Move definition of dmtimer platform data structure in to its own header
under <linux/platform_data>.
Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>

Some instances of the DMTIMER peripheral on OMAP devices have the ability
to interrupt the on-chip DSP in addition to the ARM CPU. Add a DMTIMER
attribute to indicate which timers can interrupt the DSP. By using the
omap_dm_timer_request_by_cap() API, driver will now be able to allocate
a DMTIMER that can interrupt the DSP based upon this attribute and not require
the driver to know which instance has this capability.

DMTIMERs that have the ability to interrupt the DSP on OMAP devices are as
follows ...

- OMAP1 (OMAP5912/16xx/17xx) devices	- All 8 DMTIMERs
- OMAP2/3/4 devices			- DMTIMERs 5-8

Please note that for OMAP3+, timer8 has the ability to interrupt the DSP and
generate a PWM output.
Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>

For OMAP1 devices, it is necessary to perform a manual reset of the timer.
Currently, this is indicating by setting the "needs_manual_reset" variable in
the platform data. Instead of using an extra variable to indicate this add a new
timer capabilities flag to indicate this and remove the "needs_manual_reset"
member from the platform data.
Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

The platform data variable loses_context is used to determine if the timer may
lose its logic state during power transitions and so needs to be restored. This
information is also provided in the HWMOD device attributes for OMAP2+ devices
via the OMAP_TIMER_ALWON flag. When this flag is set the timer will not lose
context. So use the HWMOD device attributes to determine this.

For OMAP1 devices, loses_context is never set and so set the OMAP_TIMER_ALWON
flag for OMAP1 timers to ensure that code is equivalent.
Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

DMTIMER source selection on OMAP1 is broken.  omap1_dm_timer_set_src()
tries to use __raw_{read,write}l() to read from and write to physical
addresses, but those functions take virtual addresses.

sparse caught this:

arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:50:13: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:50:13:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:50:13:    got unsigned int
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:52:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:52:9:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:52:9:    got unsigned int

Fix by using omap_{read,writel}(), just like the other users of the
MOD_CONF_CTRL_1 register in the OMAP1 codebase.  Of course, in the long term,
removing omap_{read,write}l() is the appropriate thing to do; but
this will take some work to do this cleanly.

Looks like this was caused by 97933d6c (ARM: OMAP1: dmtimer: conversion
to platform devices) that dangerously moved code and changed it in
the same patch.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[tony@atomide.com: updated comments to include the breaking commit]
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Several function declarations used only in the files in which they're
declared should include the static keyword, but don't:

    arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c:248:6: warning: symbol 'cmdline_find_option' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:259:6: warning: symbol 'irq_sar_clear' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:878:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_vibra_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:882:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_audio_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:201:29: warning: symbol 'omap_panda_wlan_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:393:24: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:403:12: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:464:6: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c:434:6: warning: symbol 'omap_init_hsmmc' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:12: warning: symbol 'hwspinlocks_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:58:12: warning: symbol 'omap1_dm_timer_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
    arch/arm/mach-omap1/fpga.c:90:6: warning: symbol 'innovator_fpga_IRQ_demux' was not declared. Should it be static?

Mark all of these as static.

Thanks to Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for pointing out a typo in the
original patch description.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Govindraj R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: David Anders <x0132446@ti.com>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Convert OMAP1 dmtimers into a platform devices and then registers with
device model framework so that it can be bound to corresponding driver.
Signed-off-by: NThara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NCousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>