- 03 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts the tty layer change to use per-tty locking, because it's not correct yet, and fixing it will require some more deep surgery. The main revert is d29f3ef3 ("tty_lock: Localise the lock"), but there are several smaller commits that built upon it, they also get reverted here. The list of reverted commits is: fde86d31 - tty: add lockdep annotations 8f6576ad - tty: fix ldisc lock inversion trace d3ca8b64 - pty: Fix lock inversion b1d679af - tty: drop the pty lock during hangup abcefe5f - tty/amiserial: Add missing argument for tty_unlock() fd11b42e - cris: fix missing tty arg in wait_event_interruptible_tty call d29f3ef3 - tty_lock: Localise the lock The revert had a trivial conflict in the 68360serial.c staging driver that got removed in the meantime. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo Padovan 提交于
defer_setup and suspended are now flags into bt_sk(). Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
In each remaining case the tty_lock is associated with a specific tty. This means we can now lock on a per tty basis. We do need tty_lock_pair() for the pty case. Uglier but still a step in the right direction. [fixed up calls in 3 missing drivers - gregkh] Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 10 4月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
This means converting an atomic counter to a counter protected by lock. This is the first step needed to convert the rest of the code to the tty_port helpers. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
tty_wakeup is safe to be called from all contexts. No need to schedule a work for that. Let us call it directly like in other drivers. This allows us to kill another member of rfcomm_dev structure. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
Switch the refcounting from manual atomic plays with refcounter to the one offered by tty_port. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
And use tty from there. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing it. Performed with the following command: perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *` Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
All num, magic and owner are set by alloc_tty_driver. No need to re-set them on each allocation site. pti driver sets something different to what it passes to alloc_tty_driver. It is not a bug, since we don't use the lines parameter in any way. Anyway this is fixed, and now we do the right thing. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: NTilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 08 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luiz Augusto von Dentz 提交于
+ src/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c: warning: 'p' is used uninitialized in this function: => 218 + src/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c: warning: 'p' may be used uninitialized in this function: => 218 Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
There is an imbalance in the rfcomm_session_hold / rfcomm_session_put operations which causes the following crash: [ 685.010159] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b [ 685.010169] IP: [<c149d76d>] rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e [ 685.010181] *pdpt = 000000002d665001 *pde = 0000000000000000 [ 685.010191] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 685.010247] [ 685.010255] Pid: 947, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G C 3.0.16-mid8-dirty #44 [ 685.010266] EIP: 0060:[<c149d76d>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 [ 685.010274] EIP is at rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e [ 685.010281] EAX: e79f551c EBX: 6b6b6b6b ECX: 00000007 EDX: e79f40b4 [ 685.010288] ESI: e79f4060 EDI: ed4e1f70 EBP: ed4e1f68 ESP: ed4e1f50 [ 685.010295] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 [ 685.010303] Process krfcommd (pid: 947, ti=ed4e0000 task=ed43e5e0 task.ti=ed4e0000) [ 685.010308] Stack: [ 685.010312] ed4e1f68 c149eb53 e5925150 e79f4060 ed500000 ed4e1f70 ed4e1f80 c149ec10 [ 685.010331] 00000000 ed43e5e0 00000000 ed4e1f90 ed4e1f9c c149ec87 0000bf54 00000000 [ 685.010348] 00000000 ee03bf54 c149ec37 ed4e1fe4 c104fe01 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 685.010367] Call Trace: [ 685.010376] [<c149eb53>] ? rfcomm_process_rx+0x6e/0x74 [ 685.010387] [<c149ec10>] rfcomm_process_sessions+0xb7/0xde [ 685.010398] [<c149ec87>] rfcomm_run+0x50/0x6d [ 685.010409] [<c149ec37>] ? rfcomm_process_sessions+0xde/0xde [ 685.010419] [<c104fe01>] kthread+0x63/0x68 [ 685.010431] [<c104fd9e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42 [ 685.010442] [<c14dae82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd This issue has been brought up earlier here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/21/127 The issue appears to be the rfcomm_session_put in rfcomm_recv_ua. This operation doesn't seem be to required as for the non-initiator case we have the rfcomm_process_rx doing an explicit put and in the initiator case the last dlc_unlink will drive the reference counter to 0. There have been several attempts to fix these issue: 6c2718da Bluetooth: Do not call rfcomm_session_put() for RFCOMM UA on closed socket 683d949a Bluetooth: Never deallocate a session when some DLC points to it but AFAICS they do not fix the issue just make it harder to reproduce. Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGopala Krishna Murala <gopala.krishna.murala@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each protocol type). This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the following warning: <4>[ 1864.732366] ======================================================= <4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] <4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3 <4>[ 1864.733883] ------------------------------------------------------- <4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock: <4>[ 1864.734869] (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.735541] <4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock: <4>[ 1864.736045] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc <4>[ 1864.736732] <4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4>[ 1864.736750] <4>[ 1864.737428] <4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4>[ 1864.738016] <4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.738549] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.738977] [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68 <4>[ 1864.739411] [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76 <4>[ 1864.739858] [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59 <4>[ 1864.740279] [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8 <4>[ 1864.740687] [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37 <4>[ 1864.741106] [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38 <4>[ 1864.741542] [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a <4>[ 1864.741959] [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52 <4>[ 1864.742365] [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68 <4>[ 1864.742742] [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd <4>[ 1864.743187] <4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.743667] [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00 <4>[ 1864.744100] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.744519] [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f <4>[ 1864.744975] [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36 <4>[ 1864.745412] [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.745842] [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b <4>[ 1864.746288] [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62 <4>[ 1864.746737] [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422 <4>[ 1864.747165] [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
There is an imbalance in the rfcomm_session_hold / rfcomm_session_put operations which causes the following crash: [ 685.010159] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b [ 685.010169] IP: [<c149d76d>] rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e [ 685.010181] *pdpt = 000000002d665001 *pde = 0000000000000000 [ 685.010191] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 685.010247] [ 685.010255] Pid: 947, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G C 3.0.16-mid8-dirty #44 [ 685.010266] EIP: 0060:[<c149d76d>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1 [ 685.010274] EIP is at rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e [ 685.010281] EAX: e79f551c EBX: 6b6b6b6b ECX: 00000007 EDX: e79f40b4 [ 685.010288] ESI: e79f4060 EDI: ed4e1f70 EBP: ed4e1f68 ESP: ed4e1f50 [ 685.010295] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 [ 685.010303] Process krfcommd (pid: 947, ti=ed4e0000 task=ed43e5e0 task.ti=ed4e0000) [ 685.010308] Stack: [ 685.010312] ed4e1f68 c149eb53 e5925150 e79f4060 ed500000 ed4e1f70 ed4e1f80 c149ec10 [ 685.010331] 00000000 ed43e5e0 00000000 ed4e1f90 ed4e1f9c c149ec87 0000bf54 00000000 [ 685.010348] 00000000 ee03bf54 c149ec37 ed4e1fe4 c104fe01 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 685.010367] Call Trace: [ 685.010376] [<c149eb53>] ? rfcomm_process_rx+0x6e/0x74 [ 685.010387] [<c149ec10>] rfcomm_process_sessions+0xb7/0xde [ 685.010398] [<c149ec87>] rfcomm_run+0x50/0x6d [ 685.010409] [<c149ec37>] ? rfcomm_process_sessions+0xde/0xde [ 685.010419] [<c104fe01>] kthread+0x63/0x68 [ 685.010431] [<c104fd9e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42 [ 685.010442] [<c14dae82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd This issue has been brought up earlier here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/21/127 The issue appears to be the rfcomm_session_put in rfcomm_recv_ua. This operation doesn't seem be to required as for the non-initiator case we have the rfcomm_process_rx doing an explicit put and in the initiator case the last dlc_unlink will drive the reference counter to 0. There have been several attempts to fix these issue: 6c2718da Bluetooth: Do not call rfcomm_session_put() for RFCOMM UA on closed socket 683d949a Bluetooth: Never deallocate a session when some DLC points to it but AFAICS they do not fix the issue just make it harder to reproduce. Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGopala Krishna Murala <gopala.krishna.murala@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each protocol type). This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the following warning: <4>[ 1864.732366] ======================================================= <4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] <4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3 <4>[ 1864.733883] ------------------------------------------------------- <4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock: <4>[ 1864.734869] (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.735541] <4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock: <4>[ 1864.736045] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc <4>[ 1864.736732] <4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4>[ 1864.736750] <4>[ 1864.737428] <4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4>[ 1864.738016] <4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.738549] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.738977] [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68 <4>[ 1864.739411] [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76 <4>[ 1864.739858] [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59 <4>[ 1864.740279] [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8 <4>[ 1864.740687] [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37 <4>[ 1864.741106] [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38 <4>[ 1864.741542] [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a <4>[ 1864.741959] [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52 <4>[ 1864.742365] [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68 <4>[ 1864.742742] [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd <4>[ 1864.743187] <4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.743667] [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00 <4>[ 1864.744100] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.744519] [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f <4>[ 1864.744975] [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36 <4>[ 1864.745412] [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.745842] [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b <4>[ 1864.746288] [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62 <4>[ 1864.746737] [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422 <4>[ 1864.747165] [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
We now run in process context, no need to disable interrupts. Calls from the tty layer also run in process context. rw_lock was converted to spinlock, we have more writers than readers in this case. Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
Code now run in process context, does not need to disable interrupt anymore. Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 28 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
sock and sk were leftover from another change. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 23 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
