In many cases in the RCU tree code, we iterate over the set of cpus for
a leaf node described by rcu_node::grplo and rcu_node::grphi, checking
per-cpu data for each cpu in this range. However, if the set of possible
cpus is sparse, some cpus described in this range are not possible, and
thus no per-cpu region will have been allocated (or initialised) for
them by the generic percpu code.

Erroneous accesses to a per-cpu area for these !possible cpus may fault
or may hit other data depending on the addressed generated when the
erroneous per cpu offset is applied. In practice, both cases have been
observed on arm64 hardware (the former being silent, but detectable with
additional patches).

To avoid issues resulting from this, we must iterate over the set of
*possible* cpus for a given leaf node. This patch add a new helper,
for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu, to enable this. As iteration is often
intertwined with rcu_node local bitmask manipulation, a new
leaf_node_cpu_bit helper is added to make this simpler and more
consistent. The RCU tree code is made to use both of these where
appropriate.

Without this patch, running reboot at a shell can result in an oops
like:

[ 3369.075979] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffff8008b21b4c
[ 3369.083881] pgd = ffffffc3ecdda000
[ 3369.087270] [ffffff8008b21b4c] *pgd=00000083eca48003, *pud=00000083eca48003, *pmd=0000000000000000
[ 3369.096222] Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 3369.101781] Modules linked in:
[ 3369.104825] CPU: 2 PID: 1817 Comm: NetworkManager Tainted: G        W       4.6.0+ #3
[ 3369.121239] task: ffffffc0fa13e000 ti: ffffffc3eb940000 task.ti: ffffffc3eb940000
[ 3369.128708] PC is at sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x188/0x510
[ 3369.134094] LR is at sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x104/0x510
[ 3369.139479] pc : [<ffffff80081109a8>] lr : [<ffffff8008110924>] pstate: 200001c5
[ 3369.146860] sp : ffffffc3eb9435a0
[ 3369.150162] x29: ffffffc3eb9435a0 x28: ffffff8008be4f88
[ 3369.155465] x27: ffffff8008b66c80 x26: ffffffc3eceb2600
[ 3369.160767] x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff8008be4f88
[ 3369.166070] x23: ffffff8008b51c3c x22: ffffff8008b66c80
[ 3369.171371] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: ffffff8008b21b40
[ 3369.176673] x19: ffffff8008b66c80 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 3369.181975] x17: 0000007fa951a010 x16: ffffff80086a30f0
[ 3369.187278] x15: 0000007fa9505590 x14: 0000000000000000
[ 3369.192580] x13: ffffff8008b51000 x12: ffffffc3eb940000
[ 3369.197882] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: ffffff8008b51b78
[ 3369.203184] x9 : 0000000000000001 x8 : ffffff8008be4000
[ 3369.208486] x7 : ffffff8008b21b40 x6 : 0000000000001003
[ 3369.213788] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffffff8008b27280
[ 3369.219090] x3 : ffffff8008b21b4c x2 : 0000000000000001
[ 3369.224406] x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : 0000000000000140
...
[ 3369.972257] [<ffffff80081109a8>] sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x188/0x510
[ 3369.978685] [<ffffff80081128b4>] synchronize_rcu_expedited+0x64/0xa8
[ 3369.985026] [<ffffff80086b987c>] synchronize_net+0x24/0x30
[ 3369.990499] [<ffffff80086ddb54>] dev_deactivate_many+0x28c/0x298
[ 3369.996493] [<ffffff80086b6bb8>] __dev_close_many+0x60/0xd0
[ 3370.002052] [<ffffff80086b6d48>] __dev_close+0x28/0x40
[ 3370.007178] [<ffffff80086bf62c>] __dev_change_flags+0x8c/0x158
[ 3370.012999] [<ffffff80086bf718>] dev_change_flags+0x20/0x60
[ 3370.018558] [<ffffff80086cf7f0>] do_setlink+0x288/0x918
[ 3370.023771] [<ffffff80086d0798>] rtnl_newlink+0x398/0x6a8
[ 3370.029158] [<ffffff80086cee84>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xe4/0x220
[ 3370.034891] [<ffffff80086e274c>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xc4/0xf8
[ 3370.040364] [<ffffff80086ced8c>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2c/0x40
[ 3370.045663] [<ffffff80086e1fe8>] netlink_unicast+0x160/0x238
[ 3370.051309] [<ffffff80086e24b8>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2f0/0x358
[ 3370.056956] [<ffffff80086a0070>] sock_sendmsg+0x18/0x30
[ 3370.062168] [<ffffff80086a21cc>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x26c/0x280
[ 3370.067728] [<ffffff80086a30ac>] __sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x88
[ 3370.073027] [<ffffff80086a3100>] SyS_sendmsg+0x10/0x20
[ 3370.078153] [<ffffff8008085e70>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reported-by: NDennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit removes CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE in favor of the
already-existing rcutorture.torture_runnable kernel boot parameter.
It also converts an #ifdef into IS_ENABLED(), saving a few lines of code.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

