- 13 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
NOTE: the only reason we can do that without ->i_rdir_offs races is that hpfs_lock() serializes everything in there anyway. It's not that hard to get rid of, but not as part of this series... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
pr_err() is nice, but we'd better propagate the error to caller and not proceed to violate the invariants (namely, "every file with f_pos tied to directory block should have its address visible in per-inode array"). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
protected by glock and already used without locking the directory by gfs2_get_name() Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 10 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 09 5月, 2016 13 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Lots of Idiotic Silly Parentheses is -> that way... What that condition checks is that there's exactly 32 bytes between the end of name and the end of entire drectory record. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and make that weird ioctl lock directory only shared. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
don't need to lock directory in ->llseek(), either Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Note that lustre has its private mutex protecting directory pagecache; if they ever remove it, they'll need to be careful with PageChecked() use. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
use d_alloc_parallel() for sillyunlink/lookup exclusion and explicit rwsem (nfs_rmdir() being a writer and nfs_call_unlink() - a reader) for rmdir/sillyunlink one. That ought to make lookup/readdir/!O_CREAT atomic_open really parallel on NFS. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 08 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Payloads of NM entries are not supposed to contain NUL. When we run into such, only the part prior to the first NUL goes into the concatenation (i.e. the directory entry name being encoded by a bunch of NM entries). We do stop when the amount collected so far + the claimed amount in the current NM entry exceed 254. So far, so good, but what we return as the total length is the sum of *claimed* sizes, not the actual amount collected. And that can grow pretty large - not unlimited, since you'd need to put CE entries in between to be able to get more than the maximum that could be contained in one isofs directory entry / continuation chunk and we are stop once we'd encountered 32 CEs, but you can get about 8Kb easily. And that's what will be passed to readdir callback as the name length. 8Kb __copy_to_user() from a buffer allocated by __get_free_page() Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 0.98pl6+ (yes, really) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 05 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
First of all, trying to open them r/w is idiocy; it's guaranteed to fail. Moreover, assigning ->f_pos and assuming that everything will work is blatantly broken - try that with e.g. tmpfs as underlying layer and watch the fireworks. There may be a non-trivial amount of state associated with current IO position, well beyond the numeric offset. Using the single struct file associated with underlying inode is really not a good idea; we ought to open one for each ecryptfs directory struct file. Additionally, file_operations both for directories and non-directories are full of pointless methods; non-directories should *not* have ->iterate(), directories should not have ->flush(), ->fasync() and ->splice_read(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 5月, 2016 16 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
aside of the usual care about seeding dcache from readdir, we need to be careful about the pagecache evictions here. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and lose the duplicate IS_DEADDIR() - we'd already checked that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It should never return positives; however, with Linux S&M crowd involved, no bogosity is impossible. Results would be unpleasant... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
nobody else needs that transformation. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make it conditional on *opened & FILE_OPENED; in addition to getting rid of exit_fput: thing, it simplifies atomic_open() cleanup on may_open() failure. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
may_open() will catch it Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Lift IS_DEADDIR handling up into the part common with atomic_open(), remove it from the latter. Collapse permission checks into the call of may_o_create(), getting it closer to atomic_open() case. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
do_last() and lookup_open() simpler that way and so does O_PATH itself. As it bloody well should: we find what the pathname resolves to, same way as in stat() et.al. and associate it with FMODE_PATH struct file. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-