RFCOMM needs a proper priority mechanism inside itself and not try to use l2cap priority to fix its own problem. Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 21 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulisses Furquim 提交于
The handling of SCO audio links and the L2CAP protocol are essential to any system with Bluetooth thus are always compiled in from now on. Signed-off-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 20 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy trick. It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. (Thanks to Joe Perches for suggesting coccinelle for 0/1 -> true/false). Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mat Martineau 提交于
When the last RFCOMM data channel is closed, a timer is normally set up to disconnect the control channel at a later time. If the control channel disconnect command is sent with the timer pending, the timer needs to be cancelled. If the timer is not cancelled in this situation, the reference counting logic for the RFCOMM session does not work correctly when the remote device closes the L2CAP connection. The session is freed at the wrong time, leading to a kernel panic. Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 08 11月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Szymon Janc 提交于
This was triggered by turning off encryption on ACL link when rfcomm was using high security. rfcomm_security_cfm (which is called from rx task) was closing DLC and this involves sending disconnect message (and locking socket). Move closing DLC to rfcomm_process_dlcs and only flag DLC for closure in rfcomm_security_cfm. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:2032 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1788, name: kworker/0:3 [<c0068a08>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x108) from [<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) [<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c) [<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c) from [<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64) [<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64) from [<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc) [<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc) from [<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0) [<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0) from [<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44) [<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44) from [<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58) [<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58) from [<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80) [<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80) from [<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc) [<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc) from [<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0) [<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0) from [<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84) [<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84) from [<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0) [<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0) from [<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4) [<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4) from [<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274) [<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274) from [<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c) [<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c) from [<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4) [<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4) from [<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c) [<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c) from [<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec) [<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec) from [<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178) [<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178) from [<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0) [<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0) from [<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0) [<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0) from [<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198) [<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198) from [<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8) [<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8) from [<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468) [<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468) from [<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) [<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) from [<c0061744>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) Signed-off-by: NSzymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Luiz Augusto von Dentz 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Luiz Augusto von Dentz 提交于
When all items in the list have the same type there is no much of a point to use list_for_each except if you want to use the list pointer itself. Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 David Herrmann 提交于
Remove old tasklets and replace by workqueue. To avoid reentrancy (which tasklets always avoid) we use the system_nrt_wq. Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 David Herrmann 提交于
Forward error codes from tty core to the rfcomm_init caller instead of using generic -1 errors. Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 19 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Moore 提交于
The Bluetooth stack has internal connection handlers for all of the various Bluetooth protocols, and unfortunately, they are currently lacking the LSM hooks found in the core network stack's connection handlers. I say unfortunately, because this can cause problems for users who have have an LSM enabled and are using certain Bluetooth devices. See one problem report below: * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741703 In order to keep things simple at this point in time, this patch fixes the problem by cloning the parent socket's LSM attributes to the newly created child socket. If we decide we need a more elaborate LSM marking mechanism for Bluetooth (I somewhat doubt this) we can always revisit this decision in the future. Reported-by: NJames M. Cape <jcape@ignore-your.tv> Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Szymon Janc 提交于
