Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 09 8月, 2014 14 次提交
  5. 05 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 08 4月, 2014 3 次提交
  9. 20 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 24 1月, 2014 4 次提交
    • O
      proc: fix ->f_pos overflows in first_tid() · 9f6e963f
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      1. proc_task_readdir()->first_tid() path truncates f_pos to int, this
   is wrong even on 64bit.

   We could check that f_pos < PID_MAX or even INT_MAX in
   proc_task_readdir(), but this patch simply checks the potential
   overflow in first_tid(), this check is nop on 64bit.  We do not care if
   it was negative and the new unsigned value is huge, all we need to
   ensure is that we never wrongly return !NULL.

2. Remove the 2nd "nr != 0" check before get_nr_threads(),
   nr_threads == 0 is not distinguishable from !pid_task() above.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9f6e963f
    • O
      proc: don't (ab)use ->group_leader in proc_task_readdir() paths · d855a4b7
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      proc_task_readdir() does not really need "leader", first_tid() has to
revalidate it anyway.  Just pass proc_pid(inode) to first_tid() instead,
it can do pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) itself and read ->group_leader only if
necessary.

The patch also extracts the "inode is dead" code from
pid_delete_dentry(dentry) into the new trivial helper,
proc_inode_is_dead(inode), proc_task_readdir() uses it to return -ENOENT
if this dir was removed.

This is a bit racy, but the race is very inlikely and the getdents() after
openndir() can see the empty "." + ".." dir only once.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d855a4b7
    • O
      proc: change first_tid() to use while_each_thread() rather than next_thread() · c986c14a
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Rerwrite the main loop to use while_each_thread() instead of
next_thread().  We are going to fix or replace while_each_thread(),
next_thread() should be avoided whenever possible.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c986c14a
    • O
      proc: fix the potential use-after-free in first_tid() · 940fe479
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      proc_task_readdir() verifies that the result of get_proc_task() is
pid_alive() and thus its ->group_leader is fine too.  However this is not
necessarily true after rcu_read_unlock(), we need to recheck this again
after first_tid() does rcu_read_lock().  Otherwise
leader->thread_group.next (used by next_thread()) can be invalid if the
rcu grace period expires in between.

The race is subtle and unlikely, but still it is possible afaics.  To
simplify lets ignore the "likely" case when tid != 0, f_version can be
cleared by proc_task_operations->llseek().

Suppose we have a main thread M and its subthread T.  Suppose that f_pos
== 3, iow first_tid() should return T.  Now suppose that the following
happens between rcu_read_unlock() and rcu_read_lock():

	1. T execs and becomes the new leader. This removes M from
	    ->thread_group but next_thread(M) is still T.

	2. T creates another thread X which does exec as well, T
	   goes away.

	3. X creates another subthread, this increments nr_threads.

	4. first_tid() does next_thread(M) and returns the already
	   dead T.

Note also that we need 2.  and 3.  only because of get_nr_threads() check,
and this check was supposed to be optimization only.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      940fe479
  15. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 29 6月, 2013 5 次提交
  19. 28 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 02 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  23. 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 18 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • P
      posix-timers: Show sigevent info in proc file · 57b8015e
      由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于 
      Previous patch added proc file to list posix timers created by task.
Expand the information provided in this file by adding info about
notification method, with which timers were created. I.e. after
the "ID:" line there go

1. "signal:" line, that shows signal number and sigval bits;
2. "notify:" line, that shows the timer notification method.

Thus the timer entry would looke like this:

ID: 123
signal: 14/0000000000b005d0
notify: signal/pid.732

This information is enough to understand how timer_create() was called
for each particular timer.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/513DA024.80404@parallels.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      57b8015e
    • P
      posix-timers: Introduce /proc/PID/timers file · 48f6a7a5
      由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于 
      Currently kernel doesn't provide any API for getting info about what
posix timers are configured by processes. It's implied, that a process
which configured some timers, knows what it did. However, for external
tools it's impossible to get this information. In particular, this is
critical for checkpoint-restore project to have this info.

Introduce a per-pid proc file with information about posix
timers. Since these timers are shared between threads, this file is
present on tgid level only, no such thing in tid subdirs.

The file format is expected to be the "/proc/<pid>/smaps"-like,
i.e. each timer will occupy seveal lines to allow for future
extending.

Each new timer entry starts with the

ID: <number>

line which is added by this patch.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/513DA00D.6070009@parallels.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      48f6a7a5
  27. 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交