People have been having some difficulty finding their way around the
RCU code.  This commit therefore pulls some of the expedited grace-period
code from tree_plugin.h to a new tree_exp.h file.  This commit is strictly
code movement.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit pulls the grace-period-start counter adjustment and tracing
from synchronize_rcu_expedited() and synchronize_sched_expedited()
into exp_funnel_lock(), thus eliminating some code duplication.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit moves some duplicate code from synchronize_rcu_expedited()
and synchronize_sched_expedited() into rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap().  This
doesn't save lines of code, but does eliminate a "tell me twice" issue.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Currently, synchronize_rcu_expedited() and rcu_sched_expedited() have
significant duplicate code.  This commit therefore consolidates some of
this code into rcu_exp_wake(), which is now renamed to rcu_exp_wait_wake()
in recognition of its added responsibilities.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The current mutex-based funnel-locking approach used by expedited grace
periods is subject to severe unfairness.  The problem arises when a
few tasks, making a path from leaves to root, all wake up before other
tasks do.  A new task can then follow this path all the way to the root,
which needlessly delays tasks whose grace period is done, but who do
not happen to acquire the lock quickly enough.

This commit avoids this problem by maintaining per-rcu_node wait queues,
along with a per-rcu_node counter that tracks the latest grace period
sought by an earlier task to visit this node.  If that grace period
would satisfy the current task, instead of proceeding up the tree,
it waits on the current rcu_node structure using a pair of wait queues
provided for that purpose.  This decouples awakening of old tasks from
the arrival of new tasks.

If the wakeups prove to be a bottleneck, additional kthreads can be
brought to bear for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit brings the synchronize_rcu_expedited() function's header
comment into line with the new implementation.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

As of commit dae6e64d ("rcu: Introduce proper blocking to no-CBs kthreads
GP waits") the RCU subsystem started making use of wait queues.

Here we convert all additions of RCU wait queues to use simple wait queues,
since they don't need the extra overhead of the full wait queue features.

Originally this was done for RT kernels[1], since we would get things like...

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 8, name: rcu_preempt
  Pid: 8, comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff8106c8d0>] __might_sleep+0xd0/0xf0
   [<ffffffff817d77b4>] rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x50
   [<ffffffff8106fcf6>] __wake_up+0x36/0x70
   [<ffffffff810c4542>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x4d2/0x680
   [<ffffffff8105f910>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
   [<ffffffff810c4070>] ? rcu_gp_fqs+0x80/0x80
   [<ffffffff8105eabb>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8106b912>] ? finish_task_switch+0x52/0x100
   [<ffffffff817e0754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
   [<ffffffff8105e9e0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x60/0x60
   [<ffffffff817e0750>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb

...and hence simple wait queues were deployed on RT out of necessity
(as simple wait uses a raw lock), but mainline might as well take
advantage of the more streamline support as well.

[1] This is a carry forward of work from v3.10-rt; the original conversion
was by Thomas on an earlier -rt version, and Sebastian extended it to
additional post-3.10 added RCU waiters; here I've added a commit log and
unified the RCU changes into one, and uprev'd it to match mainline RCU.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455871601-27484-6-git-send-email-wagi@monom.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() is called while holding rnp->lock. Currently,
this is okay because the wake_up_all() in rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() will
not enable the IRQs. lockdep is happy.

By switching over using swait this is not true anymore. swake_up_all()
enables the IRQs while processing the waiters. __do_softirq() can now
run and will eventually call rcu_process_callbacks() which wants to
grap nrp->lock.

Let's move the rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() call outside the lock before we
switch over to swait.

