- 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
The utimescaled / stimescaled fields in the task structure and the global cpustat should be set on all architectures. On s390 the calls to account_user_time_scaled and account_system_time_scaled never have been added. In addition system time that is accounted as guest time to the user time of a process is accounted to the scaled system time instead of the scaled user time. To fix the bugs and to prevent future forgetfulness this patch merges account_system_time_scaled into account_system_time and account_user_time_scaled into account_user_time. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Woodruff, Richard 提交于
In my device I get many interrupts from a high speed USB device in a very short period of time. The system spends a lot of time reprogramming the hardware timer which is in a slower timing domain as compared to the CPU. This results in the CPU spending a huge amount of time waiting for the timer posting to be done. All of this reprogramming is useless as the wake up time has not changed. As measured using ETM trace this drops my reprogramming penalty from almost 60% CPU load down to 15% during high interrupt rate. I can send traces to show this. Suppress setting of duplicate timer event when timer already stopped. Timer programming can be very costly and can result in long cpu stall/wait times. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [tglx@linutronix.de: move the check to the right place and avoid raising the softirq for nothing] Signed-off-by: NRichard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com> Cc: johnstul@us.ibm.com Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
Impact: remove false positive warning After a cpu was taken down during cpu hotplug (read: disabled for interrupts) it still might have pending softirqs. However take_cpu_down makes sure that the idle task will run next instead of ksoftirqd on the taken down cpu. The idle task will call tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick which might warn about pending softirqs just before the cpu kills itself completely. However the pending softirqs on the dead cpu aren't a problem because they will be moved to an online cpu during CPU_DEAD handling. So make sure we warn only for online cpus. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 25 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Impact: cleanup, move all hrtimer processing into hardirq context This is an attempt at removing some of the hrtimer complexity by reducing the number of callback modes to 1. This means that all hrtimer callback functions will be ran from HARD-irq context. I went through all the 30 odd hrtimer callback functions in the kernel and saw only one that I'm not quite sure of, which is the one in net/can/bcm.c - hence I'm CC-ing the folks responsible for that code. Furthermore, the hrtimer core now calls callbacks directly with IRQs disabled in case you try to enqueue an expired timer. If this timer is a periodic timer (which should use hrtimer_forward() to advance its time) then it might be possible to end up in an inf. recursive loop due to the fact that hrtimer_forward() doesn't round up to the next timer granularity, and therefore keeps on calling the callback - obviously this needs a fix. Aside from that, this seems to compile and actually boot on my dual core test box - although I'm sure there are some bugs in, me not hitting any makes me certain :-) Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Impact: nohz powersavings and wakeup regression commit fb02fbc1 (NOHZ: restart tick device from irq_enter()) causes a serious wakeup regression. While the patch is correct it does not take into account that spurious wakeups happen on x86. A fix for this issue is available, but we just revert to the .27 behaviour and let long running softirqs screw themself. Disable it for now. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 22 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit fb02fbc1 (NOHZ: restart tick device from irq_enter()) solves the problem of stale jiffies when long running softirqs happen in a long idle sleep period, but it has a major thinko in it: When the interrupt which came in _is_ the timer interrupt which should expire ts->sched_timer then we cancel and rearm the timer _before_ it gets expired in hrtimer_interrupt() to the next period. That means the call back function is not called. This game can go on for ever :( Prevent this by making sure to only rearm the timer when the expiry time is more than one tick_period away. Otherwise keep it running as it is either already expired or will expiry at the right point to update jiffies. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NVenkatesch Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We did not restart the tick device from irq_enter() to avoid double reprogramming and extra events in the return immediate to idle case. But long lasting softirqs can lead to a situation where jiffies become stale: idle() tick stopped (reprogrammed to next pending timer) halt() interrupt jiffies updated from irq_enter() interrupt handler softirq function 1 runs 20ms softirq function 2 arms a 10ms timer with a stale jiffies value jiffies updated from irq_exit() timer wheel has now an already expired timer (the one added in function 2) timer fires and timer softirq runs This was discovered when debugging a timer problem which happend only when the ath5k driver is active. The debugging proved that there is a softirq function running for more than 20ms, which is a bug by itself. To solve this we restart the tick timer right from irq_enter(), but do not go through the other functions which are necessary to return from idle when need_resched() is set. Reported-by: NElias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NElias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Split out the clock event device reprogramming. Preparatory patch. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
