- 02 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Unlikely is implicit for NULL checks of pointers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch implement data repair function when direct read fails. The detail of the implementation is: - When we find the data is not right, we try to read the data from the other mirror. - When the io on the mirror ends, we will insert the endio work into the dedicated btrfs workqueue, not common read endio workqueue, because the original endio work is still blocked in the btrfs endio workqueue, if we insert the endio work of the io on the mirror into that workqueue, deadlock would happen. - After we get right data, we write it back to the corrupted mirror. - And if the data on the new mirror is still corrupted, we will try next mirror until we read right data or all the mirrors are traversed. - After the above work, we set the uptodate flag according to the result. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 24 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This has been reported and discussed for a long time, and this hang occurs in both 3.15 and 3.16. Btrfs now migrates to use kernel workqueue, but it introduces this hang problem. Btrfs has a kind of work queued as an ordered way, which means that its ordered_func() must be processed in the way of FIFO, so it usually looks like -- normal_work_helper(arg) work = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work); work->func() <---- (we name it work X) for ordered_work in wq->ordered_list ordered_work->ordered_func() ordered_work->ordered_free() The hang is a rare case, first when we find free space, we get an uncached block group, then we go to read its free space cache inode for free space information, so it will file a readahead request btrfs_readpages() for page that is not in page cache __do_readpage() submit_extent_page() btrfs_submit_bio_hook() btrfs_bio_wq_end_io() submit_bio() end_workqueue_bio() <--(ret by the 1st endio) queue a work(named work Y) for the 2nd also the real endio() So the hang occurs when work Y's work_struct and work X's work_struct happens to share the same address. A bit more explanation, A,B,C -- struct btrfs_work arg -- struct work_struct kthread: worker_thread() pick up a work_struct from @worklist process_one_work(arg) worker->current_work = arg; <-- arg is A->normal_work worker->current_func(arg) normal_work_helper(arg) A = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work); A->func() A->ordered_func() A->ordered_free() <-- A gets freed B->ordered_func() submit_compressed_extents() find_free_extent() load_free_space_inode() ... <-- (the above readhead stack) end_workqueue_bio() btrfs_queue_work(work C) B->ordered_free() As if work A has a high priority in wq->ordered_list and there are more ordered works queued after it, such as B->ordered_func(), its memory could have been freed before normal_work_helper() returns, which means that kernel workqueue code worker_thread() still has worker->current_work pointer to be work A->normal_work's, ie. arg's address. Meanwhile, work C is allocated after work A is freed, work C->normal_work and work A->normal_work are likely to share the same address(I confirmed this with ftrace output, so I'm not just guessing, it's rare though). When another kthread picks up work C->normal_work to process, and finds our kthread is processing it(see find_worker_executing_work()), it'll think work C as a collision and skip then, which ends up nobody processing work C. So the situation is that our kthread is waiting forever on work C. Besides, there're other cases that can lead to deadlock, but the real problem is that all btrfs workqueue shares one work->func, -- normal_work_helper, so this makes each workqueue to have its own helper function, but only a wraper pf normal_work_helper. With this patch, I no long hit the above hang. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 08 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sergei Trofimovich 提交于
Reproducer: mount /dev/ubda /mnt mount -oremount,thread_pool=42 /mnt Gives a crash: ? btrfs_workqueue_set_max+0x0/0x70 btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0xe3/0xf0 ? sync_filesystem+0x0/0xc0 ? btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0x0/0xf0 btrfs_remount+0x1d2/0x570 ? kern_path+0x0/0x80 do_remount_sb+0xd9/0x1c0 do_mount+0x26a/0xbf0 ? kfree+0x0/0x1b0 SyS_mount+0xc4/0x110 It's a call btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers, new_pool_size); with fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers = NULL; as scrub wqs get created only on user's demand. Patch skips not-created-yet workqueues. Signed-off-by: NSergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> CC: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> CC: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> CC: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since most of the btrfs_workqueue is printed as pointer address, for easier analysis, add trace for btrfs_workqueue alloc/destroy. So it is possible to determine the workqueue that a given work belongs to(by comparing the wq pointer address with alloc trace event). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Add ftrace for btrfs_workqueue for further workqueue tunning. This patch needs to applied after the workqueue replace patchset. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The new btrfs_workqueue still use open-coded function defition, this patch will change them into btrfs_func_t type which is much the same as kernel workqueue. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one, there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed into btrfs_workqueue. Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the too long "_struct" suffix. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since all the btrfs_worker is replaced with the newly created btrfs_workqueue, the old codes can be easily remove. Signed-off-by: NQuwenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The original btrfs_workers has thresholding functions to dynamically create or destroy kthreads. Though there is no such function in kernel workqueue because the worker is not created manually, we can still use the workqueue_set_max_active to simulated the behavior, mainly to achieve a better HDD performance by setting a high threshold on submit_workers. (Sadly, no resource can be saved) So in this patch, extra workqueue pending counters are introduced to dynamically change the max active of each btrfs_workqueue_struct, hoping to restore the behavior of the original thresholding function. Also, workqueue_set_max_active use a mutex to protect workqueue_struct, which is not meant to be called too frequently, so a new interval mechanism is applied, that will only call workqueue_set_max_active after a count of work is queued. Hoping to balance both the random and sequence performance on HDD. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Add high priority function to btrfs_workqueue. This is implemented by embedding a btrfs_workqueue into a btrfs_workqueue and use some helper functions to differ the normal priority wq and high priority wq. So the high priority wq is completely independent from the normal workqueue. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Use kernel workqueue to implement a new btrfs_workqueue_struct, which has the ordering execution feature like the btrfs_worker. The func is executed in a concurrency way, and the ordred_func/ordered_free is executed in the sequence them are queued after the corresponding func is done. The new btrfs_workqueue works much like the original one, one workqueue for normal work and a list for ordered work. When a work is queued, ordered work will be added to the list and helper function will be queued into the workqueue. The helper function will execute a normal work and then check and execute as many ordered work as possible in the sequence they were queued. At this patch, high priority work queue or thresholding is not added yet. The high priority feature and thresholding will be added in the following patches. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
In case we do not refill, we can overwrite cur pointer from prio_head by one from not prioritized head, what looks as something that was not intended. This change make we always take works from prio_head first until it's not empty. Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race. This is wrong because worker in this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed. Return -EINVAL instead. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dulshani Gunawardhana 提交于
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the kernel style guidelines. Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
The current implementation of worker threads in Btrfs has races in worker stopping code, which cause all kinds of panics and lockups when running btrfs/011 xfstest in a loop. The problem is that btrfs_stop_workers is unsynchronized with respect to check_idle_worker, check_busy_worker and __btrfs_start_workers. E.g., check_idle_worker race flow: btrfs_stop_workers(): check_idle_worker(aworker): - grabs the lock - splices the idle list into the working list - removes the first worker from the working list - releases the lock to wait for its kthread's completion - grabs the lock - if aworker is on the working list, moves aworker from the working list to the idle list - releases the lock - grabs the lock - puts the worker - removes the second worker from the working list ...... btrfs_stop_workers returns, aworker is on the idle list FS is umounted, memory is freed ...... aworker is waken up, fireworks ensue With this applied, I wasn't able to trigger the problem in 48 hours, whereas previously I could reliably reproduce at least one of these races within an hour. Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Each ordered operation has a free callback, and this was called with the worker spinlock held. Josef made the free callback also call iput, which we can't do with the spinlock. This drops the spinlock for the free operation and grabs it again before moving through the rest of the list. We'll circle back around to this and find a cleaner way that doesn't bounce the lock around so much. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 22 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Dan Carpenter noticed that we were doing a double unlock on the worker lock, and sometimes picking a worker thread without the lock held. This fixes both errors. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Al pointed out we have some random problems with the way we account for num_workers_starting in the async thread stuff. First of all we need to make sure to decrement num_workers_starting if we fail to start the worker, so make __btrfs_start_workers do this. Also fix __btrfs_start_workers so that it doesn't call btrfs_stop_workers(), there is no point in stopping everybody if we failed to create a worker. Also check_pending_worker_creates needs to call __btrfs_start_work in it's work function since it already increments num_workers_starting. People only start one worker at a time, so get rid of the num_workers argument everywhere, and make btrfs_queue_worker a void since it will always succeed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 15 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
If we have a constant stream of end_io completions or crc work, we can hit softlockup messages from the async helper threads. This adds a cond_resched() into the loop to avoid them. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
There is no reason to export two functions for entering the refrigerator. Calling refrigerator() instead of try_to_freeze() doesn't save anything noticeable or removes any race condition. * Rename refrigerator() to __refrigerator() and make it return bool indicating whether it scheduled out for freezing. * Update try_to_freeze() to return bool and relay the return value of __refrigerator() if freezing(). * Convert all refrigerator() users to try_to_freeze(). * Update documentation accordingly. * While at it, add might_sleep() to try_to_freeze(). Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