If we would hold the rnp->lock and use swait, lockdep reports
following:

 =================================
 [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------
 inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
 rcu_preempt/8 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  (rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
 {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
   [<ffffffff81109b9f>] __lock_acquire+0xd5f/0x21e0
   [<ffffffff8110be0f>] lock_acquire+0xdf/0x2b0
   [<ffffffff81841cc9>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x59/0xa0
   [<ffffffff81136991>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x141/0x3c0
   [<ffffffff810b1a9d>] __do_softirq+0x14d/0x670
   [<ffffffff810b2214>] irq_exit+0x104/0x110
   [<ffffffff81844e96>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x46/0x60
   [<ffffffff81842e70>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x70/0x80
   [<ffffffff810dba66>] rq_attach_root+0xa6/0x100
   [<ffffffff810dbc2d>] cpu_attach_domain+0x16d/0x650
   [<ffffffff810e4b42>] build_sched_domains+0x942/0xb00
   [<ffffffff821777c2>] sched_init_smp+0x509/0x5c1
   [<ffffffff821551e3>] kernel_init_freeable+0x172/0x28f
   [<ffffffff8182cdce>] kernel_init+0xe/0xe0
   [<ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
 irq event stamp: 76
 hardirqs last  enabled at (75): [<ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
 hardirqs last disabled at (76): [<ffffffff8184116f>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x1f/0x90
 softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810a8df2>] copy_process.part.26+0x602/0x1cf0
 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>]           (null)
 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
        CPU0
        ----
   lock(rcu_node_1);
   <Interrupt>
     lock(rcu_node_1);
  *** DEADLOCK ***
 1 lock held by rcu_preempt/8:
  #0:  (rcu_node_1){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff811387c7>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xb97/0xeb0
 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 4.2.0-rc5-00025-g9a73ba0 #136
 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820/066N7P, BIOS 2.0.20 01/16/2014
  0000000000000000 000000006d7e67d8 ffff881fb081fbd8 ffffffff818379e0
  0000000000000000 ffff881fb0812a00 ffff881fb081fc38 ffffffff8110813b
  0000000000000000 0000000000000001 ffff881f00000001 ffffffff8102fa4f
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff818379e0>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
  [<ffffffff8110813b>] print_usage_bug+0x1db/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff8102fa4f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
  [<ffffffff811087ad>] mark_lock+0x66d/0x6e0
  [<ffffffff81107790>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x150/0x150
  [<ffffffff81108898>] mark_held_locks+0x78/0xa0
  [<ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff81108a28>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x168/0x220
  [<ffffffff81108aed>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
  [<ffffffff81841330>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff810fd1c7>] swake_up_all+0xb7/0xe0
  [<ffffffff811386e1>] rcu_gp_kthread+0xab1/0xeb0
  [<ffffffff811089bf>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xff/0x220
  [<ffffffff81841341>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x41/0x60
  [<ffffffff81137c30>] ? rcu_barrier+0x20/0x20
  [<ffffffff810d2014>] kthread+0x104/0x120
  [<ffffffff81841330>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
  [<ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260
  [<ffffffff8184231f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
  [<ffffffff810d1f10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x260/0x260
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455871601-27484-5-git-send-email-wagi@monom.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

In patch:

"rcu: Add transitivity to remaining rcu_node ->lock acquisitions"

All locking operations on rcu_node::lock are replaced with the wrappers
because of the need of transitivity, which indicates we should never
write code using LOCK primitives alone(i.e. without a proper barrier
following) on rcu_node::lock outside those wrappers. We could detect
this kind of misuses on rcu_node::lock in the future by adding __private
modifier on rcu_node::lock.

To privatize rcu_node::lock, unlock wrappers are also needed. Replacing
spinlock unlocks with these wrappers not only privatizes rcu_node::lock
but also makes it easier to figure out critical sections of rcu_node.

This patch adds __private modifier to rcu_node::lock and makes every
access to it wrapped by ACCESS_PRIVATE(). Besides, unlock wrappers are
added and raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock) and its friends are replaced with
those wrappers.
Signed-off-by: NBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The related warning from gcc 6.0:

  In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:4630:0:
  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:810:40: warning: ‘rcu_data_p’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable]
   static struct rcu_data __percpu *const rcu_data_p = &rcu_sched_data;
                                          ^~~~~~~~~~

Also remove always redundant rcu_data_p in tree.c.
Signed-off-by: NChen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that the rcu_state structure's ->rda field is compile-time initialized,
there is no need to pass the per-CPU rcu_data structure into rcu_init_one().
This commit therefore eliminates this now-unused parameter.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

We need the scheduler's fastpaths to be, well, fast, and unnecessarily
disabling and re-enabling interrupts is not necessarily consistent with
this goal.  Especially given that there are regions of the scheduler that
already have interrupts disabled.

