1. 16 7月, 2013 8 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: extract rps interrupt enable/disable helpers · 44fc7d5c
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The VECS enabling required some changes to how rps interrupts are
      enabled/disabled since VECS interrupts are handling with the PM
      interrupt registers.
      
      But now that the pre/postinstall sequences is identical for all
      platforms with rps support (snb, ivb, hsw, vlv) we can also use the
      exact same sequence to actually enable the rps interrupts. Strictly
      speaking using spinlocks is overkill on snb/ivb & vlv since they have
      no VECS ring, but imo that's more than made up by the common code.
      
      Hence this just unifies the vlv code with the snb-hsw code which
      matched exactly before the VECS enabling. See
      
      commit eda63ffb
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:26 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Add PM regs to pre/post install
      
      and
      
      commit 4848405c
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:27 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: make PM interrupt writes non-destructive
      
      for why the gen6 code (shared between snb, ivb and hsw) needed to be
      changed originally.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      44fc7d5c
    • D
      drm/i915: unify GT/PM irq postinstall code · 0a9a8c91
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Again extract a common helper. For the postinstall hook things are a
      bit more complicated since we have more cases on ilk-hsw/vlv here.
      
      But since vlv was clearly broken by failing to initialize
      dev_priv->gt_irq_mask correctly the shared code is clearly justified.
      
      Also kill the PMIER setting in the async rps enable work. I should
      have been save, but also clearly looked rather fragile. PMIER setup is
      now all down in the irq pre/postinstall hooks.
      
      With this we now have the usual interrupt register sequence for GT/PM
      irq registers:
      
      - IER is setup once with all the interrupts we ever need in the
        postinstall hook and never touched again. Exceptions are SDEIER,
        which is touched in the preinstall hook (when the irq handler isn't
        enabled) and then only from the irq handler. And DEIER/VLV_IER with
        is used in the irq handler but also written to once in the
        postinstall hook. But since that write is essentially what enables
        the interrupt and we should always have MSI interrupts we should be
        save. In case we ever have non-MSI interrupts we'd be screwed.
      
      - IIR is cleared in the postinstall hook before we enable/unmask the
        respective interrupt sources. Hence we can't steal an interrupt
        event an accidentally trigger the spurious interrupt logic in the
        core kernel. Note that after some discussion with Ben Widawsky we
        think that we actually should clear the IIR registers in the
        preinstall hook. But doing that is a much larger patch series.
      
      - IMR regs are (usually) all masked off. Those are the only regs
        changed at runtime, which is all protected by dev_priv->irq_lock.
      
      This unification also kills the cargo-culted read-modify-write PM
      register setup for VECS. Interrupt setup is done without userspace
      being able to interfere, so we better know what values we want to put
      into those registers. RMW cycles otoh are really good at papering over
      races, until stuff magically blows up and no one has a clue why.
      
      v2: Touch the gen6+ PM interrupt registers only on gen6+.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: Add a comment to explain why the l3 parity interrupt is
      special.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0a9a8c91
    • D
      drm/i915: unify PM interrupt preinstall sequence · d18ea1b5
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Since the addition of VECS we have a slightly different enable
      sequence for PM interrupts on ivb/hsw vs snb and vlv. Usually that
      will end up in hard to track down surprises.
      
      Hence unifiy things and since we have copies of this code in 3 places
      now, extract it into its own little helper.
      
      Note that this changes the irq preinstall sequence a bit for snb and
      vlv: We now also clear the PM registers in the preinstall hook, in
      addition to the PM register clearing/setup already done when actually
      enabling rps. So this doesn't fix a bug but simply unifies the code
      across all platforms. After the postinstall hook is similarly unified
      we can rip out the then redundant PM interrupt setup from the rps
      code.
      
      v3: Rebase on top of the retained double-GTIIR clearing. Also
      resurrect the masking/disabling of the gen6+ PM interrupts as spotted
      by Ben Widaswky.
      
      v4: Move the DE interrupt reset code out of gen5_gt_irq_preinstall
      back to ironlake_irq_preinstall where it really belongs. Spotted by
      Paulo.
      
      v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want
      to unify the code and what exactly changes.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: s/GT/PM/ to fix up a comment which Ben spotted while
      reviewing.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d18ea1b5
    • B
      drm/i915: debugfs entries for [e]LLC · 63573eb7
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      To make users life a little easier figuring out what they have on their
      system.
      
