When requested from cpufreq to set policy, look into _pss and get
control values, instead of using max/min perf calculations. These
calculation misses next control state in boundary conditions.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use ACPI _PSS to limit the Intel P State turbo, max and min ratios.
This driver uses acpi processor perf lib calls to register performance.
The following logic is used to adjust Intel P state driver limits:
- If there is no turbo entry in _PSS, then disable Intel P state turbo
and limit to non turbo max
- If the non turbo max ratio is more than _PSS max non turbo value, then
set the max non turbo ratio to _PSS non turbo max
- If the min ratio is less than _PSS min then change the min ratio
matching _PSS min
- Scale the _PSS turbo frequency to max turbo frequency based on control
value.
This feature can be disabled by using kernel parameters:
intel_pstate=no_acpi
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Systems with configurable TDP have multiple max non turbo p state. Intel
P state uses max non turbo P state for scaling. But using the real max
non turbo p state causes underestimation of next P state. So using
the physical max non turbo P state as before for scaling.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After Ivybridge, the max non turbo ratio obtained from platform info msr
is not always guaranteed P1 on client platforms. The max non turbo
activation ratio (TAR), determines the max for the current level of TDP.
The ratio in platform info is physical max. The TAR MSR can be locked,
so updating this value is not possible on all platforms.
This change gets this ratio from MSR TURBO_ACTIVATION_RATIO if
available,
but also do some sanity checking to make sure that this value is
correct.
The sanity check involves reading the TDP ratio for the current tdp
control value when platform has configurable TDP present and matching
TAC
with this.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We just made sure policy->cpu is online and this check will always fail
as the policy is active. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When scaling_available_frequencies is read on an offlined cpu, then
either lockup or junk values are displayed. This is caused by
freed freq_table, which policy is using.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When freqdomain_cpus attribute is read from an offlined cpu, it will
cause crash. This change prevents calling cpufreq_show_cpus when
policy driver_data is NULL.

Crash info:

[  170.814949] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
[  170.814990] IP: [<ffffffff813b2490>] _find_next_bit.part.0+0x10/0x70
[  170.815021] PGD 227d30067 PUD 229e56067 PMD 0
[  170.815043] Oops: 0000 [#2] SMP
[  170.816022] CPU: 3 PID: 3121 Comm: cat Tainted: G      D    OE   4.3.0-rc3+ #33
...
...
[  170.816657] Call Trace:
[  170.816672]  [<ffffffff813b2505>] ? find_next_bit+0x15/0x20
[  170.816696]  [<ffffffff8160e47c>] cpufreq_show_cpus+0x5c/0xd0
[  170.816722]  [<ffffffffa031a409>] show_freqdomain_cpus+0x19/0x20 [acpi_cpufreq]
[  170.816749]  [<ffffffff8160e65b>] show+0x3b/0x60
[  170.816769]  [<ffffffff8129b31c>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xbc/0x130
[  170.816793]  [<ffffffff81299be3>] kernfs_seq_show+0x23/0x30
[  170.816816]  [<ffffffff81240f2c>] seq_read+0xec/0x390
[  170.816837]  [<ffffffff8129a64a>] kernfs_fop_read+0x10a/0x160
[  170.816861]  [<ffffffff8121d9b7>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100
[  170.816883]  [<ffffffff813217c0>] ? security_file_permission+0xa0/0xc0
[  170.816909]  [<ffffffff8121e2e3>] vfs_read+0x83/0x130
[  170.816930]  [<ffffffff8121f035>] SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
...
...
[  170.817185] ---[ end trace bc6eadf82b2b965a ]---
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Log a 'critical' message if the max frequency is reduced below nominal
frequency. We already log 'info' message if the max frequency is
capped below turbo frequency. CPU should guarantee atleast nominal
frequency, but not turbo frequency in all system configurations and
environments. So report the pmax throttling with severity when Pmax is
dipped below nominal frequency.
Signed-off-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

For i.MX6UL, the clock switch flow is slightly different from
other i.MX6 SOCs. It has a 'secondary_sel' clk that will be used
when the CPU freq is higher than 396MHz. So the clock switch flow in
'set_target' callback need to update to support i.MX6UL in the common
i.MX6 SOC cpufreq driver.
Signed-off-by: NBai Ping <b51503@freescale.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CONFIG_PM ifdefs are superfluous and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
conservative governor is used for a CPU or not

This can be checked by policy->governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
and so this field can be dropped.

Because its not guaranteed that dbs_info->cdbs.shared will a valid
pointer for all CPUs (will be NULL for CPUs that don't use
ondemand/conservative governors), we can't use it anymore. Lets get
policy with cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This platform driver has a OF device ID table but the OF module
alias information is not created so module autoloading won't work.
Signed-off-by: NLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get() called by get_cur_freq_on_cpu() is overkill,
because the ->get() callback is always invoked in a context in
which all of the conditions checked by cpufreq_cpu_get() are
guaranteed to be satisfied.

