This patch simplifies task_struct by removing the four numa_* pointers
in the same array and replacing them with the array pointer. By doing this,
on x86_64, the size of task_struct is reduced by 3 ulong pointers (24 bytes on
x86_64).

A new parameter is added to the task_faults_idx function so that it can return
an index to the correct offset, corresponding with the old precalculated
pointers.

All of the code in sched/ that depended on task_faults_idx and numa_* was
changed in order to match the new logic.
Signed-off-by: NIulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141031001331.GA30662@winterfellSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There are both UP and SMP version of pull_dl_task(), so don't need
to check CONFIG_SMP in switched_from_dl();
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-6-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In switched_from_dl() we have to issue a resched if we successfully
pulled some task from other cpus. This patch also aligns the behavior
with -rt.
Suggested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-5-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch pushes task away if the dealine of the task is equal
to current during wake up. The same behavior as rt class.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-4-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch add deadline rq status print.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The yield semantic of deadline class is to reduce remaining runtime to
zero, and then update_curr_dl() will stop it. However, comsumed bandwidth
is reduced from the budget of yield task again even if it has already been
set to zero which leads to artificial overrun. This patch fix it by make
sure we don't steal some more time from the task that yielded in update_curr_dl().
Suggested-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch checks if current can be pushed/pulled somewhere else
in advance to make logic clear, the same behavior as dl class.

- If current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule, let's hope
  task can move out.
- If task is migratable, so let's not schedule it and see if it
  can be pushed or pulled somewhere else.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414708776-124078-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

As per commit f10e00f4 ("sched/dl: Use dl_bw_of() under
rcu_read_lock_sched()"), dl_bw_of() has to be protected by
rcu_read_lock_sched().
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414497286-28824-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Idle cpu is idler than non-idle cpu, so we needn't search for least_loaded_cpu
after we have found an idle cpu.
Signed-off-by: NYao Dongdong <yaodongdong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414469286-6023-1-git-send-email-yaodongdong@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently used hrtimer_try_to_cancel() is racy:

raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
...                            dl_task_timer                 raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
...                               raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)   ...
   switched_from_dl()             ...                        ...
      hrtimer_try_to_cancel()     ...                        ...
   switched_to_fair()             ...                        ...
...                               ...                        ...
...                               ...                        ...
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)        ...                        (asquired)
...                               ...                        ...
...                               ...                        ...
do_exit()                         ...                        ...
   schedule()                     ...                        ...
      raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)    ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
      ...                         ...                        ...
      raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)  ...                        raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
      ...                         ...                        (asquired)
      put_task_struct()           ...                        ...
          free_task_struct()      ...                        ...
      ...                         ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
...                               (asquired)                 ...
...                               ...                        ...
...                               (use after free)           ...

So, let's implement 100% guaranteed way to cancel the timer and let's
be sure we are safe even in very unlikely situations.

rq unlocking does not limit the area of switched_from_dl() use, because
this has already been possible in pull_dl_task() below.

Let's consider the safety of of this unlocking. New code in the patch
is working when hrtimer_try_to_cancel() fails. This means the callback
is running. In this case hrtimer_cancel() is just waiting till the
callback is finished. Two

1) Since we are in switched_from_dl(), new class is not dl_sched_class and
new prio is not less MAX_DL_PRIO. So, the callback returns early; it's
right after !dl_task() check. After that hrtimer_cancel() returns back too.

The above is:

raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);                  ...
...                                       dl_task_timer()
...                                          raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);
   switched_from_dl()                        ...
       hrtimer_try_to_cancel()               ...
          raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock);         ...
          hrtimer_cancel()                   ...
          ...                                raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock);
          ...                                return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
          ...                             ...
          raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);        ...

2) But the below is also possible:
                                   dl_task_timer()
                                      raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);
                                      ...
                                      raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock);
raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);              ...
   switched_from_dl()                 ...
       hrtimer_try_to_cancel()        ...
       ...                            return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
       raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock);  ...
       hrtimer_cancel();           ...
       raw_spin_lock(rq->lock);    ...

In this case hrtimer_cancel() returns immediately. Very unlikely case,
just to mention.

Nobody can manipulate the task, because check_class_changed() is
always called with pi_lock locked. Nobody can force the task to
participate in (concurrent) priority inheritance schemes (the same reason).

All concurrent task operations require pi_lock, which is held by us.
No deadlocks with dl_task_timer() are possible, because it returns
right after !dl_task() check (it does nothing).

