- 29 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There are a few places not using it, use it at those places. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When we need only one antenna, we should refrain from using the antenna that is shared with BT if BT load is high. Fix this. Reviewed-by: NEyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This makes it easier to tune the values during the testing. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is were it really needs to be. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.16+] Fixes: 2adc8949 ("iwlwifi: mvm: BT Coex - fix boost register / LUT values") Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The sharing model will differ in new hardware. Define the non shared antenna based on the device so that different devices can have different names for the non shared antenna. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 08 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
smps_mode is used uninitialized in a debug statement in AP mode, so always initialize it. While at it, fix a typo. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The variable 'u32 mode' exists twice, the latter shadowing the former - remove the latter since there's no need for two variables. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Our legal structure changed at some point (see wikipedia), but we forgot to immediately switch over to the new copyright notice. For files that we have modified in the time since the change, add the proper copyright notice now. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Leave it to default instead - regardless of the BT activity. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
According to new requirements, the ACK / CTS kill mask is not related to reduced TX power anymore. This allows to remove the code that tracked reduced TX power enablement across different interfaces. The ACK / CTS kill mask is now fetch from a table. It depends on the Activity grading (activity from BT) and on the Look Up Table (LUT) type. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
A copy paste issue broke the rate control when a firmware with the old API is used. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When TxTxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constraints on the rate control. When RxRxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constrains on SMPS. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Tell the firmware if TTC should be enabled when switching to High Band. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now a much thiner command that updates only what is needed. Adapt the code to that. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now a much thiner command that updates only what is needed. Adapt the code to that. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now a much thiner command that updates only what is needed. Adapt the code to that, and open the patch to the updates. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Start the new BT Coex implementation. Don't react to notifications for now - only the initial configuration is implemented. The rest will happen in next patches. Since coex.c now uses the new the new structures in all functions, we need to adapt the code to compile, even if it doesn't run yet. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
A new API is coming. This new API is not backward compatible. So we need to keep the old commands to be able to work with the former API. Move all the current code into a new file: coex_legacy. If a firmware with the new API is detected, we currently just bail out since the implementation of the new API will come in future patches. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
If BT is active, we need to refrain from using the shared antenna. This logic is done in the firmware when we use the link quality tables. But for management frames, the rate is written in the Tx command by the driver. Hence the driver needs to make sure not use the shared antenna when BT is active for any frames that don't use the rate scale table such as management frames or multicast. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This really belongs to the constants file. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When the firmware enables TxTxCorunning, we can lift the constaints on the rate control. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
We can Tx in MIMO rates when we are in TxTx Disallow mode just like we can when we are in Tight mode. Same if we are in 5Ghz regardless of the mode we are. Change the code to allow MIMO in these cases. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This can be used for testing. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This was not used is unlikely to be used, just kill it. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
I forgot to disable the reduced Tx power in a few paths. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 16 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The firmware needs to know on what channel we run before we set the association bit in the MAC context. Change a bit the flow to achieve this. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
These values are used to give preference to WiFi according to a certain pattern. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
CMD_SYNC is really 0 which is confusing: if (cmd.flags & CMD_SYNC) is always false. Fix this by simply removing its definition. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 11 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
All messages should have a trailing newline, add all the missing ones. Also make all messages constants, replacing the single one that pointlessly used a variable. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The commit below introduced a bug in the validity bits in init. Due to that, all the Coex mechanism stopped sending kills to the BT side. Fix that. Fixes: b9fae2d5 ("iwlwifi: mvm: BT Coex add support for Co-running block") Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Calling iwl_send_bt_init_conf for INIT firmware is not a problem, and calling iwl_send_bt_prio_tbl from iwl_send_bt_init_conf allows us to prepare for new API. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The BT Coex API underwent a minor backward compatible API change. We now need to set an invalid value in the override fields. While at it, add kerneldoc comments on the fields in the command. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is really not needed. This is a remainder from a C99 initialiser. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
All the supported firmwares have this flag set. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
A few entries were wrong and this caused throughput issues. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.13+] Fixes: dac94da8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: new BT Coex API") Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Eliad Peller 提交于
Implement Adaptive Tx Power Control algorithm. ATPC basically tries to decrease the tx power as much as possible while the throughput is not being hurt. Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
I forgot to send the new Look Up Table to the firmware and I also forgot to free the command which is kzalloc'ed. This code is relevant for 7265 device only. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
In order to debug the firmware, we need to be able to set the BT priority of WiFi packets. This priority is set based on the type of the packet (control frames, EAPOL etc...). For debugging purposes, allow to override this priority by a debugfs controlled value. Enable this feature that needs this priority to be able to test it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
We can now define the priority against BT per AC. This is possible with a newer firmware that allows to define the priority with 2 bits. Note that this change is compatible with older firmware since older firmware will simply ignore the new bit (11), and we still set the old bit (12) in the same cases as before. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-