- 24 12月, 2008 40 次提交
-
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Keep a pointer to the inode that the message is queued on in the struct gss_upcall_msg. This will be convenient, especially after we have a choice of two pipes that an upcall could be queued on. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Introduce a global variable pipe_version which will eventually be used to keep track of which version of the upcall gssd is using. For now, though, it only keeps track of whether any pipe is open or not; it is negative if not, zero if one is opened. We use this to wait for the first gssd to open a pipe. (Minor digression: note this waits only for the very first open of any pipe, not for the first open of a pipe for a given auth; thus we still need the RPC_PIPE_WAIT_FOR_OPEN behavior to wait for gssd to open new pipes that pop up on subsequent mounts.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
Keep a count of the number of pipes open plus the number of messages on a pipe. This count isn't used yet. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
I can't see any reason we need to call this until either the kernel or the last gssd closes the pipe. Also, this allows to guarantee that open_pipe and release_pipe are called strictly in pairs; open_pipe on gssd's first open, release_pipe on gssd's last close (or on the close of the kernel side of the pipe, if that comes first). That will make it very easy for the gss code to keep track of which pipes gssd is using. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
We want to transition to a new gssd upcall which is text-based and more easily extensible. To simplify upgrades, as well as testing and debugging, it will help if we can upgrade gssd (to a version which understands the new upcall) without having to choose at boot (or module-load) time whether we want the new or the old upcall. We will do this by providing two different pipes: one named, as currently, after the mechanism (normally "krb5"), and supporting the old upcall. One named "gssd" and supporting the new upcall version. We allow gssd to indicate which version it supports by its choice of which pipe to open. As we have no interest in supporting *simultaneous* use of both versions, we'll forbid opening both pipes at the same time. So, add a new pipe_open callback to the rpc_pipefs api, which the gss code can use to track which pipes have been open, and to refuse opens of incompatible pipes. We only need this to be called on the first open of a given pipe. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
I want to add a little more code here, so it'll be convenient to have this flatter. Also, I'll want to add another error condition, so it'll be more convenient to return -ENOMEM than NULL in the error case. The only caller is already converting NULL to -ENOMEM anyway. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
We'll want to call this from elsewhere soon. And this is a bit nicer anyway. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 \"J. Bruce Fields\ 提交于
We're just about to kfree() gss_auth, so there's no point to setting any of its fields. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson<andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson<andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson<andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Clean-up Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson<andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
3 call sites look at hdr.status before returning success. hdr.status must be zero in this case so there's no point in this. Currently, hdr.status is correctly processed at decode_op_hdr time if the op status cannot be decoded. Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
When there are no op replies encoded in the compound reply hdr.status still contains the overall status of the compound rpc. This can happen, e.g., when the server returns a NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH error. Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Benny Halevy 提交于
rq_bufsize is not used. Signed-off-by: NMike Sager <Mike.Sager@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NBenny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Marten Gajda <marten.gajda@fernuni-hagen.de> states: I tracked the problem down to the function nfs4_do_open_expired. Within this function _nfs4_open_expired is called and may return -NFS4ERR_DELAY. When a further call to _nfs4_open_expired is executed and does not return -NFS4ERR_DELAY the "exception.retry" variable is not reset to 0, causing the loop to iterate again (and as long as err != -NFS4ERR_DELAY, probably forever) Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There's a bit of a chicken and egg problem when it comes to destroying auth_gss credentials. When we destroy the last instance of a GSSAPI RPC credential, we should send a NULL RPC call with a GSS procedure of RPCSEC_GSS_DESTROY to hint to the server that it can destroy those creds. This isn't happening because we're setting clearing the uptodate bit on the credentials and then setting the operations to the gss_nullops. When we go to do the RPC call, we try to refresh the creds. That fails with -EACCES and the call fails. Fix this by not clearing the UPTODATE bit for the credentials and adding a new crdestroy op for gss_nullops that just tears down the cred without trying to destroy the context. The only difference between this patch and the first one is the removal of some minor formatting deltas. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Peter Staubach 提交于
Hi. I've been looking at a bugzilla which describes a problem where a customer was advised to use either the "noac" or "actimeo=0" mount options to solve a consistency problem that they were seeing in the file attributes. It turned out that this solution did not work reliably for them because sometimes, the local attribute cache was believed to be valid and not timed out. (With an attribute cache timeout of 0, the cache should always appear to be timed out.) In looking at this situation, it appears to me that the problem is that the attribute cache timeout code has an off-by-one error in it. It is assuming that the cache is valid in the region, [read_cache_jiffies, read_cache_jiffies + attrtimeo]. The cache should be considered valid only in the region, [read_cache_jiffies, read_cache_jiffies + attrtimeo). With this change, the options, "noac" and "actimeo=0", work as originally expected. This problem was previously addressed by special casing the attrtimeo == 0 case. However, since the problem is only an off- by-one error, the cleaner solution is address the off-by-one error and thus, not require the special case. Thanx... ps Signed-off-by: NPeter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This ensures that we don't have to look up the dentry again after we return the delegation if we know that the directory didn't change. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, the callback server is listening on IPv6 if it is enabled. This means that IPv4 addresses will always be mapped. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client is not using a delegation, the right thing to do is to return it as soon as possible. This helps reduce the amount of state the server has to track, as well as reducing the potential for conflicts with other clients. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Reuse the state management thread in order to return delegations when we get a callback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Let the actual delegreturn stuff be run in the state manager thread rather than allocating a separate kthread. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We really shouldn't be resetting the sequence ids when doing state expiration recovery, since we don't know if the server still remembers our previous state owners. There are servers out there that do attempt to preserve client state even if the lease has expired. Such a server would only release that state if a conflicting OPEN request occurs. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix up a potential race... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It is really a more general purpose state management thread at this point. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a delegation cleanup phase to the state management loop, and do the NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN recovery there. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a flag to mark delegations as requiring return, then run a garbage collector. In the future, this will allow for more flexible delegation management, where delegations may be marked for return if it turns out that they are not being referenced. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv4 defines a number of state errors which the client does not currently handle. Among those we should worry about are: NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED - the server's administrator revoked our locks and/or delegations. NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID - the client and server are out of sync, possibly due to a delegation return racing with an OPEN request. NFS4ERR_OPENMODE - the client attempted to do something not sanctioned by the open mode of the stateid. Should normally just occur as a result of a delegation return race. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Now that we're using the flags to indicate state that needs to be recovered, as well as having implemented proper refcounting and spinlocking on the state and open_owners, we can get rid of nfs_client->cl_sem. The only remaining case that was dubious was the file locking, and that case is now covered by the nfsi->rwsem. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The unlock path is currently failing to take the nfs_client->cl_sem read lock, and hence the recovery path may see locks disappear from underneath it. Also ensure that it takes the nfs_inode->rwsem read lock so that it there is no conflict with delegation recalls. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and move some code around in order to clear out an unnecessary forward declaration. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of doing a full setclientid, try doing a RENEW call first. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-