When an array is failed (some data inaccessible) then there is no
point attempting to add a spare as it could not possibly be recovered.

However that may be value in re-adding a recently removed device.
e.g. if there is a write-intent-bitmap and it is clear, then access
to the data could be restored by this action.

So don't reject a re-add to a failed array for RAID10 and RAID5 (the
only arrays  types that check for a failed array).
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Recent commit 4ca40c2c (md/raid10: Allow replacement device ...)
added an smp_mb in end_sync_write.
This was to close a possible race with raid10_remove_disk.
However there is no such race as it is never attempted to remove a
disk while resync (or recovery) is happening.
so the smp_mb is just noise.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

commit 56a2559b (md/raid10: recognise replacements ...)
changed 'run' to set ->replacement or ->rdev depending on the
'Replacement' status if the device, but it didn't remove the
old unconditional setting of 'rdev'.  So it was largely ineffective.

So remove that now.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we get a read error on the last working device in a RAID10 which
contains the target block, then we don't fail the device (which is
good) but we don't abort retries, which is wrong.
We end up in an infinite loop retrying the read on the one device.

This patch fixes the problem in two places:
1/ in raid10_end_read_request we don't even ask for a retry if this
   was the last usable device.  This is efficient but a little racy
   and will sometimes retry when it should not.

2/ in handle_read_error we are careful to exclude any device from
   retry which we tried to mark as faulty (that might have failed if
   it was the last device).  This is race-free but less efficient.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When attempting to add a spare to a RAID10 array, also consider
adding it as a replacement for a want_replacement device.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If a Replacement is seen, file it as such.

If we see two replacements (or two normal devices) for the one slot,
abort.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When recovery finish and spare_active is called, check for a
replace that might have just become fully synced and mark it
as such, marking the original as failed.

Then when the original is removed, move the replacement into
its position.

This means that 'replacement' and spontaneously become NULL in some
situations.  Make sure we check for those.
It also means that 'rdev' and 'replacement' could appear to be
identical - check for that too.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If there is a replacement device, then recover to it,
reading from any drives - maybe the one being replaced, maybe not.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we need to resync an array which has replacement devices,
we always write any block checked to every replacement.

If the resync was bitmap-based resync we will then complete the
replacement normally.
If it was a full resync, we mark the replacements as fully recovered
when the resync finishes so no further recovery is needed.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When writing, we need to submit two writes, one to the original,
and one to the replacements - if there is a replacement.

If the write to the replacement results in a write error we just
fail the device.  We only try to record write errors to the
original.

This only handles writing new data.  Writing for resync/recovery
will come later.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Enhance raid10_remove_disk to be able to remove ->replacement
as well as ->rdev
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When reading (for array reads, not for recovery etc) we read from the
replacement device if it has recovered far enough.
This requires storing the chosen rdev in the 'r10_bio' so we can make
sure to drop the ref on the right device when the read finishes.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

It makes more sense to return an rdev than just an index as
read_balance() gets a reference to the rdev and so returning
the pointer make this more idiomatic.

This will be needed in a future patch when we might return
a 'replacement' rdev instead of the main rdev.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Allow each slot in the RAID10 to have 2 devices, the want_replacement
and the replacement.

Also an r10bio to have 2 bios, and for resync/recovery allocate the
second bio if there are any replacement devices.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Soon an array will be able to have multiple devices with the
same raid_disk number (an original and a replacement).  So removing
a device based on the number won't work.  So pass the actual device
handle instead.
Reviewed-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

A pending cleanup will mean that module.h won't be implicitly
everywhere anymore.  Make sure the modular drivers in md dir
are actually calling out for <module.h> explicitly in advance.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

This is a fairly serious bug in RAID10.

When a RAID10 array is degraded and a hot-spare is activated, the
spare does not take up the empty slot, but rather replaces the first
working device.
This is likely to make the array non-functional.   It would normally
be possible to recover the data, but that would need care and is not
guaranteed.

This bug was introduced in commit
   2bb77736
which first appeared in 3.1.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

In 3.0 we changed the way recovery_disabled was handle so that instead
of testing against zero, we test an mddev-> value against a conf->
value.
Two problems:
  1/ one place in raid1 was missed and still sets to '1'.
  2/ We didn't explicitly set the conf-> value at array creation
     time.
     It defaulted to '0' just like the mddev value does so they
     could appear equal and thus disable recovery.
     This did not affect normal 'md' as it calls bind_rdev_to_array
     which changes the mddev value.  However the dmraid interface
     doesn't call this and so doesn't change ->recovery_disabled; so at
     array start all recovery is incorrectly disabled.

So initialise the 'conf' value to one less that the mddev value, so
the will only be the same when explicitly set that way.
Reported-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown  <neilb@suse.de>

RAID1 and RAID10 handle write requests by queuing them for handling by
a separate thread.  This is because when a write-intent-bitmap is
active we might need to update the bitmap first, so it is good to
queue a lot of writes, then do one big bitmap update for them all.

