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX ...)

We do not use ACPI_ERROR/ACPI_WARNING since they're not exported, see
-------------------------------------------------------------
commit 6468463a
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Jun 26 23:41:38 2006 -0400

    ACPI: un-export ACPI_ERROR() -- use printk(KERN_ERR...)
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers.  The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.

lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

  * Replace previous instances of the cpumask_of_cpu_ptr* macros
    with a the new (lvalue capable) generic cpumask_of_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

  * This patch replaces the dangerous lvalue version of cpumask_of_cpu
    with new cpumask_of_cpu_ptr macros.  These are patterned after the
    node_to_cpumask_ptr macros.

    In general terms, if there is a cpumask_of_cpu_map[] then a pointer to
    the cpumask_of_cpu_map[cpu] entry is used.  The cpumask_of_cpu_map
    is provided when there is a large NR_CPUS count, reducing
    greatly the amount of code generated and stack space used for
    cpumask_of_cpu().  The pointer to the cpumask_t value is needed for
    calling set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to reduce the amount of stack space
    needed to pass the cpumask_t value.

    If there isn't a cpumask_of_cpu_map[], then a temporary variable is
    declared and filled in with value from cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) as well as
    a pointer variable pointing to this temporary variable.  Afterwards,
    the pointer is used to reference the cpumask value.  The compiler
    will optimize out the extra dereference through the pointer as well
    as the stack space used for the pointer, resulting in identical code.

    A good example of the orthogonal usages is in net/sunrpc/svc.c:

	case SVC_POOL_PERCPU:
	{
		unsigned int cpu = m->pool_to[pidx];
		cpumask_of_cpu_ptr(cpumask, cpu);

		*oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask);
		return 1;
	}
	case SVC_POOL_PERNODE:
	{
		unsigned int node = m->pool_to[pidx];
		node_to_cpumask_ptr(nodecpumask, node);

		*oldmask = current->cpus_allowed;
		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, nodecpumask);
		return 1;
	}
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Fix printk format warning:

linux-next-20080617/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:1258: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704

When echo some invalid values to /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling,
there isn't any error info returned, on the contray, it sets
throttling value to some T* successfully, obviously, this is incorrect,
a correct way should be to let it fail and return error info.

This patch fixed the aforementioned issue, it also enables
/proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling to accept such values as 't0' and 'T0',
it also strictly limits /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling only to accept
 "*", "t*" and "T*", "*" is the throttling state value the processor can
support, current, it is 0 - 7.

Before applying this patch, the test result is below:

[root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T1
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
   *T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost acpi]# echo "1xxxxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T1
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
   *T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost acpi]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost acpi]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost acpi]# cd /
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "T100" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "2xxxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T2
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
   *T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]# echo "7777" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost /]# echo "7xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T7
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
   *T7:                  12%
[root@localhost /]#

After applying this patch, the test result is below:

[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T0" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T0
state available: T0 to T7
states:
   *T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
    T7:                  12%
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T7
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
   *T7:                  12%
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# vi drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "T8" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t7" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "t70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "7000" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "70" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo "xxx" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo $?
0
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T7
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
   *T7:                  12%
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo -n "" > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
state count:             8
active state:            T7
state available: T0 to T7
states:
    T0:                  100%
    T1:                  87%
    T2:                  75%
    T3:                  62%
    T4:                  50%
    T5:                  37%
    T6:                  25%
   *T7:                  12%
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo t0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo Tt0 > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]# echo T > /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost linux-2.6.24-rc6]#
Signed-off-by: NYi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable.
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr
where appropriate
Reviewed-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data
be setup before gluing PDE to main tree.

Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

  * Use new set_cpus_allowed_ptr() function added by previous patch,
    which instead of passing the "newly allowed cpus" cpumask_t arg
    by value,  pass it by pointer:

    -int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask)
    +int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const cpumask_t *new_mask)

  * Modify CPU_MASK_ALL

Depends on:
	[sched-devel]: sched: add new set_cpus_allowed_ptr function
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

According to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM. So the t-state
coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu is changed.

According to ACPI spec, three types of coordination are defined.
SW_ALL, SW_ANY and HW_ALL.

SW_ALL: it means that OSPM needs to initiate T-state transition on
all processors in the domain. It is necessary to call throttling set function
for all affected cpus.

SW_ANY: it means that OSPM may initiate T-state transition on any processor in
the domain.

HW_ALL: Spec only says that hardware will perform the coordination and doesn't
recommend how OSPM coordinate T-state among the affected cpus. So it is treated
as the type of SW_ALL. It means that OSPM needs to initiate t-state transition
on all the processors in the domain.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The t-state coordination should be considered when T-state for one cpu
is changed.It means that OSPM should select one proper target T-state for
the all affected cpus before updating T-state.

So the function of acpi_processor_throttling_notifier is added.
Before updating T-state it can be called for all  the affected cpus to get
the proper target T-state, which can meet the requirement of thermal, user and
_TPC. After updating T-state, it can be called to update T-state flag.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Accordint to ACPI spec, the _TSD object provides T-state control cross
logical processor dependency information to OSPM.
After the _TSD data for all cpus are obtained, OSPM will set up
the T-state coordination between CPUs.

Of course if the _TSD doesn't exist or _TSD data is incorrect , it is
assumed that there is no T-state coordination and T-state is changed
independently.

Now there is no proper solution to update T-state coordination after
one cpu is hotplugged. So this patch won't support hotplugged cpu very well.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

It is necessary to check the parameter when calling the function of
acpi_processor_get/set_throttling function so as to avoid the NULL
pointer reference in pr or throttling.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The IRQ operation(enable/disable) should be avoided when throttling is
controlled via PTC method. It is replaced by the migration of task.

This fixes an oops on T61 -- a regression due to
f79f06ab b/c FixedHW support tried to read remote MSR with interrupts disabled.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add throttling control via MSR when T-states uses
the FixHW Control Status registers.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

_TSS was erroneously ignored, in favor of the FADT.

When TSS is used, the access width is included in the PTC control/status
register.  So it is unnecessary that the access bit width is multiplied by 8.
At the same time the bit_offset should be considered for system I/O Access.

It should be checked the bit_width and bit_offset of PTC regsiter in order to
avoid the failure of system I/O access. It means that bit_width plus
bit_offset can't be greater than 32.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC.
The following functions are concerned:

acpi_read_throttling_status()
acpi_write_throttling_state()
acpi_get_throttling_value()
acpi_get_throttling_state()
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Factor out legacy FADT.duty_width code
and run it only in the non _TSS case.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

When a T-state limit change notification is received,
Linux must evaluate _TPC and change its current
T-state immediately to comply with the new limit.

Previously, Linux would notice the new limit
only upon the next throttling change.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126]
ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147): AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126]

These methods are optional, so Linux should not
alarm users when they are not found.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8802Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Acked-by: NLuming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLuming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

make 2 needlessly global functions static.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

adds _TPC _TSS _PTC -- Throttling Present Capabilities
Signed-off-by: NLuming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>