- 17 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
RCU callback execution can add significant OS jitter and also can degrade both scheduling latency and, in asymmetric multiprocessors, energy efficiency. This commit therefore adds the ability for selected CPUs ("rcu_nocbs=" boot parameter) to have their callbacks offloaded to kthreads. If the "rcu_nocb_poll" boot parameter is also specified, these kthreads will do polling, removing the need for the offloaded CPUs to do wakeups. At least one CPU must be doing normal callback processing: currently CPU 0 cannot be selected as a no-CBs CPU. In addition, attempts to offline the last normal-CBs CPU will fail. This feature was inspired by Jim Houston's and Joe Korty's JRCU, and this commit includes fixes to problems located by Fengguang Wu's kbuild test robot. [ paulmck: Added gfp.h include file as suggested by Fengguang Wu. ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 14 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This commit explicitly states the memory-ordering properties of the RCU grace-period primitives. Although these properties were in some sense implied by the fundmental property of RCU ("a grace period must wait for all pre-existing RCU read-side critical sections to complete"), stating it explicitly will be a great labor-saving device. Reported-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
-
- 09 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The ->onofflock field in the rcu_state structure at one time synchronized CPU-hotplug operations for RCU. However, its scope has decreased over time so that it now only protects the lists of orphaned RCU callbacks. This commit therefore renames it to ->orphan_lock to reflect its current use. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Antti P Miettinen 提交于
There have been some embedded applications that would benefit from use of expedited grace-period primitives. In some ways, this is similar to synchronize_net() doing either a normal or an expedited grace period depending on lock state, but with control outside of the kernel. This commit therefore adds rcu_expedited boot and sysfs parameters that cause the kernel to substitute expedited primitives for the normal grace-period primitives. [ paulmck: Add trace/event/rcu.h to kernel/srcu.c to avoid build error. Get rid of infinite loop through contention path.] Signed-off-by: NAntti P Miettinen <amiettinen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The current implementation of RCU_FAST_NO_HZ tries reasonably hard to rid the current CPU of RCU callbacks. This is appropriate when the CPU is entering idle, where it doesn't have much useful to do anyway, but is most definitely not what you want when transitioning to user-mode execution. This commit therefore detects the adaptive-tick case, and refrains from burning CPU time getting rid of RCU callbacks in that case. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
- 23 9月, 2012 11 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz() function attempts to print -1 when the ->idle_gp_timer is not pending, but unsigned arithmetic causes it to instead print ULONG_MAX, which is 4294967295 on 32-bit systems and 18446744073709551615 on 64-bit systems. Neither of these are the most reader-friendly values, so this commit instead causes "timer not pending" to be printed when ->idle_gp_timer is not pending. Reported-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp() function invokes rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() to verify that there are some preempted RCU readers blocking the current grace period outside of the protection of the rcu_node structure's ->lock. This means that the last blocked reader might exit its RCU read-side critical section and remove itself from the ->blkd_tasks list before the ->lock is acquired, resulting in a segmentation fault when the subsequent code attempts to dereference the now-NULL gp_tasks pointer. This commit therefore moves the test under the lock. This will not have measurable effect on lock contention because this code is invoked only when printing RCU CPU stall warnings, in other words, in the common case, never. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The increment_cpu_stall_ticks() function listed each RCU flavor explicitly, with an ifdef to handle preemptible RCU. This commit therefore applies for_each_rcu_flavor() to save a line of code. Because this commit switches from a code-based enumeration of the flavors of RCU to an rcu_state-list-based enumeration, it is no longer possible to apply __get_cpu_var() to the per-CPU rcu_data structures. We instead use __this_cpu_var() on the rcu_state structure's ->rda field that references the corresponding rcu_data structures. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment accordingly. This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() moves all tasks queued on a given leaf rcu_node structure to the root rcu_node, which is done when the last CPU corresponding the the leaf rcu_node structure goes offline. Now that RCU-preempt's synchronize_rcu_expedited() implementation blocks CPU-hotplug operations during the initialization of each rcu_node structure's ->boost_tasks pointer, rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() can do a better job of setting the root rcu_node's ->boost_tasks pointer. The key point is that rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() runs as part of the CPU-hotplug process, so that a concurrent synchronize_rcu_expedited() is guaranteed to either have not started on the one hand (in which case there is no boosting on behalf of the expedited grace period) or to be completely initialized on the other (in which case, in the absence of other priority boosting, all ->boost_tasks pointers will be initialized). Therefore, if rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() finds that the ->boost_tasks pointer is equal to the ->exp_tasks pointer, it can be sure that it is correctly placed. In the case where there was boosting ongoing at the time that the synchronize_rcu_expedited() function started, different nodes might start boosting the tasks blocking the expedited grace period at different times. In this mixed case, the root node will either be boosting tasks for the expedited grace period already, or it will start as soon as it gets done boosting for the normal grace period -- but in this latter case, the root node's tasks needed to be boosted in any case. This commit therefore adds a check of the ->boost_tasks pointer against the ->exp_tasks pointer to the list that prevents updating ->boost_tasks. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
When rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() clears tasks from a leaf rcu_node structure, it does not NULL out the structure's ->boost_tasks field. This commit therefore fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The current quiescent-state detection algorithm is needlessly complex. It records the grace-period number corresponding to the quiescent state at the time of the quiescent state, which works, but it seems better to simply erase any record of previous quiescent states at the time that the CPU notices the new grace period. This has the further advantage of removing another piece of RCU for which lockless reasoning is required. Therefore, this commit makes this change. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The synchronize_rcu_expedited() function disables interrupts across a scan of all leaf rcu_node structures, which is not good for real-time scheduling latency on large systems (hundreds or especially thousands of CPUs). This commit therefore holds off CPU-hotplug operations using get_online_cpus(), and removes the prior acquisiion of the ->onofflock (which required disabling interrupts). Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
In the C language, signed overflow is undefined. It is true that twos-complement arithmetic normally comes to the rescue, but if the compiler can subvert this any time it has any information about the values being compared. For example, given "if (a - b > 0)", if the compiler has enough information to realize that (for example) the value of "a" is positive and that of "b" is negative, the compiler is within its rights to optimize to a simple "if (1)", which might not be what you want. This commit therefore converts synchronize_rcu_expedited()'s work-done detection counter from signed to unsigned. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
As the first step towards allowing quiescent-state forcing to be preemptible, this commit moves RCU quiescent-state forcing into the same kthread that is now used to initialize and clean up after grace periods. This is yet another step towards keeping scheduling latency down to a dull roar. Updated to change from raw_spin_lock_irqsave() to raw_spin_lock_irq() and to remove the now-unused rcu_state structure fields as suggested by Peter Zijlstra. Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de> Reported-by: NDimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
In kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y, CPUs can accumulate a large number of lazy callbacks, which as the name implies will be slow to be invoked. This can be a problem on small-memory systems, where the default 6-second sleep for CPUs having only lazy RCU callbacks could well be fatal. This commit therefore installs an OOM hander that ensures that every CPU with lazy callbacks has at least one non-lazy callback, in turn ensuring timely advancement for these callbacks. Updated to fix bug that disabled OOM killing, noted by Lai Jiangshan. Updated to push the for_each_rcu_flavor() loop into rcu_oom_notify_cpu(), thus reducing the number of IPIs, as suggested by Steven Rostedt. Also to make the for_each_online_cpu() loop be preemptible. (Later, it might be good to use smp_call_function(), as suggested by Peter Zijlstra.) Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
- 13 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Bring RCU into the new-age CPU-hotplug fold by modifying RCU's per-CPU kthread code to use the new smp_hotplug_thread facility. [ tglx: Adapted it to use callbacks and to the simplified rcu yield ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120716103948.673354828@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The rcu_yield() code is amazing. It's there to avoid starvation of the system when lots of (boosting) work is to be done. Now looking at the code it's functionality is: Make the thread SCHED_OTHER and very nice, i.e. get it out of the way Arm a timer with 2 ticks schedule() Now if the system goes idle the rcu task returns, regains SCHED_FIFO and plugs on. If the systems stays busy the timer fires and wakes a per node kthread which in turn makes the per cpu thread SCHED_FIFO and brings it back on the cpu. For the boosting thread the "make it FIFO" bit is missing and it just runs some magic boost checks. Now this is a lot of code with extra threads and complexity. It's way simpler to let the tasks when they detect overload schedule away for 2 ticks and defer the normal wakeup as long as they are in yielded state and the cpu is not idle. That solves the same problem and the only difference is that when the cpu goes idle it's not guaranteed that the thread returns right away, but it won't be longer out than two ticks, so no harm is done. If that's an issue than it is way simpler just to wake the task from idle as RCU has callbacks there anyway. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120716103948.131256723@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 06 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The Linux kernel coding style says that single-statement blocks should omit curly braces unless the other leg of the "if" statement has multiple statements, in which case the curly braces should be included. This commit fixes RCU's violations of this rule. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
- 03 7月, 2012 11 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
