Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  3. 22 7月, 2011 12 次提交
  5. 21 7月, 2011 12 次提交
    • O
      ptrace: fix ptrace_signal() && STOP_DEQUEUED interaction · 8a352418
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Simple test-case,

	int main(void)
	{
		int pid, status;

		pid = fork();
		if (!pid) {
			pause();
			assert(0);
			return 0x23;
		}

		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0,0) == 0);
		assert(wait(&status) == pid);
		assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP);

		kill(pid, SIGCONT);	// <--- also clears STOP_DEQUEUD

		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0,0) == 0);
		assert(wait(&status) == pid);
		assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGCONT);

		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0, SIGSTOP) == 0);
		assert(wait(&status) == pid);
		assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP);

		kill(pid, SIGKILL);
		return 0;
	}

Without the patch it hangs. After the patch SIGSTOP "injected" by the
tracer is not ignored and stops the tracee.

Note also that if this test-case uses, say, SIGWINCH instead of SIGCONT,
everything works without the patch. This can't be right, and this is
confusing.

The problem is that SIGSTOP (or any other sig_kernel_stop() signal) has
no effect without JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED. This means it is simply ignored
after PTRACE_CONT unless JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED was set "by accident", say
it wasn't cleared after initial SIGSTOP sent by PTRACE_ATTACH.

At first glance we could change ptrace_signal() to add STOP_DEQUEUED
after return from ptrace_stop(), but this is not right in case when the
tracer does not change the reported SIGSTOP and SIGCONT comes in between.
This is even more wrong with PT_SEIZED, SIGCONT adds JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY
which will be "lost" during the TRAP_STOP | TRAP_NOTIFY report.

So lets add STOP_DEQUEUED _before_ we report the signal. It has no effect
unless sig_kernel_stop() == T after the tracer resumes us, and in the
latter case the pending STOP_DEQUEUED means no SIGCONT in between, we
should stop.

Note also that if SIGCONT was sent, PT_SEIZED tracee will correctly
report PTRACE_EVENT_STOP/SIGTRAP and thus the tracer can notice the fact
SIGSTOP was cancelled.

Also, move the current->ptrace check from ptrace_signal() to its caller,
get_signal_to_deliver(), this looks more natural.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      8a352418
    • C
      rw_semaphore: remove up/down_read_non_owner · 11b80f45
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Now that the last users is gone these can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      11b80f45
    • J
      time: Fix stupid KERN_WARN compile issue · cbaa5152
      由 John Stultz 提交于 
      Terribly embarassing. Don't know how I committed this, but its
KERN_WARNING not KERN_WARN.

This fixes the following compile error:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c: In function ‘__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime’:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:608: error: ‘KERN_WARN’ undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:608: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:608: error: for each function it appears in.)
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:608: error: expected ‘)’ before string constant
make[2]: *** [kernel/time/timekeeping.o] Error 1
Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
      cbaa5152
    • P
      sysctl,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_head) to kfree · a95cded3
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The RCU callback free_head just calls kfree(), so we can use kfree_rcu()
instead of call_rcu().
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      a95cded3
    • L
      audit_tree,rcu: Convert call_rcu(__put_tree) to kfree_rcu() · 3b097c46
      由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于 
      The rcu callback __put_tree() just calls a kfree(),
so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(__put_tree).
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      3b097c46
    • P
      signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU · a841796f
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The __lock_task_sighand() function calls rcu_read_lock() with interrupts
and preemption enabled, but later calls rcu_read_unlock() with interrupts
disabled.  It is therefore possible that this RCU read-side critical
section will be preempted and later RCU priority boosted, which means that
rcu_read_unlock() will call rt_mutex_unlock() in order to deboost itself, but
with interrupts disabled. This results in lockdep splats, so this commit
nests the RCU read-side critical section within the interrupt-disabled
region of code.  This prevents the RCU read-side critical section from
being preempted, and thus prevents the attempt to deboost with interrupts
disabled.

