Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 16 5月, 2013 17 次提交
  3. 15 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      time: Revert ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK compile time optimizaitons · b4f711ee
      由 John Stultz 提交于 
      Kay Sievers noted that the ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK config,
which enables some minor compile time optimization to avoid
uncessary code in mostly the suspend/resume path could cause
problems for userland.

In particular, the dependency for RTC_HCTOSYS on
!ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK, which avoids setting the time
twice and simplifies suspend/resume, has the side effect
of causing the /sys/class/rtc/rtcN/hctosys flag to always be
zero, and this flag is commonly used by udev to setup the
/dev/rtc symlink to /dev/rtcN, which can cause pain for
older applications.

While the udev rules could use some work to be less fragile,
breaking userland should strongly be avoided. Additionally
the compile time optimizations are fairly minor, and the code
being optimized is likely to be reworked in the future, so
lets revert this change.
Reported-by: NKay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.9
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1366828376-18124-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      b4f711ee
  5. 14 5月, 2013 3 次提交
    • T
      timer: Don't reinitialize the cpu base lock during CPU_UP_PREPARE · 42a5cf46
      由 Tirupathi Reddy 提交于 
      An inactive timer's base can refer to a offline cpu's base.

In the current code, cpu_base's lock is blindly reinitialized each
time a CPU is brought up. If a CPU is brought online during the period
that another thread is trying to modify an inactive timer on that CPU
with holding its timer base lock, then the lock will be reinitialized
under its feet. This leads to following SPIN_BUG().

<0> BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#3, kworker/u:3/1466
<0> lock: 0xe3ebe000, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u:3/1466, .owner_cpu: 1
<4> [<c0013dc4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc)
<4> [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) from [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30)
<4> [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) from [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310)
<4> [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) from [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120)
<4> [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) from [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c)
<4> [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) from [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48)
<4> [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) from [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0)
<4> [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) from [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc)
<4> [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) from [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4)
<4> [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) from [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484)
<4> [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) from [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0)
<4> [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) from [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c)
<4> [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) from [<c000ea80>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

As an example, this particular crash occurred when CPU #3 is executing
mod_timer() on an inactive timer whose base is refered to offlined CPU
#2.  The code locked the timer_base corresponding to CPU #2. Before it
could proceed, CPU #2 came online and reinitialized the spinlock
corresponding to its base. Thus now CPU #3 held a lock which was
reinitialized. When CPU #3 finally ended up unlocking the old cpu_base
corresponding to CPU #2, we hit the above SPIN_BUG().

CPU #0		CPU #3				       CPU #2
------		-------				       -------
.....		 ......				      <Offline>
		mod_timer()
		 lock_timer_base
		   spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock)

cpu_up(2)	 .....				        ......
							init_timers_cpu()
....		 .....				    	spin_lock_init(&base->lock)
.....		   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock)  ......
		   <spin_bug>

Allocation of per_cpu timer vector bases is done only once under
"tvec_base_done[]" check. In the current code, spinlock_initialization
of base->lock isn't under this check. When a CPU is up each time the
base lock is reinitialized. Move base spinlock initialization under
the check.
Signed-off-by: NTirupathi Reddy <tirupath@codeaurora.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1368520142-4136-1-git-send-email-tirupath@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      42a5cf46
    • S
      rcu/idle: Wrap cpu-idle poll mode within rcu_idle_enter/exit · b47430d3
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Bjørn Mork reported the following warning when running powertop.

[   49.289034] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   49.289055] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree.c:502 rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.48+0x3d/0x125()
[   49.289244] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.0-bisect-rcu-warn+ #107
[   49.289251]  ffffffff8157d8c8 ffffffff81801e28 ffffffff8137e4e3 ffffffff81801e68
[   49.289260]  ffffffff8103094f ffffffff81801e68 0000000000000000 ffff88023afcd9b0
[   49.289268]  0000000000000000 0140000000000000 ffff88023bee7700 ffffffff81801e78
[   49.289276] Call Trace:
[   49.289285]  [<ffffffff8137e4e3>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[   49.289293]  [<ffffffff8103094f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x62/0x7b
[   49.289300]  [<ffffffff8103097d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
[   49.289306]  [<ffffffff810a9006>] rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.48+0x3d/0x125
[   49.289314]  [<ffffffff81079b49>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x37/0xa6
[   49.289320]  [<ffffffff810a9692>] rcu_idle_exit+0x85/0xa8
[   49.289327]  [<ffffffff8107076e>] trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle+0xae/0xff
[   49.289334]  [<ffffffff810708b1>] cpu_startup_entry+0x72/0x115
[   49.289341]  [<ffffffff813689e5>] rest_init+0x149/0x150
[   49.289347]  [<ffffffff8136889c>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
[   49.289355]  [<ffffffff81a82d34>] start_kernel+0x3f0/0x3fd
[   49.289362]  [<ffffffff81a8274c>] ? repair_env_string+0x5a/0x5a
[   49.289368]  [<ffffffff81a82481>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[   49.289375]  [<ffffffff81a82550>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xcd/0xd1
[   49.289379] ---[ end trace 07a1cc95e29e9036 ]---

The warning is that 'rdtp->dynticks' has an unexpected value, which roughly
translates to - the calls to rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() were not
made in the correct order, or otherwise messed up.