However writeback request devices to appear to be congested after a
while so it can make some guesstimate of throughput.  The infinite
queue defeats that (note that RAID5 has already has a finite queue so
it doesn't suffer from this problem).

So impose a limit on the number of pending write requests.  By default
it is 1024 which seems to be generally suitable.  Make it configurable
via module option just in case someone finds a regression.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

"mdk" doesn't mean anything any more.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Having mddev_t and 'struct mddev_s' is ugly and not preferred
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

The typedefs are just annoying. 'mdk' probably refers to 'md_k.h'
which used to be an include file that defined this thing.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Two related problems:

1/ some error paths call "md_unregister_thread(mddev->thread)"
   without subsequently clearing ->thread.  A subsequent call
   to mddev_unlock will try to wake the thread, and crash.

2/ Most calls to md_wakeup_thread are protected against the thread
   disappeared either by:
      - holding the ->mutex
      - having an active request, so something else must be keeping
        the array active.
   However mddev_unlock calls md_wakeup_thread after dropping the
   mutex and without any certainty of an active request, so the
   ->thread could theoretically disappear.
   So we need a spinlock to provide some protections.

So change md_unregister_thread to take a pointer to the thread
pointer, and ensure that it always does the required locking, and
clears the pointer properly.
Reported-by: N"Moshe Melnikov" <moshe@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
cc: stable@kernel.org

There is very little benefit in allowing to let a ->make_request
instance update the bios device and sector and loop around it in
__generic_make_request when we can archive the same through calling
generic_make_request from the driver and letting the loop in
generic_make_request handle it.

Note that various drivers got the return value from ->make_request and
returned non-zero values for errors.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

A single request to RAID1 or RAID10 might result in multiple
requests if there are known bad blocks that need to be avoided.

To detect if we need to submit another write request we test:
 	if (sectors_handled < (bio->bi_size >> 9)) {

However this is after we call **_write_done() so the 'bio' no longer
belongs to us - the writes could have completed and the bio freed.

So move the **_write_done call until after the test against
bio->bi_size.

This addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862Reported-by: NBruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Tested-by: NBruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

A write can complete at two different places:
1/ when the last member-device write completes, through
   raid10_end_write_request
2/ in make_request() when we remove the initial bias from ->remaining.

These two should do exactly the same thing and the comment says they
do, but they don't.

So factor the correct code out into a function and call it in both
places.  This makes the code much more similar to RAID1.

The difference is only significant if there is an error, and they
usually take a while, so it is unlikely that there will be an error
already when make_request is completing, so this is unlikely to cause
real problems.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we find more read/write errors we should record a bad block before
failing the device.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Currently when we get a read error during recovery, we simply abort
the recovery.

Instead, repeat the read in page-sized blocks.
On successful reads, write to the target.
On read errors, record a bad block on the destination,
and only if that fails do we abort the recovery.

As we now retry reads we need to know where we read from.  This was in
bi_sector but that can be changed during a read attempt.
So store the correct from_addr and to_addr in the r10_bio for later
access.


Signed-off-by: NeilBrown<neilb@suse.de>

If a read error is detected during recovery the code currently
fails the read device.
This isn't really necessary.  recovery_request_write will signal
a write error to end_sync_write and it will record a write
error on the destination device which will record a bad block
there or kick it from the array.

So just remove this call to do md_error.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we get a write error during resync/recovery don't fail the device
but instead record a bad block.  If that fails we can then fail the
device.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

We already attempt to fix read errors found during normal IO
and a 'repair' process.
It is best to try to repair them at any time they are found,
so move a test so that during sync and check a read error will
be corrected by over-writing with good data.

If both (all) devices have known bad blocks in the sync section we
won't try to fix even though the bad blocks might not overlap.  That
should be considered later.

Also if we hit a read error during recovery we don't try to fix it.
It would only be possible to fix if there were at least three copies
of data, which is not very common with RAID10.  But it should still
be considered later.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When we get a write error (in the data area, not in metadata),
update the badblock log rather than failing the whole device.

As the write may well be many blocks, we trying writing each
block individually and only log the ones which fail.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If we succeed in writing to a block that was recorded as
being bad, we clear the bad-block record.

This requires some delayed handling as the bad-block-list update has
to happen in process-context.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Writing to known bad blocks on drives that have seen a write error
is asking for trouble.  So try to avoid these blocks.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When recovering one or more devices, if all the good devices have
bad blocks we should record a bad block on the device being rebuilt.

If this fails, we need to abort the recovery.

To ensure we don't think that we aborted later than we actually did,
we need to move the check for MD_RECOVERY_INTR earlier in md_do_sync,
in particular before mddev->curr_resync is updated.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

During resync/recovery limit the size of the request to avoid
reading into a bad block that does not start at-or-before the current
read address.

Similarly if there is a bad block at this address, don't allow the
current request to extend beyond the end of that bad block.

Now that we don't ever read from known bad blocks, it is safe to allow
devices with those blocks into the array.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>