It is quite possible that a better long-term fix is to make rt_mutex_unlock()
disable irqs when acquiring the rt_mutex structure's ->wait_lock.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      a841796f
    • P
      softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity · ec433f0c
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The rcu_read_unlock_special() function relies on in_irq() to exclude
scheduler activity from interrupt level.  This fails because exit_irq()
can invoke the scheduler after clearing the preempt_count() bits that
in_irq() uses to determine that it is at interrupt level.  This situation
can result in failures as follows:

 $task			IRQ		SoftIRQ

 rcu_read_lock()

 /* do stuff */

 <preempt> |= UNLOCK_BLOCKED

 rcu_read_unlock()
   --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting

			irq_enter();
			/* do stuff, don't use RCU */
			irq_exit();
			  sub_preempt_count(IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET);
			  invoke_softirq()

					ttwu();
					  spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock)
					  rcu_read_lock();
					  /* do stuff */
					  rcu_read_unlock();
					    rcu_read_unlock_special()
					      rcu_report_exp_rnp()
					        ttwu()
					          spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock) /* deadlock */

   rcu_read_unlock_special(t);

Ed can simply trigger this 'easy' because invoke_softirq() immediately
does a ttwu() of ksoftirqd/# instead of doing the in-place softirq stuff
first, but even without that the above happens.

Cure this by also excluding softirqs from the
rcu_read_unlock_special() handler and ensuring the force_irqthreads
ksoftirqd/# wakeup is done from full softirq context.

[ Alternatively, delaying the ->rcu_read_lock_nesting decrement
  until after the special handling would make the thing more robust
  in the face of interrupts as well.  And there is a separate patch
  for that. ]

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: NEd Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      ec433f0c
    • P
      sched: Add irq_{enter,exit}() to scheduler_ipi() · c5d753a5
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Ensure scheduler_ipi() calls irq_{enter,exit} when it does some actual
work. Traditionally we never did any actual work from the resched IPI
and all magic happened in the return from interrupt path.

Now that we do do some work, we need to ensure irq_{enter,exit} are
called so that we don't confuse things.

This affects things like timekeeping, NO_HZ and RCU, basically
everything with a hook in irq_enter/exit.

Explicit examples of things going wrong are:

  sched_clock_cpu() -- has a callback when leaving NO_HZ state to take
                    a new reading from GTOD and TSC. Without this
                    callback, time is stuck in the past.

  RCU -- needs in_irq() to work in order to avoid some nasty deadlocks
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      c5d753a5
    • P
      rcu: protect __rcu_read_unlock() against scheduler-using irq handlers · 10f39bb1
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The addition of RCU read-side critical sections within runqueue and
priority-inheritance lock critical sections introduced some deadlock
cycles, for example, involving interrupts from __rcu_read_unlock()
where the interrupt handlers call wake_up().  This situation can cause
the instance of __rcu_read_unlock() invoked from interrupt to do some
of the processing that would otherwise have been carried out by the
task-level instance of __rcu_read_unlock().  When the interrupt-level
instance of __rcu_read_unlock() is called with a scheduler lock held
from interrupt-entry/exit situations where in_irq() returns false,
deadlock can result.

This commit resolves these deadlocks by using negative values of
the per-task ->rcu_read_lock_nesting counter to indicate that an
instance of __rcu_read_unlock() is in flight, which in turn prevents
instances from interrupt handlers from doing any special processing.
This patch is inspired by Steven Rostedt's earlier patch that similarly
made __rcu_read_unlock() guard against interrupt-mediated recursion
(see https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/15/326), but this commit refines
Steven's approach to avoid the need for preemption disabling on the
__rcu_read_unlock() fastpath and to also avoid the need for manipulating
a separate per-CPU variable.

This patch avoids need for preempt_disable() by instead using negative
values of the per-task ->rcu_read_lock_nesting counter.  Note that nested
rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs are still permitted, but they will
never see ->rcu_read_lock_nesting go to zero, and will therefore never
invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(), thus preventing them from seeing the
RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit should it be set in ->rcu_read_unlock_special.
This patch also adds a check for ->rcu_read_unlock_special being negative
in rcu_check_callbacks(), thus preventing the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS
bit from being set should a scheduling-clock interrupt occur while
__rcu_read_unlock() is exiting from an outermost RCU read-side critical
section.

