- 17 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 04 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
Calls to ext4_get_inode_loc() returns with a reference to a buffer head in iloc->bh. The callers of this function in ext4_write_inode() when in no journal mode and in ext4_xattr_fiemap() don't release the buffer head after using it. Addresses-Google-Bug: #2548165 Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
There are duplicate macro definitions of in_range() in mballoc.h and balloc.c. This consolidates these two definitions into ext4.h, and changes extents.c to use in_range() as well. Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
This is a cleanup and simplification patch which takes some open-coded calculations to calculate the first block number of a group and converts them to use the (already defined) ext4_group_first_block_no() function. Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
Convert a bunch of BUG_ONs to emit a ext4_error() message and return EIO. This is a first pass and most notably does _not_ cover mballoc.c, which is a morass of void functions. Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于
Allocate uninitialized extent before ext4 buffer write and convert the extent to initialized after io completes. The purpose is to make sure an extent can only be marked initialized after it has been written with new data so we can safely drop the i_mutex lock in ext4 DIO read without exposing stale data. This helps to improve multi-thread DIO read performance on high-speed disks. Skip the nobh and data=journal mount cases to make things simple for now. Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于
This commit renames some of the direct I/O's block allocation flags, variables, and functions introduced in Mingming's "Direct IO for holes and fallocate" patches so that they can be used by ext4's buffered write path as well. Also changed the related function comments accordingly to cover both direct write and buffered write cases. Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于
fallocate() may potentially instantiate blocks past EOF, depending on the flags used when it is called. e2fsck currently has a test for blocks past i_size, and it sometimes trips up - noticeably on xfstests 013 which runs fsstress. This patch from Jiayang does fix it up - it (along with e2fsprogs updates and other patches recently from Aneesh) has survived many fsstress runs in a row. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Leonard Michlmayr 提交于
ext4_fiemap() rounds the length of the requested range down to blocksize, which is is not the true number of blocks that cover the requested region. This problem is especially impressive if the user requests only the first byte of a file: not a single extent will be reported. We fix this by calculating the last block of the region and then subtract to find the number of blocks in the extents. Signed-off-by: NLeonard Michlmayr <leonard.michlmayr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Just a pet peeve of mine; we had a mishash of calls with either __func__ or "function_name" and the latter tends to get out of sync. I think it's easier to just hide the __func__ in a macro, and it'll be consistent from then on. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
At several places we modify EXT4_I(inode)->i_state without holding i_mutex (ext4_release_file, ext4_bmap, ext4_journalled_writepage, ext4_do_update_inode, ...). These modifications are racy and we can lose updates to i_state. So convert handling of i_state to use bitops which are atomic. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We should update reserve space if it is delalloc buffer and that is indicated by EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE flag. So use EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE in place of EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When we fallocate a region of the file which we had recently written, and which is still in the page cache marked as delayed allocated blocks we need to make sure we don't do the quota update on writepage path. This is because the needed quota updated would have already be done by fallocate. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In the past, ext4_calc_metadata_amount(), and its sub-functions ext4_ext_calc_metadata_amount() and ext4_indirect_calc_metadata_amount() badly over-estimated the number of metadata blocks that might be required for delayed allocation blocks. This didn't matter as much when functions which managed the reserved metadata blocks were more aggressive about dropping reserved metadata blocks as delayed allocation blocks were written, but unfortunately they were too aggressive. This was fixed in commit 0637c6f4, but as a result the over-estimation by ext4_calc_metadata_amount() would lead to reserving 2-3 times the number of pending delayed allocation blocks as potentially required metadata blocks. So if there are 1 megabytes of blocks which have been not yet been allocation, up to 3 megabytes of space would get reserved out of the user's quota and from the file system free space pool until all of the inode's data blocks have been allocated. This commit addresses this problem by much more accurately estimating the number of metadata blocks that will be required. It will still somewhat over-estimate the number of blocks needed, since it must make a worst case estimate not knowing which physical blocks will be needed, but it is much more accurate than before. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This fixes a bug (found by Curt Wohlgemuth) in which new blocks returned from an extent created with ext4_ext_zeroout() can have dirty metadata still associated with them. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Surbhi Palande 提交于