      Ideally, I'd really like to report LLC size, but it turned out to be a
      bit of a pain. Maybe I'll revisit it in the future.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      63573eb7
    • B
      drm/i915: Use eLLC/LLC by default when available · 4d15c145
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming
      cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve
      performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a
      problem elsewhere.
      
      In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from
      this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not
      using it is the special case for MOCS.
      
      References: http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf (page 57)
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4d15c145
    • B
      drm/i915: store eLLC size · 59124506
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The eLLC cannot be determined by PCIID because as far as we know, even
      machines supporting eLLC may not have it enabled, or fused off or
      whatever. It's possible this isn't actually true, and at that point we
      can switch to a DEV_INFO flag instead.
      
      I've defined everything where the docs are clear, and left the rest as
      magic.
      
      But we need it before we set the pte_encode function pointers, which
      happens really early, in gtt_init.
      
      The problem with just doing the normal sequence earlier is we don't have
      the ability to use forcewake until after the pte functions have been set
      up.
      
      Since all solutions are somewhat ugly (barring rewriting all the init
      ordering), I've opted to do the detection really early, and the enabling
      later - since the register to detect doesn't require forcewake.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      [danvet: Move dev_priv->ellc_size away from the dri1 dungeon to a nice
      place right next to the l3 parity stuff. Also squash in the follow-up
      commit to read out the eLLC size a bit earlier.]
      Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59124506
    • B
      drm/i915: Define some of the eLLC magic · 05e21cc4
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The EDRAM present register isn't really defined in the docs. It just
      says check to see if it's set to 1. So I haven't defined the 1 value not
      knowing what it actually means.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      05e21cc4
    • B
      drm/i915/hsw: Set correct Haswell PTE encodings. · 0d8ff15e
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The cacheability controls have changed, and the bits have been
      rearranged in general.
      
      Note that age 0 is the oldest (most likely to get evicted) and age 3
      is the youngest (most likely to stick around for a bit). We've picked
      0 for no reason, but atm it shouldn't matter anyway (since we don't
      yet try to differentiate between different objects).
      
      v2: Remove comments for snb/ivb cache leves, that's a separate change.
      
      v3: Resolve conflicts due to patch series reordering.
      
      v4: Rebased on top of Kenneth Graunke's ->pte_encode refactoring.
      
      v5: Removed eLLC bits for separate patch.
      
      In the internal repository this was:
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
      Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      [danvet: Add comment about cache ages as requested by Ben provoked due
      to a question from Damien.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0d8ff15e
  2. 13 7月, 2013 4 次提交
  3. 12 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  4. 11 7月, 2013 10 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: don't enable PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT · c0d6a3dd
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The code to handle it is broken - there's simply no code to clear CS
      parser errors on gen5+. And behold, for all the other rings we also
      don't enable it!
      
      Leave the handling code itself in place just to be consistent with the
      existing mess though. And in case someone feels like fixing it all up.
      
      This has been errornously enabled in
      
      commit 12638c57
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:31 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Enable vebox interrupts
      
      Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c0d6a3dd
    • D
      drm/i915: unify ring irq refcounts (again) · c7113cc3
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      With the simplified locking there's no reason any more to keep the
      refcounts seperate.
      
      v2: Readd the lost comment that ring->irq_refcount is protected by
      dev_priv->irq_lock.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7113cc3
    • D
      drm/i915: kill dev_priv->rps.lock · 59cdb63d
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Now that the rps interrupt locking isn't clearly separated (at elast
      conceptually) from all the other interrupt locking having a different
      lock stopped making sense: It protects much more than just the rps
      workqueue it started out with. But with the addition of VECS the
      separation started to blurr and resulted in some more complex locking
      for the ring interrupt refcount.
      
