If the owner of a PI futex dies we fix up the pi_state and set
pi_state->owner to NULL. When a malicious or just sloppy programmed
user space application sets the futex value to 0 e.g. by calling
pthread_mutex_init(), then the futex can be acquired again. A new
waiter manages to enqueue itself on the pi_state w/o damage, but on
unlock the kernel dereferences pi_state->owner and oopses.

Prevent this by checking pi_state->owner in the unlock path. If
pi_state->owner is not current we know that user space manipulated the
futex value. Ignore the mess and return -EINVAL.

This catches the above case and also the case where a task hijacks the
futex by setting the tid value and then tries to unlock it.
Reported-by: NJermome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>

This fixes a futex key reference count bug in futex_lock_pi(),
where a key's reference count is incremented twice but decremented
only once, causing the backing object to not be released.

If the futex is created in a temporary file in an ext3 file system,
this bug causes the file's inode to become an "undead" orphan,
which causes an oops from a BUG_ON() in ext3_put_super() when the
file system is unmounted. glibc's test suite is known to trigger this,
see <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256>.

The bug is a regression from 2.6.28-git3, namely Peter Zijlstra's
38d47c1b "[PATCH] futex: rely on
get_user_pages() for shared futexes". That commit made get_futex_key()
also increment the reference count of the futex key, and updated its
callers to decrement the key's reference count before returning.
Unfortunately the normal exit path in futex_lock_pi() wasn't corrected:
the reference count is incremented by get_futex_key() and queue_lock(),
but the normal exit path only decrements once, via unqueue_me_pi().
The fix is to put_futex_key() after unqueue_me_pi(), since 2.6.31
this is easily done by 'goto out_put_key' rather than 'goto out'.
Signed-off-by: NMikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>

Currently, futexes have two problem:

A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly.

get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and
anon, which can cause the following bad scenario:

  1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it
     sleeps on file mapping object.
  2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow.
  3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it
     wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing)

B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly.

Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current
futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes
infinite loop internally.

The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for
page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private
mappings and zero page.

Performance concerns:

Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables
for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see
the overhead of this patch.

Compatibility concerns:

This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch,
FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only
mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem,
glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody
uses read-only mappings.
Reported-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100105162633.45A2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Convert locks which cannot be sleeping locks in preempt-rt to
raw_spinlocks.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Convert locks which cannot be sleeping locks in preempt-rt to
raw_spinlocks.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

plists are used with spinlocks and raw_spinlocks. Change the plist
debugging to handle both types.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

get_user_pages() must be called with mmap_sem held.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091208121942.GA21298@basil.fritz.box>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The requeue_pi path doesn't use unqueue_me() (and the racy lock_ptr ==
NULL test) nor does it use the wake_list of futex_wake() which where
the reason for commit 41890f2 (futex: Handle spurious wake up)

See debugging discussing on LKML Message-ID: <4AD4080C.20703@us.ibm.com>

The changes in this fix to the wait_requeue_pi path were considered to
be a likely unecessary, but harmless safety net. But it turns out that
due to the fact that for unknown $@#!*( reasons EWOULDBLOCK is defined
as EAGAIN we built an endless loop in the code path which returns
correctly EWOULDBLOCK.

Spurious wakeups in wait_requeue_pi code path are unlikely so we do
the easy solution and return EWOULDBLOCK^WEAGAIN to user space and let
it deal with the spurious wakeup.

Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4AE23C74.1090502@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

When requeuing tasks from one futex to another, the reference held
by the requeued task to the original futex location needs to be
dropped eventually.

Dropping the reference may ultimately lead to a call to
"iput_final" and subsequently call into filesystem- specific code -
which may be non-atomic.

It is therefore safer to defer this drop operation until after the
futex_hash_bucket spinlock has been dropped.

Originally-From: Helge Bahmann <hcb@chaoticmind.net>
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <4AD7A298.5040802@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

If userspace tries to perform a requeue_pi on a non-requeue_pi waiter,
it will find the futex_q->requeue_pi_key to be NULL and OOPS.

Check for NULL in match_futex() instead of doing explicit NULL pointer
checks on all call sites.  While match_futex(NULL, NULL) returning
false is a little odd, it's still correct as we expect valid key
references.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
CC: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
LKML-Reference: <4AD60687.10306@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The futex code does not handle spurious wake up in futex_wait and
futex_wait_requeue_pi.

The code assumes that any wake up which was not caused by futex_wake /
requeue or by a timeout was caused by a signal wake up and returns one
of the syscall restart error codes.