This patch fixes the Kernel BZ #14286. When the address of an extent corresponding to a valid block is corrupted, a -EIO should be reported instead of a BUG(). This situation should not normally not occur except in the case of a corrupted filesystem. If however it does, then the system should not panic directly but depending on the mount time options appropriate action should be taken. If the mount options so permit, the I/O should be gracefully aborted by returning a -EIO. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14286Signed-off-by: NSurbhi Palande <surbhi.palande@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Fix the following potential circular locking dependency between mm->mmap_sem and ei->i_data_sem: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.32-04115-gec044c5 #37 ------------------------------------------------------- ureadahead/1855 is trying to acquire lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81107224>] might_fault+0x5c/0xac but task is already holding lock: (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811be1fd>] ext4_fiemap+0x11b/0x159 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}: [<ffffffff81099bfa>] __lock_acquire+0xb67/0xd0f [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102 [<ffffffff81516633>] down_read+0x51/0x84 [<ffffffff811a2414>] ext4_get_blocks+0x50/0x2a5 [<ffffffff811a3453>] ext4_get_block+0xab/0xef [<ffffffff81154f39>] do_mpage_readpage+0x198/0x48d [<ffffffff81155360>] mpage_readpages+0xd0/0x114 [<ffffffff811a104b>] ext4_readpages+0x1d/0x1f [<ffffffff810f8644>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x12f/0x1bc [<ffffffff810f86f2>] ra_submit+0x21/0x25 [<ffffffff810f0cfd>] filemap_fault+0x19f/0x32c [<ffffffff81107b97>] __do_fault+0x55/0x3a2 [<ffffffff81109db0>] handle_mm_fault+0x327/0x734 [<ffffffff8151aaa9>] do_page_fault+0x292/0x2aa [<ffffffff81518205>] page_fault+0x25/0x30 [<ffffffff812a34d8>] clear_user+0x38/0x3c [<ffffffff81167e16>] padzero+0x20/0x31 [<ffffffff81168b47>] load_elf_binary+0x8bc/0x17ed [<ffffffff81130e95>] search_binary_handler+0xc2/0x259 [<ffffffff81166d64>] load_script+0x1b8/0x1cc [<ffffffff81130e95>] search_binary_handler+0xc2/0x259 [<ffffffff8113255f>] do_execve+0x1ce/0x2cf [<ffffffff81027494>] sys_execve+0x43/0x5a [<ffffffff8102918a>] stub_execve+0x6a/0xc0 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}: [<ffffffff81099aa4>] __lock_acquire+0xa11/0xd0f [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102 [<ffffffff81107251>] might_fault+0x89/0xac [<ffffffff81139382>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x95/0xda [<ffffffff811bcb43>] ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x138/0x157 [<ffffffff811be069>] ext4_ext_walk_space+0x178/0x1f1 [<ffffffff811be21e>] ext4_fiemap+0x13c/0x159 [<ffffffff811390e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x348/0x4d6 [<ffffffff811392ca>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79 [<ffffffff81028cb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by ureadahead/1855: #0: (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811be1fd>] ext4_fiemap+0x11b/0x159 stack backtrace: Pid: 1855, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 2.6.32-04115-gec044c5 #37 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81098c70>] print_circular_bug+0xa8/0xb7 [<ffffffff81099aa4>] __lock_acquire+0xa11/0xd0f [<ffffffff8102f229>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102 [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac [<ffffffff81107251>] might_fault+0x89/0xac [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac [<ffffffff81124b44>] ? __kmalloc+0x13b/0x18c [<ffffffff81139382>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x95/0xda [<ffffffff811bcb43>] ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x138/0x157 [<ffffffff811bca0b>] ? ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x0/0x157 [<ffffffff811be069>] ext4_ext_walk_space+0x178/0x1f1 [<ffffffff811be21e>] ext4_fiemap+0x13c/0x159 [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac [<ffffffff811390e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x348/0x4d6 [<ffffffff8129f6d0>] ? __up_read+0x8d/0x95 [<ffffffff81517fb5>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b [<ffffffff811392ca>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79 [<ffffffff81028cb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The "offset" member in ext4_io_end holds bytes, not blocks, so ext4_lblk_t is wrong - and too small (u32). This caused the async i/o writes to sparse files beyond 4GB to fail when they wrapped around to 0. Also fix up the type of arguments to ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(), it gets ssize_t from ext4_end_aio_dio_nolock() and ext4_ext_direct_IO(). Reported-by: NGiel de Nijs <giel@vectorwise.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We cannot rely on buffer dirty bits during fsync because pdflush can come before fsync is called and clear dirty bits without forcing a transaction commit. What we do is that we track which transaction has last changed the inode and which transaction last changed allocation and force it to disk on fsync. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Currently all quota block reservation macros contains hard-coded "2" aka MAXQUOTAS value. This is no good because in some places it is not obvious to understand what does this digit represent. Let's introduce new macro with self descriptive name. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add the facility for ext4_forget() to be called from ext4_free_blocks(). This simplifies the code in a large number of places, and centralizes most of the work of calling ext4_forget() into a single place. Also fix a bug in the extents migration code; it wasn't calling ext4_forget() when releasing the indirect blocks during the conversion. As a result, if the system cashed during or shortly after the extents migration, and the released indirect blocks get reused as data blocks, the journal replay would corrupt the data blocks. With this new patch, fixing this bug was as simple as adding the EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET flags to the call to ext4_free_blocks(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
