This reverts commit 95c80bb1.

The bug addressed by this commit was fixed differently back in 3.6
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

I noticed while doing fsync tests that we were always dropping the path and
re-searching when we first cow the log root even though we've already gotten
the write lock on the root.  That's because we don't take into account that
there might not be a parent node, so fix the check to make sure there is
actually a parent node before we undo all of this work for nothing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This gets called at least 4 times for every level while adding an object,
and it involves 3 kmapping calls, which on my box take about 5us a piece.
So instead use a token, which brings us down to 1 kmap call and makes this
function take 1/3 of the time per call.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We don't really need to copy extents from the source tree since we have all
of the information already available to us in the extent_map tree.  So
instead just write the extents straight to the log tree and don't bother to
copy the extent items from the source tree.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

You'd think path->keep_locks would keep all the locks wouldn't you?  You'd
be wrong.  It only keeps them if the slot is pointing to the last item in
the node.  This is for use with btrfs_next_leaf, which needs this sort of
thing.  But the horrible horrible things I'm going to do to the tree log
means I really need everything held from root to leaf so I can add and
delete items in the same search.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Originally root_times_lock was introduced as part of send/receive
code however newly developed patch to label the subvol reused
the same lock, so renaming it for a meaningful name.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Just use WARN_ON rather than an if containing only WARN_ON(1).

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression e;
@@
- if (e) WARN_ON(1);
+ WARN_ON(e);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression list es;
@@

-printk(
+WARN(1,
  es);
-WARN_ON(1);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

'disk_key' is not used at all.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The argument 'tree_mod_log' is not necessary since all of callers enable it.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Since we don't use MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING to add nritems
during rewinding, we should insert a MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE operation first.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Key MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING means that we're doing memmove inside
an extent buffer node, and the node's number of items remains unchanged
(unless we are inserting a single pointer, but we have MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for that).

So we don't need to increase node's number of items during rewinding,
otherwise we may get an node larger than leafsize and cause general protection
errors later.

Here is the details,
- If we do memory move for inserting a single pointer, we need to
  add node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for adding.

- If we do memory move for deleting a single pointer, we need to
  decrease node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for
  deleting.

- If we do memory move for balance left/right, we need to decrease
  node's nritems, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for balaning.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

After cloning root's node, we forgot to dec the src's ref
which can lead to a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Emphasis the way tree_mod_log_insert_move avoids adding
MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING operations, depending on the direction of
the move operation.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In get_old_root we grab a lock on the extent buffer before we obtain a
reference on that buffer. That order is changed now.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In btrfs_find_all_roots' termination condition, we compare the level of the
old buffer we got from btrfs_search_old_slot to the level of the current
root node. We'd better compare it to the level of the rewinded root node.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Tree mod log treated old root buffers as always empty buffers when starting
the rewind operations. However, the old root may still be part of the
current tree at a lower level, with still some valid entries.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Avoid the implicit free by tree_mod_log_set_root_pointer, which is wrong in
two places. Where needed, we call tree_mod_log_free_eb explicitly now.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Independant of the check (push_items < src_items) tree_mod_log_eb_copy did
log the removal of the old data entries from the source buffer. Therefore,
we must not call tree_mod_log_eb_move if the check evaluates to true, as
that would log the removal twice, finally resulting in (rewinded) buffers
with wrong values for header_nritems.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

The function btrfs_insert_some_items() would not be called by any other functions,
so remove it.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>

The btrfs send code was assuming the offset of the file item into the
extent translated to bytes on disk.  If we're compressed, this isn't
true, and so it was off into extents owned by other files.

It was also improperly handling inline extents.  This solves a crash
where we may have gone past the end of the file extent item by not
testing early enough for an inline extent.  It also solves problems
where we have a whole between the end of the inline item and the start
of the full extent.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When we split a leaf, we may end up inserting a new root on top of that
leaf.  The reflog code was incorrectly assuming the old root was always
a node.  This makes sure we skip over leaves.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Commit a168650c introduced a waiting mechanism to prevent busy waiting in
btrfs_run_delayed_refs. This can deadlock with btrfs_run_ordered_operations,
where a tree_mod_seq is held while waiting for the io to complete, while
the end_io calls btrfs_run_delayed_refs.
This whole mechanism is unnecessary. If not enough runnable refs are
available to satisfy count, just return as count is more like a guideline
than a strict requirement.
In case we have to run all refs, commit transaction makes sure that no
other threads are working in the transaction anymore, so we just assert
here that no refs are blocked.
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This function is used to find the differences between
two trees. The tree compare skips whole subtrees if it
detects shared tree blocks and thus is pretty fast.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Reviewed-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.bolshoy.btrfs@gmail.com>