Use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of it and drop the
corresponding cpufreq_cpu_put() from get_cur_freq_on_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

PCT_TO_HWP does not take the actual range of pstates exported
by HWP_CAPABILITIES in account, and is broken on most platforms.
Remove the macro and set the min and max pstate for hwp by
determining the range and adjusting by the min and max percent
limits values.
Signed-off-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In current code, max_perf_pct might be smaller than min_perf_pct
by improper user input:

$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:100
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100

$ echo 80 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct

$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/m*_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct:80
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:100

Fix this problem by 2 steps:
 1. Normalize the user input to [min_policy, max_policy].
 2. Make sure max_perf_pct>=min_perf_pct, suggested by Seiichi Ikarashi.
Signed-off-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add suspend frequency support and if needed set it to
the frequency obtained from the suspend opp (can be defined
using opp-v2 bindings and is optional).
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Some cpufreq drivers may set suspend frequency only for
selected setups but still would like to use the generic
suspend handler.  Thus don't treat !policy->suspend_freq
condition as an incorrect one.
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its better to use __func__ to print functions name instead of writing
the name in the print statement. This also has the advantage that a
change in function's name doesn't force us to change the print message
as well.
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() isn't used by any external users, staticize it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If ARM_MT8173_CPUFREQ is configured, and THERMAL is configured as module,
the following build error is seen for arm:allmodconfig and
arm64:allmodconfig.

drivers/built-in.o: In function `mtk_cpufreq_ready':
:(.text+0x32a20c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `mtk_cpufreq_exit':
:(.text+0x32a420): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'

The fix is similar to CPUFREQ_DT, but more restrictive since
ARM_MT8173_CPUFREQ can not be built as module.

Fixes: 1453863f ("cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver")
Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Tolerance applies on both sides of the target voltage, i.e. both min and
max sides. But while checking if a voltage is supported by the regulator
or not, we haven't taken care of tolerance on the lower side. Fix that.

Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Fixes: 045ee45c ("cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: disable unsupported OPPs")
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NLucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to explicitly mark OPPs as shared, when they are not defined
with OPP-v2 bindings. This operation can potentially fail, and in that
case we should at least print an error message.

Fixes: 2e02d872 ("cpufreq: dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings")
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to explicitly mark OPPs as shared, when they are not defined
with OPP-v2 bindings. But this isn't required to be done if we failed to
initialize OPP table.

Reorder code to verify OPP count before marking them shared.

Fixes: 2e02d872 ("cpufreq: dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings")
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Wall time obtained from do_gettimeofday is susceptible to sudden jumps due to
user setting the time or due to NTP.

Monotonic time is constantly increasing time better suited for comparing two
timestamps.
Signed-off-by: NAbhilash Jindal <klock.android@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Modify the OCC reset/load/active event message to make it clearer for
the user to understand the event and effect of the event.
Suggested-by: NStewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NShilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The patch was generated using fixed coccinelle semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2014320Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Driver is guaranteed to be present on a call to cpufreq_parse_governor()
and there is no need to check for !cpufreq_driver. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->policy, and there is no need to keep another
copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its always same as policy->governor, and there is no need to keep
another copy of it. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'user_policy' caches properties of a policy that are set by userspace.
And these must be updated only if cpufreq core was successful in
updating them based on request from user space.

In store_scaling_governor(), we are updating user_policy.policy and
user_policy.governor even if cpufreq_set_policy() failed. That's
incorrect.

Fix this by updating user_policy.* only if we were successful in
updating the properties.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

cpufreq_get_policy() is useful if the pointer to policy isn't available
in advance. But if it is available, then there is no need to call
cpufreq_get_policy(). Directly use memcpy() to copy the policy.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

What's being done from CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE, can also be done with
CPUFREQ_ADJUST. There is nothing special with CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE
notifier.

Kill CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE and fix its usage sites.

This also updates the numbering of notifier events to remove holes.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Mediatek MT8173 is an ARMv8 based quad-core (2*Cortex-A53 and
2*Cortex-A72) SoC with duall clusters. For each cluster, two voltage
inputs, Vproc and Vsram are supplied by two regulators. For the big
cluster, two regulators come from different PMICs. In this case, when
scaling voltage inputs of the cluster, the voltages of two regulator
inputs need to be controlled by software explicitly under the SoC
specific limitation:

	100mV < Vsram - Vproc < 200mV

which is called 'voltage tracking' mechanism. And when scaling the
frequency of cluster clock input, the input MUX need to be parented to
another "intermediate" stable PLL first and reparented to the original
PLL once the original PLL is stable at the target frequency. This patch
implements those mechanisms to enable CPU DVFS support for Mediatek
MT8173 SoC.
Signed-off-by: NPi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of
unknown SoC type.
Signed-off-by: NShailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
[k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)]
Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 966f2a71 ("cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific
cpufreq driver support") deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed
to delete a rule in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that
option.

Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
from drivers/cpufreq/Makefile.
Signed-off-by: NJonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>

Exynos4x12 based platforms have switched over to use generic
cpufreq driver for cpufreq functionality.  So the Exynos
specific cpufreq support for these platforms can be removed.

Also once Exynos4x12 based platforms support have been removed
the shared exynos-cpufreq driver is no longer needed and can
be deleted.

Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham.

Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NTobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Tested-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>

Make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attribute is available when
cpufreq-dt driver is used and boost support is enabled.
Suggested-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Append more Oracle X86 servers that have their own power management,

SUN FIRE X4275 M3
SUN FIRE X4170 M3
and
SUN FIRE X6-2
Signed-off-by: NEthan Zhao <ethan.zhao@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Whitelist the SKL-S processor
Signed-off-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

With opp-v2 DT bindings, few OPPs can be used only for the boost mode.
But using such OPPs require the boost mode to be supported by cpufreq
driver.

We will parse DT bindings only during ->init() and so can enable boost
support only after registering cpufreq driver.

This enables boost support as soon as any policy has boost/turbo OPPs
for its CPUs.

We don't need to disable boost support as that is done by the core, when
the driver is unregistered.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>