When an inode gets unlinked, the functions ext4_clear_blocks() and ext4_remove_blocks() call ext4_forget() for all the buffer heads corresponding to the deleted inode's data blocks. If the inode is a directory or a symlink, the is_metadata parameter must be non-zero so ext4_forget() will revoke them via jbd2_journal_revoke(). Otherwise, if these blocks are reused for a data file, and the system crashes before a journal checkpoint, the journal replay could end up corrupting these data blocks. Thanks to Curt Wohlgemuth for pointing out potential problems in this area. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
To prepare for a direct I/O write, we need to split the unwritten extents before submitting the I/O. When no extents needed to be split, ext4_split_unwritten_extents() was incorrectly returning 0 instead of the size of uninitialized extents. This bug caused the wrong return value sent back to VFS code when it gets called from async IO path, leading to an unnecessary fall back to buffered IO. This bug also hid the fact that the check to see whether or not a split would be necessary was incorrect; we can only skip splitting the extent if the write completely covers the uninitialized extent. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
At the end of direct I/O operation, ext4_ext_direct_IO() always called ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(), regardless of whether there were any unwritten extents involved in the I/O or not. This commit adds a state flag so that ext4_ext_direct_IO() only calls ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() when necessary. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming 提交于
After a direct I/O request covering an uninitalized extent (i.e., created using the fallocate system call) or a hole in a file, ext4 will convert the uninitialized extent so it is marked as initialized by calling ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(). This function returns zero on success. This return value was getting returned by ext4_direct_IO(); however the file system's direct_IO function is supposed to return the number of bytes read or written on a success. By returning zero, it confused the direct I/O code into falling back to buffered I/O unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
There are a number of kernel printk's which are printed when an ext4 filesystem is mounted and unmounted. Disable them to economize space in the system logs. In addition, disabling the mballoc stats by default saves a number of unneeded atomic operations for every block allocation or deallocation. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
For async direct IO that covers holes or fallocate, the end_io callback function now queued the convertion work on workqueue but don't flush the work rightaway as it might take too long to afford. But when fsync is called after all the data is completed, user expects the metadata also being updated before fsync returns. Thus we need to flush the conversion work when fsync() is called. This patch keep track of a listed of completed async direct io that has a work queued on workqueue. When fsync() is called, it will go through the list and do the conversion. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
When writing into an unitialized extent via direct I/O, and the direct I/O doesn't exactly cover the unitialized extent, split the extent into uninitialized and initialized extents before submitting the I/O. This avoids needing to deal with an ENOSPC error in the end_io callback that gets used for direct I/O. When the IO is complete, the written extent will be marked as initialized. Singed-Off-By: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The extents sanity-checking code depends on the ext4_ext_space_*() functions returning the maximum alloable size for eh_max; however, when the debugging #ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST is enabled to test the extent tree handling code, this prevents a normally created ext4 filesystem from being mounted with the errors: Aug 26 15:43:50 bsd086 kernel: [ 96.070277] EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_ext_check_inode: bad header/extent in inode #8: too large eh_max - magic f30a, entries 1, max 4(3), depth 0(0) Aug 26 15:43:50 bsd086 kernel: [ 96.070526] EXT4-fs (sda8): no journal found Bug reported by Akira Fujita. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