If we receive a new dl_task during the time of unlocked rq, we just
don't have to do pull_dl_task() in switched_from_dl() further.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
[ Added comments]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414420852.19914.186.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In some cases this can trigger a true flood of output.
Requested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There is a race between kthread_stop() and the new wait_woken() that
can result in a lack of progress.

CPU 0                                    | CPU 1
                                         |
rfcomm_run()                             | kthread_stop()
  ...                                    |
  if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP))    |
                                         |   set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
                                         |   wake_up_process()
    wait_woken()                         |   wait_for_completion()
      set_current_state(INTERRUPTIBLE)   |
      if (!WQ_FLAG_WOKEN)                |
        schedule_timeout()               |
                                         |

After which both tasks will wait.. forever.

Fix this by having wait_woken() check for kthread_should_stop() but
only for kthreads (obviously).
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

cond_resched() is a preemption point, not strictly a blocking
primitive, so exclude it from the ->state test.

In particular, preemption preserves task_struct::state.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: ilya.dryomov@inktank.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: Alex Elder <alex.elder@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.656559952@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Validate we call might_sleep() with TASK_RUNNING, which catches places
where we nest blocking primitives, eg. mutex usage in a wait loop.

Since all blocking is arranged through task_struct::state, nesting
this will cause the inner primitive to set TASK_RUNNING and the outer
will thus not block.

Another observed problem is calling a blocking function from
schedule()->sched_submit_work()->blk_schedule_flush_plug() which will
then destroy the task state for the actual __schedule() call that
comes after it.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: ilya.dryomov@inktank.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.591637616@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There are a few places that call blocking primitives from wait loops,
provide infrastructure to support this without the typical
task_struct::state collision.

We record the wakeup in wait_queue_t::flags which leaves
task_struct::state free to be used by others.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: ilya.dryomov@inktank.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140924082242.051202318@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use nr_cpus_allowed to bail from select_task_rq() when only one cpu
can be used, and saves some cycles for pinned tasks.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413253360-5318-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

There is no need to do balance during fork since SCHED_DEADLINE
tasks can't fork. This patch avoid the SD_BALANCE_FORK check.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413253360-5318-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

How we deal with updates to exclusive cpusets is currently broken.
As an example, suppose we have an exclusive cpuset composed of
two cpus: A[cpu0,cpu1]. We can assign SCHED_DEADLINE task to it
up to the allowed bandwidth. If we want now to modify cpusetA's
cpumask, we have to check that removing a cpu's amount of
bandwidth doesn't break AC guarantees. This thing isn't checked
in the current code.

This patch fixes the problem above, denying an update if the
new cpumask won't have enough bandwidth for SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
that are currently active.
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5433E6AF.5080105@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Exclusive cpusets are the only way users can restrict SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
affinity (performing what is commonly called clustered scheduling).
Unfortunately, such thing is currently broken for two reasons:

 - No check is performed when the user tries to attach a task to
   an exlusive cpuset (recall that exclusive cpusets have an
   associated maximum allowed bandwidth).

 - Bandwidths of source and destination cpusets are not correctly
   updated after a task is migrated between them.

This patch fixes both things at once, as they are opposite faces
of the same coin.

The check is performed in cpuset_can_attach(), as there aren't any
points of failure after that function. The updated is split in two
halves. We first reserve bandwidth in the destination cpuset, after
we pass the check in cpuset_can_attach(). And we then release
bandwidth from the source cpuset when the task's affinity is
actually changed. Even if there can be time windows when sched_setattr()
may erroneously fail in the source cpuset, we are fine with it, as
we can't perfom an atomic update of both cpusets at once.
Reported-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Reported-by: NVincent Legout <vincent@legout.info>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Cc: michael@amarulasolutions.com
Cc: luca.abeni@unitn.it
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411118561-26323-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

As Kirill mentioned (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/118):

 | If rq has already had 2 or more pushable tasks and we try to add a
 | pinned task then call of push_rt_task will just waste a time.

Just switched pinned task is not able to be pushed. If the rq has had
several dl tasks before they have already been considered as candidates
to be pushed (or pulled). This patch implements the same behavior as rt
class which introduced by commit 10447917 ("sched/rt: Do not try to
push tasks if pinned task switches to RT").
Suggested-by: NKirill V Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413938203-224610-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

task_preempt_count() is pointless if preemption counter is per-cpu,
currently this is x86 only. It is only valid if the task is not
running, and even in this case the only info it can provide is the
state of PREEMPT_ACTIVE bit.

Change its single caller to check p->on_rq instead, this should be
the same if p->state != TASK_RUNNING, and kill this helper.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141008183348.GC17495@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Both callers of finish_task_switch() need to recalculate this_rq()
and pass it as an argument, plus __schedule() does this again after
context_switch().

