Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • N
      ASoC: simple-card: overwrite cpu_dai->fmt with codec_dai->fmt · 46c39cae
      由 Nicolin Chen 提交于 
      The current simple-card driver separates the daimft for cpu_dai and codec_dai.
So we might get different values for them (0x4003 and 0x1003 for example):

asoc-simple-card sound-cs42888.12: cpu : 2024000.esai / 4003 / 132000000
asoc-simple-card sound-cs42888.12: codec : cs42888 / 1003 / 24576000
asoc-simple-card sound-cs42888.12: cs42888 <-> 2024000.esai mapping ok

This is not allowed at all as we need to keep the DAIFMT settings identical
for both the ends of the link.

Thus this patch fixes it by overwriting the cpu_dai->fmt with codec_dai->fmt
since we defined the DAIFMT_MASTER basing on CODEC at the first place while
the other bits are same.
Signed-off-by: NNicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
      46c39cae
  3. 23 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 10 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 31 1月, 2014 4 次提交
    • R
      Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt: update file_operations documentation · 46bf16c4
      由 Richard Yao 提交于 
      ->readv, ->writev and ->sendfile have been removed while ->show_fdinfo
has been added. The documentation should reflect this.
Signed-off-by: NRichard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      46bf16c4
    • D
      mm, oom: base root bonus on current usage · 778c14af
      由 David Rientjes 提交于 
      A 3% of system memory bonus is sometimes too excessive in comparison to
other processes.

With commit a63d83f4 ("oom: badness heuristic rewrite"), the OOM
killer tries to avoid killing privileged tasks by subtracting 3% of
overall memory (system or cgroup) from their per-task consumption.  But
as a result, all root tasks that consume less than 3% of overall memory
are considered equal, and so it only takes 33+ privileged tasks pushing
the system out of memory for the OOM killer to do something stupid and
kill dhclient or other root-owned processes.  For example, on a 32G
machine it can't tell the difference between the 1M agetty and the 10G
fork bomb member.

The changelog describes this 3% boost as the equivalent to the global
overcommit limit being 3% higher for privileged tasks, but this is not
the same as discounting 3% of overall memory from _every privileged task
individually_ during OOM selection.

Replace the 3% of system memory bonus with a 3% of current memory usage
bonus.

By giving root tasks a bonus that is proportional to their actual size,
they remain comparable even when relatively small.  In the example
above, the OOM killer will discount the 1M agetty's 256 badness points
down to 179, and the 10G fork bomb's 262144 points down to 183500 points
and make the right choice, instead of discounting both to 0 and killing
agetty because it's first in the task list.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reported-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      778c14af
    • M
      zram: remove old private project comment · 49061236
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Remove the old private compcache project address so upcoming patches
should be sent to LKML because we Linux kernel community will take care.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      49061236
    • M
      zram: promote zram from staging · cd67e10a
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Zram has lived in staging for a LONG LONG time and have been
fixed/improved by many contributors so code is clean and stable now.  Of
course, there are lots of product using zram in real practice.

The major TV companys have used zram as swap since two years ago and
recently our production team released android smart phone with zram
which is used as swap, too and recently Android Kitkat start to use zram
for small memory smart phone.  And there was a report Google released
their ChromeOS with zram, too and cyanogenmod have been used zram long
time ago.  And I heard some disto have used zram block device for tmpfs.
In addition, I saw many report from many other peoples.  For example,
Lubuntu start to use it.

The benefit of zram is very clear.  With my experience, one of the
benefit was to remove jitter of video application with backgroud memory
pressure.  It would be effect of efficient memory usage by compression
but more issue is whether swap is there or not in the system.  Recent
mobile platforms have used JAVA so there are many anonymous pages.  But
embedded system normally are reluctant to use eMMC or SDCard as swap
because there is wear-leveling and latency issues so if we do not use
swap, it means we can't reclaim anoymous pages and at last, we could
encounter OOM kill.  :(

Although we have real storage as swap, it was a problem, too.  Because
it sometime ends up making system very unresponsible caused by slow swap
storage performance.

Quote from Luigi on Google
 "Since Chrome OS was mentioned: the main reason why we don't use swap
  to a disk (rotating or SSD) is because it doesn't degrade gracefully
  and leads to a bad interactive experience.  Generally we prefer to
  manage RAM at a higher level, by transparently killing and restarting
  processes.  But we noticed that zram is fast enough to be competitive
  with the latter, and it lets us make more efficient use of the
  available RAM.  " and he announced.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg57717.html

Other uses case is to use zram for block device.  Zram is block device
so anyone can format the block device and mount on it so some guys on
the internet start zram as /var/tmp.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-838198-start-0.html

Let's promote zram and enhance/maintain it instead of removing.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NNitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd67e10a
  9. 30 1月, 2014 4 次提交
  11. 29 1月, 2014 16 次提交
  13. 28 1月, 2014 5 次提交
  15. 27 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • P
      KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for DABRX register on POWER7 · 8563bf52
      由 Paul Mackerras 提交于 
      The DABRX (DABR extension) register on POWER7 processors provides finer
control over which accesses cause a data breakpoint interrupt.  It
contains 3 bits which indicate whether to enable accesses in user,
kernel and hypervisor modes respectively to cause data breakpoint
interrupts, plus one bit that enables both real mode and virtual mode
accesses to cause interrupts.  Currently, KVM sets DABRX to allow
both kernel and user accesses to cause interrupts while in the guest.

This adds support for the guest to specify other values for DABRX.
PAPR defines a H_SET_XDABR hcall to allow the guest to set both DABR
and DABRX with one call.  This adds a real-mode implementation of
H_SET_XDABR, which shares most of its code with the existing H_SET_DABR
implementation.  To support this, we add a per-vcpu field to store the
DABRX value plus code to get and set it via the ONE_REG interface.

For Linux guests to use this new hcall, userspace needs to add
"hcall-xdabr" to the set of strings in the /chosen/hypertas-functions
property in the device tree.  If userspace does this and then migrates
the guest to a host where the kernel doesn't include this patch, then
userspace will need to implement H_SET_XDABR by writing the specified
DABR value to the DABR using the ONE_REG interface.  In that case, the
old kernel will set DABRX to DABRX_USER | DABRX_KERNEL.  That should
still work correctly, at least for Linux guests, since Linux guests
cope with getting data breakpoint interrupts in modes that weren't
requested by just ignoring the interrupt, and Linux guests never set
DABRX_BTI.

The other thing this does is to make H_SET_DABR and H_SET_XDABR work
on POWER8, which has the DAWR and DAWRX instead of DABR/X.  Guests that
know about POWER8 should use H_SET_MODE rather than H_SET_[X]DABR, but
guests running in POWER7 compatibility mode will still use H_SET_[X]DABR.
For them, this adds the logic to convert DABR/X values into DAWR/X values
on POWER8.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      8563bf52
  17. 25 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  19. 24 1月, 2014 2 次提交