- 12 6月, 2009 15 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
[folded fix from Jiri Slaby] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that touch lock_super() on their own. Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags"). [folded a build fix from hch] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We can't run into contention on it. All other callers of lock_super() either hold s_umount (and we have it exclusive) or hold an active reference to superblock in question, which prevents the call of generic_shutdown_super() while the reference is held. So we can replace lock_super(s) with get_fs_excl() in generic_shutdown_super() (and corresponding change for unlock_super(), of course). Since ext4 expects s_lock held for its put_super, take lock_super() into it. The rest of filesystems do not care at all. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Merge the write_super helper into sync_super and move the check for ->write_super earlier so that we can avoid grabbing a reference to a superblock that doesn't have it. While we're at it also add a little comment documenting sync_supers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We just did a full fs writeout using sync_filesystem before, and if that's not enough for the filesystem it can perform it's own writeout in ->put_super, which many filesystems already do. Move a call to foofs_write_super into every foofs_put_super for now to guarantee identical behaviour until it's cleaned up by the individual filesystem maintainers. Exceptions: - affs already has identical copy & pasted code at the beginning of affs_put_super so no need to do it twice. - xfs does the right thing without it and I have changes pending for the xfs tree touching this are so I don't really need conflicts here.. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Rename the function so that it better describe what it really does. Also remove the unnecessary include of buffer_head.h. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Move sync_filesystems(), __fsync_super(), fsync_super() from super.c to sync.c where it fits better. [build fixes folded] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is unnecessarily fragile to have two places (fsync_super() and do_sync()) doing data integrity sync of the filesystem. Alter __fsync_super() to accommodate needs of both callers and use it. So after this patch __fsync_super() is the only place where we gather all the calls needed to properly send all data on a filesystem to disk. Nice bonus is that we get a complete livelock avoidance and write_supers() is now only used for periodic writeback of superblocks. sync_blockdevs() introduced a couple of patches ago is gone now. [build fixes folded] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
__fsync_super() does the same thing as fsync_super(). So change the only caller to use fsync_super() and make __fsync_super() static. This removes unnecessarily duplicated call to sync_blockdev() and prepares ground for the changes to __fsync_super() in the following patches. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
sync_filesystems() has a condition that if wait == 0 and s_dirt == 0, then ->sync_fs() isn't called. This does not really make much sence since s_dirt is generally used by a filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs to be called. But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some filesystems (btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
So far, do_sync() called: sync_inodes(0); sync_supers(); sync_filesystems(0); sync_filesystems(1); sync_inodes(1); This ordering makes it kind of hard for filesystems as sync_inodes(0) need not submit all the IO (for example it skips inodes with I_SYNC set) so e.g. forcing transaction to disk in ->sync_fs() is not really enough. Therefore sys_sync has not been completely reliable on some filesystems (ext3, ext4, reiserfs, ocfs2 and others are hit by this) when racing e.g. with background writeback. A similar problem hits also other filesystems (e.g. ext2) because of write_supers() being called before the sync_inodes(1). Change the ordering of calls in do_sync() - this requires a new function sync_blockdevs() to preserve the property that block devices are always synced after write_super() / sync_fs() call. The same issue is fixed in __fsync_super() function used on umount / remount read-only. [AV: build fixes] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Remove the unused s_async_list in the superblock, a leftover of the broken async inode deletion code that leaked into mainline. Having this in the middle of the sync/unmount path is not helpful for the following cleanups. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 npiggin@suse.de 提交于
This function walks the s_files lock, and operates primarily on the files in a superblock, so it better belongs here (eg. see also fs_may_remount_ro). [AV: ... and it shouldn't be static after that move] Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 09 5月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 H Hartley Sweeten 提交于
Signed-off-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Cc: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Does equivalent of up_write(&s->s_umount); deactivate_super(s); However, it does not does not unlock it until it's all over. As the result, it's safe to use to dispose of new superblock on ->get_sb() failure exits - nobody will see the sucker until it's all over. Equivalent using up_write/deactivate_super is safe for that purpose if superblock is either safe to use or has NULL ->s_root when we unlock. Normally filesystems take the required precautions, but a) we do have bugs in that area in some of them. b) up_write/deactivate_super sequence is extremely common, so the helper makes sense anyway. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Serge E. Hallyn 提交于
The mqueuefs filesystem will use this helper as well. Proc's main get_sb could also be made to use it, but that will require a bit more rework. Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Export a number of functions for CacheFiles's use. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sukadev Bhattiprolu 提交于