It would be simpler to call this_rq() once in finish_task_switch()
and return the this rq to the callers.

Note: probably "int cpu" in __schedule() should die; it is not used
and both rcu_note_context_switch() and wq_worker_sleeping() do not
really need this argument.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141009193232.GB5408@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

finish_task_switch() enables preemption, so post_schedule(rq) can be
called on the wrong (and even dead) CPU. Afaics, nothing really bad
can happen, but in this case we can wrongly clear rq->post_schedule
on that CPU. And this simply looks wrong in any case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141008193644.GA32055@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In pseudo-interleaved numa_groups, all tasks try to relocate to
the group's preferred_nid.  When a group is spread across multiple
NUMA nodes, this can lead to tasks swapping their location with
other tasks inside the same group, instead of swapping location with
tasks from other NUMA groups. This can keep NUMA groups from converging.

Examining all nodes, when dealing with a task in a pseudo-interleaved
NUMA group, avoids this problem. Note that only CPUs in nodes that
improve the task or group score are examined, so the loop isn't too
bad.
Tested-by: NVinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Vinod Chegu" <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141009172747.0d97c38c@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

On systems with complex NUMA topologies, the node scoring is adjusted
to allow workloads to converge on nodes that are near each other.

The way a task group's preferred nid is determined needs to be adjusted,
in order for the preferred_nid to be consistent with group_weight scoring.
This ensures that we actually try to converge workloads on adjacent nodes.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NChegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413530994-9732-6-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In order to do task placement on systems with complex NUMA topologies,
it is necessary to count the faults on nodes nearby the node that is
being examined for a potential move.

In case of a system with a backplane interconnect, we are dealing with
groups of NUMA nodes; each of the nodes within a group is the same number
of hops away from nodes in other groups in the system. Optimal placement
on this topology is achieved by counting all nearby nodes equally. When
comparing nodes A and B at distance N, nearby nodes are those at distances
smaller than N from nodes A or B.

Placement strategy on a system with a glueless mesh NUMA topology needs
to be different, because there are no natural groups of nodes determined
by the hardware. Instead, when dealing with two nodes A and B at distance
N, N >= 2, there will be intermediate nodes at distance < N from both nodes
A and B. Good placement can be achieved by right shifting the faults on
nearby nodes by the number of hops from the node being scored. In this
context, a nearby node is any node less than the maximum distance in the
system away from the node. Those nodes are skipped for efficiency reasons,
there is no real policy reason to do so.

Placement policy on directly connected NUMA systems is not affected.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NChegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413530994-9732-5-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Preparatory patch for adding NUMA placement on systems with
complex NUMA topology. Also fix a potential divide by zero
in group_weight()
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NChegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413530994-9732-4-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Smaller NUMA systems tend to have all NUMA nodes directly connected
to each other. This includes the degenerate case of a system with just
one node, ie. a non-NUMA system.

Larger systems can have two kinds of NUMA topology, which affects how
tasks and memory should be placed on the system.

On glueless mesh systems, nodes that are not directly connected to
each other will bounce traffic through intermediary nodes. Task groups
can be run closer to each other by moving tasks from a node to an
intermediary node between it and the task's preferred node.

On NUMA systems with backplane controllers, the intermediary hops
are incapable of running programs. This creates "islands" of nodes
that are at an equal distance to anywhere else in the system.

Each kind of topology requires a slightly different placement
algorithm; this patch provides the mechanism to detect the kind
of NUMA topology of a system.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NChegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
[ Changed to use kernel/sched/sched.h ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413530994-9732-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Export some information that is necessary to do placement of
tasks on systems with multi-level NUMA topologies.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413530994-9732-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1) switched_to_dl() check is wrong. We reschedule only
   if rq->curr is deadline task, and we do not reschedule
   if it's a lower priority task. But we must always
   preempt a task of other classes.

2) dl_task_timer():
   Policy does not change in case of priority inheritance.
   rt_mutex_setprio() changes prio, while policy remains old.

So we lose some balancing logic in dl_task_timer() and
switched_to_dl() when we check policy instead of priority. Boosted
task may be rq->curr.

(I didn't change switched_from_dl() because no check is necessary
there at all).

I've looked at this place(switched_to_dl) several times and even fixed
this function, but found just now...  I suppose some performance tests
may work better after this.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413909356.19914.128.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

preempt_schedule_context() does preempt_enable_notrace() at the end
and this can call the same function again; exception_exit() is heavy
and it is quite possible that need-resched is true again.