In case of a spurious wake up the signal delivery code which deals
with the restart error codes is not invoked and we return that error
code to user space. That causes applications which actually check the
return codes to fail. Blaise reported that on preempt-rt a python test
program run into a exception trap. -rt exposed that due to a built in
spurious wake up accelerator :)

Solve this by checking signal_pending(current) in the wake up path and
handle the spurious wake up case w/o returning to user space.
Reported-by: NBlaise Gassend <blaise@willowgarage.com>
Debugged-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>

If futex_wait_requeue_pi() wakes prior to requeue, we drop the
reference to the source futex_key twice, once in
handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() and once on our way out.

Remove the drop from the handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() and keep
the get/drops together in futex_wait_requeue_pi().
Reported-by: NHelge Bahmann <hcb@chaoticmind.net>
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Bahmann <hcb@chaoticmind.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable-2.6.31 <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4ACCE21E.5030805@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Rich reported a lock imbalance in the futex code:

   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14288

It's caused by the displacement of the retry_private label in
futex_wake_op(). The code unlocks the hash bucket locks in the
error handling path and retries without locking them again which
makes the next unlock fail.

Move retry_private so we lock the hash bucket locks when we retry.
Reported-by: NRich Ercolany <rercola@acm.jhu.edu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable-2.6.31 <stable@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The memory barrier semantics of futex_wait_queue_me() are
non-obvious. Add some commentary to try and clarify it.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090924185447.694.38948.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

PI futexes do not use the same plist_node_empty() test for wakeup.
It was possible for the waiter (in futex_wait_requeue_pi()) to set
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after the waker assigned the rtmutex to the
waiter. The waiter would then note the plist was not empty and call
schedule(). The task would not be found by any subsequeuent futex
wakeups, resulting in a userspace hang.

By moving the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to before the call to
queue_me(), the race with the waker is eliminated. Since we no
longer call get_user() from within queue_me(), there is no need to
delay the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE until after the call to
queue_me().

The FUTEX_LOCK_PI operation is not affected as futex_lock_pi()
relies entirely on the rtmutex code to handle schedule() and
wakeup.  The requeue PI code is affected because the waiter starts
as a non-PI waiter and is woken on a PI futex.

Remove the crusty old comment about holding spinlocks() across
get_user() as we no longer do that. Correct the locking statement
with a description of why the test is performed.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922053038.8717.97838.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Use kernel-doc format to describe struct futex_q.

Correct the wakeup definition to eliminate the statement about
waking the waiter between the plist_del() and the q->lock_ptr = 0.

Note in the comment that PI futexes have a different definition of
the woken state.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922053029.8717.62798.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Make the existing function kernel-doc consistent throughout
futex.c, following Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-howto.txt as
closely as possible.

When unsure, at least be consistent within futex.c.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922053022.8717.13339.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The queue_me/unqueue_me commentary is oddly placed and out of date.
Clean it up and correct the inaccurate bits.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922053015.8717.71713.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Correct various typos and formatting inconsistencies in the
commentary of futex_wait_requeue_pi().
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922052958.8717.21932.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

There is currently no check to ensure that userspace uses the same
futex requeue target (uaddr2) in futex_requeue() that the waiter used
in futex_wait_requeue_pi().  A mismatch here could very unexpected
results as the waiter assumes it either wakes on uaddr1 or uaddr2. We
could detect this on wakeup in the waiter, but the cleanup is more
intense after the improper requeue has occured.

This patch stores the waiter's expected requeue target in a new
requeue_pi_key pointer in the futex_q which futex_requeue() checks
prior to attempting to do a proxy lock acquistion or a requeue when
requeue_pi=1. If they don't match, return -EINVAL from futex_requeue,
aborting the requeue of any remaining waiters.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090814003650.14634.63916.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

If futex_requeue(requeue_pi=1) finds a futex_q that was created by a call
other the futex_wait_requeue_pi(), the q.rt_waiter may be null.  If so,
this will result in an oops from the following call graph:

futex_requeue()
  rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
    task_blocks_on_rt_mutex()
      waiter->task dereference
        OOPS

We currently WARN_ON() if this is detected, clearly this is inadequate.
If we detect a mispairing in futex_requeue(), bail out, seding -EINVAL to
user-space.

V2: Fix parenthesis warnings.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4A7CA8C0.7010809@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

futex_requeue() can acquire the lock on behalf of a waiter
early on or during the requeue loop if it is uncontended or in
the event of a lock steal or owner died. On wakeup, the waiter
(in futex_wait_requeue_pi()) cleans up the pi_state owner using
the lock_ptr to protect against concurrent access to the
pi_state. The pi_state is hung off futex_q's on the requeue
target futex hash bucket so the lock_ptr needs to be updated
accordingly.