Of course, __rcu_read_unlock() can be preempted during the time that
->rcu_read_lock_nesting is negative.  This could result in the setting
of the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit after __rcu_read_unlock() checks it,
and would also result it this task being queued on the corresponding
rcu_node structure's blkd_tasks list.  Therefore, some later RCU read-side
critical section would enter rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up --
which could result in deadlock if that critical section happened to be in
the scheduler where the runqueue or priority-inheritance locks were held.

This situation is dealt with by making rcu_preempt_note_context_switch()
check for negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, thus refraining from
queuing the task (and from setting RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) if we are
already exiting from the outermost RCU read-side critical section (in
other words, we really are no longer actually in that RCU read-side
critical section).  In addition, rcu_preempt_note_context_switch()
invokes rcu_read_unlock_special() to carry out the cleanup in this case,
which clears out the ->rcu_read_unlock_special bits and dequeues the task
(if necessary), in turn avoiding needless delay of the current RCU grace
period and needless RCU priority boosting.

It is still illegal to call rcu_read_unlock() while holding a scheduler
lock if the prior RCU read-side critical section has ever had either
preemption or irqs enabled.  However, the common use case is legal,
namely where then entire RCU read-side critical section executes with
irqs disabled, for example, when the scheduler lock is held across the
entire lifetime of the RCU read-side critical section.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      10f39bb1
    • P
      sched: Avoid creating superfluous NUMA domains on non-NUMA systems · d110235d
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      When creating sched_domains, stop when we've covered the entire
target span instead of continuing to create domains, only to
later find they're redundant and throw them away again.

This avoids single node systems from touching funny NUMA
sched_domain creation code and reduces the risks of the new
SD_OVERLAP code.
Requested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1311180177.29152.57.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d110235d
    • P
      sched: Allow for overlapping sched_domain spans · e3589f6c
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Allow for sched_domain spans that overlap by giving such domains their
own sched_group list instead of sharing the sched_groups amongst
each-other.

This is needed for machines with more than 16 nodes, because
sched_domain_node_span() will generate a node mask from the
16 nearest nodes without regard if these masks have any overlap.

Currently sched_domains have a sched_group that maps to their child
sched_domain span, and since there is no overlap we share the
sched_group between the sched_domains of the various CPUs. If however
there is overlap, we would need to link the sched_group list in
different ways for each cpu, and hence sharing isn't possible.

In order to solve this, allocate private sched_groups for each CPU's
sched_domain but have the sched_groups share a sched_group_power
structure such that we can uniquely track the power.
Reported-and-tested-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-08bxqw9wis3qti9u5inifh3y@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      e3589f6c
    • P
      sched: Break out cpu_power from the sched_group structure · 9c3f75cb
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      In order to prepare for non-unique sched_groups per domain, we need to
carry the cpu_power elsewhere, so put a level of indirection in.
Reported-and-tested-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-qkho2byuhe4482fuknss40ad@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9c3f75cb
  7. 20 7月, 2011 5 次提交
    • A
      make sure that nsproxy_cache is initialized early enough · 66577193
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      66577193
    • A
      kill file_permission() completely · 3bfa784a
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      convert the last remaining caller to inode_permission()
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      3bfa784a
    • P
      rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() · be0e1e21
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Given some common flag combinations, particularly -Os, gcc will inline
rcu_read_unlock_special() despite its being in an unlikely() clause.
Use noinline to prohibit this misoptimization.

In addition, move the second barrier() in __rcu_read_unlock() so that
it is not on the common-case code path.  This will allow the compiler to
generate better code for the common-case path through __rcu_read_unlock().
Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
      be0e1e21
    • P
      rcu: Fix RCU_BOOST race handling current->rcu_read_unlock_special · 7765be2f
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The RCU_BOOST commits for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU introduced an other-task
write to a new RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BOOSTED bit in the task_struct structure's
->rcu_read_unlock_special field, but, as noted by Steven Rostedt, without
correctly synchronizing all accesses to ->rcu_read_unlock_special.
This could result in bits in ->rcu_read_unlock_special being spuriously
set and cleared due to conflicting accesses, which in turn could result
in deadlocks between the rcu_node structure's ->lock and the scheduler's
rq and pi locks.  These deadlocks would result from RCU incorrectly
believing that the just-ended RCU read-side critical section had been
preempted and/or boosted.  If that RCU read-side critical section was
executed with either rq or pi locks held, RCU's ensuing (incorrect)
calls to the scheduler would cause the scheduler to attempt to once
again acquire the rq and pi locks, resulting in deadlock.  More complex
deadlock cycles are also possible, involving multiple rq and pi locks
as well as locks from multiple rcu_node structures.