      With this we can (again) unifiy the ringbuffer irq refcounts without
      causing a massive confusion, but that's for the next patch.
      
      v2: Explain better why the rps.lock once made sense and why no longer,
      requested by Ben.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59cdb63d
    • D
      drm/i915: queue work outside spinlock in hsw_pm_irq_handler · 2adbee62
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      And kill the comment about it. Queueing work is a barrier type event,
      no amount of locking will help in ordering things (as long as we queue
      the work after having updated all relevant data structures). Also, the
      queue_work works itself as a sufficient memory barrier.
      
      Again on the surface this is just a tiny micro-optimization to reduce
      the hold-time of dev_priv->irq_lock. But the better reason is that it
      reduces superficial locking and so makes it clearer what we actually
      need for correctness.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      2adbee62
    • D
      drm/i915: streamline hsw_pm_irq_handler · 41a05a3a
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) check was redunandant. Otoh
      adding a check for rps events allows us to avoid the spinlock grabbing
      for VECS interrupts.
      
      v2: Drop misplaced hunk which now moved to the right patch.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      41a05a3a
    • D
      drm/i915: irq handlers don't need interrupt-safe spinlocks · d0ecd7e2
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Since we only have one interrupt handler and interrupt handlers are
      non-reentrant.
      
      To drive the point really home give them all an _irq_handler suffix.
      
      This is a tiny micro-optimization but even more important it makes it
      clearer what locking we actually need. And in case someone screws this
      up: lockdep will catch hardirq vs. other context deadlocks.
      
      v2: Fix up compile fail.
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d0ecd7e2
    • D
      drm/i915: kill lpt pch transcoder->crtc mapping code for fifo underruns · de28075d
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      It's racy: There's no guarantee that we won't walk this code (due to a
      pch fifo underrun interrupt) while someone is changing the pointers
      around.
      
      The only reason we do this is to use the righ crtc for the pch fifo
      underrun accounting. But we never expose this to userspace, so
      essentially no one really cares if we use the "wrong" crtc.
      
      So let's just rip it out.
      
      With this patch fifo underrun code will always use crtc A for tracking
      underruns on the (only) pch transcoder on LPT.
      
      v2: Add a big comment explaining what's going on. Requested by Paulo.
      
      v3: Fixup spelling in comment as spotted by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      de28075d
    • D
      drm/i915: improve GEN7_ERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 7336df65
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Same treatment as for SERR_INT: If we clear only the bit for the pipe
      we're enabling (but unconditionally) then we can always check for
      possible underruns after having disabled the interrupt. That way pipe
      underruns won't be lost, but at worst only get reported in a delayed
      fashion.
      
      v2: The same logic bug as in the SERR handling change also existed
      here. The same bugfix of only reporting missed underruns when the
      error interrupt was masked applies, too.
      
      v3: Do the same fixes as for the SERR handling that Paulo suggested in
      his review:
      - s/%i/%c/ fix in the debug output
      - move the DE_ERR_INT_IVB read into the respective if block
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      [danvet: Fix up the checkpatch bikeshed Paulo noticed.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7336df65
    • D
      drm/i915: improve SERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 1dd246fb
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The current code won't report any fifo underruns on cpt if just one
      pipe has fifo underrun reporting disabled. We can't enable the
      interrupts, but we can still check the per-transcoder bits and so
      report the underrun delayed if:
      - We always clear the transcoder's bit (and none of the other bits)
        when enabling.
      - We check the transcoder's bit after disabling (to avoid racing with
        the interrupt handler).
      
      v2: I've forgotten to actually remove the old SERR_INT clearing.
      
      v3: Use transcoder_name as suggested by Paulo Zanoni. Paulo also
      noticed a logic bug: When an underrun interrupt fires we report it
      both in the interrupt handler and when checking for underruns when
      disabling it in cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But that second check
      is only required if the interrupt is disabled and we're switching of
      underrun reporting (e.g. because we're disabling the crtc). Hence
      check for that condition.
      