simple_set_mnt() is defined as returning 'int' but always returns 0. Callers assume simple_set_mnt() never fails and don't properly cleanup if it were to _ever_ fail. For instance, get_sb_single() and get_sb_nodev() should: up_write(sb->s_unmount); deactivate_super(sb); if simple_set_mnt() fails. Since simple_set_mnt() never fails, would be cleaner if it did not return anything. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] Signed-off-by: NSukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Opencode a cheasy approach with kevent. The idea here is that we'll add some generic delayed work infrastructure, which probably wont be based on pdflush (or maybe it will, in which case we can just add it back). This is in preparation for getting rid of pdflush completely. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Use lowercase names of quota functions instead of old uppercase ones. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
In sget(), destroy_super(s) is called with s->s_umount held, which makes lockdep unhappy. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Li Zefan said: Thread 1: for ((; ;)) { mount -t cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1 cat /mnt/cpus > /dev/null 2>&1 umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1 } Thread 2: for ((; ;)) { mount -t cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1 umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1 } (Note: It is irrelevant which cgroup subsys is used.) After a while a lockdep warning showed up: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.28 #479 --------------------------------------------- mount/13554 is trying to acquire lock: (&type->s_umount_key#19){--..}, at: [<c049d888>] sget+0x5e/0x321 but task is already holding lock: (&type->s_umount_key#19){--..}, at: [<c049da0c>] sget+0x1e2/0x321 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by mount/13554: #0: (&type->s_umount_key#19){--..}, at: [<c049da0c>] sget+0x1e2/0x321 stack backtrace: Pid: 13554, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.28-mc #479 Call Trace: [<c044ad2e>] validate_chain+0x4c6/0xbbd [<c044ba9b>] __lock_acquire+0x676/0x700 [<c044bb82>] lock_acquire+0x5d/0x7a [<c049d888>] ? sget+0x5e/0x321 [<c061b9b8>] down_write+0x34/0x50 [<c049d888>] ? sget+0x5e/0x321 [<c049d888>] sget+0x5e/0x321 [<c045a2e7>] ? cgroup_set_super+0x0/0x3e [<c045959f>] ? cgroup_test_super+0x0/0x2f [<c045bcea>] cgroup_get_sb+0x98/0x2e7 [<c045cfb6>] cpuset_get_sb+0x4a/0x5f [<c049dfa4>] vfs_kern_mount+0x40/0x7b [<c049e02d>] do_kern_mount+0x37/0xbf [<c04af4a0>] do_mount+0x5c3/0x61a [<c04addd2>] ? copy_mount_options+0x2c/0x111 [<c04af560>] sys_mount+0x69/0xa0 [<c0403251>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 The cause is after alloc_super() and then retry, an old entry in list fs_supers is found, so grab_super(old) is called, but both functions hold s_umount lock: struct super_block *sget(...) { ... retry: spin_lock(&sb_lock); if (test) { list_for_each_entry(old, &type->fs_supers, s_instances) { if (!test(old, data)) continue; if (!grab_super(old)) <--- 2nd: down_write(&old->s_umount); goto retry; if (s) destroy_super(s); return old; } } if (!s) { spin_unlock(&sb_lock); s = alloc_super(type); <--- 1th: down_write(&s->s_umount) if (!s) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); goto retry; } ... } It seems like a false positive, and seems like VFS but not cgroup needs to be fixed. Peter said: We can simply put the new s_umount instance in a but lockdep doesn't particularly cares about subclass order. If there's any issue with the callers of sget() assuming the s_umount lock being of sublcass 0, then there is another annotation we can use to fix that, but lets not bother with that if this is sufficient. Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12673Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Reported-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Cornelia Huck 提交于
Rename the async_*_special() functions to async_*_domain(), which describes the purpose of these functions much better. [Broke up long lines to silence checkpatch] Signed-off-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
-
- 14 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
-
- 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Kleikamp 提交于
sync_filesystems() shouldn't be calling async_synchronize_full_special while holding a spinlock. The second while loop in that function is the right place for this anyway. Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NGrissiom <chaos.proton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
this makes "rm -rf" on a (names cached) kernel tree go from 11.6 to 8.6 seconds on an ext3 filesystem Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Implement blkdev_releasepage() to release the buffer_heads and pages after we release private data belonging to a mounted filesystem. Cc: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 20 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Morris 提交于
Pass mount flags to security_sb_kern_mount(), so security modules can determine if a mount operation is being performed by the kernel. Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Acked-by: NStephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
-
- 21 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
replace open_bdev_excl/close_bdev_excl with variants taking fmode_t. superblock gets the value used to mount it stored in sb->s_mode Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 25 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kentaro Makita 提交于