- 25 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Yan Zheng noticed two places we were doing a lot of work without task->state set to TASK_RUNNING. This sets the state properly after we get ready to sleep but decide not to. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The btrfs async worker threads are used for a wide variety of things, including processing bio end_io functions. This means that when the endio threads aren't running, the rest of the FS isn't able to do the final processing required to clear PageWriteback. The endio threads also try to exit as they become idle and start more as the work piles up. The problem is that starting more threads means kthreadd may need to allocate ram, and that allocation may wait until the global number of writeback pages on the system is below a certain limit. The result of that throttling is that end IO threads wait on kthreadd, who is waiting on IO to end, which will never happen. This commit fixes the deadlock by handing off thread startup to a dedicated thread. It also fixes a bug where the on-demand thread creation was creating far too many threads because it didn't take into account threads being started by other procs. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
It was possible for an async worker thread to be selected to receive a new work item, but exit before the work item was actually placed into that thread's work list. This commit fixes the race by incrementing the num_pending counter earlier, and making sure to check the number of pending work items before a thread exits. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The exit-on-idle code for async worker threads was incorrectly calling spin_lock_irq with interrupts already off. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
After a new worker thread starts, it is placed into the list of idle threads. But, this may race with a check for idle done by the worker thread itself, resulting in a double list_add operation. This fix adds a check to make sure the idle thread addition is done properly. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 12 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This changes the btrfs worker threads to batch work items into a local list. It allows us to pull work items in large chunks and significantly reduces the number of times we need to take the worker thread spinlock. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The btrfs worker thread spinlock was being used both for the queueing of IO and for the processing of ordered events. The ordered events never happen from end_io handlers, and so they don't need to use the _irq version of spinlocks. This adds a dedicated lock to the ordered lists so they don't have to run with irqs off. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The Btrfs worker threads don't currently die off after they have been idle for a while, leading to a lot of threads sitting around doing nothing for each mount. Also, they are unable to start atomically (from end_io hanlders). This commit reworks the worker threads so they can be started from end_io handlers (just setting a flag that asks for a thread to be added at a later date) and so they can exit if they have been idle for a long time. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
If spin_lock_irqsave is called twice in a row with the same second argument, the interrupt state at the point of the second call overwrites the value saved by the first call. Indeed, the second call does not need to save the interrupt state, so it is changed to a simple spin_lock. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 03 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
worker memory is already freed on one fail path in btrfs_start_workers, but is still dereferenced. Switch the dereference and kfree. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shin Hong 提交于
This patch fixes a bug which may result race condition between btrfs_start_workers() and worker_loop(). btrfs_start_workers() executed in a parent thread writes on workers->worker and worker_loop() in a child thread reads workers->worker. However, there is no synchronization enforcing the order of two operations. This patch makes btrfs_start_workers() fill workers->worker before it starts a child thread with worker_loop() Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 21 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Btrfs is using WRITE_SYNC_PLUG to send down synchronous IOs with a higher priority. But, the checksumming helper threads prevent it from being fully effective. There are two problems. First, a big queue of pending checksumming will delay the synchronous IO behind other lower priority writes. Second, the checksumming uses an ordered async work queue. The ordering makes sure that IOs are sent to the block layer in the same order they are sent to the checksumming threads. Usually this gives us less seeky IO. But, when we start mixing IO priorities, the lower priority IO can delay the higher priority IO. This patch solves both problems by adding a high priority list to the async helper threads, and a new btrfs_set_work_high_prio(), which is used to make put a new async work item onto the higher priority list. The ordering is still done on high priority IO, but all of the high priority bios are ordered separately from the low priority bios. This ordering is purely an IO optimization, it is not involved in data or metadata integrity. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 03 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jim Owens 提交于
Signed-off-by: Njim owens <jowens@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Amit Gud 提交于
Need to check kthread_should_stop after schedule_timeout() before calling schedule(). This causes threads to sleep with potentially no one to wake them up causing mount(2) to hang in btrfs_stop_workers waiting for threads to stop. Signed-off-by: NAmit Gud <gud@ksu.edu> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Tracing shows the delay between when an async thread goes to sleep and when more work is added is often very short. This commit adds a little bit of delay and extra checking to the code right before we schedule out. It allows more work to be added to the worker without requiring notifications from other procs. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The async bio submission thread was missing some bios that were added after it had decided there was no work left to do. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-