      At first I wanted to rework the code to pass that bit of information
      from the uppper functions down to cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But
      that turned out too messy. Hence the quick&dirty check whether the
      south error interrupt source is masked off or not.
      
      v4: Streamline the control flow a bit.
      
      v5: s/pipe/pch transcoder/ in the dmesg output, suggested by Paulo.
      
      v6: Review from Paulo:
      - Reorder the was_enabled assignment to only read the register when we
        need it. Also add a comment that we need to do that before updating
        the register.
      - s/%i/%c/ fix for the debug output.
      - Fix the checkpath complaint in the SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN
        #define.
      
      v7: Hopefully put that elusive SERR hunk back into this patch, spotted
      by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1dd246fb
    • D
      drm/i915: extract ibx_display_interrupt_update · fee884ed
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This way all changes to SDEIMR all go through the same function, with
      the exception of the (single-threaded) setup/teardown code.
      
      For paranoia again add an assert_spin_locked.
      
      v2: For even more paranoia also sprinkle a spinlock assert over
      cpt_can_enable_serr_int since we need to have that one there, too.
      
      v3: Fix the logic of interrupt enabling, add enable/disable macros for
      the simple cases in the fifo code and add a comment. All requested by
      Paulo.
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      fee884ed
  5. 10 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  6. 09 7月, 2013 11 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: WARN if the bios reserved range is bigger than stolen size · 897f9ed0
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      v2: Bail out if we hit the WARN_ON to avoid fallout later on. Spotted
      by Chris Wilson.
      Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      897f9ed0
    • D
      drm/i915: clean up media reset on gm45 · 36c0cc61
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Originally I've thought that this fixes up the reset issues on my
      gm45, but that was just a red herring due to b0rked testing.
      
      Still I much prefer writing the right values (all other fields are
      reserved) instead of potentially dragging gunk around. Hence also
      clear the register to 0 after a reset.
      
      Note that Cspec is a bit confused and doesn't explicitly say that all
      the other bits in this register are "reserved, mbz" like usually.
      Instead they're marked as "r/o, default value = 0" which semantically
      amounts to the same thing.
      
      v2: Stop claiming this fixes anything and return 0 if successful
      instead of stack garbage.
      
      v3: Pimp the commit message to explain exactly why I think the docs
      allow us to ditch the rmw cycle, spurred by a discussion with Chris.
      
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      36c0cc61
    • C
      drm/i915: Verify that our stolen memory doesn't conflict · eaba1b8f
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      Sanity check that the memory region found through the Graphics Base
      of Stolen Memory is reserved and hidden from the rest of the system
      through the use of the resource API.
      
      v2: "Graphics Stolen Memory" is such a more bodacious name than the lame
          "i915 stolen", and convert to using devres for automagical cleanup of
          the resource. (danvet)
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      [danvet: Dump proper hexcodes.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      eaba1b8f
    • D
      drm/i915: convert debugfs creation/destruction to table · 34b9674c
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      At least for the common cases where we only need special file
      operations. The forcewake file is still rather more special.
      
      v2: Fix up the debugfs unregister code.
      
      v3: Actually squash in the right fixup.
      Acked-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      34b9674c
    • D
      drm/i915: dvo needs a P2 divisor of 4 · 5d536e28
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Section 1.5.4, "DPLL A Control Register" from Bspec about bit 23
      "FPA0/A1 P2 Clock Divide":
      
      0 = Divide by 2
      1 = Divide by 4. This bit must be set in DVO non-gang mode
      
      So copy the current limits (which should be good for i8xx) and create
      a new set for dvo encoders.
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5d536e28
    • D
      drm/i915: fix dvo DPLL regression · 4a33e48d
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      I've missed that intel_dvo_mode_set changes the dpll configuration.
      Hence when I've reworked the sequence to only enable the dpll in the
      crtc_enable callback in
      
      commit 66e3d5c0
      Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Date:   Sun Jun 16 21:24:16 2013 +0200
      
          drm/i915: move i9xx dpll enabling into crtc enable function
      
      that special DVO bit was lost. Some BSpec reading confirms that it's
      only needed for DVO encoders. Section 1.5.4, "DPLL A Control Register"
      for bit 30:
      
      "2X Clock Enable. When driving In non-gang DVO modes such as a
      connected flat panel or TV, a 2X" version of the clock is needed. When
      not using the 2X output it should be disabled. This bit cannot be set
      when driving the integrated LVDS port on devices such as Montara-GM."
      