This commit fixes synchronization by creating ->rcu_boosted field in
task_struct that is accessed and modified only when holding the ->lock
in the rcu_node structure on which the task is queued (on that rcu_node
structure's ->blkd_tasks list).  This results in tasks accessing only
their own current->rcu_read_unlock_special fields, making unsynchronized
access once again legal, and keeping the rcu_read_unlock() fastpath free
of atomic instructions and memory barriers.

The reason that the rcu_read_unlock() fastpath does not need to access
the new current->rcu_boosted field is that this new field cannot
be non-zero unless the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit is set in the
current->rcu_read_unlock_special field.  Therefore, rcu_read_unlock()
need only test current->rcu_read_unlock_special: if that is zero, then
current->rcu_boosted must also be zero.

This bug does not affect TINY_PREEMPT_RCU because this implementation
of RCU accesses current->rcu_read_unlock_special with irqs disabled,
thus preventing races on the !SMP systems that TINY_PREEMPT_RCU runs on.
Maybe-reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Maybe-reported-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      7765be2f
    • P
      rcu: decrease rcu_report_exp_rnp coupling with scheduler · 131906b0
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      PREEMPT_RCU read-side critical sections blocking an expedited grace
period invoke rcu_report_exp_rnp().  When the last such critical section
has completed, rcu_report_exp_rnp() invokes the scheduler to wake up the
task that invoked synchronize_rcu_expedited() -- needlessly holding the
root rcu_node structure's lock while doing so, thus needlessly providing
a way for RCU and the scheduler to deadlock.

This commit therefore releases the root rcu_node structure's lock before
calling wake_up().
Reported-by: NEd Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      131906b0
  9. 19 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • V
      connector: add an event for monitoring process tracers · f701e5b7
      由 Vladimir Zapolskiy 提交于 
      This change adds a procfs connector event, which is emitted on every
successful process tracer attach or detach.

If some process connects to other one, kernelspace connector reports
process id and thread group id of both these involved processes. On
disconnection null process id is returned.

Such an event allows to create a simple automated userspace mechanism
to be aware about processes connecting to others, therefore predefined
process policies can be applied to them if needed.

Note, a detach signal is emitted only in case, if a tracer process
explicitly executes PTRACE_DETACH request. In other cases like tracee
or tracer exit detach event from proc connector is not reported.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vzapolskiy@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NEvgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      f701e5b7
  11. 18 7月, 2011 2 次提交
    • O
      ptrace: mv send-SIGSTOP from do_fork() to ptrace_init_task() · dcace06c
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      If the new child is traced, do_fork() adds the pending SIGSTOP.
It assumes that either it is traced because of auto-attach or the
tracer attached later, in both cases sigaddset/set_thread_flag is
correct even if SIGSTOP is already pending.

Now that we have PTRACE_SEIZE this is no longer right in the latter
case. If the tracer does PTRACE_SEIZE after copy_process() makes the
child visible the queued SIGSTOP is wrong.

We could check PT_SEIZED bit and change ptrace_attach() to set both
PT_PTRACED and PT_SEIZED bits simultaneously but see the next patch,
we need to know whether this child was auto-attached or not anyway.

So this patch simply moves this code to ptrace_init_task(), this
way we can never race with ptrace_attach().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      dcace06c
    • O
      has_stopped_jobs: s/task_is_stopped/SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED/ · 961c4675
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      has_stopped_jobs() naively checks task_is_stopped(group_leader). This
was always wrong even without ptrace, group_leader can be dead. And
given that ptrace can change the state to TRACED this is wrong even
in the single-threaded case.

Change the code to check SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED and simplify the code,
retval + break/continue doesn't make this trivial code more readable.