Often no exact match is wanted but just the next lower or
higher item. There's a lot of duplicated code throughout
btrfs to deal with the corner cases. This patch adds a
helper function that can facilitate searching.
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>

When calling btrfs_next_old_leaf, we were leaking an extent buffer in the
rare case of using the deadlock avoidance code needed for the tree mod log.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Often no exact match is wanted but just the next lower or
higher item. There's a lot of duplicated code throughout
btrfs to deal with the corner cases. This patch adds a
helper function that can facilitate searching.
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>

We've got two mechanisms both required for reliable backref resolving (tree
mod log and holding back delayed refs). You cannot make use of one without
the other. So instead of requiring the user of this mechanism to setup both
correctly, we join them into a single interface.

Additionally, we stop inserting non-blockers into fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list
as we did before, which was of no value.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

When calling btrfs_next_old_leaf, we were leaking an extent buffer in the
rare case of using the deadlock avoidance code needed for the tree mod log.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

With the tree mod log, we may end up with two roots (the current root and a
rewinded version of it) both pointing to two leaves, l1 and l2, of which l2
had already been cow-ed in the current transaction. If we don't rewind any
tree blocks, we cannot have two roots both pointing to an already cowed tree
block.

Now there is btrfs_next_leaf, which has a leaf locked and wants a lock on
the next (right) leaf. And there is push_leaf_left, which has a (cowed!)
leaf locked and wants a lock on the previous (left) leaf.

In order to solve this dead lock situation, we use try_lock in
btrfs_next_leaf (only in case it's called with a tree mod log time_seq
paramter) and if we fail to get a lock on the next leaf, we give up our lock
on the current leaf and retry from the very beginning.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

When a MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD operation is rewinded, we remove the key from the
tree block. If its not the last key, removal involves a move operation.
This move operation was explicitly done before this commit.

However, at insertion time, there's a move operation before the actual
addition to make room for the new key, which is recorded in the tree mod
log as well. This means, we must drop the move operation when rewinding the
add operation, because the next operation we'll be rewinding will be the
corresponding MOD_LOG_MOVE_KEYS operation.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Several callers of insert_ptr set the tree_mod_log parameter to 0 to avoid
addition to the tree mod log. In fact, we need all of those operations. This
commit simply removes the additional parameter and makes addition to the
tree mod log unconditional.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

For the tree mod log, we don't log any operations at leaf level. If the root
is at the leaf level (i.e. the tree consists only of the root), then
__tree_mod_log_oldest_root will find a ROOT_REPLACE operation in the log
(because we always log that one no matter which level), but no other
operations.

With this patch __tree_mod_log_oldest_root exits cleanly instead of
BUGging in this situation. get_old_root checks if its really a root at leaf
level in case we don't have any operations and WARNs if this assumption
breaks.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

gcc was giving an uninit variable warning here.  Strictly
speaking we don't need to init it, but this will make things
much less error prone.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When adding to the tree modification log, we grab two locks at different
stages. We must not drop the outer lock until we're done with section
protected by the inner lock. This moves the unlock call for the outer lock
to the appropriate position.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs
btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was
calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result.

This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for
btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly
like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot
with this time_seq parameter.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In __tree_mod_log_oldest_root() we must return the found operation even if
it's not a ROOT_REPLACE operation. Otherwise, the caller assumes that there
are no operations to be rewinded and returns immediately.

The code in the caller is modified to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

get_old_root could race with root node updates because we weren't locking
the node early enough. Use btrfs_read_lock_root_node to grab the root locked
in the very beginning and release the lock as soon as possible (just like
btrfs_search_slot does).
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

This is a leftover from cleanup patch 559af821. Before the cleanup,
btrfs_header_nritems was called inside an if condition. As it has no side
effects we need to preserve here, it should simply be dropped.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

When we rewind REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations, there's code that allocates
a fresh buffer instead of cloning the old one. Setting that buffer's level
correctly was missing in this case.

When rewinding a MOVE_KEYS operation, btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(slot) was
missing for memmove_extent_buffer()'s arguments.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>