During truncate we are sometimes forced to start a new transaction as the amount of blocks to be journaled is both quite large and hard to predict. So far we restarted a transaction while holding i_data_sem and that violates lock ordering because i_data_sem ranks below a transaction start (and it can lead to a real deadlock with ext4_get_blocks() mapping blocks in some page while having a transaction open). We fix the problem by dropping the i_data_sem before restarting the transaction and acquire it afterwards. It's slightly subtle that this works: 1) By the time ext4_truncate() is called, all the page cache for the truncated part of the file is dropped so get_block() should not be called on it (we only have to invalidate extent cache after we reacquire i_data_sem because some extent from not-truncated part could extend also into the part we are going to truncate). 2) Writes, migrate or defrag hold i_mutex so they are stopped for all the time of the truncate. This bug has been found and analyzed by Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 19 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
ext4_ext_show_leaf() will display the leaf extents when extent debugging is enabled. Printing out the unwritten bit is useful for debugging unwritten extent, allow us to see the unwritten extents vs written extents, after the unwritten extents are splitted or converted. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
When EXT_DEBUG is enabled I received the following compile warning on PPC64: CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’: fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’ fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’: fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’ fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’ fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’ CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o The patch fixes compile warning. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c ===================================================================
-
- 18 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Fujita 提交于
The EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT exchanges the blocks between orig_fd and donor_fd, and then write the file data of orig_fd to donor_fd. ext4_mext_move_extent() is the main fucntion of ext4 online defrag, and this patch includes all functions related to ext4 online defrag. Signed-off-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NTakashi Sato <t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NKazuya Mio <k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
The unitialized bit was not properly getting preserved in in an extent which is partially truncated because the it was geting set to the value of the first extent to be removed or truncated as part of the truncate operation, and if there are multiple extents are getting removed or modified as part of the truncate operation, it is only the last extent which will might be partially truncated, and its uninitalized bit is not necessarily the same as the first extent to be truncated. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Get rid of EXTEND_DISKSIZE flag of ext4_get_blocks_handle(). This seems to be a relict from some old days and setting disksize in this function does not make much sense. Currently it was set only by ext4_getblk(). Since the parameter has some effect only if create == 1, it is easy to check by grepping through the sources that the three callers which end up calling ext4_getblk() with create == 1 (ext4_append, ext4_quota_write, ext4_mkdir) do the right thing and set disksize themselves. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When we have space in the extent tree leaf node we should be able to insert the extent with much less journal credits. The code was doing proper calculation but missed a return statement. Reported-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 5月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Not sure why I put this in as down_write originally; all we are doing is walking the tree, nothing will change under us and concurrent reads should be no problem. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
To catch filesystem bugs or corruption which could lead to the filesystem getting severly damaged, this patch adds a facility for tracking all of the filesystem metadata blocks by contiguous regions in a red-black tree. This allows quick searching of the tree to locate extents which might overlap with filesystem metadata blocks. This facility is also used by the multi-block allocator to assure that it is not allocating blocks out of the system zone, as well as by the routines used when reading indirect blocks and extents information from disk to make sure their contents are valid. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If two CPU's simultaneously call ext4_ext_get_blocks() at the same time, there is nothing protecting the i_cached_extent structure from being used and updated at the same time. This could potentially cause the wrong location on disk to be read or written to, including potentially causing the corruption of the block group descriptors and/or inode table. This bug has been in the ext4 code since almost the very beginning of ext4's development. Fortunately once the data is stored in the page cache cache, ext4_get_blocks() doesn't need to be called, so trying to replicate this problem to the point where we could identify its root cause was *extremely* difficult. Many thanks to Kevin Shanahan for working over several months to be able to reproduce this easily so we could finally nail down the cause of the corruption. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: N"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We need to mark the buffer_head mapping preallocated space as new during write_begin. Otherwise we don't zero out the page cache content properly for a partial write. This will cause file corruption with preallocation. Now that we mark the buffer_head new we also need to have a valid buffer_head blocknr so that unmap_underlying_metadata() unmaps the correct block. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-