This commit therefore moves the call to rcu_note_context_switch()
to one of the interrupts-disabled regions of the scheduler, and
removes the now-redundant disabling and re-enabling of interrupts from
rcu_note_context_switch() and the functions it calls.
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Shift rcu_note_context_switch() to avoid deadlock, as suggested
  by Peter Zijlstra. ]

Currently, rcu_prepare_for_idle() checks for tick_nohz_active, even on
individual NOCBs CPUs, unless all CPUs are marked as NOCBs CPUs at build
time.  This check is pointless on NOCBs CPUs because they never have any
callbacks posted, given that all of their callbacks are handed off to the
corresponding rcuo kthread.  There is a check for individually designated
NOCBs CPUs, but it pointelessly follows the check for tick_nohz_active.

This commit therefore moves the check for individually designated NOCBs
CPUs up with the check for CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This function no longer has #ifdefs, so this commit removes the
header comment calling them out.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Several releases have come and gone without the warning triggering,
so remove the lock-acquisition loop.  Retain the WARN_ON_ONCE()
out of sheer paranoia.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Although expedited grace periods can be quite useful, and although their
OS jitter has been greatly reduced, they can still pose problems for
extreme real-time workloads.  This commit therefore adds a rcu_normal
kernel boot parameter (which can also be manipulated via sysfs)
to suppress expedited grace periods, that is, to treat requests for
expedited grace periods as if they were requests for normal grace periods.
If both rcu_expedited and rcu_normal are specified, rcu_normal wins.
This means that if you are relying on expedited grace periods to speed up
boot, you will want to specify rcu_expedited on the kernel command line,
and then specify rcu_normal via sysfs once boot completes.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The rule is that all acquisitions of the rcu_node structure's ->lock
must provide transitivity:  The lock is not acquired that frequently,
and sorting out exactly which required it and which did not would be
a maintenance nightmare.  This commit therefore supplies the needed
transitivity to the remaining ->lock acquisitions.
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Providing RCU's memory-ordering guarantees requires that the rcu_node
tree's locking provide transitive memory ordering, which the Linux kernel's
spinlocks currently do not provide unless smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
is used.  Having a separate smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() after each and
every lock acquisition is error-prone, hard to read, and a bit annoying,
so this commit provides wrapper functions that pull in the
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() invocations.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit redirects synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s wait to
synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(), thus enabling RCU CPU
stall warnings.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit makes the RCU CPU stall warning message print online/offline
indications immediately after the CPU number.  A "O" indicates global
offline, a "." global online, and a "o" indicates RCU believes that the
CPU is offline for the current grace period and "." otherwise, and an
"N" indicates that RCU believes that the CPU will be offline for the
next grace period, and "." otherwise, all right after the CPU number.
So for CPU 10, you would normally see "10-...:" indicating that everything
believes that the CPU is online.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that sync_sched_exp_select_cpus() and sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus()
are identical aside from the the argument to smp_call_function_single(),
this commit consolidates them with a functional argument.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit makes the RCU CPU stall warning message print online/offline
indications immediately after a hyphen following the CPU number.  A "O"
indicates that the global CPU-hotplug system believes that the CPU is
online, a "o" that RCU perceived the CPU to be online at the beginning
of the current expedited grace period, and an "N" that RCU currently
believes that it will perceive the CPU as being online at the beginning
of the next expedited grace period, with "." otherwise for all three
indications.  So for CPU 10, you would normally see "10-OoN:" indicating
that everything believes that the CPU is online.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

As we now have rcu_callback_t typedefs as the type of rcu callbacks, we
should use it in call_rcu*() and friends as the type of parameters. This
could save us a few lines of code and make it clear which function
requires an rcu callbacks rather than other callbacks as its argument.

Besides, this can also help cscope to generate a better database for
code reading.
Signed-off-by: NBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

This commit converts the rcu_data structure's ->cpu_no_qs field
to a union.  The bytewise side of this union allows individual access
to indications as to whether this CPU needs to find a quiescent state
for a normal (.norm) and/or expedited (.exp) grace period.  The setwise
side of the union allows testing whether or not a quiescent state is
needed at all, for either type of grace period.

For now, only .norm is used.  A later commit will introduce the expedited
usage.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit inverts the sense of the rcu_data structure's ->passed_quiesce
field and renames it to ->cpu_no_qs.  This will allow a later commit to
use an "aggregate OR" operation to test expedited as well as normal grace
periods without added overhead.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

An upcoming commit needs to invert the sense of the ->passed_quiesce
rcu_data structure field, so this commit is taking this opportunity
to clarify things a bit by renaming ->qs_pending to ->core_needs_qs.

