Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 2月, 2012 4 次提交
  3. 14 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  5. 13 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  7. 20 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  9. 21 11月, 2011 5 次提交
  11. 09 11月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      crypto: twofish-x86_64-3way - add xts support · bae6d303
      由 Jussi Kivilinna 提交于 
      Patch adds XTS support for twofish-x86_64-3way by using xts_crypt(). Patch has
been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests.

Tcrypt benchmarks results (twofish-3way/twofish-asm speed ratios):

Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13):

size    xts-enc xts-dec
16B     0.98x   1.00x
64B     1.14x   1.15x
256B    1.23x   1.25x
1024B   1.26x   1.29x
8192B   1.28x   1.30x

AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10):

size    xts-enc xts-dec
16B     1.03x   1.03x
64B     1.13x   1.16x
256B    1.20x   1.20x
1024B   1.22x   1.22x
8192B   1.22x   1.21x
Signed-off-by: NJussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      bae6d303
    • J
      crypto: twofish-x86_64-3way - add lrw support · 81559f9a
      由 Jussi Kivilinna 提交于 
      Patch adds LRW support for twofish-x86_64-3way by using lrw_crypt(). Patch has
been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests.

Tcrypt benchmarks results (twofish-3way/twofish-asm speed ratios):

Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13):

size	lrw-enc	lrw-dec
16B	0.99x	1.00x
64B	1.17x	1.17x
256B	1.26x	1.27x
1024B	1.30x	1.31x
8192B	1.31x	1.32x

AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10):

size	lrw-enc	lrw-dec
16B	1.06x	1.01x
64B	1.08x	1.14x
256B	1.19x	1.20x
1024B	1.21x	1.22x
8192B	1.23x	1.24x
Signed-off-by: NJussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      81559f9a
  13. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 21 10月, 2011 6 次提交
  17. 22 9月, 2011 2 次提交
  19. 10 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      crypto: sha1 - SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64 · 66be8951
      由 Mathias Krause 提交于 
      This is an assembler implementation of the SHA1 algorithm using the
Supplemental SSE3 (SSSE3) instructions or, when available, the
Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX).

Testing with the tcrypt module shows the raw hash performance is up to
2.3 times faster than the C implementation, using 8k data blocks on a
Core 2 Duo T5500. For the smalest data set (16 byte) it is still 25%
faster.

Since this implementation uses SSE/YMM registers it cannot safely be
used in every situation, e.g. while an IRQ interrupts a kernel thread.
The implementation falls back to the generic SHA1 variant, if using
the SSE/YMM registers is not possible.

With this algorithm I was able to increase the throughput of a single
IPsec link from 344 Mbit/s to 464 Mbit/s on a Core 2 Quad CPU using
the SSSE3 variant -- a speedup of +34.8%.

Saving and restoring SSE/YMM state might make the actual throughput
fluctuate when there are FPU intensive userland applications running.
For example, meassuring the performance using iperf2 directly on the
machine under test gives wobbling numbers because iperf2 uses the FPU
for each packet to check if the reporting interval has expired (in the
above test I got min/max/avg: 402/484/464 MBit/s).

Using this algorithm on a IPsec gateway gives much more reasonable and
stable numbers, albeit not as high as in the directly connected case.
Here is the result from an RFC 2544 test run with a EXFO Packet Blazer
FTB-8510:

 frame size    sha1-generic     sha1-ssse3    delta
    64 byte     37.5 MBit/s    37.5 MBit/s     0.0%
   128 byte     56.3 MBit/s    62.5 MBit/s   +11.0%
   256 byte     87.5 MBit/s   100.0 MBit/s   +14.3%
   512 byte    131.3 MBit/s   150.0 MBit/s   +14.2%
  1024 byte    162.5 MBit/s   193.8 MBit/s   +19.3%
  1280 byte    175.0 MBit/s   212.5 MBit/s   +21.4%
  1420 byte    175.0 MBit/s   218.7 MBit/s   +25.0%
  1518 byte    150.0 MBit/s   181.2 MBit/s   +20.8%

The throughput for the largest frame size is lower than for the
previous size because the IP packets need to be fragmented in this
case to make there way through the IPsec tunnel.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      66be8951
  21. 30 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 18 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  25. 16 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 27 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 18 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  31. 16 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 23 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      crypto: aesni-intel - Don't leak memory in rfc4106_set_hash_subkey · 7efd95f6
      由 Jesper Juhl 提交于 
      There's a small memory leak in 
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c::rfc4106_set_hash_subkey(). If the call 
to kmalloc() fails and returns NULL then the memory allocated previously 
by ablkcipher_request_alloc() is not freed when we leave the function.

I could have just added a call to ablkcipher_request_free() before we 
return -ENOMEM, but that started to look too much like the code we 
already had at the end of the function, so I chose instead to rework the 
code a bit so that there are now a few labels at the end that we goto when 
various allocations fail, so we don't have to repeat the same blocks of 
code (this also reduces the object code size slightly).
Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      7efd95f6
  35. 15 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  37. 13 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  39. 29 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  41. 27 11月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      crypto: aesni-intel - Ported implementation to x86-32 · 0d258efb
      由 Mathias Krause 提交于 
      The AES-NI instructions are also available in legacy mode so the 32-bit
architecture may profit from those, too.

To illustrate the performance gain here's a short summary of a dm-crypt
speed test on a Core i7 M620 running at 2.67GHz comparing both assembler
implementations:

x86:                   i568       aes-ni    delta
ECB, 256 bit:     93.8 MB/s   123.3 MB/s   +31.4%
CBC, 256 bit:     84.8 MB/s   262.3 MB/s  +209.3%
LRW, 256 bit:    108.6 MB/s   222.1 MB/s  +104.5%
XTS, 256 bit:    105.0 MB/s   205.5 MB/s   +95.7%

Additionally, due to some minor optimizations, the 64-bit version also
got a minor performance gain as seen below:

x86-64:           old impl.    new impl.    delta
ECB, 256 bit:    121.1 MB/s   123.0 MB/s    +1.5%
CBC, 256 bit:    285.3 MB/s   290.8 MB/s    +1.9%
LRW, 256 bit:    263.7 MB/s   265.3 MB/s    +0.6%
XTS, 256 bit:    251.1 MB/s   255.3 MB/s    +1.7%
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      0d258efb
  43. 13 11月, 2010 1 次提交