If the nohz= boot parameter disables nohz, then RCU_FAST_NO_HZ needs to also disable itself. This commit therefore checks for tick_nohz_enabled being zero, disabling rcu_prepare_for_idle() if so. This commit assumes that tick_nohz_enabled can change at runtime: If this is not the case, then a simpler approach suffices. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, if several CPUs in the same package have all lazy RCU callbacks, their wakeups will be uncorrelated. If all the CPUs are in the same power domain (as is often the case), this will result in unnecessary power-ups of the package. This commit therefore uses round_jiffies() to round the timeouts to a second boundary, increasing the odds that they can be coalesced with each other or with other timeouts. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Carsten Emde 提交于
An uninitialized string may be displayed at the end of the rcu_preempt detected stall info such as 0: (1 GPs behind) idle=075/140000000000000/0 =8?^D=8?^D ^^^^^^^^^^ if CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ is not defined. This trivial patch clears the string in this case. Signed-off-by: NCarsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU versions of __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock() are identical, so this commit consolidates them into kernel/rcupdate.h. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The arrival of TREE_PREEMPT_RCU some years back included some ugly code involving either #ifdef or #ifdef'ed wrapper functions to iterate over all non-SRCU flavors of RCU. This commit therefore introduces a for_each_rcu_flavor() iterator over the rcu_state structures for each flavor of RCU to clean up a bit of the ugliness. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
With the advent of __this_cpu_ptr(), it is no longer necessary to pass both the rcu_state and rcu_data structures into __rcu_process_callbacks(). This commit therefore computes the rcu_data pointer from the rcu_state pointer within __rcu_process_callbacks() so that callers can pass in only the pointer to the rcu_state structure. This paves the way for linking the rcu_state structures together and iterating over them. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This is a preparatory commit for increasing rcu_barrier()'s concurrency. It adds a pointer in the rcu_data structure to the corresponding call_rcu() function. This allows a pointer to the rcu_data structure to imply the function pointer, which allows _rcu_barrier() state to be placed in the rcu_state structure. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_node tree array is sized based on compile-time constants, including NR_CPUS. Although this approach has worked well in the past, the recent trend by many distros to define NR_CPUS=4096 results in excessive grace-period-initialization latencies. This commit therefore substitutes the run-time computed nr_cpu_ids for the compile-time NR_CPUS when building the tree. This can result in much of the compile-time-allocated rcu_node array being unused. If this is a major problem, you are in a specialized situation anyway, so you can manually adjust the NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT, and RCU_FANOUT_LEAF kernel config parameters. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Time to make the four-level-hierarchy setting less scary, so this commit removes "Experimental" from the boot-time message. Leave the message in order to get a heads-up on any possible need to expand to a five-level hierarchy. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Although making RCU_FANOUT_LEAF a kernel configuration parameter rather than a fixed constant makes it easier for people to decrease cache-miss overhead for large systems, it is of little help for people who must run a single pre-built kernel binary. This commit therefore allows the value of RCU_FANOUT_LEAF to be increased (but not decreased!) via a boot-time parameter named rcutree.rcu_fanout_leaf. Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
This reverts commit 616c310e. (Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation). Testing by Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> showed that this can result in deadlock due to invoking the scheduler when one of the runqueue locks is held. Because this commit was simply a performance optimization, revert it. Reported-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
When a CPU is entering dyntick-idle mode, tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() calls rcu_needs_cpu() see if RCU needs that CPU, and, if not, computes the next wakeup time based on the timer wheels. Only later, when actually entering the idle loop, rcu_prepare_for_idle() will be invoked. In some cases, rcu_prepare_for_idle() will post timers to wake the CPU back up. But all for naught: The next wakeup time for the CPU has already been computed, and posting a timer afterwards does not force that wakeup time to be recomputed. This means that rcu_prepare_for_idle()'s have no effect. This is not a problem on a busy system because something else will wake up the CPU soon enough. However, on lightly loaded systems, the CPU might stay asleep for a considerable length of time. If that CPU has a callback that the rest of the system is waiting on, the system might run very slowly or (in theory) even hang. This commit avoids this problem by having rcu_needs_cpu() give tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() an estimate of when RCU will need the CPU to wake back up, which tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() takes into account when programming the CPU's wakeup time. An alternative approach is for rcu_prepare_for_idle() to use hrtimers instead of normal timers, but timers are much more efficient than are hrtimers for frequently and repeatedly posting and cancelling a given timer, which is exactly what RCU_FAST_NO_HZ does. Reported-by: NPascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr> Reported-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The RCU_FAST_NO_HZ code relies on a number of per-CPU variables. This works, but is hidden from someone scanning the data structures in rcutree.h. This commit therefore converts these per-CPU variables to fields in the per-CPU rcu_dynticks structures. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