We have two separate nohz function calls in irq_enter() for no good reason. Just call a single NOHZ function from irq_enter() and call the bits in the tick code. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
export get_cpu_idle_time_us() for it to be used in ondemand governor. Last update time can be current time when the CPU is currently non-idle, accounting for the busy time since last idle. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Impact: per CPU hrtimers can be migrated from a dead CPU The hrtimer code has no knowledge about per CPU timers, but we need to prevent the migration of such timers and warn when such a timer is active at migration time. Explicitely mark the timers as per CPU and use a more understandable mode descriptor for the interrupts safe unlocked callback mode, which is used by hrtimer_sleeper and the scheduler code. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 23 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Impact: possible hang on CPU onlining in timer one shot mode. The tick_next_period variable is only used during boot on nohz/highres enabled systems, but for CPU onlining it needs to be maintained when the per cpu clock events device operates in one shot mode. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Impact: rare hang which can be triggered on CPU online. tick_do_timer_cpu keeps track of the CPU which updates jiffies via do_timer. The value -1 is used to signal, that currently no CPU is doing this. There are two cases, where the variable can have this state: boot: necessary for systems where the boot cpu id can be != 0 nohz long idle sleep: When the CPU which did the jiffies update last goes into a long idle sleep it drops the update jiffies duty so another CPU which is not idle can pick it up and keep jiffies going. Using the same value for both situations is wrong, as the CPU online code can see the -1 state when the timer of the newly onlined CPU is setup. The setup for a newly onlined CPU goes through periodic mode and can pick up the do_timer duty without being aware of the nohz / highres mode of the already running system. Use two separate states and make them constants to avoid magic numbers confusion. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 06 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
In order to be able to do range hrtimers we need to use accessor functions to the "expire" member of the hrtimer struct. This patch converts kernel/* to these accessors. Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
If HLT stops the TSC, we'll fail to account idle time, thereby inflating the actual process times. Fix this by re-calibrating the clock against GTOD when leaving nohz mode. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 21 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
On the tickless system(CONFIG_NO_HZ=y and CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n), after I made an offlined cpu online, I found this cpu's event handler was tick_handle_periodic, not tick_nohz_handler. After debuging, I found this bug was caused by the wrong tick mode. the tick mode is not changed to NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE when the cpu is offline. This patch fixes this bug. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Avoid deadlocks against rq->lock and xtime_lock by deferring the klogd wakeup by polling from the timer tick. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 31 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Found an interactivity problem on a quad core test-system - simple CPU loops would occasionally delay the system un an unacceptable way. After much debugging with Peter Zijlstra it turned out that the problem is caused by the string of sched_clock() changes - they caused the CPU clock to jump backwards a bit - which confuses the scheduler arithmetics. (which is unsigned for performance reasons) So revert: # c300ba25: sched_clock: and multiplier for TSC to gtod drift # c0c87734: sched_clock: only update deltas with local reads. # af52a90a: sched_clock: stop maximum check on NO HZ # f7cce27f: sched_clock: widen the max and min time This solves the interactivity problems. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
-
- 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Jack Ren and Eric Miao tracked down the following long standing problem in the NOHZ code: scheduler switch to idle task enable interrupts Window starts here ----> interrupt happens (does not set NEED_RESCHED) irq_exit() stops the tick ----> interrupt happens (does set NEED_RESCHED) return from schedule() cpu_idle(): preempt_disable(); Window ends here The interrupts can happen at any point inside the race window. The first interrupt stops the tick, the second one causes the scheduler to rerun and switch away from idle again and we end up with the tick disabled. The fact that it needs two interrupts where the first one does not set NEED_RESCHED and the second one does made the bug obscure and extremly hard to reproduce and analyse. Kudos to Jack and Eric. Solution: Limit the NOHZ functionality to the idle loop to make sure that we can not run into such a situation ever again. cpu_idle() { preempt_disable(); while(1) { tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(1); <- tell NOHZ code that we are in the idle loop while (!need_resched()) halt(); tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(); <- disables NOHZ mode preempt_enable_no_resched(); schedule(); preempt_disable(); } } In hindsight we should have done this forever, but ... /me grabs a large brown paperbag. Debugged-by: Jack Ren <jack.ren@marvell.com>, Debugged-by: Neric miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 11 7月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
