- 22 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
ext4_mb_free_blocks() is only called by ext4_free_blocks(), and the latter function doesn't really do much. So merge the two functions together, such that ext4_free_blocks() is now found in fs/ext4/mballoc.c. This saves about 200 bytes of compiled text space. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Convert the last two callers of ext4_journal_forget() to use ext4_forget() instead, and then fold ext4_journal_forget() into ext4_forget(). This reduces are code complexity and shortens our call stack. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The only caller of ext4_journal_revoke() is ext4_forget(), so we can fold ext4_journal_revoke() into ext4_forget() to simplify the code and shorten the call stack. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The ext4_forget() function better belongs in ext4_jbd2.c. This will allow us to do some cleanup of the ext4_journal_revoke() and ext4_journal_forget() functions, as well as giving us better error reporting since we can report the caller of ext4_forget() when things go wrong. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 20 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Users on the linux-ext4 list recently complained about differences across filesystems w.r.t. how to mount without a journal replay. In the discussion it was noted that xfs's "norecovery" option is perhaps more descriptively accurate than "noload," so let's make that an alias for ext4. Also show this status in /proc/mounts Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
It is anticipated that when sb_issue_discard starts doing real work on trim-capable devices, we may see issues. Make this mount-time optional, and default it to off until we know that things are working out OK. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When an error happened in ext4_splice_branch we failed to notice that in ext4_ind_get_blocks and mapped the buffer anyway. Fix the problem by checking for error properly. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We don't to issue an I/O barrier on an error or if we force commit because we are doing data journaling. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 16 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The block validity checks used by ext4_data_block_valid() wasn't correctly written to check file systems with the meta_bg feature. Fix this. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 23 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The number of old-style block group descriptor blocks is s_meta_first_bg when the meta_bg feature flag is set. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
commit a71ce8c6 updated ext4_statfs() to update the on-disk superblock counters, but modified this buffer directly without any journaling of the change. This is one of the accesses that was causing the crc errors in journal replay as seen in kernel.org bugzilla #14354. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 16 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
ext4_xattr_set_handle() was zeroing out an inode outside of journaling constraints; this is one of the accesses that was causing the crc errors in journal replay as seen in kernel.org bugzilla #14354. Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
We need to be testing the i_flags field in the ext4 specific portion of the inode, instead of the (confusingly aliased) i_flags field in the generic struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 23 11月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
When an inode gets unlinked, the functions ext4_clear_blocks() and ext4_remove_blocks() call ext4_forget() for all the buffer heads corresponding to the deleted inode's data blocks. If the inode is a directory or a symlink, the is_metadata parameter must be non-zero so ext4_forget() will revoke them via jbd2_journal_revoke(). Otherwise, if these blocks are reused for a data file, and the system crashes before a journal checkpoint, the journal replay could end up corrupting these data blocks. Thanks to Curt Wohlgemuth for pointing out potential problems in this area. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Now that we are checking for failed journal checksums in the jbd2 layer, we don't need to check in the ext4 mount path --- since a checksum fail will result in ext4_load_journal() returning an error, causing the file system to refuse to be mounted until e2fsck can deal with the problem. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
One of the invalid error paths in ext4_iget() forgot to brelse() the inode buffer head. Fix it by adding a brelse() in the common error return path, which also simplifies function. Thanks to Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> reporting the problem. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Fujita 提交于
Fix a few spelling typos in move_extent.c Signed-off-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Akira Fujita 提交于
If CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled, the double_down_write_data_sem() will trigger a false-positive warning of a recursive lock. Since we take i_data_sem for the two inodes ordered by their inode numbers, this isn't a problem. Use of down_write_nested() will notify the lock dependency checker machinery that there is no problem here. This problem was reported by Brian Rogers: http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=125115356928011&w=1Reported-by: NBrian Rogers <brian@xyzw.org> Signed-off-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Akira Fujita 提交于
