1. 17 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 12 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      x86: fix wrong section of pat_disable & make it static · 1ee4bd92
      Marcin Slusarz 提交于
      pat_disable cannot be __cpuinit anymore because it's called from pat_init
      and the callchain looks like this:
      pat_disable [cpuinit] <- pat_init <- generic_set_all <-
       ipi_handler <- set_mtrr <- (other non init/cpuinit functions)
      
      WARNING: arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.text+0x449e): Section mismatch in reference
      from the function pat_init() to the function .cpuinit.text:pat_disable()
      The function pat_init() references
      the function __cpuinit pat_disable().
      This is often because pat_init lacks a __cpuinit
      annotation or the annotation of pat_disable is wrong.
      
      Non CONFIG_X86_PAT version of pat_disable is static inline, so this version
      can be static too (and there are no callers outside of this file).
      Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
      LKML-Reference: <49DFB055.6070405@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1ee4bd92
  3. 10 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  4. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 28 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 25 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 12 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 24 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: handle PAT more like other CPU features · 75a04811
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Impact: Cleanup
      
      When PAT was originally introduced, it was handled specially for a few
      reasons:
      
      - PAT bugs are hard to track down, so we wanted to maintain a
        whitelist of CPUs.
      - The i386 and x86-64 CPUID code was not yet unified.
      
      Both of these are now obsolete, so handle PAT like any other features,
      including ordinary feature blacklisting due to known bugs.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      75a04811
  9. 22 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 16 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 15 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 14 1月, 2009 3 次提交
    • V
      x86 PAT: remove CPA WARN_ON for zero pte · 58dab916
      venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com 提交于
      Impact: reduce scope of debug check - avoid warnings
      
      The logic to find whether identity map exists or not using
      high_memory or max_low_pfn_mapped/max_pfn_mapped are not complete
      as the memory withing the range may not be mapped if there is a
      unusable hole in e820.
      
      Specifically, on my test system I started seeing these warnings with
      tools like hwinfo, acpidump trying to map ACPI region.
      
      [   27.400018] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [   27.400344] WARNING: at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:560 __change_page_attr_set_clr+0xf3/0x8b8()
      [   27.400821] Hardware name: X7DB8
      [   27.401070] CPA: called for zero pte. vaddr = ffff8800cff6a000 cpa->vaddr = ffff8800cff6a000
      [   27.401569] Modules linked in:
      [   27.401882] Pid: 4913, comm: dmidecode Not tainted 2.6.28-05716-gfe0bdec6 #586
      [   27.402141] Call Trace:
      [   27.402488]  [<ffffffff80237c21>] warn_slowpath+0xd3/0x10f
      [   27.402749]  [<ffffffff80274ade>] ? find_get_page+0xb3/0xc9
      [   27.403028]  [<ffffffff80274a2b>] ? find_get_page+0x0/0xc9
      [   27.403333]  [<ffffffff80226425>] __change_page_attr_set_clr+0xf3/0x8b8
      [   27.403628]  [<ffffffff8028ec99>] ? __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x192/0x1a1
      [   27.403883]  [<ffffffff8028eb52>] ? __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x4b/0x1a1
      [   27.404172]  [<ffffffff80290268>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x1ab/0x1bb
      [   27.404512]  [<ffffffff80290105>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x48/0x1bb
      [   27.404766]  [<ffffffff80226d28>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0x13e/0x2e6
      [   27.405026]  [<ffffffff80698fa7>] ? _spin_unlock+0x26/0x2a
      [   27.405292]  [<ffffffff80227e6a>] ? reserve_memtype+0x19b/0x4e3
      [   27.405590]  [<ffffffff80226ffd>] _set_memory_wb+0x22/0x24
      [   27.405844]  [<ffffffff80225d28>] ioremap_change_attr+0x26/0x28
      [   27.406097]  [<ffffffff80228355>] reserve_pfn_range+0x1a3/0x235
      [   27.406427]  [<ffffffff80228430>] track_pfn_vma_new+0x49/0xb3
      [   27.406686]  [<ffffffff80286c46>] remap_pfn_range+0x94/0x32c
      [   27.406940]  [<ffffffff8022878d>] ? phys_mem_access_prot_allowed+0xb5/0x1a8
      [   27.407209]  [<ffffffff803e9bf4>] mmap_mem+0x75/0x9d
      [   27.407523]  [<ffffffff8028b3b4>] mmap_region+0x2cf/0x53e
      [   27.407776]  [<ffffffff8028b8cc>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x2a9/0x30d
      [   27.408034]  [<ffffffff8020f4a4>] sys_mmap+0x92/0xce
      [   27.408339]  [<ffffffff8020b65b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [   27.408614] ---[ end trace 4b16ad70c09a602d ]---
      [   27.408871] dmidecode:4913 reserve_pfn_range ioremap_change_attr failed write-back for cff6a000-cff6b000
      
      This is wih track_pfn_vma_new trying to keep identity map in sync.
      The address cff6a000 is the ACPI region according to e820.
      