Working with ftrace I would get large jumps of 11 millisecs or more with the clock tracer. This killed the latencing timings of ftrace and also caused the irqoff self tests to fail. What was happening is with NO_HZ the idle would stop the jiffy counter and before the jiffy counter was updated the sched_clock would have a bad delta jiffies to compare with the gtod with the maximum. The jiffies would stop and the last sched_tick would record the last gtod. On wakeup, the sched clock update would compare the gtod + delta jiffies (which would be zero) and compare it to the TSC. The TSC would have correctly (with a stable TSC) moved forward several jiffies. But because the jiffies has not been updated yet the clock would be prevented from moving forward because it would appear that the TSC jumped too far ahead. The clock would then virtually stop, until the jiffies are updated. Then the next sched clock update would see that the clock was very much behind since the delta jiffies is now correct. This would then jump the clock forward by several jiffies. This caused ftrace to report several milliseconds of interrupts off latency at every resume from NO_HZ idle. This patch adds hooks into the nohz code to disable the checking of the maximum clock update when nohz is in effect. It resumes the max check when nohz has updated the jiffies again. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
In case a cpu goes idle but softirqs are pending only an error message is printed to the console. It may take a very long time until the pending softirqs will finally be executed. Worst case would be a hanging system. With this patch the timer tick just continues and the softirqs will be executed after the next interrupt. Still a delay but better than a hanging system. Currently we have at least two device drivers on s390 which under certain circumstances schedule a tasklet from process context. This is a reason why we can end up with pending softirqs when going idle. Fixing these drivers seems to be non-trivial. However there is no question that the drivers should be fixed. This patch shouldn't be considered as a bug fix. It just is intended to keep a system running even if device drivers are buggy. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com> Cc: Stefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 30 5月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Fix (probably theoretical only) rq->clock update bug: in tick_nohz_update_jiffies() [which is called on all irq entry on all cpus where the irq entry hits an idle cpu] we call touch_softlockup_watchdog() before we update jiffies. That works fine most of the time when idle timeouts are within 60 seconds. But when an idle timeout is beyond 60 seconds, jiffies is updated with a jump of more than 60 seconds, which causes a jump in cpu-clock of more than 60 seconds, triggering a false positive. Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 25 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
David Miller reported: |---------------> the following commit: | commit 27ec4407 | Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | Date: Thu Feb 28 21:00:21 2008 +0100 | | sched: make cpu_clock() globally synchronous | | Alexey Zaytsev reported (and bisected) that the introduction of | cpu_clock() in printk made the timestamps jump back and forth. | | Make cpu_clock() more reliable while still keeping it fast when it's | called frequently. | | Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> causes watchdog triggers when a cpu exits NOHZ state when it has been there for >= the soft lockup threshold, for example here are some messages from a 128 cpu Niagara2 box: [ 168.106406] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#11 stuck for 128s! [dd:3239] [ 168.989592] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#21 stuck for 86s! [swapper:0] [ 168.999587] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#29 stuck for 91s! [make:4511] [ 168.999615] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 85s! [swapper:0] [ 169.020514] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#37 stuck for 91s! [swapper:0] [ 169.020514] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#45 stuck for 91s! [sh:4515] [ 169.020515] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#69 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.020515] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#77 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.020515] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#61 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.112554] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#85 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.112554] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#101 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.112554] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#109 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.112554] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#117 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.171483] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#40 stuck for 80s! [dd:3239] [ 169.331483] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 86s! [swapper:0] [ 169.351500] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#43 stuck for 101s! [dd:3239] [ 169.531482] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 129s! [mkdir:4565] [ 169.595754] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#20 stuck for 93s! [swapper:0] [ 169.626787] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#52 stuck for 93s! [swapper:0] [ 169.626787] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#84 stuck for 92s! [swapper:0] [ 169.636812] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#116 stuck for 94s! [swapper:0] It's simple enough to trigger this by doing a 10 minute sleep after a fresh bootup then starting a parallel kernel build. I suspect this might be reintroducing a problem we've had and fixed before, see the thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119546414004065&w=2 <---------------| touch the softlockup watchdog when exiting NOHZ state - we are obviously not locked up. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Various SMP balancing algorithms require that the bandwidth period run in sync. Possible improvements are moving the rt_bandwidth thing into root_domain and keeping a span per rt_bandwidth which marks throttled cpus. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 17 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Wiese 提交于
Call ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); and cpu = smp_processor_id(); once instead of twice. No functional change done, as changed code runs with local irq off. Reduces source lines and text size (20bytes on x86_64). [ akpm@linux-foundation.org: Build fix ] Signed-off-by: NKarsten Wiese <fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 09 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Karsten Wiese 提交于
Silences WARN_ONs in rcu_enter_nohz() and rcu_exit_nohz(), which appeared before caused by (repeated) calls to: $ echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online $ echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online Signed-off-by: NKarsten Wiese <fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> Cc: johnstul@us.ibm.com Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
The PREEMPT-RCU can get stuck if a CPU goes idle and NO_HZ is set. The idle CPU will not progress the RCU through its grace period and a synchronize_rcu my get stuck. Without this patch I have a box that will not boot when PREEMPT_RCU and NO_HZ are set. That same box boots fine with this patch. This patch comes from the -rt kernel where it has been tested for several months. Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 09 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Function timekeeping_is_continuous() no longer checks flag CLOCK_IS_CONTINUOUS, and it checks CLOCK_SOURCE_VALID_FOR_HRES now. So rename the function accordingly. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
To allow better diagnosis of tick-sched related, especially NOHZ related problems, we need to know when the last wakeup via an irq happened and when the CPU left the idle state. Add two fields (idle_waketime, idle_exittime) to the tick_sched structure and add them to the timer_list output. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Venki Pallipadi 提交于
Current idle time in kstat is based on jiffies and is coarse grained. tick_sched.idle_sleeptime is making some attempt to keep track of idle time in a fine grained manner. But, it is not handling the time spent in interrupts fully. Make tick_sched.idle_sleeptime accurate with respect to time spent on handling interrupts and also add tick_sched.idle_lastupdate, which keeps track of last time when idle_sleeptime was updated. This statistics will be crucial for cpufreq-ondemand governor, which can shed some conservative gaurd band that is uses today while setting the frequency. The ondemand changes that uses the exact idle time is coming soon. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Pavel Machek 提交于
I was confused by FSEC = 10^15 NSEC statement, plus small whitespace fixes. When there's copyright, there should be GPL. Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Pavel Machek 提交于
Small cleanups to tick-related code. Wrong preempt count is followed by BUG(), so it is hardly KERN_WARNING. Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 1月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
In order to more easily allow for the scheduler to use timers, clean up the locking a bit. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
We need to teach no_hz about the rt throttling because its tick driven. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 28 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
David Miller reported soft lockup false-positives that trigger on NOHZ due to CPUs idling for more than 10 seconds. The solution is touch the softlockup watchdog when we return from idle. (by definition we are not 'locked up' when we were idle) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9409Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 06 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 29 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length). Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length), which we no long user b/c we no longer build optional modules. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Acked-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 john stultz 提交于
To avoid lock contention, we distribute the sched_timer calls across the cpus so they do not trigger at the same instant. However, I used NR_CPUS, which can cause needless grouping on small smp systems depending on your kernel config. This patch converts to using num_possible_cpus() so we spread it as evenly as possible on every machine. Briefly tested w/ NR_CPUS=255 and verified reduced contention. Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-