[Summary] Split LRU-list of unused dentries to one per superblock to avoid soft lock up during NFS mounts and remounting of any filesystem. Previously I posted here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/5/590 [Descriptions] - background dentry_unused is a list of dentries which are not referenced. dentry_unused grows up when references on directories or files are released. This list can be very long if there is huge free memory. - the problem When shrink_dcache_sb() is called, it scans all dentry_unused linearly under spin_lock(), and if dentry->d_sb is differnt from given superblock, scan next dentry. This scan costs very much if there are many entries, and very ineffective if there are many superblocks. IOW, When we need to shrink unused dentries on one dentry, but scans unused dentries on all superblocks in the system. For example, we scan 500 dentries to unmount a filesystem, but scans 1,000,000 or more unused dentries on other superblocks. In our case , At mounting NFS*, shrink_dcache_sb() is called to shrink unused dentries on NFS, but scans 100,000,000 unused dentries on superblocks in the system such as local ext3 filesystems. I hear NFS mounting took 1 min on some system in use. * : NFS uses virtual filesystem in rpc layer, so NFS is affected by this problem. 100,000,000 is possible number on large systems. Per-superblock LRU of unused dentried can reduce the cost in reasonable manner. - How to fix I found this problem is solved by David Chinner's "Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists V3"(1), so I rebase it and add some fix to reclaim with fairness, which is in Andrew Morton's comments(2). 1) http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/25/318 2) http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/25/320 Split LRU-list of unused dentries to each superblocks. Then, NFS mounting will check dentries under a superblock instead of all. But this spliting will break LRU of dentry-unused. So, I've attempted to make reclaim unused dentrins with fairness by calculate number of dentries to scan on this sb based on following way number of dentries to scan on this sb = count * (number of dentries on this sb / number of dentries in the machine) - ToDo - I have to measuring performance number and do stress tests. - When unmount occurs during prune_dcache(), scanning on same superblock, It is unable to reach next superblock because it is gone away. We restart scannig superblock from first one, it causes unfairness of reclaim unused dentries on first superblock. But I think this happens very rarely. - Test Results Result on 6GB boxes with excessive unused dentries. Without patch: $ cat /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state 10181835 10180203 45 0 0 0 # mount -t nfs 10.124.60.70:/work/kernel-src nfs real 0m1.830s user 0m0.001s sys 0m1.653s With this patch: $ cat /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state 10236610 10234751 45 0 0 0 # mount -t nfs 10.124.60.70:/work/kernel-src nfs real 0m0.106s user 0m0.002s sys 0m0.032s [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comments] Signed-off-by: NKentaro Makita <k-makita@np.css.fujitsu.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
Make the needlessly global __put_super() static. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently, we just turn quotas off on remount of filesystem to read-only state. The patch below adds necessary framework so that we can turn quotas off on remount RO but we are able to automatically reenable them again when filesystem is remounted to RW state. All we need to do is to keep references to inodes of quota files when remounting RO and using these references to reenable quotas when remounting RW. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Hansen 提交于
There have been a few oopses caused by 'struct file's with NULL f_vfsmnts. There was also a set of potentially missed mnt_want_write()s from dentry_open() calls. This patch provides a very simple debugging framework to catch these kinds of bugs. It will WARN_ON() them, but should stop us from having any oopses or mnt_writer count imbalances. I'm quite convinced that this is a good thing because it found bugs in the stuff I was working on as soon as I wrote it. [hch: made it conditional on a debug option. But it's still a little bit too ugly] [hch: merged forced remount r/o fix from Dave and akpm's fix for the fix] Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Hansen 提交于
The emergency remount code forcibly removes FMODE_WRITE from filps. The r/o bind mount code notices that this was done without a proper mnt_drop_write() and properly gives a warning. This patch does a mnt_drop_write() to keep everything balanced. Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 20 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc notation warnings in fs/. Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/super.c:560): missing initial short description on line: * mark_files_ro Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line: * lease_get_mtime Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line: * lease_get_mtime Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/namei.c:1368): missing initial short description on line: * lookup_one_len: filesystem helper to lookup single pathname component Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3221): missing initial short description on line: * bh_uptodate_or_lock: Test whether the buffer is uptodate Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3240): missing initial short description on line: * bh_submit_read: Submit a locked buffer for reading Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:30): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_acquire: attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:47): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_in_progress: determine whether there is writeback in progress Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:58): missing initial short description on line: * writeback_release: relinquish exclusive writeback access against a device. Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:351): contents before sections Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:561): contents before sections Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/jbd/transaction.c:1935): missing initial short description on line: * void journal_invalidatepage() Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-