      Fix this regression up.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66516
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reported-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Partially-tested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4a33e48d
    • B
      drm/i915: Embed drm_mm_node in i915 gem obj · c6cfb325
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      Embedding the node in the obj is more natural in the transition to VMAs
      which will also have embedded nodes. This change also helps transition
      away from put_block to remove node.
      
      Though it's quite an uncommon occurrence, it's somewhat convenient to not
      fail at bind time because we cannot allocate the node. Though in
      practice there are other allocations (like the request structure) which
      would probably make this point not terribly useful.
      
      Quoting Daniel:
      Note that the only difference between put_block and remove_node is
      that the former fills up the preallocation cache. Which we don't need
      anyway and hence is just wasted space.
      
      v2: Clean up the stolen preallocation code.
      Rebased on the reserve_node patches
      renames ggtt_ stuff to gtt_ stuff
      WARN_ON if the object is already bound (which doesn't mean it's in the
      bound list, tricky)
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c6cfb325
    • B
      drm/i915: Kill obj->gtt_offset · edd41a87
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      With the getters in place from the previous patch this members serves no
      purpose other than saving one spare pointer chase, which will be killed
      in the next patch anyway.
      
      Moving to VMAs, this members adds unnecessary confusion since an object
      may exist at different offsets in different VMs.
      
      v2: Properly preserve the stolen offset. This code is a bit hacky but it
      all goes away when we embed the drm_mm_node and removes the need for the
      incorrect patch I submitted previously: "Use gtt_space->start for stolen
      reservation"
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      edd41a87
    • B
      drm/i915: Getter/setter for object attributes · f343c5f6
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      Soon we want to gut a lot of our existing assumptions how many address
      spaces an object can live in, and in doing so, embed the drm_mm_node in
      the object (and later the VMA).
      
      It's possible in the future we'll want to add more getter/setter
      methods, but for now this is enough to enable the VMAs.
      
      v2: Reworked commit message (Ben)
      Added comments to the main functions (Ben)
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_set_color/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_set_color/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_bound/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_bound/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_size/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      sed -i "s/i915_gem_obj_offset/i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset/" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.[ch]
      (Daniel)
      
      v3: Rebased on new reserve_node patch
      Changed DRM_DEBUG_KMS to actually work (will need fixing later)
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      f343c5f6
    • B
      drm: Change create block to reserve node · 338710e7
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      With the previous patch we no longer actually create a node, we simply
      find the correct hole and occupy it. This very well could have been
      squashed with the last patch, but since I already had David's review, I
      figured it's easiest to keep it distinct.
      
      Also update the users in i915. Conveniently this is the only user of the
      interface.
      
      CC: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      CC: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Acked-by: NDavid Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      338710e7
    • B
      drm: pre allocate node for create_block · b3a070cc
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
      have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
      Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
      will break a bunch of code, but amongst them are 2 callers of
      drm_mm_create_block(), both related to stolen memory.
      
      It also allows us to embed the drm_mm_node into the object currently
      which provides a nice transition over to the new code.
      
      v2: Reordered to do before ripping out obj->gtt_offset.
      Some minor cleanups made available because of reordering.
      
      v3: s/continue/break on failed stolen node allocation (David)
      Set obj->gtt_space on failed node allocation (David)
      Only unref stolen (fix double free) on failed create_stolen (David)
      Free node, and NULL it in failed create_stolen (David)
      Add back accidentally removed newline (David)
      
      CC: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Acked-by: NDavid Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b3a070cc
  7. 06 7月, 2013 2 次提交