1. 20 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  2. 17 3月, 2007 2 次提交
  3. 22 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • F
      [MIPS] Add basic SMARTMIPS ASE support · 9693a853
      Franck Bui-Huu 提交于
      This patch adds trivial support for SMARTMIPS extension. This extension
      is currently implemented by 4KS[CD] CPUs.
      
      Basically it saves/restores ACX register, which is part of the SMARTMIPS
      ASE, when needed. This patch does *not* add any support for Smartmips MMU
      features.
      
      Futhermore this patch does not add explicit support for 4KS[CD] CPUs since
      they are respectively mips32 and mips32r2 compliant.  So with the current
      processor configuration, a platform that has such CPUs needs to select
      both configs:
      
      	CPU_HAS_SMARTMIPS
      	SYS_HAS_CPU_MIPS32_R[12]
      
      This is due to the processor configuration which is mixing up all the
      architecture variants and the processor types.
      
      The drawback of this, is that we currently pass '-march=mips32' option to
      gcc when building a kernel instead of '-march=4ksc' for 4KSC case. This
      can lead to a kernel image a little bit bigger than required.
      Signed-off-by: NFranck Bui-Huu <fbuihuu@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      9693a853
  4. 19 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 14 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  6. 11 2月, 2007 6 次提交
  7. 07 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  8. 27 9月, 2006 3 次提交
  9. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 09 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  12. 07 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  13. 01 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 08 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  15. 30 10月, 2005 4 次提交
  16. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] convert signal handling of NODEFER to act like other Unix boxes. · 69be8f18
      Steven Rostedt 提交于
      It has been reported that the way Linux handles NODEFER for signals is
      not consistent with the way other Unix boxes handle it.  I've written a
      program to test the behavior of how this flag affects signals and had
      several reports from people who ran this on various Unix boxes,
      confirming that Linux seems to be unique on the way this is handled.
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on other Unix boxes is as follows:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals in sa_mask are still blocked.
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal is
      still blocked. (Note: this is the behavior of all tested but Linux _and_
      NetBSD 2.0 *).
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on Linux:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals are _not_ blocked regardless of
      sa_mask (Even NetBSD doesn't do this).
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal being
      handled is not blocked.
      
      The patch converts signal handling in all current Linux architectures to
      the way most Unix boxes work.
      
      Unix boxes that were tested:  DU4, AIX 5.2, Irix 6.5, NetBSD 2.0, SFU
      3.5 on WinXP, AIX 5.3, Mac OSX, and of course Linux 2.6.13-rcX.
      
      * NetBSD was the only other Unix to behave like Linux on point #2. The
      main concern was brought up by point #1 which even NetBSD isn't like
      Linux.  So with this patch, we leave NetBSD as the lonely one that
      behaves differently here with #2.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      69be8f18
  17. 28 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  18. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4