The problem manifested by triggering the WARN_ON in
lookup_pi_state() about the pid != pi_state->owner->pid.  With
this patch, the pi_state is properly guarded against concurrent
access via the requeue target hb lock.

The astute reviewer may notice that there is a window of time
between when futex_requeue() unlocks the hb locks and when
futex_wait_requeue_pi() will acquire hb2->lock.  During this
time the pi_state and uval are not in sync with the underlying
rtmutex owner (but the uval does indicate there are waiters, so
no atomic changes will occur in userspace).  However, this is
not a problem. Should a contending thread enter
lookup_pi_state() and acquire hb2->lock before the ownership is
fixed up, it will find the pi_state hung off a waiter's
(possibly the pending owner's) futex_q and block on the
rtmutex.  Once futex_wait_requeue_pi() fixes up the owner, it
will also move the pi_state from the old owner's
task->pi_state_list to its own.

v3: Fix plist lock name for application to mainline (rather
    than -rt) Compile tested against tip/v2.6.31-rc5.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4A7F4EFF.6090903@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The state machine described in the comments wasn't updated with
a follow-on fix.  Address that and cleanup the corresponding
commentary in the function.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <4A737C2A.9090001@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

get_futex_key() can infinitely loop if it is called on a
virtual address that is within a huge page but not aligned to
the beginning of that page.  The call to get_user_pages_fast
will return the struct page for a sub-page within the huge page
and the check for page->mapping will always fail.

The fix is to call compound_head on the page before checking
that it's mapped.
Signed-off-by: NSonny Rao <sonnyrao@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: anton@samba.org
Cc: rajamony@us.ibm.com
Cc: speight@us.ibm.com
Cc: mstephen@us.ibm.com
Cc: grimm@us.ibm.com
Cc: mikey@ozlabs.au.ibm.com
LKML-Reference: <20090710231313.GA23572@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Yanmin noticed that fault_in_user_writeable() requests 4 pages instead
of one.

That's the result of blindly trusting Linus' proposal :) I even looked
up the prototype to verify the correctness: the argument in question
is confusingly enough named "len" while in reality it means number of
pages.
Pointed-out-by: NYanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

commit 64d1304a (futex: setup writeable mapping for futex ops which
modify user space data) did address only half of the problem of write
access faults.

The patch was made on two wrong assumptions:

1) access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE,...) would actually check write access.

   On x86 it does _NOT_. It's a pure address range check.

2) a RW mapped region can not go away under us.

   That's wrong as well. Nobody can prevent another thread to call
   mprotect(PROT_READ) on that region where the futex resides. If that
   call hits between the get_user_pages_fast() verification and the
   actual write access in the atomic region we are toast again.

The solution is to not rely on access_ok and get_user() for any write
access related fault on private and shared futexes. Instead we need to
fault it in with verification of write access.

There is no generic non destructive write mechanism which would fault
the user page in trough a #PF, but as we already know that we will
fault we can as well call get_user_pages() directly and avoid the #PF
overhead.

If get_user_pages() returns -EFAULT we know that we can not fix it
anymore and need to bail out to user space.

Remove a bunch of confusing comments on this issue as well.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

If the waiter has been requeued to the outer PI futex and is
interrupted by a signal and the thread handles the signal then
ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK is changed to EINTR and the restart block is
discarded. That way we return an unexcpected EINTR to user space
instead of ending up in futex_lock_pi_restart.

But we do not need to restart the syscall because we know that the
condition has changed since we have been requeued. If we would simply
restart the syscall then we would drop out via the comparison of the
user space value with EWOULDBLOCK.

The user space side needs to handle EWOULDBLOCK anyway as the
enqueueing on the inner futex can race with a requeue/wake. So we can
simply return EWOULDBLOCK to user space which also signals that we did
not take the outer futex and let user space handle it in the same way
it has to handle the requeue/wake race.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The futex_wait_requeue_pi op should restart unconditionally like
futex_lock_pi. The user of that function e.g. pthread_cond_wait can
not be interrupted so we do not care about the SA_RESTART flag of the
signal. Clean up the FIXMEs.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Reuse the put_key_ref(key2) call in the exit path.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The futex code installs a read only mapping via get_user_pages_fast()
even if the futex op function has to modify user space data. The
eventual fault was fixed up by futex_handle_fault() which walked the
VMA with mmap_sem held.

After the cleanup patches which removed the mmap_sem dependency of the
futex code commit 4dc5b7a36a49eff97050894cf1b3a9a02523717 (futex:
clean up fault logic) removed the private VMA walk logic from the
futex code. This change results in a stale RO mapping which is not
fixed up.

