1. 03 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner · 99b76233
      Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
      Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
      as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
      ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
      in module refcount underflow.
      
      We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
      and ->data.
      
      But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
      and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
      switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
      some thoughts.
      
      ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
      protection.
      
      rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
      And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
      We definitely don't want such modular code.
      
      Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.
      
      So, let's nuke it.
      
      Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.
      
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      99b76233
  4. 22 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 19 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 14 3月, 2009 4 次提交
  7. 04 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 03 3月, 2009 7 次提交
  9. 16 2月, 2009 4 次提交
  10. 01 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 23 1月, 2009 4 次提交
  12. 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 26 12月, 2008 5 次提交
  15. 28 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 26 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 24 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 17 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 04 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      net: '&' redux · 6d9f239a
      Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
      I want to compile out proc_* and sysctl_* handlers totally and
      stub them to NULL depending on config options, however usage of &
      will prevent this, since taking adress of NULL pointer will break
      compilation.
      
      So, drop & in front of every ->proc_handler and every ->strategy
      handler, it was never needed in fact.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6d9f239a
  20. 31 10月, 2008 1 次提交