This was triggered by turning off encryption on ACL link when rfcomm was using high security. rfcomm_security_cfm (which is called from rx task) was closing DLC and this involves sending disconnect message (and locking socket). Move closing DLC to rfcomm_process_dlcs and only flag DLC for closure in rfcomm_security_cfm. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:2032 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1788, name: kworker/0:3 [<c0068a08>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x108) from [<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) [<c05e25dc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c) [<c0087ba8>] (__might_sleep+0x110/0x12c) from [<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64) [<c04801d8>] (lock_sock_nested+0x2c/0x64) from [<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc) [<c05670c8>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x58/0xcc) from [<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0) [<c047cf6c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xd0) from [<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44) [<c047cfc8>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x3c/0x44) from [<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58) [<c056b0e8>] (rfcomm_send_frame+0x50/0x58) from [<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80) [<c056b168>] (rfcomm_send_disc+0x78/0x80) from [<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc) [<c056b9f4>] (__rfcomm_dlc_close+0x2d0/0x2fc) from [<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0) [<c056bbac>] (rfcomm_security_cfm+0x140/0x1e0) from [<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84) [<c0555ec0>] (hci_event_packet+0x1ce8/0x4d84) from [<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0) [<c0550380>] (hci_rx_task+0x1d0/0x2d0) from [<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4) [<c009ee04>] (tasklet_action+0x138/0x1e4) from [<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274) [<c009f21c>] (__do_softirq+0xcc/0x274) from [<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c) [<c009f6c0>] (do_softirq+0x60/0x6c) from [<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4) [<c009f794>] (local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xd4) from [<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c) [<c05e5804>] (_raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x48/0x4c) from [<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec) [<c040d470>] (data_from_chip+0xf4/0xaec) from [<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178) [<c04136c0>] (send_skb_to_core+0x40/0x178) from [<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0) [<c04139f4>] (cg2900_hu_receive+0x15c/0x2d0) from [<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0) [<c0414cb8>] (hci_uart_tty_receive+0x74/0xa0) from [<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198) [<c02cbd9c>] (flush_to_ldisc+0x188/0x198) from [<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8) [<c00b2774>] (process_one_work+0x144/0x4b8) from [<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468) [<c00b2e8c>] (worker_thread+0x198/0x468) from [<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) [<c00b9bc8>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) from [<c0061744>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) Signed-off-by: NSzymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 28 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mat Martineau 提交于
Fragmented skbs are only encountered when receiving ERTM or streaming mode L2CAP data. BNEP, CMTP, HIDP, and RFCOMM generally use basic mode, but they need to handle fragments without crashing. Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 12 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Fix race conditions which can cause lost wakeups (or missed signals) while waiting to accept an rfcomm socket connection. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Removed superfluous event handling which was used to signal that the rfcomm kthread had been woken. This appears to have been used to prevent lost wakeups. Correctly ordering when the task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE is sufficient to prevent lost wakeups. To prevent wakeups which occurred prior to initially setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE from being lost, the main work of the thread loop - rfcomm_process_sessions() - is performed prior to sleeping. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 10 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filip Palian 提交于
Structures "l2cap_conninfo" and "rfcomm_conninfo" have one padding byte each. This byte in "cinfo" is copied to userspace uninitialized. Signed-off-by: NFilip Palian <filip.palian@pjwstk.edu.pl> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Enabling DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS causes the following warning: In function 'copy_from_user', inlined from 'rfcomm_sock_setsockopt' at net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:705: arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:65: warning: call to 'copy_from_user_overflow' declared with attribute warning: copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct presumably due to buf_size being signed causing GCC to fail to see that buf_size can't become negative. Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 09 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 12 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Waldemar Rymarkiewicz 提交于
In case of pre v2.1 devices authentication request will return success immediately if the link key already exists without any authentication process. That means, it's not possible to re-authenticate the link if you already have combination key and for instance want to re-authenticate to get the high security (use 16 digit pin). Therefore, it's necessary to check security requirements on auth complete event to prevent not enough secure connection. Signed-off-by: NWaldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 28 4月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
There is no need to the socket deal directly with the channel, most of the time it cares about the channel only. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
In this commit, omtu, imtu, flush_to, mode and sport. It also remove the pi var from l2cap_sock_sendmsg(). Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
In this commit all ERTM and Streaming Mode specific vars. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 18 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
Only oddities here are a couple of drivers that bogusly called the ldisc helpers instead of returning -ENOIOCTLCMD. Fix the bug and the rest goes away. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
Doing tiocmget was such fun we should do tiocmset as well for the same reasons Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-