So if !rdp->core_needs_qs, then this CPU need not concern itself with
quiescent states, in particular, it need not acquire its leaf rcu_node
structure's ->lock to check.  Otherwise, it needs to report the next
quiescent state.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The current preemptible-RCU expedited grace-period algorithm invokes
synchronize_sched_expedited() to enqueue all tasks currently running
in a preemptible-RCU read-side critical section, then waits for all the
->blkd_tasks lists to drain.  This works, but results in both an IPI and
a double context switch even on CPUs that do not happen to be running
in a preemptible RCU read-side critical section.

This commit implements a new algorithm that causes less OS jitter.
This new algorithm IPIs all online CPUs that are not idle (from an
RCU perspective), but refrains from self-IPIs.  If a CPU receiving
this IPI is not in a preemptible RCU read-side critical section (or
is just now exiting one), it pushes quiescence up the rcu_node tree,
otherwise, it sets a flag that will be handled by the upcoming outermost
rcu_read_unlock(), which will then push quiescence up the tree.

The expedited grace period must of course wait on any pre-existing blocked
readers, and newly blocked readers must be queued carefully based on
the state of both the normal and the expedited grace periods.  This
new queueing approach also avoids the need to update boost state,
courtesy of the fact that blocked tasks are no longer ever migrated to
the root rcu_node structure.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit replaces sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(() and
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2() with sync_exp_reset_tree_hotplug()
and sync_exp_reset_tree(), which will also be used by
synchronize_sched_expedited(), and sync_rcu_exp_select_nodes(), which
contains code specific to synchronize_rcu_expedited().
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This is a nearly pure code-movement commit, moving rcu_report_exp_rnp(),
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(), and rcu_preempted_readers_exp() so
that later commits can make synchronize_sched_expedited() use them.
The non-code-movement portion of this commit tags rcu_report_exp_rnp()
as __maybe_unused to avoid build errors when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that there is an ->expedited_wq waitqueue in each rcu_state structure,
there is no need for the sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq global variable.  This
commit therefore substitutes ->expedited_wq for sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq.
It also initializes ->expedited_wq only once at boot instead of at the
start of each expedited grace period.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

RCU's rcu_oom_notify() disables CPU hotplug in order to stabilize the
list of online CPUs, which it traverses.  However, this is completely
pointless because smp_call_function_single() will quietly fail if invoked
on an offline CPU.  Because the count of requests is incremented in the
rcu_oom_notify_cpu() function that is remotely invoked, everything works
nicely even in the face of concurrent CPU-hotplug operations.

Furthermore, in recent kernels, invoking get_online_cpus() from an OOM
notifier can result in deadlock.  This commit therefore removes the
call to get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() from rcu_oom_notify().
Reported-by: NMarcin Ślusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Tested-by: NMarcin Ślusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>

This commit renames rcu_lockdep_assert() to RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() for
consistency with the WARN() series of macros.  This also requires
inverting the sense of the conditional, which this commit also does.
Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Tasks are no longer migrated to the root rcu_node, so there is no
longer any need for a boost kthread for the root rcu_node, and there no
longer is such a kthread.  This commit therefore fixes the comment in
rcu_boost_kthread()'s header to reflect this new reality.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

One of the requirements on RCU grace periods is that if there is a
causal chain of operations that starts after one grace period and
ends before another grace period, then the two grace periods must
be serialized.  There has been (and might still be) code that relies
on this, for example, certain types of reference-counting code that
does a call_rcu() within an RCU callback function.

This requirement is why there is an smp_mb() at the end of both
synchronize_sched_expedited() and synchronize_rcu_expedited().
However, this is the only smp_mb() in these functions, so it would
be nicer to consolidate it into rcu_exp_gp_seq_end().  This commit
does just that.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit gets rid of synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s mutex_trylock()
polling loop in favor of the funnel-locking scheme that was abstracted
from synchronize_sched_expedited().
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Although synchronize_rcu_expedited() uses a sequence-counter scheme, it
is based on a single increment per grace period, which means that tasks
piggybacking off of concurrent grace periods may be forced to wait longer
than necessary.  This commit therefore applies the new sequence-count
functions developed for synchronize_sched_expedited() to speed things
up a bit and to consolidate the sequence-counter implementation.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>