1. Change this code to dec preempt_count() and check need_resched()
   by hand.

2. As Linus suggested, we can use the PREEMPT_ACTIVE bit and avoid
   the enable/disable dance around __schedule(). But in this case
   we need to move into sched/core.c.

3. Cosmetic, but x86 forgets to declare this function. This doesn't
   really matter because it is only called by asm helpers, still it
   make sense to add the declaration into asm/preempt.h to match
   preempt_schedule().
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141005202322.GB27962@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

File /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing_scan_size_mb allows writing of zero.

This bash command reproduces problem:

$ while :; do echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing_scan_size_mb; \
	   echo 256 > /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing_scan_size_mb; done

	divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
	Modules linked in:
	CPU: 0 PID: 24112 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.17.0+ #8
	Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
	task: ffff88013c852600 ti: ffff880037a68000 task.ti: ffff880037a68000
	RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81074191>]  [<ffffffff81074191>] task_scan_min+0x21/0x50
	RSP: 0000:ffff880037a6bce0  EFLAGS: 00010246
	RAX: 0000000000000a00 RBX: 00000000000003e8 RCX: 0000000000000000
	RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88013c852600
	RBP: ffff880037a6bcf0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000015c90
	R10: ffff880239bf6c00 R11: 0000000000000016 R12: 0000000000003fff
	R13: ffff88013c852600 R14: ffffea0008d1b000 R15: 0000000000000003
	FS:  00007f12bb048700(0000) GS:ffff88007da00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
	CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
	CR2: 0000000001505678 CR3: 0000000234770000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
	Stack:
	 ffff88013c852600 0000000000003fff ffff880037a6bd18 ffffffff810741d1
	 ffff88013c852600 0000000000003fff 000000000002bfff ffff880037a6bda8
	 ffffffff81077ef7 ffffea0008a56d40 0000000000000001 0000000000000001
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffff810741d1>] task_scan_max+0x11/0x40
	 [<ffffffff81077ef7>] task_numa_fault+0x1f7/0xae0
	 [<ffffffff8115a896>] ? migrate_misplaced_page+0x276/0x300
	 [<ffffffff81134a4d>] handle_mm_fault+0x62d/0xba0
	 [<ffffffff8103e2f1>] __do_page_fault+0x191/0x510
	 [<ffffffff81030122>] ? native_smp_send_reschedule+0x42/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8106dc00>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x80/0xa0
	 [<ffffffff8107092c>] ? wake_up_new_task+0x11c/0x1a0
	 [<ffffffff8104887d>] ? do_fork+0x14d/0x340
	 [<ffffffff811799bb>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x2b/0x30
	 [<ffffffff811799df>] ? __fd_install+0x1f/0x60
	 [<ffffffff8103e67c>] do_page_fault+0xc/0x10
	 [<ffffffff8150d322>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
	RIP  [<ffffffff81074191>] task_scan_min+0x21/0x50
	RSP <ffff880037a6bce0>
	---[ end trace 9a826d16936c04de ]---

Also fix race in task_scan_min (it depends on compiler behaviour).
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413455977.24793.78.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

While offling node by hot removing memory, the following divide error
occurs:

  divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   [...] handle_mm_fault
   [...] ? try_to_wake_up
   [...] ? wake_up_state
   [...] __do_page_fault
   [...] ? do_futex
   [...] ? put_prev_entity
   [...] ? __switch_to
   [...] do_page_fault
   [...] page_fault
  [...]
  RIP  [<ffffffff810a7081>] task_numa_fault
   RSP <ffff88084eb2bcb0>

The issue occurs as follows:
  1. When page fault occurs and page is allocated from node 1,
     task_struct->numa_faults_buffer_memory[] of node 1 is
     incremented and p->numa_faults_locality[] is also incremented
     as follows:

     o numa_faults_buffer_memory[]       o numa_faults_locality[]
              NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_TYPES
             |      0     |     1     |
     ----------------------------------  ----------------------
      node 0 |      0     |     0     |   remote |      0     |
      node 1 |      0     |     1     |   locale |      1     |
     ----------------------------------  ----------------------

  2. node 1 is offlined by hot removing memory.

  3. When page fault occurs, fault_types[] is calculated by using
     p->numa_faults_buffer_memory[] of all online nodes in
     task_numa_placement(). But node 1 was offline by step 2. So
     the fault_types[] is calculated by using only
     p->numa_faults_buffer_memory[] of node 0. So both of fault_types[]
     are set to 0.