      [    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009c000 (usable)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 000000000009c000 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000000cc000 - 00000000000d0000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000000e4000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff60000 (usable)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000cff60000 - 00000000cff69000 (ACPI data)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000cff69000 - 00000000cff80000 (ACPI NVS)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
      [    0.000000]  BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000230000000 (usable)
      
      And is not mapped as per init_memory_mapping.
      
      [    0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff60000
      [    0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-0000000230000000
      
      We can add logic to check for this. But, there can also be other holes in
      identity map when we have 1GB of aligned reserved space in e820.
      
      This patch handles it by removing the WARN_ON and returning a specific
      error value (EFAULT) to indicate that the address does not have any
      identity mapping.
      
      The code that tries to keep identity map in sync can ignore
      this error, with other callers of cpa still getting error here.
      Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      58dab916
    • V
      x86 PAT: return compatible mapping to remap_pfn_range callers · cdecff68
      venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com 提交于
      Impact: avoid warning message, potentially solve 3D performance regression
      
      Change x86 PAT code to return compatible memtype if the exact memtype that
      was requested in remap_pfn_rage and friends is not available due to some
      conflict.
      
      This is done by returning the compatible type in pgprot parameter of
      track_pfn_vma_new(), and the caller uses that memtype for page table.
      
      Note that track_pfn_vma_copy() which is basically called during fork gets the
      prot from existing page table and should not have any conflict. Hence we use
      strict memtype check there and do not allow compatible memtypes.
      
      This patch fixes the bug reported here:
      
        http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123108883716357&w=2
      
      Specifically the error message:
      
        X:5010 map pfn expected mapping type write-back for d0000000-d0101000,
        got write-combining
      
      Should go away.
      Reported-and-bisected-by: NKevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      cdecff68
    • V
      x86 PAT: change track_pfn_vma_new to take pgprot_t pointer param · e4b866ed
      venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com 提交于
      Impact: cleanup
      
      Change the protection parameter for track_pfn_vma_new() into a pgprot_t pointer.
      Subsequent patch changes the x86 PAT handling to return a compatible
      memtype in pgprot_t, if what was requested cannot be allowed due to conflicts.
      No fuctionality change in this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e4b866ed
  13. 24 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: PAT: fix address types in track_pfn_vma_new() · c1c15b65
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Impact: cleanup, fix warning
      
      This warning:
      
       arch/x86/mm/pat.c: In function track_pfn_vma_copy:
       arch/x86/mm/pat.c:701: warning: passing argument 5 of follow_phys from incompatible pointer type
      
      Triggers because physical addresses are resource_size_t, not u64.
      
      This really matters when calling an interface like follow_phys() which
      takes a pointer to a physical address -- although on x86, being
      littleendian, it would generally work anyway as long as the memory region
      wasn't completely uninitialized.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c1c15b65
  14. 20 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 19 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  16. 31 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 11 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  18. 21 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  20. 12 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 20 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • I
      Subject: devmem, x86: fix rename of CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM · d092633b
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:47:17 -0700
      
      CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM was a rather confusing name - but renaming it
      to CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM causes problems on architectures that do not
      support this feature; this patch renames it to CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM,
      so that architectures can opt-in into it.
      
      ( the polarity of the option is still the same as it was originally; it
        needs to be for now to not break architectures that don't have the
        infastructure yet to support this feature)
      Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: "V.Radhakrishnan" <rk@atr-labs.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ---
      d092633b
  22. 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 18 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • I
      x86: rename CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM to CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM · 64d206d8
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Linus observed:
      
      > The real bug is that we shouldn't have "double negatives", and
      > certainly not negative config options. Making that "promiscuous
      > /dev/mem" option a negated thing as a config option was bad.
      
      right ... lets rename this option. There should never be a negation
      in config options.
      
      [ that reminds me of CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER, but that
        is for another commit ;-) ]
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      64d206d8
  24. 13 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 11 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 24 6月, 2008 7 次提交
  27. 19 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  28. 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  29. 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交