Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 08 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 22 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 30 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      hfsplus: switch to ->iterate_shared() · 323ee8fc
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      We need to protect the list of hfsplus_readdir_data against parallel
insertions (in readdir) and removals (in release).  Add a spinlock
for that.  Note that it has nothing to do with protection of
hfsplus_readdir_data->key - we have an exclusion between hfsplus_readdir()
and hfsplus_delete_cat() on directory lock and between several
hfsplus_readdir() for the same struct file on ->f_pos_lock.  The spinlock
is strictly for list changes.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      323ee8fc
  13. 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  17. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      wrappers for ->i_mutex access · 5955102c
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested},
inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex).

Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle
->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held
only shared.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      5955102c
  19. 09 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      don't put symlink bodies in pagecache into highmem · 21fc61c7
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      kmap() in page_follow_link_light() needed to go - allowing to hold
an arbitrary number of kmaps for long is a great way to deadlocking
the system.

new helper (inode_nohighmem(inode)) needs to be used for pagecache
symlinks inodes; done for all in-tree cases.  page_follow_link_light()
instrumented to yell about anything missed.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      21fc61c7
  21. 17 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      hfsplus: fix expand when not enough available space · 059a704c
      由 Sergei Antonov 提交于 
      Fix a bug which is reproduced as follows. Create a file:

 echo abc > test_file

Try to expand the file beyond available space:

 truncate --size=<size exceeding available space> test_file

Since HFS+ does not support file size > allocated size, truncate should
fail.  However, it ends successfully.  The driver returns success despite
having been unable to allocate the requested space for the file.  Also
filesystem check finds an error:

 Checking catalog file.
 Incorrect size for file test_file
 (It should be 469094400 instead of 1000000000)

Add a piece of code analogous to code in the fat driver.  Now a proper
error is returned and filesystem remains consistent.
Signed-off-by: NSergei Antonov <saproj@gmail.com>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: NAnton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      059a704c
  23. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 12 4月, 2015 4 次提交
  27. 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  29. 07 5月, 2014 5 次提交
  31. 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      hfsplus: add HFSX subfolder count support · d7d673a5
      由 Sergei Antonov 提交于 
      Adds support for HFSX 'HasFolderCount' flag and a corresponding
'folderCount' field in folder records.  (For reference see
HFS_FOLDERCOUNT and kHFSHasFolderCountBit/kHFSHasFolderCountMask in
Apple's source code.)

Ignoring subfolder count leads to fs errors found by Mac:

  ...
  Checking catalog hierarchy.
  HasFolderCount flag needs to be set (id = 105)
  (It should be 0x10 instead of 0)
  Incorrect folder count in a directory (id = 2)
  (It should be 7 instead of 6)
  ...

Steps to reproduce:
 Format with "newfs_hfs -s /dev/diskXXX".
 Mount in Linux.
 Create a new directory in root.
 Unmount.
 Run "fsck_hfs /dev/diskXXX".

The patch handles directory creation, deletion, and rename.
Signed-off-by: NSergei Antonov <saproj@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d7d673a5
  33. 01 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 26 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  37. 24 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      hfsplus: remove hfsplus_file_lookup() · d74a054f
      由 Sougata Santra 提交于 
      HFS+ resource fork lookup breaks opendir() library function.  Since
opendir first calls open() with O_DIRECTORY flag set.  O_DIRECTORY means
"refuse to open if not a directory".  The open system call in the kernel
does a check for inode->i_op->lookup and returns -ENOTDIR.  So if
hfsplus_file_lookup is set it allows opendir() for plain files.

Also resource fork lookup in HFS+ does not work.  Since it is never
invoked after VFS permission checking.  It will always return with
-EACCES.

When we call opendir() on a file, it does not return NULL.  opendir()
library call is based on open with O_DIRECTORY flag passed and then
layered on top of getdents() system call.  O_DIRECTORY means "refuse to
open if not a directory".

The open() system call in the kernel does a check for: do_sys_open()
-->..--> can_lookup() i.e it only checks inode->i_op->lookup and returns
ENOTDIR if this function pointer is not set.

In OSX, we can open "file/rsrc" to get the resource fork of "file".  This
behavior is emulated inside hfsplus on Linux, which means that to some
degree every file acts like a directory.  That is the reason lookup()
inode operations is supported for files, and it is possible to do a lookup
on this specific name.  As a result of this open succeeds without
returning ENOTDIR for HFS+

Please see the LKML discussion thread on this issue:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=122823343730412&w=2

I tried to test file/rsrc lookup in HFS+ driver and the feature does not
work.  From OSX:

$ touch test
$ echo "1234" > test/..namedfork/rsrc
$ ls -l test..namedfork/rsrc
--rw-r--r-- 1 tuxera staff 5 10 dec 12:59 test/..namedfork/rsrc

[sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ id
uid=1000(sougata) gid=1000(sougata) groups=1000(sougata),5(tty),18(dialout),1001(vboxusers)

[sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mount
/dev/sdb1 on /mnt/tmp type hfsplus (rw,relatime,umask=0,uid=1000,gid=1000,nls=utf8)

[sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ ls -l test/rsrc
ls: cannot access test/rsrc: Permission denied

According to this LKML thread it is expected behavior.

http://marc.info/?t=121139033800008&r=1&w=4

I guess now that permission checking happens in vfs generic_permission() ?
 So it turns out that even though the lookup() inode_operation exists for
HFS+ files.  It cannot really get invoked ?.  So if we can disable this
feature to make opendir() work for HFS+.
Signed-off-by: NSougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com>
Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d74a054f
  39. 13 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  41. 12 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  43. 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  45. 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  47. 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  51. 21 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  53. 21 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  55. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      hfsplus: get rid of write_super · 9e6c5829
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      This patch makes hfsplus stop using the VFS '->write_super()' method along with
the 's_dirt' superblock flag, because they are on their way out.

The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblocks using the '->write_super()' call-back.  But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.

Tested using fsstress from the LTP project.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      9e6c5829
  57. 14 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      stop passing nameidata to ->lookup() · 00cd8dd3
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are
legitimate uses for such argument.  And getting rid of that
completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple
of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      00cd8dd3
  59. 21 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  61. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  63. 02 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  65. 21 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers · 02c24a82
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers.  Some
file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
ocfs2.  For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
Thanks,
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      02c24a82