1. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 11 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 10 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 05 12月, 2013 4 次提交
    • P
      selinux: pull address family directly from the request_sock struct · 0b1f24e6
      Paul Moore 提交于
      We don't need to inspect the packet to determine if the packet is an
      IPv4 packet arriving on an IPv6 socket when we can query the
      request_sock directly.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
      0b1f24e6
    • P
      selinux: ensure that the cached NetLabel secattr matches the desired SID · 050d032b
      Paul Moore 提交于
      In selinux_netlbl_skbuff_setsid() we leverage a cached NetLabel
      secattr whenever possible.  However, we never check to ensure that
      the desired SID matches the cached NetLabel secattr.  This patch
      checks the SID against the secattr before use and only uses the
      cached secattr when the SID values match.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
      050d032b
    • P
      selinux: handle TCP SYN-ACK packets correctly in selinux_ip_postroute() · 7f721643
      Paul Moore 提交于
      In selinux_ip_postroute() we perform access checks based on the
      packet's security label.  For locally generated traffic we get the
      packet's security label from the associated socket; this works in all
      cases except for TCP SYN-ACK packets.  In the case of SYN-ACK packet's
      the correct security label is stored in the connection's request_sock,
      not the server's socket.  Unfortunately, at the point in time when
      selinux_ip_postroute() is called we can't query the request_sock
      directly, we need to recreate the label using the same logic that
      originally labeled the associated request_sock.
      
      See the inline comments for more explanation.
      Reported-by: NJanak Desai <Janak.Desai@gtri.gatech.edu>
      Tested-by: NJanak Desai <Janak.Desai@gtri.gatech.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
      7f721643
    • P
      selinux: handle TCP SYN-ACK packets correctly in selinux_ip_output() · da2ea0d0
      Paul Moore 提交于
      In selinux_ip_output() we always label packets based on the parent
      socket.  While this approach works in almost all cases, it doesn't
      work in the case of TCP SYN-ACK packets when the correct label is not
      the label of the parent socket, but rather the label of the larval
      socket represented by the request_sock struct.
      
      Unfortunately, since the request_sock isn't queued on the parent
      socket until *after* the SYN-ACK packet is sent, we can't lookup the
      request_sock to determine the correct label for the packet; at this
      point in time the best we can do is simply pass/NF_ACCEPT the packet.
      It must be said that simply passing the packet without any explicit
      labeling action, while far from ideal, is not terrible as the SYN-ACK
      packet will inherit any IP option based labeling from the initial
      connection request so the label *should* be correct and all our
      access controls remain in place so we shouldn't have to worry about
      information leaks.
      Reported-by: NJanak Desai <Janak.Desai@gtri.gatech.edu>
      Tested-by: NJanak Desai <Janak.Desai@gtri.gatech.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
      da2ea0d0
  5. 26 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 20 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 05 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  8. 27 9月, 2013 2 次提交
    • P
      selinux: correct locking in selinux_netlbl_socket_connect) · 42d64e1a
      Paul Moore 提交于
      The SELinux/NetLabel glue code has a locking bug that affects systems
      with NetLabel enabled, see the kernel error message below.  This patch
      corrects this problem by converting the bottom half socket lock to a
      more conventional, and correct for this call-path, lock_sock() call.
      
       ===============================
       [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
       3.11.0-rc3+ #19 Not tainted
       -------------------------------
       net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c:1928 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
      
       other info that might help us debug this:
      
       rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
       2 locks held by ping/731:
        #0:  (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-...}, at: [...] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect
        #1:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<...>] netlbl_conn_setattr
      
       stack backtrace:
       CPU: 1 PID: 731 Comm: ping Not tainted 3.11.0-rc3+ #19
       Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
        0000000000000001 ffff88006f659d28 ffffffff81726b6a ffff88003732c500
        ffff88006f659d58 ffffffff810e4457 ffff88006b845a00 0000000000000000
        000000000000000c ffff880075aa2f50 ffff88006f659d90 ffffffff8169bec7
       Call Trace:
        [<ffffffff81726b6a>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
        [<ffffffff810e4457>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
        [<ffffffff8169bec7>] cipso_v4_sock_setattr+0x187/0x1a0
        [<ffffffff8170f317>] netlbl_conn_setattr+0x187/0x190
        [<ffffffff8170f195>] ? netlbl_conn_setattr+0x5/0x190
        [<ffffffff8131ac9e>] selinux_netlbl_socket_connect+0xae/0xc0
        [<ffffffff81303025>] selinux_socket_connect+0x135/0x170
        [<ffffffff8119d127>] ? might_fault+0x57/0xb0
        [<ffffffff812fb146>] security_socket_connect+0x16/0x20
        [<ffffffff815d3ad3>] SYSC_connect+0x73/0x130
        [<ffffffff81739a85>] ? sysret_check+0x22/0x5d
        [<ffffffff810e5e2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
        [<ffffffff81373d4e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
        [<ffffffff815d52be>] SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
        [<ffffffff81739a59>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
      42d64e1a
    • D
      7d1db4b2
  9. 29 8月, 2013 2 次提交
    • E
      Revert "SELinux: do not handle seclabel as a special flag" · 0b4bdb35
      Eric Paris 提交于
      This reverts commit 308ab70c.
      
      It breaks my FC6 test box.  /dev/pts is not mounted.  dmesg says
      
      SELinux: mount invalid.  Same superblock, different security settings
      for (dev devpts, type devpts)
      
      Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      0b4bdb35
    • A
      selinux: consider filesystem subtype in policies · 102aefdd
      Anand Avati 提交于
      Not considering sub filesystem has the following limitation. Support
      for SELinux in FUSE is dependent on the particular userspace
      filesystem, which is identified by the subtype. For e.g, GlusterFS,
      a FUSE based filesystem supports SELinux (by mounting and processing
      FUSE requests in different threads, avoiding the mount time
      deadlock), whereas other FUSE based filesystems (identified by a
      different subtype) have the mount time deadlock.
      
      By considering the subtype of the filesytem in the SELinux policies,
      allows us to specify a filesystem subtype, in the following way:
      
      fs_use_xattr fuse.glusterfs gen_context(system_u:object_r:fs_t,s0);
      
      This way not all FUSE filesystems are put in the same bucket and
      subjected to the limitations of the other subtypes.
      Signed-off-by: NAnand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      102aefdd
  10. 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 26 7月, 2013 22 次提交