Instead of reintroducing the previous fault logic we set up the
mapping in get_user_pages_fast() read/write for all operations which
modify user space data. Also handle private futexes in the same way
and make the current unconditional access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE) depend on
the futex op.
Reported-by: NAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: stable@kernel.org

The waitqueue which is used in struct futex_q is a leftover from the
futexfd implementation. There is no need to use a waitqueue at all, as
the waiting task is the only user of it. The waitqueue just adds
additional locking and a loop in the wake up path which both can be
avoided.

We have already a task reference in struct futex_q which is used for
PI futexes. Use it for normal futexes as well and just wake up the
task directly.

The logic of signalling the futex wakeup via setting q->lock_ptr to
NULL is kept with the difference that we set it NULL before doing the
wakeup. This opens an exit race window vs. a non futex wake up of the
to be woken up task, which we prevent with get_task_struct /
put_task_struct on the waiter.

[ Impact: simplification ]
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The new requeue PI futex op codes were modeled after the existing
FUTEX_REQUEUE and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE calls.  I was unaware at the time
that FUTEX_REQUEUE was only around for compatibility reasons and
shouldn't be used in new code.  Ulrich Drepper elaborates on this in his
Futexes are Tricky paper: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/futex.pdf.
The deprecated call doesn't catch changes to the futex corresponding to
the destination futex which can lead to deadlock.

Therefor, I feel it best to remove FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI and leave only
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI as there are not yet any existing users of the API.
This patch does change the OP code value of FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI to 12
from 13.  Since my test case is the only known user of this API, I felt
this was the right thing to do, rather than leave a hole in the
enumeration.

I chose to continue using the _CMP_ modifier in the OP code to make it
explicit to the user that the test is being done.

Builds, boots, and ran several hundred iterations requeue_pi.c.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <49ED580E.1050502@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

If the get_futex_key() call were to fail, the existing code would
try and put_futex_key() prior to returning.  This patch makes sure
we only put_futex_key() if get_futex_key() succeeded.
Reported-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090410165005.14342.16973.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thomas's testing caught a problem when the requeue target futex is
unowned and multiple tasks are requeued to it. This patch ensures
the FUTEX_WAITERS bit gets set if futex_requeue() will requeue one
or more tasks in addition to the one acquiring the lock.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

PI Futexes and their underlying rt_mutex cannot be left ownerless if
there are pending waiters as this will break the PI boosting logic, so
the standard requeue commands aren't sufficient.  The new commands
properly manage pi futex ownership by ensuring a futex with waiters
has an owner at all times.  This will allow glibc to properly handle
pi mutexes with pthread_condvars.

The approach taken here is to create two new futex op codes:

FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI:
Tasks will use this op code to wait on a futex (such as a non-pi waitqueue)
and wake after they have been requeued to a pi futex.  Prior to returning to
userspace, they will acquire this pi futex (and the underlying rt_mutex).

futex_wait_requeue_pi() is the result of a high speed collision between
futex_wait() and futex_lock_pi() (with the first part of futex_lock_pi() being
done by futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() on behalf of the top_waiter).

FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI (and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI):
This call must be used to wake tasks waiting with FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI,
regardless of how many tasks the caller intends to wake or requeue.
pthread_cond_broadcast() should call this with nr_wake=1 and
nr_requeue=INT_MAX.  pthread_cond_signal() should call this with nr_wake=1 and
nr_requeue=0.  The reason being we need both callers to get the benefit of the
futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() routine.  futex_requeue() also enqueues the
top_waiter on the rt_mutex via rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock().
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Refactor the code to validate the expected futex value in order to
reuse it with the requeue_pi code.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

futex_requeue() is getting a bit long-winded, and will be getting more
so after the requeue_pi patch. Factor out the actual requeueing into a
nicely contained inline function to reduce function length and improve
legibility.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Currently restart is only used if there is a timeout. The requeue_pi
functionality requires restarting to futex_lock_pi() on signal after
wakeup in futex_wait_requeue_pi() regardless of if there was a timeout
or not. Using 0 for the timeout value is confusing as that could
indicate an expired timer. The flag makes this explicit. While the
check is not technically needed in futex_wait_restart(), doing so
makes the code consistent with and will avoid confusion should the
need arise to restart wait without a timeout.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Refactor the post lock acquisition logic from futex_lock_pi(). This
code will be reused in futex_wait_requeue_pi().
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Refactor the atomic portion of futex_lock_pi() into futex_lock_pi_atomic().

This logic will be needed by requeue_pi, so modularize it to reduce
code duplication.  The only significant change is passing of the task
to try and take the lock for.  This simplifies the -EDEADLK test as if
the lock is owned by task t, it's a deadlock, regardless of if we are
doing requeue pi or not.  This patch updates the corresponding comment
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>