In the current code, a short dyntick-idle interval (where there is at least one non-lazy callback on the CPU) and a long dyntick-idle interval (where there are only lazy callbacks on the CPU) are traced identically, which can be less than helpful. This commit therefore emits different event traces in these two cases. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr>
-
- 10 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The current initialization of the RCU_FAST_NO_HZ per-CPU variables makes needless and fragile assumptions about the initial value of things like the jiffies counter. This commit therefore explicitly initializes all of them that are better started with a non-zero value. It also adds some comments describing the per-CPU state variables. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The current RCU_FAST_NO_HZ assumes that timers do not migrate unless a CPU goes offline, in which case it assumes that the CPU will have to come out of dyntick-idle mode (cancelling the timer) in order to go offline. This is important because when RCU_FAST_NO_HZ permits a CPU to enter dyntick-idle mode despite having RCU callbacks pending, it posts a timer on that CPU to force a wakeup on that CPU. This wakeup ensures that the CPU will eventually handle the end of the grace period, including invoking its RCU callbacks. However, Pascal Chapperon's test setup shows that the timer handler rcu_idle_gp_timer_func() really does get invoked in some cases. This is problematic because this can cause the CPU that entered dyntick-idle mode despite still having RCU callbacks pending to remain in dyntick-idle mode indefinitely, which means that its RCU callbacks might never be invoked. This situation can result in grace-period delays or even system hangs, which matches Pascal's observations of slow boot-up and shutdown (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/5/142). See also the bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806548 This commit therefore causes the "should never be invoked" timer handler rcu_idle_gp_timer_func() to use smp_call_function_single() to wake up the CPU for which the timer was intended, allowing that CPU to invoke its RCU callbacks in a timely manner. Reported-by: NPascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
When running preemptible RCU, if a task exits in an RCU read-side critical section having blocked within that same RCU read-side critical section, the task must be removed from the list of tasks blocking a grace period (perhaps the current grace period, perhaps the next grace period, depending on timing). The exit() path invokes exit_rcu() to do this cleanup. However, the current implementation of exit_rcu() needlessly does the cleanup even if the task did not block within the current RCU read-side critical section, which wastes time and needlessly increases the size of the state space. Fix this by only doing the cleanup if the current task is actually on the list of tasks blocking some grace period. While we are at it, consolidate the two identical exit_rcu() functions into a single function. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Conflicts: kernel/rcupdate.c
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, PREEMPT_RCU readers are enqueued upon entry to the scheduler. This is inefficient because enqueuing is required only if there is a context switch, and entry to the scheduler does not guarantee a context switch. The commit therefore moves the enqueuing to immediately precede the call to switch_to() from the scheduler. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Timers are subject to migration, which can lead to the following system-hang scenario when CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y: 1. CPU 0 executes synchronize_rcu(), which posts an RCU callback. 2. CPU 0 then goes idle. It cannot immediately invoke the callback, but there is nothing RCU needs from ti, so it enters dyntick-idle mode after posting a timer. 3. The timer gets migrated to CPU 1. 4. CPU 0 never wakes up, so the synchronize_rcu() never returns, so the system hangs. This commit fixes this problem by using mod_timer_pinned(), as suggested by Peter Zijlstra, to ensure that the timer is actually posted on the running CPU. Reported-by: NDipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 26 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
RCU_FAST_NO_HZ uses a timer to limit the time that a CPU with callbacks can remain in dyntick-idle mode. This timer is cancelled when the CPU exits idle, and therefore should never fire. However, if the timer were migrated to some other CPU for whatever reason (1) the timer could actually fire and (2) firing on some other CPU would fail to wake up the CPU with callbacks, possibly resulting in sluggishness or a system hang. This commit therfore adds a WARN_ON_ONCE() to the timer handler in order to detect this condition. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Both Steven Rostedt's new idle-capable trace macros and the RCU_NONIDLE() macro can cause RCU to momentarily pause out of idle without the rest of the system being involved. This can cause rcu_prepare_for_idle() to run through its state machine too quickly, which can in turn result in needless scheduling-clock interrupts. This commit therefore adds code to enable rcu_prepare_for_idle() to distinguish between an initial entry to idle on the one hand (which needs to advance the rcu_prepare_for_idle() state machine) and an idle reentry due to idle-capable trace macros and RCU_NONIDLE() on the other hand (which should avoid advancing the rcu_prepare_for_idle() state machine). Additional state is maintained to allow the timer to be correctly reposted when returning after a momentary pause out of idle, and even more state is maintained to detect when new non-lazy callbacks have been enqueued (which may require re-evaluation of the approach to idleness). Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-