  4. The values(0) of fault_types[] pass to update_task_scan_period().

  5. numa_faults_locality[1] is set to 1. So the following division is
     calculated.

        static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
                                unsigned long shared, unsigned long private){
        ...
                ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS, (private + shared));
        }

  6. But both of private and shared are set to 0. So divide error
     occurs here.

The divide error is rare case because the trigger is node offline.
This patch always increments denominator for avoiding divide error.
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54475703.8000505@jp.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Unlocked access to dst_rq->curr in task_numa_compare() is racy.
If curr task is exiting this may be a reason of use-after-free:

task_numa_compare()                    do_exit()
    ...                                        current->flags |= PF_EXITING;
    ...                                    release_task()
    ...                                        ~~delayed_put_task_struct()~~
    ...                                    schedule()
    rcu_read_lock()                        ...
    cur = ACCESS_ONCE(dst_rq->curr)        ...
        ...                                rq->curr = next;
        ...                                    context_switch()
        ...                                        finish_task_switch()
        ...                                            put_task_struct()
        ...                                                __put_task_struct()
        ...                                                    free_task_struct()
        task_numa_assign()                                     ...
            get_task_struct()                                  ...

As noted by Oleg:

  <<The lockless get_task_struct(tsk) is only safe if tsk == current
    and didn't pass exit_notify(), or if this tsk was found on a rcu
    protected list (say, for_each_process() or find_task_by_vpid()).
    IOW, it is only safe if release_task() was not called before we
    take rcu_read_lock(), in this case we can rely on the fact that
    delayed_put_pid() can not drop the (potentially) last reference
    until rcu_read_unlock().

    And as Kirill pointed out task_numa_compare()->task_numa_assign()
    path does get_task_struct(dst_rq->curr) and this is not safe. The
    task_struct itself can't go away, but rcu_read_lock() can't save
    us from the final put_task_struct() in finish_task_switch(); this
    reference goes away without rcu gp>>

The patch provides simple check of PF_EXITING flag. If it's not set,
this guarantees that call_rcu() of delayed_put_task_struct() callback
hasn't happened yet, so we can safely do get_task_struct() in
task_numa_assign().

Locked dst_rq->lock protects from concurrency with the last schedule().
Reusing or unmapping of cur's memory may happen without it.
Suggested-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413962231.19914.130.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

dl_task_timer() is racy against several paths. Daniel noticed that
the replenishment timer may experience a race condition against an
enqueue_dl_entity() called from rt_mutex_setprio(). With his own
words:

 rt_mutex_setprio() resets p->dl.dl_throttled. So the pattern is:
 start_dl_timer() throttled = 1, rt_mutex_setprio() throlled = 0,
 sched_switch() -> enqueue_task(), dl_task_timer-> enqueue_task()
 throttled is 0

=> BUG_ON(on_dl_rq(dl_se)) fires as the scheduling entity is already
enqueued on the -deadline runqueue.

As we do for the other races, we just bail out in the replenishment
timer code.
Reported-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Tested-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414142198-18552-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In the deboost path, right after the dl_boosted flag has been
reset, we can currently end up replenishing using -deadline
parameters of a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity. This of course causes
a bug, as those parameters are empty.

In the case depicted above it is safe to simply bail out, as
the deboosted task is going to be back to its original scheduling
class anyway.
Reported-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Tested-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414142198-18552-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The race may happen when somebody is changing task_group of a forking task.
Child's cgroup is the same as parent's after dup_task_struct() (there just
memory copying). Also, cfs_rq and rt_rq are the same as parent's.

But if parent changes its task_group before it's called cgroup_post_fork(),
we do not reflect this situation on child. Child's cfs_rq and rt_rq remain
the same, while child's task_group changes in cgroup_post_fork().

To fix this we introduce fork() method, which calls sched_move_task() directly.
This function changes sched_task_group on appropriate (also its logic has
no problem with freshly created tasks, so we shouldn't introduce something
special; we are able just to use it).

Possibly, this decides the Burke Libbey's problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/24/456Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414405105.19914.169.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1. vma_policy_mof(task) is simply not safe unless task == current,
   it can race with do_exit()->mpol_put(). Remove this arg and update
   its single caller.

2. vma can not be NULL, remove this check and simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

rq->rd is freed using call_rcu_sched(), so rcu_read_lock() to access it
is not enough. We should use either rcu_read_lock_sched() or preempt_disable().
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: 66339c31 "sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412065417.20287.24.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We already reschedule env.dst_cpu in attach_tasks()->check_preempt_curr()
if this is necessary.

Furthermore, a higher priority class task may be current on dest rq,
we shouldn't disturb it.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140930210441.5258.55054.stgit@localhostSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>