ext4_move_extents() checks the logical block contiguousness of original file with ext4_find_extent() and mext_next_extent(). Therefore the extent which ext4_ext_path structure indicates must not be changed between above functions. But in current implementation, there is no i_data_sem protection between ext4_ext_find_extent() and mext_next_extent(). So the extent which ext4_ext_path structure indicates may be overwritten by delalloc. As a result, ext4_move_extents() will exchange wrong blocks between original and donor files. I change the place where acquire/release i_data_sem to solve this problem. Moreover, I changed move_extent_per_page() to start transaction first, and then acquire i_data_sem. Without this change, there is a possibility of the deadlock between mmap() and ext4_move_extents(): * NOTE: "A", "B" and "C" mean different processes A-1: ext4_ext_move_extents() acquires i_data_sem of two inodes. B: do_page_fault() starts the transaction (T), and then tries to acquire i_data_sem. But process "A" is already holding it, so it is kept waiting. C: While "A" and "B" running, kjournald2 tries to commit transaction (T) but it is under updating, so kjournald2 waits for it. A-2: Call ext4_journal_start with holding i_data_sem, but transaction (T) is locked. Signed-off-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Akira Fujita 提交于
If the EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT ioctl fails, the number of blocks that were exchanged before the failure should be returned to the userspace caller. Unfortunately, currently if the block size is not the same as the page size, the returned block count that is returned is the page-aligned block count instead of the actual block count. This commit addresses this bug. Signed-off-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If s_log_groups_per_flex is greater than 31, then groups_per_flex will will overflow and cause a divide by zero error. This can cause kernel BUG if such a file system is mounted. Thanks to Nageswara R Sastry for analyzing the failure and providing an initial patch. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14287Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Previously add_dirent_to_buf() did not free its passed-in buffer head in the case of ENOSPC, since in some cases the caller still needed it. However, this led to potential buffer head leaks since not all callers dealt with this correctly. Fix this by making simplifying the freeing convention; now add_dirent_to_buf() *never* frees the passed-in buffer head, and leaves that to the responsibility of its caller. This makes things cleaner and easier to prove that the code is neither leaking buffer heads or calling brelse() one time too many. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 09 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a partial revert of commit 6487a9d3 (only the changes made to fs/ext4/namei.c), since it is causing the following brelse() double-free warning when running fsstress on a file system with 1k blocksize and we run into a block allocation failure while converting a single-block directory to a multi-block hash-tree indexed directory. WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1197 __brelse+0x2e/0x33() Hardware name: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer Modules linked in: Pid: 2226, comm: jbd2/sdd-8 Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-00577-g0003f55 #101 Call Trace: [<c01587fb>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x95 [<c0158869>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x29/0x2c [<c021168e>] __brelse+0x2e/0x33 [<c0288a9f>] jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0x67/0x6c [<c028a9ed>] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x319/0x14d8 [<c0164d73>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x58/0x60 [<c0175bcc>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12a/0x13e [<c017f6b4>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<c0175c1f>] ? cpu_clock+0x3f/0x5b [<c017f6ec>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x36/0x137 [<c0664ad0>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x51 [<c0180af3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x103/0x124 [<c0180b1f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [<c0164d73>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x58/0x60 [<c0290d1c>] kjournald2+0x11a/0x310 [<c017118e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38 [<c0290c02>] ? kjournald2+0x0/0x310 [<c0170ee6>] kthread+0x66/0x6b [<c0170e80>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6b [<c01251b3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 ---[ end trace 5579351b86af61e3 ]--- Commit 6487a9d3 was an attempt some buffer head leaks in an ENOSPC error path, but in some cases it actually results in an excess ENOSPC, as shown above. Fixing this means cleaning up who is responsible for releasing the buffer heads from the callee to the caller of add_dirent_to_buf(). Since that's a relatively complex change, and we're late in the rcX development cycle, I'm reverting this now, and holding back a more complete fix until after 2.6.32 ships. We've lived with this buffer_head leak on ENOSPC in ext3 and ext4 for a very long time; a few more months won't kill us. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
To prepare for a direct I/O write, we need to split the unwritten extents before submitting the I/O. When no extents needed to be split, ext4_split_unwritten_extents() was incorrectly returning 0 instead of the size of uninitialized extents. This bug caused the wrong return value sent back to VFS code when it gets called from async IO path, leading to an unnecessary fall back to buffered IO. This bug also hid the fact that the check to see whether or not a split would be necessary was incorrect; we can only skip splitting the extent if the write completely covers the uninitialized extent. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
