Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 27 4月, 2012 4 次提交
  5. 22 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 21 4月, 2012 4 次提交
  9. 20 4月, 2012 3 次提交
  11. 18 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 28 3月, 2012 3 次提交
  17. 25 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  19. 21 3月, 2012 12 次提交
  21. 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 17 3月, 2012 3 次提交
    • S
      Try using machine credentials for RENEW calls · e49a29bd
      由 Sachin Prabhu 提交于 
      Using user credentials for RENEW calls will fail when the user
credentials have expired.

To avoid this, try using the machine credentials when making RENEW
calls. If no machine credentials have been set, fall back to using user
credentials as before.
Signed-off-by: NSachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      e49a29bd
    • T
      NFSv4.1: Fix a few issues in filelayout_commit_pagelist · 9390f425
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      - Fix a race in which NFS_I(inode)->commits_outstanding could potentially
  go to zero (triggering a call to nfs_commit_clear_lock()) before we're
  done sending out all the commit RPC calls.

- If nfs_commitdata_alloc fails, there is no reason why we shouldn't
  try to send off all the commits-to-ds.

- Simplify the error handling.

- Change pnfs_commit_list() to always return either
  PNFS_ATTEMPTED or PNFS_NOT_ATTEMPTED.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
      9390f425
    • T
      NFSv4.1: Clean ups and bugfixes for the pNFS read/writeback/commit code · 8dd37758
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      Move more pnfs-isms out of the generic commit code.

Bugfixes:

- filelayout_scan_commit_lists doesn't need to get/put the lseg.
  In fact since it is run under the inode->i_lock, the lseg_put()
  can deadlock.

- Ensure that we distinguish between what needs to be done for
  commit-to-data server and what needs to be done for commit-to-MDS
  using the new flag PG_COMMIT_TO_DS. Otherwise we may end up calling
  put_lseg() on a bucket for a struct nfs_page that got written
  through the MDS.

- Fix a case where we were using list_del() on an nfs_page->wb_list
  instead of list_del_init().

- filelayout_initiate_commit needs to call filelayout_commit_release
  on error instead of the mds_ops->rpc_release(). Otherwise it won't
  clear the commit lock.

Cleanups:

- Let the files layout manage the commit lists for the pNFS case.
  Don't expose stuff like pnfs_choose_commit_list, and the fact
  that the commit buckets hold references to the layout segment
  in common code.

- Cast out the put_lseg() calls for the struct nfs_read/write_data->lseg
  into the pNFS layer from whence they came.

- Let the pNFS layer manage the NFS_INO_PNFS_COMMIT bit.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
      8dd37758
  25. 15 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 14 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • W
      NFSv4: Rate limit the state manager for lock reclaim warning messages · 96dcadc2
      由 William Dauchy 提交于 
      Adding rate limit on `Lock reclaim failed` messages since it could fill
up system logs
Signed-off-by: NWilliam Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      96dcadc2
    • B
      pnfs-obj: Uglify objio_segment allocation for the sake of the principle :-( · 5318a29c
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      At some past instance Linus Trovalds wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> commit a84a79e4 upstream.
>
> The size is always valid, but variable-length arrays generate worse code
> for no good reason (unless the function happens to be inlined and the
> compiler sees the length for the simple constant it is).
>
> Also, there seems to be some code generation problem on POWER, where
> Henrik Bakken reports that register r28 can get corrupted under some
> subtle circumstances (interrupt happening at the wrong time?).  That all
> indicates some seriously broken compiler issues, but since variable
> length arrays are bad regardless, there's little point in trying to
> chase it down.
>
> "Just don't do that, then".

Since then any use of "variable length arrays" has become blasphemous.
Even in perfectly good, beautiful, perfectly safe code like the one
below where the variable length arrays are only used as a sizeof()
parameter, for type-safe dynamic structure allocations. GCC is not
executing any stack allocation code.

I have produced a small file which defines two functions main1(unsigned numdevs)
and main2(unsigned numdevs). main1 uses code as before with call to malloc
and main2 uses code as of after this patch. I compiled it as:
	gcc -O2 -S see_asm.c
and here is what I get:

<see_asm.s>
main1:
.LFB7:
	.cfi_startproc
	mov	%edi, %edi
	leaq	4(%rdi,%rdi), %rdi
	salq	$3, %rdi
	jmp	malloc
	.cfi_endproc
.LFE7:
	.size	main1, .-main1
	.p2align 4,,15
	.globl	main2
	.type	main2, @function
main2:
.LFB8:
	.cfi_startproc
	mov	%edi, %edi
	addq	$2, %rdi
	salq	$4, %rdi
	jmp	malloc
	.cfi_endproc
.LFE8:
	.size	main2, .-main2
	.section	.text.startup,"ax",@progbits
	.p2align 4,,15
</see_asm.s>

*Exact* same code !!!

So please seriously consider not accepting this patch and leave the
perfectly good code intact.

CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      5318a29c