And Bjørn's painstaking debugging indicated that this happens when the idle
loop enters the poll mode. Looking at the poll function cpu_idle_poll(), and
the implementation of trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(), the problem becomes very clear:
cpu_idle_poll() lacks calls to rcu_idle_enter/exit(), and trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle()
calls them in the reverse order - first rcu_idle_exit(), and then rcu_idle_enter().
Hence the even/odd alternative sequencing of rdtp->dynticks goes for a toss.

And powertop readily triggers this because powertop uses the idle-tracing
infrastructure extensively.

So, to fix this, wrap the code in cpu_idle_poll() within rcu_idle_enter/exit(),
so that it blends properly with the calls inside trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle() and
thus get the function ordering right.
Reported-and-tested-by: NBjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/519169BF.4080208@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      b47430d3
    • T
      tick: Don't invoke tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() if the cpu is offline · f7ea0fd6
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      commit 5b39939a (nohz: Move ts->idle_calls incrementation into strict
idle logic) moved code out of tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() and missed
to bail out when the cpu is offline. That's causing subsequent
failures as an offline CPU is supposed to die and not to fiddle with
nohz magic.

Return false in can_stop_idle_tick() if the cpu is offline.
Reported-and-tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Reported-and-tested-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1305132138160.2863@ionosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      f7ea0fd6
  7. 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 11 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      workqueue: workqueue_congested() shouldn't translate WORK_CPU_UNBOUND into node number · d3251859
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      df2d5ae4 ("workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node
pool_workqueues") made unbound workqueues to map to multiple per-node
pool_workqueues and accordingly updated workqueue_contested() so that,
for unbound workqueues, it maps the specified @cpu to the NUMA node
number to obtain the matching pool_workqueue to query the congested
state.

Before this change, workqueue_congested() ignored @cpu for unbound
workqueues as there was only one pool_workqueue and some users
(fscache) called it with WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.  After the commit, this
causes the following oops as WORK_CPU_UNBOUND gets translated to
garbage by cpu_to_node().

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8803598d98b8
  IP: [<ffffffff81043b7e>] unbound_pwq_by_node+0xa1/0xfa
  PGD 2421067 PUD 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 2689 Comm: cat Tainted: GF            3.9.0-fsdevel+ #4
  task: ffff88003d801040 ti: ffff880025806000 task.ti: ffff880025806000
  RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81043b7e>]  [<ffffffff81043b7e>] unbound_pwq_by_node+0xa1/0xfa
  RSP: 0018:ffff880025807ad8  EFLAGS: 00010202
  RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8800388a2400 RCX: 0000000000000003
  RDX: ffff880025807fd8 RSI: ffffffff81a31420 RDI: ffff88003d8016e0
  RBP: ffff880025807ae8 R08: ffff88003d801730 R09: ffffffffa00b4898
  R10: ffffffff81044217 R11: ffff88003d801040 R12: 0000000064206e97
  R13: ffff880036059d98 R14: ffff880038cc8080 R15: ffff880038cc82d0
  FS:  00007f21afd9c740(0000) GS:ffff88003d100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
  CR2: ffff8803598d98b8 CR3: 000000003df49000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Stack:
   ffff8800388a2400 0000000000000002 ffff880025807b18 ffffffff810442ce
   ffffffff81044217 ffff880000000002 ffff8800371b4080 ffff88003d112ec0
   ffff880025807b38 ffffffffa00810b0 ffff880036059d88 ffff880036059be8
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff810442ce>] workqueue_congested+0xb7/0x12c
   [<ffffffffa00810b0>] fscache_enqueue_object+0xb2/0xe8 [fscache]
   [<ffffffffa007facd>] __fscache_acquire_cookie+0x3b9/0x56c [fscache]
   [<ffffffffa00ad8fe>] nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie+0xee/0x132 [nfs]
   [<ffffffffa009e112>] do_open+0x9/0xd [nfs]
   [<ffffffff810e804a>] do_dentry_open+0x175/0x24b
   [<ffffffff810e8298>] finish_open+0x41/0x51

Fix it by using smp_processor_id() if @cpu is WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-and-Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      d3251859
  11. 10 5月, 2013 16 次提交
  13. 09 5月, 2013 1 次提交