We could probably add the usual "|| signal->group_stop_count" check
but I don't think this makes sense, the task can start the group-stop
right after the check anyway.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      961c4675
  13. 16 7月, 2011 5 次提交
    • A
      PM: Improve error code of pm_notifier_call_chain() · f0c077a8
      由 Akinobu Mita 提交于 
      This enables pm_notifier_call_chain() to get the actual error code
in the callback rather than always assume -EINVAL by converting all
PM notifier calls to return encapsulate error code with
notifier_from_errno().
Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      f0c077a8
    • K
      PM / Suspend: Export suspend_set_ops, suspend_valid_only_mem · a5e4fd87
      由 Kevin Hilman 提交于 
      Some platforms wish to implement their PM core suspend code as
modules.  To do so, these functions need to be exported to modules.

[rjw: Replaced EXPORT_SYMBOL with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL]
Reported-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      a5e4fd87
    • M
      PM / Suspend: Add .suspend_again() callback to suspend_ops · 3b5fe852
      由 MyungJoo Ham 提交于 
      A system or a device may need to control suspend/wakeup events. It may
want to wakeup the system after a predefined amount of time or at a
predefined event decided while entering suspend for polling or delayed
work. Then, it may want to enter suspend again if its predefined wakeup
condition is the only wakeup reason and there is no outstanding events;
thus, it does not wakeup the userspace unnecessary or unnecessary
devices and keeps suspended as long as possible (saving the power).

Enabling a system to wakeup after a specified time can be easily
achieved by using RTC. However, to enter suspend again immediately
without invoking userland and unrelated devices, we need additional
features in the suspend framework.

Such need comes from:

 1. Monitoring a critical device status without interrupts that can
wakeup the system. (in-suspend polling)
 An example is ambient temperature monitoring that needs to shut down
the system or a specific device function if it is too hot or cold. The
temperature of a specific device may be needed to be monitored as well;
e.g., a charger monitors battery temperature in order to stop charging
if overheated.

 2. Execute critical "delayed work" at suspend.
 A driver or a system/board may have a delayed work (or any similar
things) that it wants to execute at the requested time.
 For example, some chargers want to check the battery voltage some
time (e.g., 30 seconds) after the battery is fully charged and the
charger has stopped. Then, the charger restarts charging if the voltage
has dropped more than a threshold, which is smaller than "restart-charger"
voltage, which is a threshold to restart charging regardless of the
time passed.

This patch allows to add "suspend_again" callback at struct
platform_suspend_ops and let the "suspend_again" callback return true if
the system is required to enter suspend again after the current instance
of wakeup. Device-wise suspend_again implemented at dev_pm_ops or
syscore is not done because: a) suspend_again feature is usually under
platform-wise decision and controls the behavior of the whole platform
and b) There are very limited devices related to the usage cases of
suspend_again; chargers and temperature sensors are mentioned so far.

With suspend_again callback registered at struct platform_suspend_ops
suspend_ops in kernel/power/suspend.c with suspend_set_ops by the
platform, the suspend framework tries to enter suspend again by
looping suspend_enter() if suspend_again has returned true and there has
been no errors in the suspending sequence or pending wakeups (by
pm_wakeup_pending).

Tested at Exynos4-NURI.

[rjw: Fixed up kerneldoc comment for suspend_enter().]
Signed-off-by: NMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      3b5fe852
    • M
      tracing/kprobe: Update symbol reference when loading module · 7f6878a3
      由 Masami Hiramatsu 提交于 
      Since the address of a module-local variable can only be
solved after the target module is loaded, the symbol
fetch-argument should be updated when loading target
module.
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110627072703.6528.75042.stgit@fedora15Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      7f6878a3
    • M
      tracing/kprobes: Support module init function probing · 61424318
      由 Masami Hiramatsu 提交于 
      To support probing module init functions, kprobe-tracer allows
user to define a probe on non-existed function when it is given
with a module name. This also enables user to set a probe on
a function on a specific module, even if a same name (but different)
function is locally defined in another module.

The module name must be in the front of function name and separated
by a ':'. e.g. btrfs:btrfs_init_sysfs
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110627072656.6528.89970.stgit@fedora15Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      61424318