1. 19 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      procfs: new helper - PDE_DATA(inode) · d9dda78b
      Al Viro 提交于
      The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc
      really cares about is PDE(inode)->data.  Provide a helper
      for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved
      to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry
      layout.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d9dda78b
  3. 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators · b67bfe0d
      Sasha Levin 提交于
      I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived
      
              list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member)
      
      The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter:
      
              hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member)
      
      Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only
      they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking
      exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate.
      
      Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required:
      
       - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h
       - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones.
       - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this
       was modified to use 'obj->member' instead.
       - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator
       properly, so those had to be fixed up manually.
      
      The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here:
      
      @@
      iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host;
      
      type T;
      expression a,c,d,e;
      identifier b;
      statement S;
      @@
      
      -T b;
          <+... when != b
      (
      hlist_for_each_entry(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_from(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      for_each_busy_worker(a, c,
      - b,
      d) S
      |
      ax25_uid_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      ax25_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      sctp_for_each_hentry(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      sk_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      sk_for_each_rcu(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      sk_for_each_from
      -(a, b)
      +(a)
      S
      + sk_for_each_from(a) S
      |
      sk_for_each_safe(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      sk_for_each_bound(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a,
      - b,
      c, d, e) S
      |
      hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      nr_neigh_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      nr_node_for_each(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      nr_node_for_each_safe(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S
      + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S
      |
      - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S
      + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S
      |
      for_each_host(a,
      - b,
      c) S
      |
      for_each_host_safe(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      |
      for_each_mesh_entry(a,
      - b,
      c, d) S
      )
          ...+>
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings]
      [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes]
      Tested-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
      Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
      Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b67bfe0d
  4. 19 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 19 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 02 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 18 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 04 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner · 99b76233
      Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
      Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
      as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
      ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
      in module refcount underflow.
      
      We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
      and ->data.
      
      But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
      and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
      switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
      some thoughts.
      
      ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
      protection.
      
      rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
      And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
      We definitely don't want such modular code.
      
      Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.
      
      So, let's nuke it.
      
      Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.
      
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      99b76233
  12. 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交