The ext4_debug() call in ext4_end_io_dio() should be moved after the check to make sure that io_end is non-NULL. The comment above ext4_get_block_dio_write() ("Maximum number of blocks...") is a duplicate; the original and correct comment is above the #define DIO_MAX_BLOCKS up above. Based on review comments from Curt Wohlgemuth. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
At the end of direct I/O operation, ext4_ext_direct_IO() always called ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(), regardless of whether there were any unwritten extents involved in the I/O or not. This commit adds a state flag so that ext4_ext_direct_IO() only calls ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() when necessary. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming 提交于
After a direct I/O request covering an uninitalized extent (i.e., created using the fallocate system call) or a hole in a file, ext4 will convert the uninitialized extent so it is marked as initialized by calling ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(). This function returns zero on success. This return value was getting returned by ext4_direct_IO(); however the file system's direct_IO function is supposed to return the number of bytes read or written on a success. By returning zero, it confused the direct I/O code into falling back to buffered I/O unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When restart a transaction during a truncate operation, we drop and reacquire i_data_sem. After reacquiring i_data_sem, we need to discard any inode-based preallocation that might have been grabbed while we released i_data_sem (for example, if pdflush is allocating blocks and racing against the truncate). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit d0646f7b, as requested by Eric Sandeen. It can basically cause an ext4 filesystem to miss recovery (and thus get mounted with errors) if the journal checksum does not match. Quoth Eric: "My hand-wavy hunch about what is happening is that we're finding a bad checksum on the last partially-written transaction, which is not surprising, but if we have a wrapped log and we're doing the initial scan for head/tail, and we abort scanning on that bad checksum, then we are essentially running an unrecovered filesystem. But that's hand-wavy and I need to go look at the code. We lived without journal checksums on by default until now, and at this point they're doing more harm than good, so we should revert the default-changing commit until we can fix it and do some good power-fail testing with the fixes in place." See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354 for all the gory details. Requested-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
On a 256M filesystem, doing this in a loop: xfs_io -F -f -d -c 'pwrite 0 64m' test rm -f test eventually leads to ENOSPC. (the xfs_io command does a 64m direct IO write to the file "test") As with other block allocation callers, it looks like we need to potentially retry the allocations on the initial ENOSPC. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
This fixes the following warning: fs/ext4/inode.c: In function 'ext4_dirty_inode': fs/ext4/inode.c:5615: warning: unused variable 'current_handle' We remove the jbd_debug() statement which does use current_handle, as it's not terribly important in the grand scheme of things. Thanks to Stephen Rothwell for pointing this out. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 10月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Kconfig & super.c promised it'd be gone by 2.6.31, so it's about time to drop it. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In ext4_num_dirty_pages() we were calling page_buffers() before checking to see if the page actually had pages attached to it; this would cause a BUG check crash in the inline function page_buffers(). Thanks to Markus Trippelsdorf for reporting this bug. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
"Looking at ext4.h, I think the setting of extra time fields forgets to mask the epoch bits so the epoch part overwrites nsec part. The second change is only for coherency (2 -> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS)." Thanks to Damien Guibouret for pointing out this problem. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The /proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/mb_history was maintained manually, and had a number of problems: it required a largish amount of memory to be allocated for each ext4 filesystem, and the s_mb_history_lock introduced a CPU contention problem. By ripping out the mb_history code and replacing it with ftrace tracepoints, and we get more functionality: timestamps, event filtering, the ability to correlate mballoc history with other ext4 tracepoints, etc. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
There are a number of kernel printk's which are printed when an ext4 filesystem is mounted and unmounted. Disable them to economize space in the system logs. In addition, disabling the mballoc stats by default saves a number of unneeded atomic operations for every block allocation or deallocation. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
This patch fixes a problem with handling nested calls to ext4_journal_start/ext4_journal_stop, when there is no journal present. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
This patch a problem that ext4_dirty_inode() was not calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() if the current_handle is not valid, which it is the case in no journal mode. It also removes a test for non-matching transaction which can never happen. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
This is a cleanup of commit 91ac6f43. Since ext4_mark_inode_dirty() has already called ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(), which in turn calls ext4_do_update_inode(), it's not necessary to have ext4_write_inode() call ext4_do_update_inode() in no journal mode. Indeed, it would be duplicated work. Reviewed-by: N"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-